← Back to home

SOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 591628264

UEI: FKLNYZTNFKN3

Audited by: Carr, Rigs & Ingram, LLC

Oversight agency: 16 [Department of Justice]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

SOUTH BREVARD WOMEN'S CENTER, INC.8 audit years8 findings5 repeat
8
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
5
Repeat Findings
$1.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,344,639 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 18, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 18, 2027 (169 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

$1,375,888 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 25, 2025 — management decision was due February 25, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

$1,611,111 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2024 — management decision was due December 27, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

$1,536,468 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 16, 2023 — management decision was due January 16, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

$1,146,653 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 5, 2022 — management decision was due January 5, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

$1,127,529 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 17, 2021 — management decision was due February 17, 2022.

2020-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-006

Counseling service needs assessment forms to determine compliance with eligibility requirements were not consistently reviewed. However, the Center implemented a new control in April 2020 better documenting their review of eligibility requirements. No exceptions were noted after the implementation of this control. Perspective: The control was not consistently implemented for several participants evaluated prior to April 2020. None of the participants selected for testing were ineligible. Cause: Under the old process, documentation of the counselor?s review of eligibility requirements did not consistently match the same cause of victimization as the needs assessment form. Effect: Services could be provided under VOCA to ineligible participants. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: CRI recommends the Center continue with the new intake review process implemented in April 2020. Management Response: Eligibility determination prepared by the counselors will continue to be reviewed by the Director of Counseling to ensure compliance with grant requirements as implemented in April 2020.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SD 2020-002: ELIGIBILITY CFDA 16.575 Crime Victim Assistance 2019 Funding U.S. Department of Justice Passed through the State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Office of the Attorney General Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, under 28 CFR 94.103, recipients of benefits under VOCA must be determined to be a victim of crime. Condition: Counseling service needs assessment forms to determine compliance with eligibility requirements were not consistently reviewed. However, the Center implemented a new control in April 2020 better documenting their review of eligibility requirements. No exceptions were noted after the implementation of this control. Perspective: The control was not consistently implemented for several participants evaluated prior to April 2020. None of the participants selected for testing were ineligible. Cause: Under the old process, documentation of the counselor?s review of eligibility requirements did not consistently match the same cause of victimization as the needs assessment form. Effect: Services could be provided under VOCA to ineligible participants. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: CRI recommends the Center continue with the new intake review process implemented in April 2020. Management Response: Eligibility determination prepared by the counselors will continue to be reviewed by the Director of Counseling to ensure compliance with grant requirements as implemented in April 2020.

Corrective Action Plan

SD 2020-002: ELIGIBILITY Recommendation: CRI recommends the Center continue with the new intake review process implemented in April 2020. Corrective Action: Eligibility determination prepared by the counselors will continue to be reviewed by the Director of Counseling to ensure compliance with grant requirements as implemented in April 2020. Responsible Party: Director of Counseling, Dr. Haya Soya Date Expected to be corrected: April 2020

Prior Finding References

2019-006

About Eligibility →

FY 2019-12-31

$1,068,712 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 21, 2020 — management decision was due April 21, 2021.

2019-001
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2018-001

Reimbursement requests submitted to the pass-through agency contained costs that were not reimbursed by the pass-through agency as the request contained unallowable costs. Perspective: Nine out of the twelve reimbursement requests contained costs that were not reimbursed by the pass-through agency. Cause: A more detailed review of the FICA calculations and comparing the reimbursement requests to the budget were not being completed.Effect: Unallowable costs, which included incorrect calculations of FICA and amount over the maximum allowed the category, were included in reimbursement requests and later corrected and resubmitted. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Supporting documentation should be reviewed along with the grant draw down request to minimize the amount of disallowed costs from the pass through grantor. Management Response: Unallowable costs not reimbursed by pass through agency totaled $838, or 0.09% of the contract. Costs included FICA miscalculations due to differing decimal points used between organization and pass through agency. Exact decimal placement used by grantor will be used for all future calculations. All supporting documentation for each monthly submission will be reviewed by the Finance and Operations Assistant or designee and the Director of Grants Administration along with the grant draw down request to minimize the amount of disallowed costs from the pass through grantor

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

CFDA 16.575 Crime Victim Assistance 2019 Funding U.S. Department of Justice Passed through the State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Office of the Attorney General Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Condition: Reimbursement requests submitted to the pass-through agency contained costs that were not reimbursed by the pass-through agency as the request contained unallowable costs. Perspective: Nine out of the twelve reimbursement requests contained costs that were not reimbursed by the pass-through agency. Cause: A more detailed review of the FICA calculations and comparing the reimbursement requests to the budget were not being completed.Effect: Unallowable costs, which included incorrect calculations of FICA and amount over the maximum allowed the category, were included in reimbursement requests and later corrected and resubmitted. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Supporting documentation should be reviewed along with the grant draw down request to minimize the amount of disallowed costs from the pass through grantor. Management Response: Unallowable costs not reimbursed by pass through agency totaled $838, or 0.09% of the contract. Costs included FICA miscalculations due to differing decimal points used between organization and pass through agency. Exact decimal placement used by grantor will be used for all future calculations. All supporting documentation for each monthly submission will be reviewed by the Finance and Operations Assistant or designee and the Director of Grants Administration along with the grant draw down request to minimize the amount of disallowed costs from the pass through grantor

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: Supporting documentation should be reviewed along with the grant draw down request to minimize the amount of disallowed costs from the pass through grantor. Corrective Action: Unallowable costs not reimbursed by pass through agency totaled $838, or 0.09% of the contract. Costs included FICA miscalculations due to differing decimal points used between organization and pass through agency. Exact decimal placement used by grantor will be used for all future calculations. All supporting documentation for each monthly submission will be reviewed by the Finance and Operations Assistant or designee and the Director of Grants Administration along with the grant draw down request to minimize the amount of disallowed costs from the pass through grantor. Responsible party: Finance and Operations Assistant or designee, Director of Grants Administration Date Expected to be corrected: 8/1/2020

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Cash Management →
2019-004
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2018-004

Counseling service needs assessment forms to determine compliance with eligibility requirements were not consistently reviewed. Perspective: The control was not consistently implemented. Cause: Documentation of the counselor?s review of eligibility requirements did not consistently match the same cause of victimization as the needs assessment form. Effect: Services could be provided under VOCA to ineligible participants. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: New victim demographics forms filled out by the counselors need to match the needs assessment forms filled out by participants if the new victim demographic forms are going to be used as evidence of review of eligibility documentation.Management Response: Eligibility determination prepared by the counselors will be reviewed by the Director of Counseling to ensure compliance with grant requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

CFDA 16.575 Crime Victim Assistance 2018 Funding U.S. Department of Justice Passed through the State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Office of the Attorney General Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Additionally, under 28 CFR 94.103, recipients of benefits under VOCA must be determined to be a victim of crime. Condition: Counseling service needs assessment forms to determine compliance with eligibility requirements were not consistently reviewed. Perspective: The control was not consistently implemented. Cause: Documentation of the counselor?s review of eligibility requirements did not consistently match the same cause of victimization as the needs assessment form. Effect: Services could be provided under VOCA to ineligible participants. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: New victim demographics forms filled out by the counselors need to match the needs assessment forms filled out by participants if the new victim demographic forms are going to be used as evidence of review of eligibility documentation.Management Response: Eligibility determination prepared by the counselors will be reviewed by the Director of Counseling to ensure compliance with grant requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: New victim demographics forms filled out by the counselors need to match the needs assessment forms filled out by participants if the new victim demographic forms are going to be used as evidence of review of eligibility documentation. Corrective Action: Eligibility determination prepared by the counselors will be reviewed by the Director of Counseling to ensure compliance with grant requirements. Responsible Party: Director of Counseling Date Expected to be corrected: 8/1/2020

Prior Finding References

2018-004

About Eligibility →
2019-006
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-006QUESTIONED COSTS

Time sheets for in-kind services submitted for match were not logged in sufficient detail to determine if work was performed in direct service to victims of crime. Perspective: Seven out of the sixty time entries submitted for match as in-kind services, work performed was not described as being in direct service to victims of crime. There was sufficient detail for matching during the second half of the year to determine services were performed in direct service to victims of crime. Cause: Documentation to meet matching requirements is not consistently reviewed in a timely manner. Effect: The Center was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $327 of known questioned costs. Recommendation: Timesheets and logs submitted for match should be reviewed by an independent person for compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Total amount not allowed by pass through agency was $97.59, or 0.04% of match requirement. Approved Match submitted was in excess of contractual requirement. Volunteer Log sheets will be reviewed by Volunteer and Outreach Coordinator to ensure compliance with grant requirements prior to being given to Director of Grants Administration for submission to pass through agency.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

CFDA 16.575 Crime Victim Assistance 2018 Funding U.S. Department of Justice Passed through the State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs, Office of the Attorney General Criteria: Per 2 CFR 200.303, non-Federal entities must establish and maintain effective internal controls to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with the Uniform Guidance. The VOCA grant agreement between the State of Florida Office of the Attorney General and the Center requires a 20% in cash or in-kind contributions. Condition: Time sheets for in-kind services submitted for match were not logged in sufficient detail to determine if work was performed in direct service to victims of crime. Perspective: Seven out of the sixty time entries submitted for match as in-kind services, work performed was not described as being in direct service to victims of crime. There was sufficient detail for matching during the second half of the year to determine services were performed in direct service to victims of crime. Cause: Documentation to meet matching requirements is not consistently reviewed in a timely manner. Effect: The Center was not in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Questioned Costs: $327 of known questioned costs. Recommendation: Timesheets and logs submitted for match should be reviewed by an independent person for compliance with grant requirements. Management Response: Total amount not allowed by pass through agency was $97.59, or 0.04% of match requirement. Approved Match submitted was in excess of contractual requirement. Volunteer Log sheets will be reviewed by Volunteer and Outreach Coordinator to ensure compliance with grant requirements prior to being given to Director of Grants Administration for submission to pass through agency.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: Timesheets and logs submitted for match should be reviewed by an independent person for compliance with grant requirements. Corrective Action: Total amount not allowed by pass through agency was $97.59, or 0.04% of match requirement. Approved Match submitted was in excess of contractual requirement. Volunteer Log sheets will be reviewed by Volunteer and Outreach Coordinator to ensure compliance with grant requirements prior to being given to Director of Grants Administration for submission to pass through agency. Responsible Party: Volunteer and Outreach Coordinator and Director of Grants Administration Date Expected to be corrected: 8/1/2020

Prior Finding References

2018-006

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2018-12-31

$902,062 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2019 — management decision was due March 24, 2020.

2017-001
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2017-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-001

About Cash Management →
2018-004
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →
2018-005
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2018-006
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Florida

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.