← Back to home

Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Florida, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 590951887

UEI: WJB3VLNFJ517

Audited by: BDO USA, P.C.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Florida, Inc.10 audit years6 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$3.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,427,758 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (28 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Information on Federal Program - U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Florida Department of Health CFDA Number: 10.558 CFDA Name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria – The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 230 Appendix B 8.m states support is required for salaries and wages charged to federal awards. It states that the distribution of salaries and wages to awards must be supported by personnel activity reports that reflect the distribution of activity of each employee. The reports must reflect an after-the-fact determination of the actual activity of each employee and must account for the total activity for which employees are compensated. The reports must be signed by the individual employee, or by a responsible supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the activities performed by the employee, that the distribution of activity represents a reasonable estimate of the actual work performed by the employee during the period covered by the reports. Condition – During our testing of payroll disbursements, we noted that 22 of the 40 payroll expenditures (relating to eight salaried employees) selected for testing did not have the properly approved personnel activity report that reflects the distribution of activity of the selected employee. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to in this instance to ensure a properly approved timesheet was maintained to evidence this cost was allowable and that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging this cost to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect – The lack of sufficient documentation around actual time incurred/spent on a program could lead to either over or under charging the federal program for salary costs. Questioned Costs – We were unable to determine the amount of known questioned costs. See context section below. Context – We tested a sample of 40 payroll expense items and found 22 exceptions relating to eight salaried employees. The expense consisted of $9,015 in gross employee wages charged to the federal program for which properly approved personnel activity report was not available. Total expense charged to the federal program for these employees was $104,446. This is a condition identified per review of the Organization’s controls over compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on Federal Program - U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Florida Department of Health CFDA Number: 10.558 CFDA Name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria – The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 230 Appendix B 8.m states support is required for salaries and wages charged to federal awards. It states that the distribution of salaries and wages to awards must be supported by personnel activity reports that reflect the distribution of activity of each employee. The reports must reflect an after-the-fact determination of the actual activity of each employee and must account for the total activity for which employees are compensated. The reports must be signed by the individual employee, or by a responsible supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the activities performed by the employee, that the distribution of activity represents a reasonable estimate of the actual work performed by the employee during the period covered by the reports. Condition – During our testing of payroll disbursements, we noted that 22 of the 40 payroll expenditures (relating to eight salaried employees) selected for testing did not have the properly approved personnel activity report that reflects the distribution of activity of the selected employee. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to in this instance to ensure a properly approved timesheet was maintained to evidence this cost was allowable and that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging this cost to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect – The lack of sufficient documentation around actual time incurred/spent on a program could lead to either over or under charging the federal program for salary costs. Questioned Costs – We were unable to determine the amount of known questioned costs. See context section below. Context – We tested a sample of 40 payroll expense items and found 22 exceptions relating to eight salaried employees. The expense consisted of $9,015 in gross employee wages charged to the federal program for which properly approved personnel activity report was not available. Total expense charged to the federal program for these employees was $104,446. This is a condition identified per review of the Organization’s controls over compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with this finding. A process for approval of actual time spent for employees whose compensation is charged to federal programs will be implemented.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2025-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Information on Federal Program - U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Florida Department of Health CFDA Number: 10.558 CFDA Name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria – The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowable under federal awards, they must be adequately documented and there must be sufficient documentation. Additionally, CFR Section 200.430 states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and are supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate and allowable. Condition – During our testing of payroll disbursements, we noted that three of the 40 payroll expenditures (all three relating to one employee) selected for testing did not have a properly approved personnel action form documenting the employee’s approved pay rate. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to in this instance to ensure a properly approved personnel action form was maintained to evidence this cost was allowable and that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging this cost to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect - The lack of sufficient documentation around approved pay rates of employees could lead to either over or under charging the federal program for salary costs. Questioned Costs - There are no questioned costs as the disbursement amount is under the questioned cost threshold. See context section below. Context – We tested a sample of 40 payroll expense items and found three exceptions. The expense consisted of $1,244 in gross employee wages charged to the federal program for which properly approved supporting documentation for the employee’s pay rate was not available. Total expense charged to the federal program for this employee was $3,945. This is a condition identified per review of the Organization’s controls over compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on Federal Program - U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Florida Department of Health CFDA Number: 10.558 CFDA Name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria – The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowable under federal awards, they must be adequately documented and there must be sufficient documentation. Additionally, CFR Section 200.430 states that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and are supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate and allowable. Condition – During our testing of payroll disbursements, we noted that three of the 40 payroll expenditures (all three relating to one employee) selected for testing did not have a properly approved personnel action form documenting the employee’s approved pay rate. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to in this instance to ensure a properly approved personnel action form was maintained to evidence this cost was allowable and that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging this cost to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect - The lack of sufficient documentation around approved pay rates of employees could lead to either over or under charging the federal program for salary costs. Questioned Costs - There are no questioned costs as the disbursement amount is under the questioned cost threshold. See context section below. Context – We tested a sample of 40 payroll expense items and found three exceptions. The expense consisted of $1,244 in gross employee wages charged to the federal program for which properly approved supporting documentation for the employee’s pay rate was not available. Total expense charged to the federal program for this employee was $3,945. This is a condition identified per review of the Organization’s controls over compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample.

Corrective Action Plan

Management agrees with this finding. A process has been implemented to utilize ADP workflows for personnel action forms to ensure that all employees have a personnel action form documenting approved pay rates.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$3,872,187 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2025 — management decision was due July 24, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$3,147,230 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2024 — management decision was due August 14, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,917,032 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2023 — management decision was due July 11, 2023.

2022-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Information on Federal Program(s) - U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Florida Department of Health CFDA Number: 10.558 CFDA Name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria ? The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowable under Federal awards, they must be adequately documented and there must be sufficient documentation. Additionally, CFR Section 200.430 states that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and are supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate and allowable. Condition ? During our testing of payroll disbursements, we noted that one of the 25 payroll expenditures selected for testing did not have a properly approved personnel action form documenting the employee?s pay rate. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to in this instance to ensure a properly approved personnel action form was maintained to evidence this cost was allowable and that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging this cost to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect - We were unable to confirm the accuracy or completeness of the expense claimed as a federal expenditure. Questioned Costs - There are no questioned costs as the disbursement amount is under the threshold. Context ? We tested a sample of 25 payroll expense items and found one exception. The expense consisted of $262 in gross employee wages charged to the federal program for which properly approved supporting documentation for the employee?s pay rate was not available. Total expense charged to the federal program for this employee was $5,948. This is a condition identified per review of the Organization?s controls over compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Recommendation - We recommend that the Organization review its controls over payroll disbursements to ensure that all employees have a personnel action form to document approved pay rates. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management was aware of the Organization?s manual process to approve and store physical copies of pay rate approval, which placed the Organization at risk of losing proper documentation especially when Management experienced high turnover in Human Resource Department. Beginning in September 2022, the Organization has modified this process to allow managers to virtually approve and store digital copies of pay rate documentation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Information on Federal Program(s) - U.S. Department of Agriculture Passed through Florida Department of Health CFDA Number: 10.558 CFDA Name: Child and Adult Care Food Program Criteria ? The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 200.403(g) states that for costs to be allowable under Federal awards, they must be adequately documented and there must be sufficient documentation. Additionally, CFR Section 200.430 states that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and are supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate and allowable. Condition ? During our testing of payroll disbursements, we noted that one of the 25 payroll expenditures selected for testing did not have a properly approved personnel action form documenting the employee?s pay rate. Cause - Policies and procedures were not appropriately adhered to in this instance to ensure a properly approved personnel action form was maintained to evidence this cost was allowable and that an appropriate level of review and approval was completed prior to charging this cost to a federal program. Effect or Potential Effect - We were unable to confirm the accuracy or completeness of the expense claimed as a federal expenditure. Questioned Costs - There are no questioned costs as the disbursement amount is under the threshold. Context ? We tested a sample of 25 payroll expense items and found one exception. The expense consisted of $262 in gross employee wages charged to the federal program for which properly approved supporting documentation for the employee?s pay rate was not available. Total expense charged to the federal program for this employee was $5,948. This is a condition identified per review of the Organization?s controls over compliance with specified requirements using a statistically valid sample. Recommendation - We recommend that the Organization review its controls over payroll disbursements to ensure that all employees have a personnel action form to document approved pay rates. Views of Responsible Officials ? Management was aware of the Organization?s manual process to approve and store physical copies of pay rate approval, which placed the Organization at risk of losing proper documentation especially when Management experienced high turnover in Human Resource Department. Beginning in September 2022, the Organization has modified this process to allow managers to virtually approve and store digital copies of pay rate documentation.

Corrective Action Plan

Management is in agreement with this finding and was aware of the Organization?s manual process to approve and store physical copies of pay rate approval, which could potentially create risk of losing physical copies. In September 2022, the Organization has modified this process to allow managers to virtually approve and store digital copies of pay rate documentation.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,501,126 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 8, 2021 — management decision was due June 8, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,688,337 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 7, 2020 — management decision was due June 7, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,888,744 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-002
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-001OTHER MATTERS

During the audit process, it was noted that claims for snack reimbursements were not properly reconciled to the related summary of attendance, and therefore the claim form reimbursement requests tested was overstated for the Summer Food Service Program and understated for the After School Meal Program. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs as the amounts overstated for the Summer Food Service Program are under the threshold and the amounts for the After School Meal Program were underfunded and due to the Organization. Context: These conditions were identified through our audit process and communicated to management as identified. Effect: Failure to report the proper number of meals served could result in inaccurate reporting of expenses during a specified period and possible disallowance of funds. Cause: Personnel did not adhere to the reconciliation and review process in relation to this condition. Recommendation: Boys & Girls Clubs should ensure that they remain in compliance with reconciliation and review processes.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-002 Reimbursement Request Calculations Information on Federal Programs: U.S. Department of Agriculture CFDA Number: 10.558 CFDA Name: After School Meal Program Grant Award Number - A-4995 U.S. Department of Agriculture CFDA Number: 10.559 CFDA Name: Summer Food Service Program Criteria: Claim forms for monthly meal reimbursements should be based on attendance records reflecting actual number of meals served. Condition: During the audit process, it was noted that claims for snack reimbursements were not properly reconciled to the related summary of attendance, and therefore the claim form reimbursement requests tested was overstated for the Summer Food Service Program and understated for the After School Meal Program. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs as the amounts overstated for the Summer Food Service Program are under the threshold and the amounts for the After School Meal Program were underfunded and due to the Organization. Context: These conditions were identified through our audit process and communicated to management as identified. Effect: Failure to report the proper number of meals served could result in inaccurate reporting of expenses during a specified period and possible disallowance of funds. Cause: Personnel did not adhere to the reconciliation and review process in relation to this condition. Recommendation: Boys & Girls Clubs should ensure that they remain in compliance with reconciliation and review processes.

Corrective Action Plan

Management has taken the corrective action plan to ensure the accuracy of meals claimed for reimbursement prior to submission by reviewing spreadsheets used to accumulate number of meals served. In addition to review of the spreadsheets, management will also pursue the use of a meal tracker application in place of the paper daily count sheets to reduce the risk of human error and implement a second party internal check to verify that all required information has been properly filled-in by program manager. Anticipated completion: Management will communicate the new policy to program staff in December 2019. However, the meal tracker application for After School Meal Program and Summer Food Service Program will be available in February 2020 and May 2020, respectively.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Cash Management →
2019-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The Organization did not adopt the applicable procurement policies in relation to supplies and services purchased with federal funds during the year ended June 30, 2019. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs as the amounts expended were for allowable costs and activities related to the major programs. Context: These conditions were identified through our audit process and communicated to management as identified. Effect: Failure to adhere to federal procurement policies could result in findings upon review by the funding agency and possible disallowance of future funding. Cause: The Organization did not change its internal procurement policies to adhere to federal policies. Recommendation: The Organization should modify its current procurement policies to adhere to the procurement policies as set forth in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-003 Procurement Policy Information on Federal Programs: U.S. Department of Agriculture CFDA Number: 10.558 CFDA Name: After School Meal Program U.S. Department of Agriculture CFDA Number: 10.559 CFDA Name: Summer Food Service Program Criteria: The Organization should adhere to the federal procurement policies as set forth in the U.S Code of Federal Regulations. Condition: The Organization did not adopt the applicable procurement policies in relation to supplies and services purchased with federal funds during the year ended June 30, 2019. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs as the amounts expended were for allowable costs and activities related to the major programs. Context: These conditions were identified through our audit process and communicated to management as identified. Effect: Failure to adhere to federal procurement policies could result in findings upon review by the funding agency and possible disallowance of future funding. Cause: The Organization did not change its internal procurement policies to adhere to federal policies. Recommendation: The Organization should modify its current procurement policies to adhere to the procurement policies as set forth in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations.

Corrective Action Plan

Management will implement modify its procurement procedures to adhere to the policies as set forth in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. Anticipated completion: Management will communicate a new procurement policy to staff in December 2019. However, management will begin obtaining actual quotes and performing price checks in April 2020.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2018-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,445,919 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2019 — management decision was due July 10, 2019.

2018-001
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,426,335 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2017 — management decision was due June 17, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,731,657 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 8, 2016 — management decision was due June 8, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Florida

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.