EIN: 591566799
UEI: F73DR24AQ1V1
Audited by: Rivero, Gordimer & Company, P.A.
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 24, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 24, 2026 (73 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2025 — management decision was due July 7, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2024 — management decision was due August 5, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2023 — management decision was due July 10, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2022 — management decision was due July 9, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2021 — management decision was due July 14, 2021.
The Boys & Girls Clubs of the Suncoast, Inc. (the Club) is currently reporting the performance measures to their pass-through entity but not at the required frequency prescribed in the contract agreement. Additionally, there is no internal review of the information used to populate the data before is submitted to the City. Questioned costs: None. Context: Out of the three months selected to test the performance reporting requirement, all selections have been reported to the City but they had not been submitted in a timely manner. Additionally, there was no evidence of review of the information before it was submitted. Cause: The contract agreement between the City and the Club was initiated back in 2002 and most expenditures occurred in 2004. As the compliance requirements continue to be in effect through the period in which there is a lien on the Property, over time the program has changed hands and communication between the City and the Club has not been consistent in regards to what reporting items would still be required. Effect: The Club could cause their pass-through entity to under report their performance measures each quarter if they are not receiving the updated information from the Club as prescribed by the contract agreement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The Club should submit their monthly performance reporting to the City as noted in the agreement with the City. Additionally, the Club should implement an internal review process before the information is submitted to the City. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. All grant reporting requirements will be reviewed upon receipt by Director of Grants and Chief Operating Officer and shared with all necessary parties. Parties responsible for collecting data for reporting will have internal deadlines to supply information to the designated person responsible for submitting the report. Once all information is collected, the Chief Operating Officer will review information before it is submitted to the appropriate grantor.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal program title: Community Development Block Grants CFDA Number: 14.218 Pass-Through Agency: City of St. Petersburg, Florida Pass-Through Number(s): B-01-MC-12-0017 Award Period: April 23, 2003-January 1, 2034 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: Per the contract agreement with the City of St. Petersburg, Florida it is stated that, "When the Property is occupied and offering services, Contractor shall provide a monthly report which shall include items noted in Exhibit D Monthly Service Report and Exhibit E Monthly Client Demographic Report of contract.? Condition: The Boys & Girls Clubs of the Suncoast, Inc. (the Club) is currently reporting the performance measures to their pass-through entity but not at the required frequency prescribed in the contract agreement. Additionally, there is no internal review of the information used to populate the data before is submitted to the City. Questioned costs: None. Context: Out of the three months selected to test the performance reporting requirement, all selections have been reported to the City but they had not been submitted in a timely manner. Additionally, there was no evidence of review of the information before it was submitted. Cause: The contract agreement between the City and the Club was initiated back in 2002 and most expenditures occurred in 2004. As the compliance requirements continue to be in effect through the period in which there is a lien on the Property, over time the program has changed hands and communication between the City and the Club has not been consistent in regards to what reporting items would still be required. Effect: The Club could cause their pass-through entity to under report their performance measures each quarter if they are not receiving the updated information from the Club as prescribed by the contract agreement. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The Club should submit their monthly performance reporting to the City as noted in the agreement with the City. Additionally, the Club should implement an internal review process before the information is submitted to the City. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. All grant reporting requirements will be reviewed upon receipt by Director of Grants and Chief Operating Officer and shared with all necessary parties. Parties responsible for collecting data for reporting will have internal deadlines to supply information to the designated person responsible for submitting the report. Once all information is collected, the Chief Operating Officer will review information before it is submitted to the appropriate grantor.
Recommendation: The Club should submit their monthly performance reporting to the City as noted in the agreement with the City. Additionally, the Club should implement an internal review process before the information is submitted to the City. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: All grant reporting requirements will be reviewed upon receipt by Director of Grants and Chief Operating Officer and shared with all necessary parties. Parties responsible for collecting data for reporting will have internal deadlines to supply information to the designated person responsible for submitting the report. Once all information is collected, the Chief Operating Officer will review information before it is submitted to the appropriate grantor. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action : Mandy Burnette, COO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 4, 2020 If the Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan, please call Mandy Burnette at 727-351-4994.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Florida →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
