EIN: 590603186
UEI: RZH1EL3TNFV8
Audited by: Doeren Mayhew Assurance
Cognizant agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (27 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.
During the testing of the Housing Choice Voucher Program tenant files, we noted two instances in which the Authority incorrectly calculated income for the recertification performed. Questioned costs: $365 Context: Out of 40 files, 2 files contained errors as noted above. Cause: The Authority failed to provide adequate monitoring and oversight to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations. Effect: Over- or underpayment to the landlord. Repeat finding: Yes. Finding number 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority review its quality control processes to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations. Also, we recommend that the Authority hold training for those involved in the eligibility process to ensure that the income reported on the HUD-50558 is supported with proper calculations. View of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with this audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Housing Voucher Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 14.871/14.879 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: FL017 – 2024 Award Period: 7/1/2023-6/30/2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance and Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Most PHAs devise their own application forms that are filled out by the PHA staff during an interview with the tenant. The head of the household signs (a) one or more release forms to allow the PHA to obtain information from third parties; (b) a federally prescribed general release form for employment information; and (c) a privacy notice. Under some circumstances, other members of the family are required to sign these forms (24 CFR sections 5.212 and 5.230). The PHA must do the following: (1) As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family members to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). (2) For both family income examinations and reexaminations, obtain and document in the family file third-party verification of (1) reported family annual income; (2) the value of assets; (3) expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR section 982.516). (3) Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant’s rent payment using the documentation from third-party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 Subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24 CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, and 982.516). (4) Reexamine family income and composition at least once every 12 months and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third-party verification (24 CFR section 982.516). Condition: During the testing of the Housing Choice Voucher Program tenant files, we noted two instances in which the Authority incorrectly calculated income for the recertification performed. Questioned costs: $365 Context: Out of 40 files, 2 files contained errors as noted above. Cause: The Authority failed to provide adequate monitoring and oversight to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations. Effect: Over- or underpayment to the landlord. Repeat finding: Yes. Finding number 2023-001. Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority review its quality control processes to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations. Also, we recommend that the Authority hold training for those involved in the eligibility process to ensure that the income reported on the HUD-50558 is supported with proper calculations. View of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with this audit finding.
Housing Voucher Cluster-Assistance Listing No. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: The Authority should designate an individual to review tenant files to ensure that the income reported on the HUD-50058 is supported with proper calculations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The HACMB will provide enhanced oversight of the tenant files by a Quality Control Specialist to maintain compliance with federal regulations. The Quality Control Specialist will conduct comprehensive reviews of tenant files to confirm the presence of all required documentation and the proper calculations of tenant income. Name( s) of the contact person( s) responsible for corrective action: Suzie Millien, Director of Section 8 - HCV. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: March 31, 2025 If the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan, please contact Michael O'Hara, Executive Director at (305) 532-6401, extension 3020.
2023-001
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.
During the testing of the Housing Choice Voucher Program tenant files, one instance where the housing authority failed to process correct calculation using EIV information was noted as a deficiency. Questioned costs: $540 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 file contained errors as noted above. Cause: The Authority failed to provide adequate monitoring and oversight to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations, as well as their administrative policy. Effect: The Authority does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that units income reported on the HUD-50058 is supported with proper calculations. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority designate an individual to review tenant files to ensure that the income reported on the HUD-50058 is supported with proper calculations. View of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with this audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Housing Choice Voucher Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.871/14.879 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: FL017 and 2022/2023 Award Period: 7/1/22-6/30/23 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Most PHAs devise their own application forms that are filled out by the PHA staff during an interview with the tenant. The head of the household signs (a) one or more release forms to allow the PHA to obtain information from third parties; (b) a federally prescribed general release form for employment information; and (c) a privacy notice. Under some circumstances, other members of the family are required to sign these forms (24 CFR sections 5.212 and 5.230). The PHA must do the following: (1) As a condition of admission or continued occupancy, require the tenant and other family members to provide necessary information, documentation, and releases for the PHA to verify income eligibility (24 CFR sections 5.230, 5.609, and 982.516). (2) For both family income examinations and reexaminations, obtain and document in the family file third party verification of (1) reported family annual income; (2) the value of assets; (3) expenses related to deductions from annual income; and (4) other factors that affect the determination of adjusted income or income-based rent (24 CFR section 982.516). (3) Determine income eligibility and calculate the tenant’s rent payment using the documentation from third party verification in accordance with 24 CFR Part 5 Subpart F (24 CFR section 5.601 et seq.) (24 CFR sections 982.201, 982.515, and 982.516). (4) Reexamine family income and composition at least once every 12 months and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third party verification (24 CFR section 982.516). Condition: During the testing of the Housing Choice Voucher Program tenant files, one instance where the housing authority failed to process correct calculation using EIV information was noted as a deficiency. Questioned costs: $540 Context: Out of 40 files, 1 file contained errors as noted above. Cause: The Authority failed to provide adequate monitoring and oversight to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations, as well as their administrative policy. Effect: The Authority does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that units income reported on the HUD-50058 is supported with proper calculations. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority designate an individual to review tenant files to ensure that the income reported on the HUD-50058 is supported with proper calculations. View of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with this audit finding.
Recommendation: The Authority should designate an individual to review tenant files to ensure that the income reported on the HUD-50058 is supported with proper calculations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The HACMB currently has a Quality Control Coordinator who is designated to review samples of tenant files to ensure compliance. The HACMB has reviewed its Quality Control process for areas of improvement; (1) The Quality Control Coordinator will increase the number of file samples that are undergoing the Quality Control process. (2) The Quality Control Coordinator will hold bimonthly reviews with the specialists to ensure the same standard processes are being followed and to focus on each targeted area that needs assistance the most. The Section 8 staff will be notified of the appropriate action to take regarding any finding in the files. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Suzie Millien, Director of Section 8-HCV. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 3/31/2024.
Of the tenant files provided, auditor noted the following item: One instance where the housing authority could not provide copy of reasonable rent report for a rent increase. Questioned costs: N/A Context: Out of 40 files, 1 file contained errors as noted above. Cause: The Authority failed to provide adequate monitoring and oversight to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations, as well as their administrative policy. Effect: The Authority does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that rent reasonableness is performed for rent increases Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority designate an individual to review tenant files to determine if a rent reasonableness has been performed. View of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with this audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Housing Choice Voucher Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.871/14.879 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: FL017 and 2022/2023 Award Period: 7/1/22-6/30/23 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The PHA must determine that the rent to owner is reasonable at the time of initial leasing. Also, the PHA must determine reasonable rent during the term of the contract: (a) before any increase in the rent to owner, and (b) at the HAP contract anniversary if there is a five percent decrease in the published Fair Market Rent in effect 60 days before the HAP contract anniversary. The PHA must maintain records to document the basis for the determination that rent to owner is a reasonable rent (initially and during the term of the HAP contract) (24 CFR sections 982.4, 982.54(d)(15), 982.158(f)(7), and 982.507). Condition: Of the tenant files provided, auditor noted the following item: One instance where the housing authority could not provide copy of reasonable rent report for a rent increase. Questioned costs: N/A Context: Out of 40 files, 1 file contained errors as noted above. Cause: The Authority failed to provide adequate monitoring and oversight to ensure compliance with HUD rules and regulations, as well as their administrative policy. Effect: The Authority does not have adequate procedures in place to ensure that rent reasonableness is performed for rent increases Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Authority designate an individual to review tenant files to determine if a rent reasonableness has been performed. View of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with this audit finding.
Recommendation: The Authority should designate an individual to review tenant files to determine if a rent reasonableness has been performed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The HACMB currently has a Quality Control Coordinator who is designated to review samples of tenant files to ensure compliance. The HACMB has reviewed its Quality Control process for areas of improvement; (1) The Quality Control Coordinator will increase the number of file samples that are undergoing the Quality Control process. (2) The Quality Control Coordinator will hold bimonthly reviews with the specialists to ensure the same standard processes are being followed and to focus on retaining the supporting document in the files. The Section 8 staff will be notified of the appropriate action to take regarding any finding in the files. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Suzie Millien Director of Section 8-HCV Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 3/31/2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.
During our testing, we noted the Authority did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure overpayments were not made to units that failed inspections. Context: During our testing of 40 files for failed inspection criteria, we noted the following: - One file tested was not properly abated after the unit failed the second inspection. The sample was a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: $15,677 Cause: The Authority experienced high level of staff turnover and staff absences due to the pandemic which resulted in this inspection not be conducted. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD regulations. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Authority should review their process for monitoring failed inspections and ensuring that proper abatement occurs on a timely basis. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with this audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Title: Housing Choice Voucher Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.871/14.879 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: FL017 and 2021/2022 Award Period: 7/1/21-6/30/22 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: 24 CFR sections 982.158(d) and 982.404 state that for units under HAP contract that fail to meet HQS, the PHA must require the owner to correct any life threatening HQS Deficiencies within 24 hours after the inspections and all other HQS deficiencies within 30 calendar days or within a specified PHA-approved extension. If the owner does not correct the cited HAQ deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must stop (abate) HAPs beginning no later than the first of the month following the specified correction period or must terminate the HAP contract. The owner is not responsible for a breach of HQS as a result of the family's failure to pay for utilities for which the family is responsible under the lease or for tenant damage. For family-caused defects, if the family does not correct the cited HQS deficiencies within the specified correction period, the PHA must take prompt and vigorous action to enforce the family obligations. Condition: During our testing, we noted the Authority did not have adequate internal controls designed to ensure overpayments were not made to units that failed inspections. Context: During our testing of 40 files for failed inspection criteria, we noted the following: - One file tested was not properly abated after the unit failed the second inspection. The sample was a statistically valid sample. Questioned Costs: $15,677 Cause: The Authority experienced high level of staff turnover and staff absences due to the pandemic which resulted in this inspection not be conducted. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with HUD regulations. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The Authority should review their process for monitoring failed inspections and ensuring that proper abatement occurs on a timely basis. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with this audit finding.
2022-001 Housing Voucher Cluster-Assistance Listing No. 14.871/14.879 Recommendation: The Authority should review their process for monitoring failed inspections and ensuring that proper abatement occurs on a timely basis. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Authority has reviewed its updated HOS policies, including its HOS enforcement policies. The PHA will utilize the feature of our current Software (Emphasys Elite) that will automatically place the unit into abatement upon the unit resulting in two consecutive failed inspections. The Section 8- Special Projects Supervisor will review the report biweekly to ensure that all failed units have been placed on abatement. The Section 8- Special Projects Supervisor will notify all HCV staff of the appropriate action to take regarding abated units. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Suzie Millien, Section 8-HCV Supervisor. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 3/31/2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2022 — management decision was due December 29, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2021 — management decision was due October 1, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2020 — management decision was due September 19, 2020.
Out of a total tenant population of approximately 2,300; 44 files were tested and 6 files were found to have the following 4 deficiencies: ? Three files were missing a date on the 9886 form ? One file was missing a 214 form ? One file had an incorrect income calculation ? One file had an incorrect income deduction calculation for out of pocket medical expenses Context: The auditor randomly selected 44 tenants out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size, for testing tenant files for eligibility. The auditor reviewed the tenant file and support to ensure controls over compliance were operating effectively. Criteria: The Authority?s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding complete and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced a high turnover of housing specialists during the audited period. It was determined through the quality assurance process that employees whose performance was not in compliance with established internal policies and procedures had to be replaced. New staff members were being trained on the established policies and procedures during the audited period. Effect: The Authority identified certain areas of the HCV Program that were out of compliance with HUD requirements. Auditor?s Recommendations: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and perform reviews of the remaining files, for consideration of similar errors. In addition, the Authority should establish quality control review procedures to ensure proper monitoring of compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-001 Eligibility U.S. Department of HUD Housing Choice Voucher Cluster Other matter required to be reported in accordance with Uniform Guidance Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 2,300; 44 files were tested and 6 files were found to have the following 4 deficiencies: ? Three files were missing a date on the 9886 form ? One file was missing a 214 form ? One file had an incorrect income calculation ? One file had an incorrect income deduction calculation for out of pocket medical expenses Context: The auditor randomly selected 44 tenants out of the population, which we consider to be a statistically valid sample size, for testing tenant files for eligibility. The auditor reviewed the tenant file and support to ensure controls over compliance were operating effectively. Criteria: The Authority?s Administrative Plan and 24 CFR 982.516 requires internal controls to be in place to ensure proper procedures are being followed in compliance with HUD requirements regarding complete and accurate tenant files. Cause: The Authority experienced a high turnover of housing specialists during the audited period. It was determined through the quality assurance process that employees whose performance was not in compliance with established internal policies and procedures had to be replaced. New staff members were being trained on the established policies and procedures during the audited period. Effect: The Authority identified certain areas of the HCV Program that were out of compliance with HUD requirements. Auditor?s Recommendations: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and perform reviews of the remaining files, for consideration of similar errors. In addition, the Authority should establish quality control review procedures to ensure proper monitoring of compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. View of Responsible Officials: See Corrective Action Plan.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN March 5, 2020 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development The Housing Authority of the City of Miami Beach respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2019. Berman Hopkins Wright & LaHam, CPAs and Associates, LLP 8035 Spyglass Hill Road Melbourne, FL 32940 Audit period: July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019 FINDINGS - FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT 2019-001 Eligibility U.S. Department of HUD Housing Choice Voucher Cluster Other matter required to be reported in accordance with Uniform Guidance Condition: Out of a total tenant population of approximately 3,400; 44 files were tested and 6 files were found to have the following 4 deficiencies: ? Three files were missing a date on the 9886 form ? One file was missing a 214 form, ? One file had an incorrect income calculation, ? One file had an incorrect income deduction calculation for out of pocket medical expenses, Auditor's Recommendations: The Authority should correct the deficiencies noted in the tested files and perform reviews of the remaining files, for consideration of similar errors. In addition, the Authority should establish quality control review procedures to ensure proper monitoring of compliance with the requirements related to tenant eligibility. Action Taken: The Authority has corrected the deficiencies noted in the tested files. On a quarterly basis, all staff members are trained on proper procedures, as well as oversights identified in our quality control process. The Authority has enhanced its current quality control review process. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan, please Tl Anthony Hernandez, Director of Section 8 HCV at (305) 532-6401. Miguell Del Campillo, Executive Director
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019 — management decision was due September 27, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2018 — management decision was due September 27, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2017 — management decision was due September 23, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Florida →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.