City of Social Circle, GALocal Government

EIN: 586000665

UEI: GML8R2P1GWU9

Audited by: Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC

Oversight agency: 66 [Environmental Protection Agency]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

City of Social Circle, GA5 audit years1 findings
5
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$3,637,160 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 5, 2026 (55 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

During our testing of the City’s major federal programs, it was discovered that two (2) of the same expenditures were drawn and/or charged to two separate funding sources: the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) duplicated expenditures drawn on the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF). While each grantor has its own internal auditing of payments requested and sent to the City, the different grantors would not necessarily know if an expenditure was drawn from a different grant than those under its purview. Context/Cause: In the current fiscal year, the City utilized two federal funding sources to supplement project costs within its Water and Sewer Fund. An error occurred in tracking draws and costs charged to the project amongst the funding sources. Effects: As a result, the City recorded more funding than expended within the ARPA Fund and the SEFA. A net audit adjustment for $168,743 was required to accurately report CSLFRF revenues and expenditures within the ARPA Fund and on the SEFA. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs amounted to $168,743. Recommendation: We recommend the City’s Finance Department implement and/or strengthen internal controls surrounding the review of draws and implement procedures, such as designation of an individual within the City with the responsibility to oversee all program draw requests to ensure that no amounts are duplicated and submitted to the grant agencies. Auditee’s Response: We concur with the finding. The City will ensure that controls are in place to prevent recording duplicate expenditures

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Duplicate Draws of Expenditures Identification of Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – Assistance Listing No. 21.027. Criteria: Uniform Guidance (Subpart E, §200.403) requires that costs not be included as a cost of any other federally financed program. Condition: During our testing of the City’s major federal programs, it was discovered that two (2) of the same expenditures were drawn and/or charged to two separate funding sources: the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (CSLFRF) duplicated expenditures drawn on the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF). While each grantor has its own internal auditing of payments requested and sent to the City, the different grantors would not necessarily know if an expenditure was drawn from a different grant than those under its purview. Context/Cause: In the current fiscal year, the City utilized two federal funding sources to supplement project costs within its Water and Sewer Fund. An error occurred in tracking draws and costs charged to the project amongst the funding sources. Effects: As a result, the City recorded more funding than expended within the ARPA Fund and the SEFA. A net audit adjustment for $168,743 was required to accurately report CSLFRF revenues and expenditures within the ARPA Fund and on the SEFA. Questioned Costs: Known questioned costs amounted to $168,743. Recommendation: We recommend the City’s Finance Department implement and/or strengthen internal controls surrounding the review of draws and implement procedures, such as designation of an individual within the City with the responsibility to oversee all program draw requests to ensure that no amounts are duplicated and submitted to the grant agencies. Auditee’s Response: We concur with the finding. The City will ensure that controls are in place to prevent recording duplicate expenditures

Corrective Action Plan

Name of the Contact Person Responsible for the Corrective Action Plan: Toni Jo Howard, Finance Director. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2026. Corrective Action Plan: The City will ensure that controls are in place to prevent recording duplicate expenditures

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,321,236 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 28, 2025 — management decision was due October 28, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$927,304 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2024 — management decision was due August 27, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$1,225,317 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2023 — management decision was due September 28, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$1,681,341 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2022 — management decision was due August 3, 2022.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.