EIN: 596000720
UEI: LVN6Y885WAC4
Audited by: Auditor General
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 20, 2026 (43 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2024 — management decision was due June 20, 2025.
Finding - Contrary to Federal regulations, the District under allocated Title I Program funds totaling $274,075 to two schools. Criteria - Title 34, Section 200.78, Code of Federal Regulations, requires the District to allocate Title I schoolwide program funds to schools identified as eligible and selected to participate, in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. The District is not required to allocate the same per-pupil amount (PPA) to each participating school provided that it allocates higher PPAs to schools with higher concentrations of poverty than to schools with lower concentrations of poverty. Condition - The District annually applies for Title I Program funding and the application includes a budget and an eligibility survey to document the amounts budgeted per participating school. During the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District expended $866,916 from the Title I Program, including $775,528 expended for the District’s three schools. As part of our audit, we requested for examination District records supporting the budget allocation amounts to the three schools and final budget amounts evidencing the allocations were provided. However, District records indicated that the ranking of all three District Title I schools did not agree with the ranking based on the percent of students from low-income families. Specifically, two schools had poverty concentrations of 71.01 and 60.55 percent but were allocated and received $177,894 and $69,181 less per pupil funding, respectively, than the school with a lower poverty concentration of 51.63 percent. Cause - Due to staff turnover, the District had not established effective procedures for developing and monitoring Title I budgets at participating schools. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations by appropriately allocating Title I Program resources to participating schools in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. As a result, two District schools were under allocated $247,075 and educational services were not funded at required levels. Recommendation - The District should establish procedures for ensuring and documenting that Title I Program resources are properly allocated to schools. In addition, the District should provide documentation to the FDOE supporting the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $247,075 or allocate that amount to the applicable underfunded Title I schools. District Response - The District has established procedures for ensuring and documenting that Title I Program resources are properly allocated to schools based on FDOE guidelines for allocating funds to schools based on the percentage of students from low-income families. The District will monitor expenditures throughout the year to ensure funds are being spent accordingly.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding - Contrary to Federal regulations, the District under allocated Title I Program funds totaling $274,075 to two schools. Criteria - Title 34, Section 200.78, Code of Federal Regulations, requires the District to allocate Title I schoolwide program funds to schools identified as eligible and selected to participate, in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. The District is not required to allocate the same per-pupil amount (PPA) to each participating school provided that it allocates higher PPAs to schools with higher concentrations of poverty than to schools with lower concentrations of poverty. Condition - The District annually applies for Title I Program funding and the application includes a budget and an eligibility survey to document the amounts budgeted per participating school. During the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District expended $866,916 from the Title I Program, including $775,528 expended for the District’s three schools. As part of our audit, we requested for examination District records supporting the budget allocation amounts to the three schools and final budget amounts evidencing the allocations were provided. However, District records indicated that the ranking of all three District Title I schools did not agree with the ranking based on the percent of students from low-income families. Specifically, two schools had poverty concentrations of 71.01 and 60.55 percent but were allocated and received $177,894 and $69,181 less per pupil funding, respectively, than the school with a lower poverty concentration of 51.63 percent. Cause - Due to staff turnover, the District had not established effective procedures for developing and monitoring Title I budgets at participating schools. Effect - The District did not comply with Federal regulations by appropriately allocating Title I Program resources to participating schools in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. As a result, two District schools were under allocated $247,075 and educational services were not funded at required levels. Recommendation - The District should establish procedures for ensuring and documenting that Title I Program resources are properly allocated to schools. In addition, the District should provide documentation to the FDOE supporting the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $247,075 or allocate that amount to the applicable underfunded Title I schools. District Response - The District has established procedures for ensuring and documenting that Title I Program resources are properly allocated to schools based on FDOE guidelines for allocating funds to schools based on the percentage of students from low-income families. The District will monitor expenditures throughout the year to ensure funds are being spent accordingly.
Planned Corrective Action - The District has established procedures for ensuring and documenting that Title I program resources are properly allocated to schools. The District, under a new Director of Finance, has set up spreadsheets to assist in calculating a percentage to be allocated to each school based on a rank system, which will comply with the FDOE guidelines for allocating funds to schools based on the percentage of students from low-income families. These formula-based spreadsheets are used when preparing the budget when applying for the grant each year. Throughout the fiscal year expenditures are checked to make sure the monies spent are still in rank order for each school. Anticipated Completion Date - December 30, 2024. We will provide documentation to the FDOE supporting the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $247,075 or allocate that amount to the applicable underfunded Title I schools. Responsible Contact Person - Mandie Fowler, Director of Curriculum & Instruction
Finding - District controls did not always ensure compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act for Federally funded construction projects exceeding $2,000, resulting in questioned costs totaling $71,850. Criteria - The ES Fund provides Federal funds for school facility repairs and improvements. Title 29, Section 5.5, Code of Federal Regulations (Davis-Bacon Act), requires the District to include prevailing wage rate clauses in any construction contract exceeding $2,000 that is financed either wholly or in part by Federal funds and ensure that contractors pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. This includes a requirement for the contractor to submit to the District weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). The United States Department of Labor established “prevailing wages” by geographic area and interprets the Davis-Bacon Act to apply to construction, alteration, or repair of a public building or public work. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District expended ES Fund moneys totaling $1.6 million. The Board entered into a construction contract for infrastructure renovations to accommodate a welding program expansion and, during the 2023-24 fiscal year, District ES Fund expenditures totaled $71,850 for the project. We noted that the purchase order, request for proposal, and contract for the project did not contain clauses that required compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act provisions and the contractor did not submit required weekly certified payrolls to the District. Cause - District personnel indicated they were aware that the Davis-Bacon Act applied to the project; however, due to oversight, they did not amend the contract to include the appropriate wage rate clauses or require the certified payrolls. In addition, the contractor of the project stated that they were unaware that the project was Federally funded and, as such, did not maintain certified payrolls. Effect - Absent the required contract clauses and weekly certified payrolls, there is an increased risk that construction contractors paid with Federal moneys will not pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. The District did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor demonstrating that the prevailing wage rates were paid for the services, resulting in questioned costs totaling $71,850. Recommendation - The District should enhance procedures to ensure compliance with all Davis-Bacon Act requirements. Such enhancements should ensure that applicable Federally funded facility contracts require submittal of weekly certified payrolls and that District personnel verify the payrolls were received. In addition, the District should document to the FDOE the allowability of the questioned costs or contact the FDOE regarding necessary corrective action. District Response - The District has established procedures for ensuring compliance with Davis-Bacon Act requirements. District personnel will verify they get the required documents (weekly certified payrolls) from the contractors, if a federally funded project is awarded.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding - District controls did not always ensure compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act for Federally funded construction projects exceeding $2,000, resulting in questioned costs totaling $71,850. Criteria - The ES Fund provides Federal funds for school facility repairs and improvements. Title 29, Section 5.5, Code of Federal Regulations (Davis-Bacon Act), requires the District to include prevailing wage rate clauses in any construction contract exceeding $2,000 that is financed either wholly or in part by Federal funds and ensure that contractors pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. This includes a requirement for the contractor to submit to the District weekly, for each week in which any contract work is performed, a copy of the payroll and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). The United States Department of Labor established “prevailing wages” by geographic area and interprets the Davis-Bacon Act to apply to construction, alteration, or repair of a public building or public work. Condition - For the 2023-24 fiscal year, the District expended ES Fund moneys totaling $1.6 million. The Board entered into a construction contract for infrastructure renovations to accommodate a welding program expansion and, during the 2023-24 fiscal year, District ES Fund expenditures totaled $71,850 for the project. We noted that the purchase order, request for proposal, and contract for the project did not contain clauses that required compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act provisions and the contractor did not submit required weekly certified payrolls to the District. Cause - District personnel indicated they were aware that the Davis-Bacon Act applied to the project; however, due to oversight, they did not amend the contract to include the appropriate wage rate clauses or require the certified payrolls. In addition, the contractor of the project stated that they were unaware that the project was Federally funded and, as such, did not maintain certified payrolls. Effect - Absent the required contract clauses and weekly certified payrolls, there is an increased risk that construction contractors paid with Federal moneys will not pay workers the prevailing wage rates established by the United States Department of Labor. The District did not obtain certified payrolls from the contractor demonstrating that the prevailing wage rates were paid for the services, resulting in questioned costs totaling $71,850. Recommendation - The District should enhance procedures to ensure compliance with all Davis-Bacon Act requirements. Such enhancements should ensure that applicable Federally funded facility contracts require submittal of weekly certified payrolls and that District personnel verify the payrolls were received. In addition, the District should document to the FDOE the allowability of the questioned costs or contact the FDOE regarding necessary corrective action. District Response - The District has established procedures for ensuring compliance with Davis-Bacon Act requirements. District personnel will verify they get the required documents (weekly certified payrolls) from the contractors, if a federally funded project is awarded.
Planned Corrective Action - The District has established procedures for ensuring compliance with Davis-Bacon Act requirements. In the future, if Federally funded construction projects are awarded, we will make sure that we require from the contractor weekly certified payrolls and District personnel will verify the payrolls received. Anticipated Completion Date - December 30, 2024. We will provide documentation to the FDOE supporting the allowability of the questioned costs and discuss the necessary corrective action needed to comply. Responsible Contact Person - Mandie Fowler, Director of Curriculum & Instruction
FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2023 — management decision was due July 26, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 14, 2022 — management decision was due September 14, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2021 — management decision was due July 26, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2020 — management decision was due August 16, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2019 — management decision was due September 19, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2018 — management decision was due September 18, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2017 — management decision was due September 19, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Florida →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.