EIN: 596000668
UEI: LRD2A1M88C25
Audited by: Auditor General
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 21, 2026 (39 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on March 5, 2025 — management decision was due September 5, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2024 — management decision was due September 15, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2023 — management decision was due August 16, 2023.
The District annually applies for Title I Program funding and the application includes a budget and an eligibility survey to document the amounts budgeted per participating school. During the 2021-22 fiscal year, the District expended $947,301 from the Title I Program, including $831,456 expended for the District?s six elementary, middle, and high schools. As part of our audit, we requested for examination District records supporting the District?s budget allocation amounts to the six schools and final budget amounts that evidenced the allocations were provided. However, District records indicated that the ranking of three of the District?s six Title I schools did not agree with the ranking based on the total number of students from low-income families. Specifically, District schools with a poverty concentration of 99.20 percent, 90.66 percent, and 84.39 percent were allocated and received $15,032, $18,467 and $4,556, respectively, less than a school with a lower poverty concentration of 77.74 percent. Cause: The District had not established effective procedures for monitoring Title I budgets at participating schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal regulations by appropriately allocating Title I Program resources to participating schools in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. As a result, three schools were underallocated $38,055 and educational services were not funded at the required levels. In response to our inquiries, District personnel concurred with the calculated questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should establish procedures for ensuring and documenting that Title I Program resources are properly allocated to schools. In addition, the District should provide documentation to the FDOE supporting the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $38,055 or allocate that amount to the applicable underfunded Title I schools. District Response: The District Federal Programs Coordinator will: 1. Attend professional development activities provided by our Federal Programs Consultant, Dr. Cheryl Sattler with Ethica, LLC. These activities include monthly technical calls, annual Title 1 Bootcamp, and Spring Coordinators? Workshop. 2. Seek help and advice from Dr. Sattler as needed. 3. Attend FASFEPA Conferences, twice per year, to learn about updates and changes to federal laws regarding Title 1 funds. 4. Review the budget entered into the district?s accounting system to ensure there are no discrepancies.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding: The District did not always comply with Federal regulations by properly allocating Title I Program funds to eligible schools. Criteria: Title 34, Section 200.78, Code of Federal Regulations, requires the District to allocate Title I schoolwide program funds to schools identified as eligible and selected to participate, in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. The District is not required to allocate the same per-pupil amount (PPA) to each participating school provided that it allocates higher PPAs to schools with higher concentrations of poverty than to schools with lower concentrations of poverty. Condition: The District annually applies for Title I Program funding and the application includes a budget and an eligibility survey to document the amounts budgeted per participating school. During the 2021-22 fiscal year, the District expended $947,301 from the Title I Program, including $831,456 expended for the District?s six elementary, middle, and high schools. As part of our audit, we requested for examination District records supporting the District?s budget allocation amounts to the six schools and final budget amounts that evidenced the allocations were provided. However, District records indicated that the ranking of three of the District?s six Title I schools did not agree with the ranking based on the total number of students from low-income families. Specifically, District schools with a poverty concentration of 99.20 percent, 90.66 percent, and 84.39 percent were allocated and received $15,032, $18,467 and $4,556, respectively, less than a school with a lower poverty concentration of 77.74 percent. Cause: The District had not established effective procedures for monitoring Title I budgets at participating schools. Effect: The District did not comply with Federal regulations by appropriately allocating Title I Program resources to participating schools in rank order, on the basis of the total number of children from low-income families in each school. As a result, three schools were underallocated $38,055 and educational services were not funded at the required levels. In response to our inquiries, District personnel concurred with the calculated questioned costs. Recommendation: The District should establish procedures for ensuring and documenting that Title I Program resources are properly allocated to schools. In addition, the District should provide documentation to the FDOE supporting the allowability of the questioned costs totaling $38,055 or allocate that amount to the applicable underfunded Title I schools. District Response: The District Federal Programs Coordinator will: 1. Attend professional development activities provided by our Federal Programs Consultant, Dr. Cheryl Sattler with Ethica, LLC. These activities include monthly technical calls, annual Title 1 Bootcamp, and Spring Coordinators? Workshop. 2. Seek help and advice from Dr. Sattler as needed. 3. Attend FASFEPA Conferences, twice per year, to learn about updates and changes to federal laws regarding Title 1 funds. 4. Review the budget entered into the district?s accounting system to ensure there are no discrepancies.
The District Federal Programs Coordinator will: 1. Attend professional development activities provided by our Federal Programs Consultant, Dr. Cheryl Sattler with Ethica, LLC. These activities include monthly technical calls, annual Title 1 Bootcamp, and Spring Coordinator's Workshop. 2. Seek help and advice from Dr. Sattler as needed. 3. Attend FASFEPA Conferences, twice per year, to learn about updates and changes to federal laws regarding Title 1 funds. 4. Review the budget entered into the district's accounting system to ensure there are no discrepancies.
FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2022 — management decision was due July 26, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2021 — management decision was due July 13, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2020 — management decision was due August 4, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2019 — management decision was due September 25, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2018 — management decision was due September 25, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2017 — management decision was due September 26, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-001
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-002
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.