← Back to home

Broward CountyLocal Government

EIN: 596000531

UEI: P62KF2SJJ237

Audit also covers EIN: 596000534 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: Anthony Brunson PA

Cognizant agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Broward County10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$162.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$162,869,441 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 29, 2026 (120 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Condition During our audit of State Project 60.014 – Homeless Challenge Grant, the County department did not maintain sufficient documentation to support the Annual Median Income (AMI) eligibility determinations for several participants selected for testing. Although the County was ultimately able to obtain sufficient information from the service providers to satisfy the eligibility requirement. This condition indicates that appropriate controls should be established and consistently implemented at the department level to ensure that all required eligibility documentation is maintained, readily available, and auditable upon request. Criteria Chapter 10.550, Rules of the Auditor General require local governments to establish and maintain effective internal controls to ensure compliance with state financial assistance requirements. The Compliance Supplement for Project 60.014 identifies Eligibility as a key compliance requirement and requires recipients to maintain complete and accurate documentation supporting income verification and AMI thresholds for all individuals served. Cause The County’s processes for ensuring required AMI eligibility documentation were collected, reviewed, and retained were not consistently established or formalized. The County relied on service providers to obtain and maintain participant eligibility documentation; however, procedures to ensure these records were routinely submitted to and verified by the County were limited. Additionally, processes to independently review and confirm participant eligibility prior to the provision of services were not consistently implemented. Effect The absence of effective internal controls increases the risk that services may be provided to ineligible participants and results in noncompliance with state project requirements. Continued noncompliance may adversely impact the County’s standing with the program and could result in questioned costs, funding disallowances, or potential suspension or termination of grant funding. Recommendation We recommend that the County establish and implement effective internal controls over eligibility verification. Controls should ensure that all required AMI documentation is collected, reviewed, and retained by the County prior to the provision of services. This may include implementing standardized eligibility verification procedures, requiring timely submission of supporting documentation from service providers, performing supervisory reviews, and providing training to staff and service providers on documentation requirements outlined in the State Project Compliance Supplement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition During our audit of State Project 60.014 – Homeless Challenge Grant, the County department did not maintain sufficient documentation to support the Annual Median Income (AMI) eligibility determinations for several participants selected for testing. Although the County was ultimately able to obtain sufficient information from the service providers to satisfy the eligibility requirement. This condition indicates that appropriate controls should be established and consistently implemented at the department level to ensure that all required eligibility documentation is maintained, readily available, and auditable upon request. Criteria Chapter 10.550, Rules of the Auditor General require local governments to establish and maintain effective internal controls to ensure compliance with state financial assistance requirements. The Compliance Supplement for Project 60.014 identifies Eligibility as a key compliance requirement and requires recipients to maintain complete and accurate documentation supporting income verification and AMI thresholds for all individuals served. Cause The County’s processes for ensuring required AMI eligibility documentation were collected, reviewed, and retained were not consistently established or formalized. The County relied on service providers to obtain and maintain participant eligibility documentation; however, procedures to ensure these records were routinely submitted to and verified by the County were limited. Additionally, processes to independently review and confirm participant eligibility prior to the provision of services were not consistently implemented. Effect The absence of effective internal controls increases the risk that services may be provided to ineligible participants and results in noncompliance with state project requirements. Continued noncompliance may adversely impact the County’s standing with the program and could result in questioned costs, funding disallowances, or potential suspension or termination of grant funding. Recommendation We recommend that the County establish and implement effective internal controls over eligibility verification. Controls should ensure that all required AMI documentation is collected, reviewed, and retained by the County prior to the provision of services. This may include implementing standardized eligibility verification procedures, requiring timely submission of supporting documentation from service providers, performing supervisory reviews, and providing training to staff and service providers on documentation requirements outlined in the State Project Compliance Supplement.

Corrective Action Plan

Management concurs with this finding. The expenditure understatement in the initial Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) for ALN 97.036 (Disaster Grants – Public Assistance) was caused by an operating deficiency in year-end review procedures, rather than the design of the control itself. Although the discrepancy was not identified internally prior to the initial draft submission, the error was isolated to the aforementioned program and fully corrected before the final draft SEFA was issued to the Auditors. Management is committed to strengthening the controls necessary to ensure complete and accurate SEFA reporting going forward. The FASD Division, in coordination with the Emergency Management Division and the Broward Sheriff’s Office (BSO), will enhance the SEFA Preparation and Reconciliation Protocol for year-end September 30, 2026. To ensure compliance, all departments administering and reporting under ALN 97.036 will receive comprehensive training on Uniform Guidance and FEMA Public Assistance (PA) reporting requirements prior to the fiscal year-end.

About Reporting →

FY 2024-09-30

$114,535,155 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2025 — management decision was due December 26, 2025.

FY 2023-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$323,586,756 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2024 — management decision was due December 26, 2024.

FY 2022-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$687,795,761 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2023 — management decision was due December 24, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$378,905,592 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2022 — management decision was due December 28, 2022.

FY 2020-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$504,063,286 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2021 — management decision was due December 28, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$155,100,212 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 22, 2020 — management decision was due December 22, 2020.

FY 2018-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$157,973,032 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2019 — management decision was due December 27, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$117,095,564 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 13, 2018 — management decision was due December 13, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$114,912,710 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2017 — management decision was due November 17, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Florida

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.