EIN: 610482955
UEI: GQNNW1Q2G3D8
Audited by: Dean Dorton Allen Ford, PLLC
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 16, 2026 (15 days ago).
What is a management decision? →During our testing of official withdrawals, we selected six samples and noted for four of the samples, the incorrect withdrawal date was reported to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). The difference in days from the correct withdrawal date reported ranged from 1 to 25 days. For three of the four students with incorrect withdrawal dates reported, the determination date was used instead of the withdrawal date. For one of the four students with the incorrect withdrawal date reported, the withdrawal date was a clerical error. Cause: The University’s procedure to review NSLDS reporting did not catch the error. Effect: The provisions of 34 CFR Section 668.22 were not followed and thus four students had the incorrect withdrawal date reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: There were no known questioned costs as a result of our testing of six official withdrawals. Recommendation: We recommend that the University review and revise their policies and procedures related to NSLDS reporting. Specifically, the University should implement a review process to verify accurate inputs before reporting to NSLDS. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University does not agree with the conclusion of this finding. The University determines a student’s withdrawal date based on the student’s official notification or, where applicable, the date of determination when a student ceases attendance without providing official notice. Based on the University’s review of institutional records and applicable regulatory guidance in effect during the audit period, management believes the withdrawal processing methodology applied was reasonable and consistent with institutional procedures and Title IV requirements. For three of the four students identified, the data reported to NSLDS reflected the institution’s determination date rather than the withdrawal date. Management maintains that this approach was the result of interpretation applied to specific withdrawal circumstances and did not materially misrepresent the students’ enrollment status or Title IV outcomes. For the remaining student, management agrees that a clerical data-entry error resulted in an incorrect withdrawal date being reported to NSLDS; however, this instance was isolated and does not represent a systemic control deficiency. While the University does not agree that the instances cited constitute noncompliance, management acknowledges the auditor’s concern regarding consistency in distinguishing withdrawal dates from determination dates for NSLDS reporting purposes. In response, and without conceding noncompliance, the University will enhance its policies, procedures, and internal controls to promote consistent application of regulatory definitions and reduce the risk of future discrepancies.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education: Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Direct Loan Program, Assistance Listing 84.268 Criteria: The College must comply with 34 Section 668.22. Condition: During our testing of official withdrawals, we selected six samples and noted for four of the samples, the incorrect withdrawal date was reported to the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS). The difference in days from the correct withdrawal date reported ranged from 1 to 25 days. For three of the four students with incorrect withdrawal dates reported, the determination date was used instead of the withdrawal date. For one of the four students with the incorrect withdrawal date reported, the withdrawal date was a clerical error. Cause: The University’s procedure to review NSLDS reporting did not catch the error. Effect: The provisions of 34 CFR Section 668.22 were not followed and thus four students had the incorrect withdrawal date reported to NSLDS. Questioned Costs: There were no known questioned costs as a result of our testing of six official withdrawals. Recommendation: We recommend that the University review and revise their policies and procedures related to NSLDS reporting. Specifically, the University should implement a review process to verify accurate inputs before reporting to NSLDS. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University does not agree with the conclusion of this finding. The University determines a student’s withdrawal date based on the student’s official notification or, where applicable, the date of determination when a student ceases attendance without providing official notice. Based on the University’s review of institutional records and applicable regulatory guidance in effect during the audit period, management believes the withdrawal processing methodology applied was reasonable and consistent with institutional procedures and Title IV requirements. For three of the four students identified, the data reported to NSLDS reflected the institution’s determination date rather than the withdrawal date. Management maintains that this approach was the result of interpretation applied to specific withdrawal circumstances and did not materially misrepresent the students’ enrollment status or Title IV outcomes. For the remaining student, management agrees that a clerical data-entry error resulted in an incorrect withdrawal date being reported to NSLDS; however, this instance was isolated and does not represent a systemic control deficiency. While the University does not agree that the instances cited constitute noncompliance, management acknowledges the auditor’s concern regarding consistency in distinguishing withdrawal dates from determination dates for NSLDS reporting purposes. In response, and without conceding noncompliance, the University will enhance its policies, procedures, and internal controls to promote consistent application of regulatory definitions and reduce the risk of future discrepancies.
Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: The University does not agree with the conclusion of this finding. The University determines a student’s withdrawal date based on the student’s official notification or, where applicable, the date of determination when a student ceases attendance without providing official notice. Based on the University’s review of institutional records and applicable regulatory guidance in effect during the audit period, management believes the withdrawal processing methodology applied was reasonable and consistent with institutional procedures and Title IV requirements. For three of the four students identified, the data reported to NSLDS reflected the institution’s determination date rather than the withdrawal date. Management maintains that this approach was the result of interpretation applied to specific withdrawal circumstances and did not materially misrepresent the students’ enrollment status or Title IV outcomes. For the remaining student, management agrees that a clerical data-entry error resulted in an incorrect withdrawal date being reported to NSLDS; however, this instance was isolated and does not represent a systemic control deficiency. While the University does not agree that the instances cited constitute noncompliance, management acknowledges the auditor’s concern regarding consistency in distinguishing withdrawal dates from determination dates for NSLDS reporting purposes. In response, and without conceding noncompliance, the University will enhance its policies, procedures, and internal controls to promote consistent application of regulatory definitions and reduce the risk of future discrepancies.
FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2025 — management decision was due August 27, 2025.
During our testing of official withdrawals, we selected five samples and noted that for one of the samples, the return of funds calculation was improperly calculated due to the University using the incorrect withdrawal date. Cause: The University’s procedure to review return of funds calculation did not catch the error. Effect: The provisions of 34 CFR Section 668.22 were not followed and thus one student had an incorrect return of funds calculation. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs total $1,779 in Title IV aid that should have been returned as a result of our testing of five official withdrawals. Finding 2024-001, continued Recommendation: We recommend that the University review and revise their policies and procedures related to the returns of fund calculation. Specifically, the University should implement a review process to verify calculations before finalizing returns. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Bellarmine University agrees with the auditors’ finding and recommendations. The following corrective action will be taken: The University will return $1,779 in federal student financial aid to the United States Department of Education (USED) which represents the updated R2T4 accounting for the correct withdrawal dates in the Spring 2024 semester. There will be an additional review process that will include validation from financial and student accounts to verify calculations before finalizing returns of funds. Financial Aid will provide an additional R2T4 form that has date of determination and LDA. Financial Aid will review that all dates and calculations match after the R2T4 has been completed and before handing off to student accounts. Student accounts will then review to confirm all dates and amounts match before processing the return of funds. April Tretter, Director of Financial Aid, expected implementation date 2.26.25.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-001 Federal Program: U.S. Department of Education: Student Financial Aid Cluster Federal Pell Grant, Assistance Listing 84.063 Federal Supplemental Education Opportunity Grant, Assistance Listing 84.007 Federal Direct Loan Program, Assistance Listing 84.268 Criteria: The College must comply with 34 Section 668.22. Condition: During our testing of official withdrawals, we selected five samples and noted that for one of the samples, the return of funds calculation was improperly calculated due to the University using the incorrect withdrawal date. Cause: The University’s procedure to review return of funds calculation did not catch the error. Effect: The provisions of 34 CFR Section 668.22 were not followed and thus one student had an incorrect return of funds calculation. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs total $1,779 in Title IV aid that should have been returned as a result of our testing of five official withdrawals. Finding 2024-001, continued Recommendation: We recommend that the University review and revise their policies and procedures related to the returns of fund calculation. Specifically, the University should implement a review process to verify calculations before finalizing returns. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Bellarmine University agrees with the auditors’ finding and recommendations. The following corrective action will be taken: The University will return $1,779 in federal student financial aid to the United States Department of Education (USED) which represents the updated R2T4 accounting for the correct withdrawal dates in the Spring 2024 semester. There will be an additional review process that will include validation from financial and student accounts to verify calculations before finalizing returns of funds. Financial Aid will provide an additional R2T4 form that has date of determination and LDA. Financial Aid will review that all dates and calculations match after the R2T4 has been completed and before handing off to student accounts. Student accounts will then review to confirm all dates and amounts match before processing the return of funds. April Tretter, Director of Financial Aid, expected implementation date 2.26.25.
Bellarmine University agrees with the auditors’ finding and recommendations. The following corrective action will be taken: The University will return $1,779 in federal student financial aid to the United States Department of Education (USED) which represents the updated R2T4 accounting for the correct withdrawal dates in the Spring 2024 semester. There will be an additional review process that will include validation from financial and student accounts to verify calculations before finalizing returns of funds. Financial Aid will provide an additional R2T4 form that has date of determination and LDA. Financial Aid will review that all dates and calculations match after the R2T4 has been completed and before handing off to student accounts. Student accounts will then review to confirm all dates and amounts match before processing the return of funds. April Tretter, Director of Financial Aid, expected implementation date 2.26.25.
FAC accepted this audit on November 20, 2023 — management decision was due May 20, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2023 — management decision was due July 26, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2021 — management decision was due June 27, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on June 7, 2021 — management decision was due December 7, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2019 — management decision was due August 10, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2018 — management decision was due July 11, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2017 — management decision was due July 29, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kentucky →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.