← Back to home

Housing Authority of the City of BradentonLocal Government

EIN: 596002720

UEI: D966SRZ9R7Y5

Audited by: Novogradac & Company LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Housing Authority of the City of Bradenton9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-03-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,803,201 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on November 5, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 5, 2026 (120 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit and the Authority included income that was miscalculated during the annual recertification. Context: There are approximately one hundred seventy five (175) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher units. Of a sample size of twelve (12) tenant files, the following information was unavailable for examination at the time of audit:  Original applications were missing in two (2) files  Consent to release information form was missing in one (1) file  Lead based paint form was missing in one (1) file  Copies of signed leases were missing in four (4) files  Verification of income and assets was missing in three (3) files In addition, two (2) tenants' annual recertifications (HUD-50058 form) included income that was miscalculated. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $36,406 Cause: There is a material weakness in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that reasonably assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in material non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-002 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.871 Noncompliance - E. Eligibility Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: Yes Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance for Eligibility Criteria: Tenant Files. The PHA must do the following: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family members to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant's rent payment using the documentation from third party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5, Subpart F (24 CFR sections 5.601 et seq.) and 24 CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, and 982.516). These files are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, there were documents that were unavailable for examination at the time of audit and the Authority included income that was miscalculated during the annual recertification. Context: There are approximately one hundred seventy five (175) Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher units. Of a sample size of twelve (12) tenant files, the following information was unavailable for examination at the time of audit:  Original applications were missing in two (2) files  Consent to release information form was missing in one (1) file  Lead based paint form was missing in one (1) file  Copies of signed leases were missing in four (4) files  Verification of income and assets was missing in three (3) files In addition, two (2) tenants' annual recertifications (HUD-50058 form) included income that was miscalculated. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $36,406 Cause: There is a material weakness in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that reasonably assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program is in material non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the maintenance of tenant files. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement.

Corrective Action Plan

Authority's Response and Planned Corrective Action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis. Dominique J. Dunn, Interim Executive Director, will be responsible to implement this corrective action by March 31, 2026.

About Eligibility →
2025-003
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, the Authority failed to properly calculate the tenant's rent payments using documentation from third party income verification. Context: There are approximately two hundred forty one (241) Public and Indian Housing Program units. Of a sample size of thirteen (13) tenant files, the Authority failed to properly calculate the rent payments of three (3) tenants by not utilizing documentation from third party income verification. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $27,188 Cause: There is a material weakness in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the calculation of rent. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that reasonably assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Public and Indian Housing Program is in material non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the calculation of rent. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-003 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Titles: Public and Indian Housing Program Federal Assistance Listing Numbers: 14.850 Noncompliance – E. Eligibility Non Compliance Material to the Financial Statements: Yes Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance for Eligibility Criteria: Tenant Files. The PHA must do the following: As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family members to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 960.259). Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant's rent payment using the documentation from third party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5, Subpart F (24 CFR sections 5.601 et seq.) and 24 CFR Subpart C sections 960.253, 960.255, and 960.259). These files are required to be maintained and available for examination at the time of audit. Condition: Based upon inspection of the Authority’s files and on discussion with management, the Authority failed to properly calculate the tenant's rent payments using documentation from third party income verification. Context: There are approximately two hundred forty one (241) Public and Indian Housing Program units. Of a sample size of thirteen (13) tenant files, the Authority failed to properly calculate the rent payments of three (3) tenants by not utilizing documentation from third party income verification. Our sample size is statistically valid. Known Questioned Costs: $27,188 Cause: There is a material weakness in internal controls over the compliance for the eligibility type of compliance related to the calculation of rent. The Authority has not properly considered, designed, implemented, maintained and monitored a system of internal controls that reasonably assures the program is in compliance. Effect: The Public and Indian Housing Program is in material non-compliance with the eligibility type of compliance related to the calculation of rent. Recommendation: We recommend the Authority design and implement internal control procedures that will reasonably assure compliance with the Uniform Guidance and the compliance supplement.

Corrective Action Plan

Authority's Response and Planned Corrective Action: The Authority accepts the recommendation of the auditor. The Authority will increase oversight in the Public and Indian Housing Program to ensure that established internal control policies are being followed on a timely basis. Dominique J. Dunn, Interim Executive Director, will be responsible to implement this corrective action by March 31, 2026.

About Eligibility →

FY 2024-03-31

$3,570,003 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2025 — management decision was due July 15, 2025.

FY 2023-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,743,661 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2024 — management decision was due August 10, 2024.

FY 2022-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,828,968 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 2, 2022 — management decision was due May 2, 2023.

FY 2021-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,157,690 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 16, 2021 — management decision was due March 16, 2022.

FY 2020-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,673,915 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 4, 2020 — management decision was due April 4, 2021.

FY 2019-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,490,911 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 14, 2019 — management decision was due May 14, 2020.

FY 2018-03-31

$2,519,756 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 12, 2018 — management decision was due May 12, 2019.

FY 2017-03-31

$2,500,761 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2017 — management decision was due June 20, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Florida

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.