← Back to home

Holmes County District School BoardLocal Government

EIN: 596000668

UEI: LRD2A1M88C25

Audited by: Auditor General

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Holmes County District School Board10 audit years3 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$6.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,311,204 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 21, 2026 (39 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,267,151 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2025 — management decision was due September 5, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,636,267 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2024 — management decision was due September 15, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,562,342 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2023 — management decision was due August 16, 2023.

2022-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The District annually applies for Title I Program funding and the application includes a budget and an eligibility survey to document the amounts budgeted per participating school. During the 2021-22 fiscal year, the District expended $947,301 from the Title I Program, including $831,456 expended for the District?s six elementary, middle, and high schools. As part of our audit, we requested for examination District records supporting the District?s budget allocation amounts to the six schools and final budget amounts that evidenced the allocations were provided. However, District records indicated that the ranking of three of the District?s six Title I schools did not agree with the ranking based on the total number of students from low-income families. Specifically, District schools with a poverty concentration of 99.20 percent, 90.66 percent, and 84.39 percent were allocated and received $15,032, $18,467 and $4,556, respectively, less than a school with a lower poverty concentration of 77.74 percent. Cause: The District had not established effective procedures for monitoring Title I budgets at participating schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal regulations by appropriately allocating Title I Program resources to participating schools in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. As a result, three schools were underallocated $38,055 and educational services were not funded at the required levels. In response to our inquiries, District personnel concurred with the calculated questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should establish procedures for ensuring and documenting that Title I Program resources are properly allocated to schools. In addition, the District should provide documentation to the FDOE supporting the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $38,055 or allocate that amount to the applicable underfunded Title I schools. District Response: The District Federal Programs Coordinator will: 1. Attend professional development activities provided by our Federal Programs Consultant, Dr. Cheryl Sattler with Ethica, LLC. These activities include monthly technical calls, annual Title 1 Bootcamp, and Spring Coordinators? Workshop. 2. Seek help and advice from Dr. Sattler as needed. 3. Attend FASFEPA Conferences, twice per year, to learn about updates and changes to federal laws regarding Title 1 funds. 4. Review the budget entered into the district?s accounting system to ensure there are no discrepancies.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding: The District did not always comply with Federal regulations by properly allocating Title I Program funds to eligible schools. Criteria: Title 34, Section 200.78, Code of Federal Regulations, requires the District to allocate Title I schoolwide program funds to schools identified as eligible and selected to participate, in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. The District is not required to allocate the same per-pupil amount (PPA) to each participating school provided that it allocates higher PPAs to schools with higher concentrations of poverty than to schools with lower concentrations of poverty. Condition: The District annually applies for Title I Program funding and the application includes a budget and an eligibility survey to document the amounts budgeted per participating school. During the 2021-22 fiscal year, the District expended $947,301 from the Title I Program, including $831,456 expended for the District?s six elementary, middle, and high schools. As part of our audit, we requested for examination District records supporting the District?s budget allocation amounts to the six schools and final budget amounts that evidenced the allocations were provided. However, District records indicated that the ranking of three of the District?s six Title I schools did not agree with the ranking based on the total number of students from low-income families. Specifically, District schools with a poverty concentration of 99.20 percent, 90.66 percent, and 84.39 percent were allocated and received $15,032, $18,467 and $4,556, respectively, less than a school with a lower poverty concentration of 77.74 percent. Cause: The District had not established effective procedures for monitoring Title I budgets at participating schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal regulations by appropriately allocating Title I Program resources to participating schools in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. As a result, three schools were underallocated $38,055 and educational services were not funded at the required levels. In response to our inquiries, District personnel concurred with the calculated questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should establish procedures for ensuring and documenting that Title I Program resources are properly allocated to schools. In addition, the District should provide documentation to the FDOE supporting the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $38,055 or allocate that amount to the applicable underfunded Title I schools. District Response: The District Federal Programs Coordinator will: 1. Attend professional development activities provided by our Federal Programs Consultant, Dr. Cheryl Sattler with Ethica, LLC. These activities include monthly technical calls, annual Title 1 Bootcamp, and Spring Coordinators? Workshop. 2. Seek help and advice from Dr. Sattler as needed. 3. Attend FASFEPA Conferences, twice per year, to learn about updates and changes to federal laws regarding Title 1 funds. 4. Review the budget entered into the district?s accounting system to ensure there are no discrepancies.

Corrective Action Plan

The District Federal Programs Coordinator will: 1. Attend professional development activities provided by our Federal Programs Consultant, Dr. Cheryl Sattler with Ethica, LLC. These activities include monthly technical calls, annual Title 1 Bootcamp, and Spring Coordinator's Workshop. 2. Seek help and advice from Dr. Sattler as needed. 3. Attend FASFEPA Conferences, twice per year, to learn about updates and changes to federal laws regarding Title 1 funds. 4. Review the budget entered into the district's accounting system to ensure there are no discrepancies.

About Eligibility →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,015,275 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2022 — management decision was due July 26, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,689,651 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2021 — management decision was due July 13, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,316,007 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2020 — management decision was due August 4, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,162,560 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2019 — management decision was due September 25, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$4,618,949 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2018 — management decision was due September 25, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$4,336,051 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2017 — management decision was due September 26, 2017.

2016-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-001QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-002OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.