EIN: 590684192
UEI: F2MHP2411S74
Audited by: Doeren Mayhew Assurance
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 21, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 21, 2027 (173 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 22, 2025 — management decision was due March 22, 2026.
For the year ended December 31, 2024 we noted that the amounts reported on the PPR and UOA reports for the various goals and measures outlined in the grant agreement did not agree with the accounting records and did not reflect the actual amounts expended by the Credit Union. Specifically for Year 1 of the Period of Performance (April 10, 2023 – December 31, 2024): 1. The amounts reported on the PPR and UOA reports were $129,600 for operational activities (professional services and travel costs), $3,000 for development services, and $1,275,000 for program activities (grants and loan loss reserves). 2. The amounts reflected in the accounting records were $100,000 for operational activities, $2,000 for development services, and $1,025,000 for program activities. 3. During the audit, management noted the actual expenditures should have been $54,600 for operational activities, $3,000 for development services and $1,025,000 for program activities. The differences noted above primarily relate to: A total of $250,000 of federal expenditures was reported as being used for loan loss reserves on the UOA and PPR reports. However, there were no federal expenditures used for loan loss reserves during the period of performance. A total of $125,000 was reported for professional services, however the actual amount was $50,000. Effect or potential effect: Performance goals as stipulated in the grant agreement may not be met or reported inaccurately. Reporting inaccurate information may increase scrutiny by the CDFI over the Credit Union’s grant administration. This may result in losing future funding or potential repayment of grant funds. Recommendation: Establish control procedures to ensure amounts reported on the PPR and UOA reports agree to actual expenditures and reconcile the amounts reported to the accounting records. Questioned costs: None. Views of responsible ocials: Management agrees with the finding and will establish the internal control recommendations outlined above. Additionally, the Credit Union has corrected and resubmitted the PPR and UOA reports which were accepted by the CDFI in August 2025.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-001: Compliance Finding & Material Weakness - Reporting Criteria: Section A of the grant agreement outlines the annual reports required to be submitted by Dade County Federal Credit Union (the Credit Union) to the CDFI which includes the Performance Progress Report (PPR) and the Use of Awards Report (UOA). Section 2A of the grant agreement requires that the Credit Union expend its CDFI ERP Award in eligible activities including program activities, financial services and development services, and operational support activities. Condition: For the year ended December 31, 2024 we noted that the amounts reported on the PPR and UOA reports for the various goals and measures outlined in the grant agreement did not agree with the accounting records and did not reflect the actual amounts expended by the Credit Union. Specifically for Year 1 of the Period of Performance (April 10, 2023 – December 31, 2024): 1. The amounts reported on the PPR and UOA reports were $129,600 for operational activities (professional services and travel costs), $3,000 for development services, and $1,275,000 for program activities (grants and loan loss reserves). 2. The amounts reflected in the accounting records were $100,000 for operational activities, $2,000 for development services, and $1,025,000 for program activities. 3. During the audit, management noted the actual expenditures should have been $54,600 for operational activities, $3,000 for development services and $1,025,000 for program activities. The differences noted above primarily relate to: A total of $250,000 of federal expenditures was reported as being used for loan loss reserves on the UOA and PPR reports. However, there were no federal expenditures used for loan loss reserves during the period of performance. A total of $125,000 was reported for professional services, however the actual amount was $50,000. Effect or potential effect: Performance goals as stipulated in the grant agreement may not be met or reported inaccurately. Reporting inaccurate information may increase scrutiny by the CDFI over the Credit Union’s grant administration. This may result in losing future funding or potential repayment of grant funds. Recommendation: Establish control procedures to ensure amounts reported on the PPR and UOA reports agree to actual expenditures and reconcile the amounts reported to the accounting records. Questioned costs: None. Views of responsible ocials: Management agrees with the finding and will establish the internal control recommendations outlined above. Additionally, the Credit Union has corrected and resubmitted the PPR and UOA reports which were accepted by the CDFI in August 2025.
Management agrees with the finding and will establish the internal control recommendations outlined in the Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs. Additionally, the Credit Union has corrected and resubmitted the PPR and UOA reports which were accepted by the CDFI in August 2025. Internal control procedures will be developed and implemented in December 2025 and the Credit Union has corrected and resubmitted the PPR and UOA reports which were accepted by the CDFI in August 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on August 23, 2023 — management decision was due February 23, 2024.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Florida →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.