← Back to home

Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest LouisianaNon-Profit

EIN: 581711612

UEI: QVNDEMJQ3GD5

Audit also covers EIN: 871090202 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: EisnerAmper LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana2 audit years2 findings
2
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-09-30

$2,388,629 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2025 (335 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

BRF did not submit the annual FFR report covering the period October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024 by the submission deadline. The annual FFR had a submission deadline of December 28, 2024 (90 days after end of the reporting period). Cause: BRF lacks an established control monitoring timely submission of annual FFR reports. Effect: Failure to comply with the reporting requirement may result in: deferral or additional restriction of future funding decisions, restrictions being placed on the Entity’s PMS account, or denial of future funding by the Department of Health and Human Services. Questions Costs: None. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Entity should establish a formalized control to monitor timely submission of reports. Management’s Response: BRF concurs with the observation and will implement procedures on new grants in the future.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Department of Health and Human Services set the criteria for annual Federal Financial Reports (FFR). These reports are due annually or upon the completion of the project. The annual FFR reports must be submitted and reviewed within a 90-day period based upon the end of the Entity’s reporting period. Reports should be supported by applicable accounting and performance records. Universe/Population: The total population was the annual Federal Financial Report (FFR) covering the consecutive 12-month budget period, required to be reported through the Payment Management System (PMS). EisnerAmper selected the one annual FFR report for testing of compliance requirements applicable to the program. Condition: BRF did not submit the annual FFR report covering the period October 1, 2023 – September 30, 2024 by the submission deadline. The annual FFR had a submission deadline of December 28, 2024 (90 days after end of the reporting period). Cause: BRF lacks an established control monitoring timely submission of annual FFR reports. Effect: Failure to comply with the reporting requirement may result in: deferral or additional restriction of future funding decisions, restrictions being placed on the Entity’s PMS account, or denial of future funding by the Department of Health and Human Services. Questions Costs: None. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Entity should establish a formalized control to monitor timely submission of reports. Management’s Response: BRF concurs with the observation and will implement procedures on new grants in the future.

Corrective Action Plan

BRF, LLC believed it was in compliance with federal reporting guidelines and internal policies in the reporting of federal funds as BRF was in communication with the reporting agency regarding late submission and received guidance that submission late was understandable due to the federal holiday schedule and federal reporting system technical issues. BRF, LLC will implement the following corrective action: Educate its employees to request and receive formal extension letter for reporting period timelines if technical issues arise with a reporting portal. Michael Mazur, CFO, is responsible for completing the corrective action plan. The Corrective Action Plan has already been communicated with employees and will be recommunicated with employees before September 30, 2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2021-09-30

$775,342 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 2, 2022 — management decision was due November 2, 2022.

2021-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

While testing compliance with the Federal procurement regulations, 2 vendors were identified with expenditures greater than $10,000 and less than $250,000 and testing was performed relating to the documentation to support the procurement process. The vendors provided goods and technical services during year ended September 30, 2021. Compliance testing focused on the proper awarding of the contracts to determine compliance with the procurement regulations. The contracts totaled $83,907. There was no documentation maintained to demonstrate that quotes and prices were obtained for 1 of the 2 vendors in accordance with Federal procurement regulations. Cause: Due to the time constraints involved with converting to a remote learning environment personnel administering the grants did not execute and enforce BRF's purchasing policy containing the Uniform Guidance requirements, specifically maintaining adequate documentation to support compliance with procurement of goods and services. Effect: BRF is not in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance Procurement regulations or BRF policies. Questioned Costs: None Universe/Population Size: The total universe considered to be all vendors of BRF whose transactions for the year ended September 30, 2021, exceeded the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. Based on these requirements, the total universe is 2 vendors totaling $83,907. This is also considered the population size. Sample Size: The total universe/population size of two (2) vendors was selected for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that BRF reinforce with its personnel the need to fully follow its policies and procedures for purchases made with federal awards so that federal procurement regulations are followed. Repeat Finding: No

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Uniform Guidance federal regulations were fully effective as of December 26, 2017. The regulations (200.320) require, among other things, that procurement for small purchases of goods and services in an amount between the $10,000 to $250,000, follow the small purchase procedures and obtain an adequate number of prices\quotes be obtained. Condition: While testing compliance with the Federal procurement regulations, 2 vendors were identified with expenditures greater than $10,000 and less than $250,000 and testing was performed relating to the documentation to support the procurement process. The vendors provided goods and technical services during year ended September 30, 2021. Compliance testing focused on the proper awarding of the contracts to determine compliance with the procurement regulations. The contracts totaled $83,907. There was no documentation maintained to demonstrate that quotes and prices were obtained for 1 of the 2 vendors in accordance with Federal procurement regulations. Cause: Due to the time constraints involved with converting to a remote learning environment personnel administering the grants did not execute and enforce BRF's purchasing policy containing the Uniform Guidance requirements, specifically maintaining adequate documentation to support compliance with procurement of goods and services. Effect: BRF is not in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance Procurement regulations or BRF policies. Questioned Costs: None Universe/Population Size: The total universe considered to be all vendors of BRF whose transactions for the year ended September 30, 2021, exceeded the micro-purchase threshold of $10,000. Based on these requirements, the total universe is 2 vendors totaling $83,907. This is also considered the population size. Sample Size: The total universe/population size of two (2) vendors was selected for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that BRF reinforce with its personnel the need to fully follow its policies and procedures for purchases made with federal awards so that federal procurement regulations are followed. Repeat Finding: No

Corrective Action Plan

2021-001) Procurement BRF believed it was in compliance with federal procurement guidelines and internal policies in the acquisition of technical services due to a recommendation of the vendor from an independent public educational institution an its need for timely completion. Management will implement the following corrective action steps: 1) Management will provide education and has provided education subsequent to fiscal year end to its personnel regarding federal procurement guidelines and internal policies. 2) Management will explore technology based solutions to continually remind and educate personnel about requirements for procurement under federal guidelines and internal policies and required documentation.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Louisiana

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.