EIN: 586021362
UEI: ZN3FCLDSXKR3
Audited by: Smith Marion & Co
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 2, 2026 (29 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Criteria Per 24 CFR 200.05, Housing Authorities are to minimize the time federal funds are drawn down to expenditure. Additionally 24 CFR 905.310 states that PHA shall initiate a fund requisition from HUD only when funds are due and payable, unless HUD approves another payment schedule. Condition Management did not follow the 3 day rule. Context During the fiscal year, management drew down CFP funds to provide funding to improve Public Housing. They had an invoice from a supplier, but discovered an issue with the invoice after the voucher had been submitted and the funds had been deposited into the Authority's bank account. Due to the invoice issue, management did not pay the invoice within 3 days. Cause Management did not review and verify the invoice before requesting a draw from the Capital Fund Program. Effect The Authority is not in compliance with Cash Management rules relating to the Capital Fund Program. Recommendations The Authority creates internal controls to ensure invoices are correct before requesting funds from the Capital Fund Program. Questioned Costs None Management Views Management Agrees
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria Per 24 CFR 200.05, Housing Authorities are to minimize the time federal funds are drawn down to expenditure. Additionally 24 CFR 905.310 states that PHA shall initiate a fund requisition from HUD only when funds are due and payable, unless HUD approves another payment schedule. Condition Management did not follow the 3 day rule. Context During the fiscal year, management drew down CFP funds to provide funding to improve Public Housing. They had an invoice from a supplier, but discovered an issue with the invoice after the voucher had been submitted and the funds had been deposited into the Authority's bank account. Due to the invoice issue, management did not pay the invoice within 3 days. Cause Management did not review and verify the invoice before requesting a draw from the Capital Fund Program. Effect The Authority is not in compliance with Cash Management rules relating to the Capital Fund Program. Recommendations The Authority creates internal controls to ensure invoices are correct before requesting funds from the Capital Fund Program. Questioned Costs None Management Views Management Agrees
Finding 2025-001: Capital Fund Program – Cash Management Reference to Audit Report: Auditors noted that the Authority did not comply with HUD’s 3‑day rule for expenditure of drawdowns. Cause: Invoices were not fully verified before requesting drawdowns. Effect: Funds were drawn down before being payable, resulting in noncompliance with HUD cash management rules. Corrective Action Plan: -Implement an invoice verification checklist prior to drawdowns. -Require dual sign‑off by the Executive Director and Director of Administration/Finance. -Adopt a drawdown timing policy to ensure funds are requisitioned only when invoices are ready for payment. -Maintain a drawdown log and conduct quarterly compliance reviews. Responsible Parties: -Executive Director – oversight and approval. -Director of Administration/Finance – verification and processing. Timeline: -30 days: Checklist and dual sign‑off implemented. -60 days: Staff training completed. -Ongoing: Quarterly reviews. Questioned Costs: None. Management Views: Management agrees.
2025-002 Utilities Allowance Calcuation Criteria "In accordance with the 2014 Appropriations Act Section 242, the utility allowance for a family shall be the lower of: (1) The utility allowance amount for the family unit size; or (2) the utility allowance amount for the unit size of the unit rented by the family. However, upon the request of a family that includes a person with disabilities, the PHA must approve a utility allowance higher than the applicable amount if such a higher utility allowance is needed as a reasonable accommodation in accordance with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 8 to make the program accessible to and usable by the family member with a disability. This provision applies only to vouchers issued after the effective date of this notice (June 12, 2014) and to current program participants. For current program participants, a PHA must implement the new allowance at the family's next annual reexamination, provided that the PHA is able to provide a family with at least 60 days' notice prior to the reexamination. " Condition During the audit, we noted multiple HUD Forms 50058 had utility allowances calculated not in accordance with the above criteria. Context Due to a software issue 14 of the 40 vouchers we tested did not have the correct Utility Allowance. Cause Procedures to ensure that the appropriate utility allowance was note adhered to on a consistent basis. Effect Tenant payments due to landlords were incorrectly calculated, HAP payments incorrectly calculated. Recommendations Management should review tenant files to ensure that the appropriate utility allowance is used for the type of unit under contract. Questioned Costs None Management Views Management Agrees
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2025-002 Utilities Allowance Calcuation Criteria "In accordance with the 2014 Appropriations Act Section 242, the utility allowance for a family shall be the lower of: (1) The utility allowance amount for the family unit size; or (2) the utility allowance amount for the unit size of the unit rented by the family. However, upon the request of a family that includes a person with disabilities, the PHA must approve a utility allowance higher than the applicable amount if such a higher utility allowance is needed as a reasonable accommodation in accordance with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 8 to make the program accessible to and usable by the family member with a disability. This provision applies only to vouchers issued after the effective date of this notice (June 12, 2014) and to current program participants. For current program participants, a PHA must implement the new allowance at the family's next annual reexamination, provided that the PHA is able to provide a family with at least 60 days' notice prior to the reexamination. " Condition During the audit, we noted multiple HUD Forms 50058 had utility allowances calculated not in accordance with the above criteria. Context Due to a software issue 14 of the 40 vouchers we tested did not have the correct Utility Allowance. Cause Procedures to ensure that the appropriate utility allowance was note adhered to on a consistent basis. Effect Tenant payments due to landlords were incorrectly calculated, HAP payments incorrectly calculated. Recommendations Management should review tenant files to ensure that the appropriate utility allowance is used for the type of unit under contract. Questioned Costs None Management Views Management Agrees
Finding 2025-002: Housing Choice Voucher Program – Utility Allowance Reference to Audit Report: Auditors found that utility allowances on HUD Form 50058 were not consistently calculated in accordance with Section 242 of the 2014 Appropriations Act. Cause: Software errors and inconsistent application of procedures. Effect: Tenant payments and Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) were incorrectly calculated. Corrective Action Plan: -Work with software vendor to correct calculation errors. -Conduct a review of tenant files and make adjustments where necessary. -Update internal procedures to require verification of utility allowance at annual reexaminations. -Provide refresher training to program staff. -Perform quarterly spot checks of HUD Form 50058 entries. Responsible Parties: -Executive Director – oversight and compliance. -Program Manager – staff training, file review, and monitoring. Timeline: -30 days: Correct software issue and begin file review. -60 days: Complete file review and training. -Ongoing: Quarterly monitoring. Questioned Costs: None. Management Views: Management agrees. Conclusion The College Park Authority acknowledges both findings and has established corrective action plans with clear responsibilities, timelines, and monitoring procedures to ensure compliance with HUD regulations and prevent recurrence.
FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2025 — management decision was due July 23, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on November 30, 2023 — management decision was due May 30, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on November 25, 2022 — management decision was due May 25, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2022 — management decision was due September 7, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on September 15, 2021 — management decision was due March 15, 2022.
The Authority did not provide the tenant participation funds to its resident councils. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority?s resident councils were not provided available funding to encourage tenant participation. Cause: The Authority did not ensure that proper transfers were made to its duly elected resident councils. Recommendation: The Authority should ensure that each year $15 per unit should be provided to its duly resident councils under written agreement. The Authority should also ensure that the resident councils establish its own budget and verify expenditures by the resident council are made in accordance with its approved budget. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that funding is made available to each resident council that is established.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-002 Resident participation funds were not provided to duly elected resident council (CFDA14.850) Criteria: Per CFR Section 964.150, the Authority is required to provide $15 per unit per year to its duly elected resident council to fund tenant participation activities. Condition: The Authority did not provide the tenant participation funds to its resident councils. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority?s resident councils were not provided available funding to encourage tenant participation. Cause: The Authority did not ensure that proper transfers were made to its duly elected resident councils. Recommendation: The Authority should ensure that each year $15 per unit should be provided to its duly resident councils under written agreement. The Authority should also ensure that the resident councils establish its own budget and verify expenditures by the resident council are made in accordance with its approved budget. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that funding is made available to each resident council that is established.
Resident participation funds were not provided to duly elected resident council We will implement procedures whereby funds are provided to resident councils to encourage tenant participation. Date of completion: Ongoing
2019-002
The Authority did not have its Board of Commisioners approve its fiscal year 2020 operating budget until July 23, 2019. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not comply with 24 CFR 990.315. Cause: The Authority did not present its operating budget to its Board of Commissioners for approval until July 23, 2019. Recommendation: The Authority should establish a process whereby the operating budget is prepared and presented to the Authority?s Board of Commissioners before the beginning of its fiscal year. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that operating budgets are prepared and presented to the Authority?s Board of Commissioners for approval before the beginning of the Authority?s fiscal year
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-003 Operating Budget Not approved by Board of Commissioners Before Beginning of Fiscal Year (Public Housing Program CFDA 14.850) Criteria: Under Section 11 of the Annual Contributions Contract (ACC) and 24 CFR 990.315, the Authority is required to prepare and approve its Public Housing Operating Budget before any operating expenses are incurred in the start of the Authority?s fiscal year. Condition: The Authority did not have its Board of Commisioners approve its fiscal year 2020 operating budget until July 23, 2019. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not comply with 24 CFR 990.315. Cause: The Authority did not present its operating budget to its Board of Commissioners for approval until July 23, 2019. Recommendation: The Authority should establish a process whereby the operating budget is prepared and presented to the Authority?s Board of Commissioners before the beginning of its fiscal year. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that operating budgets are prepared and presented to the Authority?s Board of Commissioners for approval before the beginning of the Authority?s fiscal year
Operating Budget Not approved by Board of Commissioners Before Beginning of Fiscal Year We will implement controls to ensure that operating budgets are approved by the Board of Commissioners before the beginning of the Authority?s fiscal year. Date of completion: April 28, 2020
2019-003
During the year, the Authority had one Operations draw from CFP 2019 in the amount of $122,196. The Operations draw was made after amounts were reported as obligated in ELOCCS. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not properly follow the requirements of CFR ? 905.314 (l). Cause: The Authority did not have an adequate understanding of the Capital Fund Program requirements as related to Operations Budget Line Item 1406 draws. Recommendation: The Authority?s staff should familiarize themselves with Capital Fund Program reporting requirements. Management Response: Management will ensure that future 1406 Operations draws will be made before amounts are reported as obligated.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-004 Noncompliance with Special Tests and Provisions (Public Housing Capital Fund CFDA 14.872) Criteria: Federal Code of Regulations, CFR ? 905.314 (l) requires the Authority to first drawdown Budget Line item 1406 Operations before amounts are obligated. Condition: During the year, the Authority had one Operations draw from CFP 2019 in the amount of $122,196. The Operations draw was made after amounts were reported as obligated in ELOCCS. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not properly follow the requirements of CFR ? 905.314 (l). Cause: The Authority did not have an adequate understanding of the Capital Fund Program requirements as related to Operations Budget Line Item 1406 draws. Recommendation: The Authority?s staff should familiarize themselves with Capital Fund Program reporting requirements. Management Response: Management will ensure that future 1406 Operations draws will be made before amounts are reported as obligated.
Noncompliance with Special Tests and Provisions (Public Housing Capital Fund CFDA 14.872) We will ensure all future CFP 1406 Operations Draws are made before amounts are reported as Obligated in ELOCCS. Date of completion: Ongoing
2019-004
The Authority did not conduct annual recertifications for 4 out of the 25 Public Housing files and 1 out of 25 Housing Choice Voucher files selected for review. These annual recertifications were not completed as of May 31, 2021. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with CFR 24 Section 960.27 and could have improperly charged tenants for incorrect amount of rent during the audit period. Cause: The Authority did not ensure that annual recertifications were performed for all tenants by the end of the waiver period of December 31, 2020. Recommendation: The Authority should ensure that all tenants? family income and household composition reexamination is performed annually. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that reexamination of family income and composition occurs at least annually and must make appropriate adjustments in the rent of each tenant in the Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher programs.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020-005 Annual tenant reexamination of family income and composition to determine eligibility not performed (CFDA14.850 and CFDA 14.871) Criteria: Per CFR 24 Section 960.257, the Authority is required to conduct reexamination of family income and composition at least annually and must make appropriate adjustments in the rent after consultation with the family and upon verification of the information. Per HUD Notice 2020-05, the Authority was granted a waiver to conduct annual reexaminations of family income and composition until December 31, 2020. Condition: The Authority did not conduct annual recertifications for 4 out of the 25 Public Housing files and 1 out of 25 Housing Choice Voucher files selected for review. These annual recertifications were not completed as of May 31, 2021. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority is not in compliance with CFR 24 Section 960.27 and could have improperly charged tenants for incorrect amount of rent during the audit period. Cause: The Authority did not ensure that annual recertifications were performed for all tenants by the end of the waiver period of December 31, 2020. Recommendation: The Authority should ensure that all tenants? family income and household composition reexamination is performed annually. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that reexamination of family income and composition occurs at least annually and must make appropriate adjustments in the rent of each tenant in the Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher programs.
Annual tenant reexamination of family income and composition to determine eligibility not performed (CFDA14.850 and CFDA 14.871) We will implement controls to ensure that reexamination of family income and composition occurs at least annually and must make appropriate adjustments in the rent of each tenant in the Public Housing and Housing Choice Voucher programs. Date of completion: Ongoing
FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2020 — management decision was due September 25, 2020.
The Authority did not provide the tenant participation funds to its resident councils. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority?s resident councils were not provided available funding to encourage tenant participation. Cause: The Authority did not ensure that proper transfers were made to its duly elected resident councils. Recommendation: The Authority should ensure that each year $15 per unit should be provided to its duly resident councils under written agreement. The Authority should also ensure that the resident councils establish its own budget and verify expenditures by the resident council are made in accordance with its approved budget. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that funding is made available to each resident council that is established.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-002 Resident participation funds were not provided to duly elected resident council (CFDA14.850) Criteria: Per CFR Section 964.150, the Authority is required to provide $15 per unit per year to its duly elected resident council to fund tenant participation activities. Condition: The Authority did not provide the tenant participation funds to its resident councils. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority?s resident councils were not provided available funding to encourage tenant participation. Cause: The Authority did not ensure that proper transfers were made to its duly elected resident councils. Recommendation: The Authority should ensure that each year $15 per unit should be provided to its duly resident councils under written agreement. The Authority should also ensure that the resident councils establish its own budget and verify expenditures by the resident council are made in accordance with its approved budget. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that funding is made available to each resident council that is established.
2019-002 Resident participation funds were not provided to duly elected resident council We will implement procedures whereby funds are provided to resident councils to encourage tenant participation. Date of completion: Ongoing
The Authority did not have its Board of Commisioners approved its fiscal year 2019 operating budget until July 24, 2018. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not comply with 24 CFR 990.315. Cause: The Authority did not present its operating budget to its Board of Commissioners for approval until July 24, 2018. Recommendation: The Authority should establish a process whereby the operating budget is prepared and presented to the Authority?s Board of Commissioners before the beginning of its fiscal year. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that operating budgets are prepared and presented to the Authority?s Board of Commissioners for approval before the beginning of the Authority?s fiscal year.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-003 Operating Budget Not approved by Board of Commissioners Before Beginning of Fiscal Year (Public Housing Program CFDA 14.850) Criteria: Under Section 11 of the Annual Contributions Contract (ACC) and 24 CFR 990.315, the Authority is required to prepare and approve its Public Housing Operating Budget before any operating expenses are incurred in the start of the Authority?s fiscal year. Condition: The Authority did not have its Board of Commisioners approved its fiscal year 2019 operating budget until July 24, 2018. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not comply with 24 CFR 990.315. Cause: The Authority did not present its operating budget to its Board of Commissioners for approval until July 24, 2018. Recommendation: The Authority should establish a process whereby the operating budget is prepared and presented to the Authority?s Board of Commissioners before the beginning of its fiscal year. Management Response: We will implement controls to ensure that operating budgets are prepared and presented to the Authority?s Board of Commissioners for approval before the beginning of the Authority?s fiscal year.
2019-003 Operating Budget Not approved by Board of Commissioners Before Beginning of Fiscal Year We will implement controls to ensure that operating budgets are approved by the Board of Commissioners before the beginning of the Authority?s fiscal year. Date of completion: Ongoing
During the year, the Authority had one Operations draw from CFP 2018 in the amount of $127,660. The Operations draw was made after amounts were reported as obligated in ELOCCS. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not properly follow the requirements of CFR ? 905.314 (l). Cause: The Authority did not have an adequate understanding of the Capital Fund Program requirements as related to Operations Budget Line Item 1406 draws. Recommendation: The Authority?s staff should familiarize themselves with Capital Fund Program reporting requirements. Management Response: Management will ensure that future 1406 Operations draws will be made before amounts are reported as obligated.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-004 Noncompliance with Special Tests and Provisions (Public Housing Capital Fund CFDA 14.872) Criteria: Federal Code of Regulations, CFR ? 905.314 (l) requires the Authority to first drawdown Budget Line item 1406 Operations before amounts are obligated. Condition: During the year, the Authority had one Operations draw from CFP 2018 in the amount of $127,660. The Operations draw was made after amounts were reported as obligated in ELOCCS. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Authority did not properly follow the requirements of CFR ? 905.314 (l). Cause: The Authority did not have an adequate understanding of the Capital Fund Program requirements as related to Operations Budget Line Item 1406 draws. Recommendation: The Authority?s staff should familiarize themselves with Capital Fund Program reporting requirements. Management Response: Management will ensure that future 1406 Operations draws will be made before amounts are reported as obligated.
2019-004 Noncompliance with Special Tests and Provisions (Public Housing Capital Fund CFDA 14.872) We will ensure all future CFP 1406 Operations Draws are made before amounts are reported as Obligated in ELOCCS. Date of completion: Ongoing
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019 — management decision was due September 27, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-002
FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2018 — management decision was due September 19, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2017 — management decision was due September 29, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Georgia →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.