EIN: 596000272
UEI: J3AGMABLA8E5
Audit also covers EIN: 591170032
Audited by: Purvis Gray
Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 30, 2026 (123 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2025 — management decision was due December 30, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on June 19, 2024 — management decision was due December 19, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2023 — management decision was due December 28, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2021 — management decision was due December 29, 2021.
Criteria In submitting the accounting records to the grantor, the City is required to certify that reported costs were incurred in performance of eligible work. Internal controls that ensure reported costs are eligible and accurate should adhere to the following standards. Uniform Guidance ? Part 2 CFR Section 200.303 |? Non-federal entities receiving federal awards must establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2020 Compliance Supplement: Part 6 ? Internal Control |? One of the objectives of internal control over compliance as found in 2 CFR Section 200.62 is to permit the preparation of reliable federal reports. Condition In the State of Florida?s accounting to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of eligible costs, it was determined that the City had submitted duplicate billings of $662,203 for reimbursement. Cause A series of invoices for eligible costs was supposed to be split among two separate project worksheets, but were applied at their full cost in both project worksheets. Several local representatives working for FEMA assisted the City in allocating costs among different project worksheets and submitting costs for reimbursement. The City relied on the local FEMA representatives to help them submit accurate reports and did not perform a full reconciliation of actual grant expenses to expenses reported to the grantor. Effect The lack of the reconciliation of eligible costs reported in project worksheets to proper documentation can allow errant reports to go undetected. Recommendation We recommend that the client review control procedures to ensure expenses included in grant reports reconcile to City records. This includes reconciliation and review of work performed by third parties on the City?s behalf. View of Responsible Officials At the time that Hurricane Irma costs were incurred and had to be tracked, the City?s finance department was understaffed with one supervisor, one full time employee, and one temporary employee. This limited the finance department?s ability to get involved in the review of Hurricane Irma invoices. As of September 30, 2020, the finance department has become fully staffed with one supervisor and four additional full time employees, one of which has been assigned the responsibility of grant accounting. The City feels that it will be better equipped to handle financial reporting needs of future emergencies as they arise.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria In submitting the accounting records to the grantor, the City is required to certify that reported costs were incurred in performance of eligible work. Internal controls that ensure reported costs are eligible and accurate should adhere to the following standards. Uniform Guidance ? Part 2 CFR Section 200.303 |? Non-federal entities receiving federal awards must establish and maintain internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal awards in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). 2020 Compliance Supplement: Part 6 ? Internal Control |? One of the objectives of internal control over compliance as found in 2 CFR Section 200.62 is to permit the preparation of reliable federal reports. Condition In the State of Florida?s accounting to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of eligible costs, it was determined that the City had submitted duplicate billings of $662,203 for reimbursement. Cause A series of invoices for eligible costs was supposed to be split among two separate project worksheets, but were applied at their full cost in both project worksheets. Several local representatives working for FEMA assisted the City in allocating costs among different project worksheets and submitting costs for reimbursement. The City relied on the local FEMA representatives to help them submit accurate reports and did not perform a full reconciliation of actual grant expenses to expenses reported to the grantor. Effect The lack of the reconciliation of eligible costs reported in project worksheets to proper documentation can allow errant reports to go undetected. Recommendation We recommend that the client review control procedures to ensure expenses included in grant reports reconcile to City records. This includes reconciliation and review of work performed by third parties on the City?s behalf. View of Responsible Officials At the time that Hurricane Irma costs were incurred and had to be tracked, the City?s finance department was understaffed with one supervisor, one full time employee, and one temporary employee. This limited the finance department?s ability to get involved in the review of Hurricane Irma invoices. As of September 30, 2020, the finance department has become fully staffed with one supervisor and four additional full time employees, one of which has been assigned the responsibility of grant accounting. The City feels that it will be better equipped to handle financial reporting needs of future emergencies as they arise.
We have reviewed the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for the audit performed by Purvis, Gray & Company, LLP for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020. Our response to the finding is as follows: Finding Number IC 2020-01 ? Accuracy of Grant Reimbursement Requests Title: Department of Homeland Security Disaster Grants ? Public Assistance (Hurricane Irma) CFDA: 97.036 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Grant Expenditure Reporting Condition: In the State of Florida?s accounting to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of eligible costs, it was determined that the City of Bartow had submitted duplicate billings of $662,203 for reimbursement. Cause: A series of invoices for eligible costs was supposed to be split among two separate project worksheets but were applied at their full cost in both project worksheets. Several local representatives working for FEMA assisted the City in allocating costs among different project worksheets and submitting costs for reimbursement. The City relied on the local FEMA representatives to help them submit accurate reports and did not perform a full reconciliation of actual grant expenses to expenses reported to the grantor. Effect: The lack of the reconciliation of eligible costs reported in project worksheets to proper documentation can allow errant reports to go undetected. Recommendation: We recommend that the client review control procedures to ensure expenses included in grant reports reconcile to City records. This includes reconciliation and review of work performed by third parties on the City?s behalf. Management?s Response: Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2021 Responsible Contact Person: Stacy Molinar, Finance Director Hurricane Irma came through the City of Bartow leaving behind significant damage. The City?s electric utility incurred the most significant damage. At the time of the hurricane, the City?s finance department was understaffed with one supervisor, one full-time employee and one temporary employee. Project reporting and document accumulation for the electric utility was spread among non-Finance employees with assistance coming from numerous FEMA representatives. This decentralized processing and the lack of centralized reconciliation led to duplication of submitted billings. The City will review control procedures to ensure that future expenses included in grant reports reconcile to City records. This will include all reports prepared by City staff or by third parties on behalf of the City. As of September 30, 2020, the finance department is fully staffed with one supervisor and four additional full-time employees, one of which has been assigned the responsibility of grant accounting. The City is better equipped to handle financial reporting needs of future emergencies as they arise.
FAC accepted this audit on June 23, 2020 — management decision was due December 23, 2020.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.