EIN: 581026695
UEI: KB5RHNPHRXZ6
Audited by: HCT Certified Public Accountants and Consultants, LLC
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 14, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on July 22, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 22, 2027 (129 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2024 — management decision was due February 13, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on July 27, 2022 — management decision was due January 27, 2023.
Of the 13 transactions examined for a line item, ten expenditures were not budgeted. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget. The additional expenditure exceeded the line-item budget. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $1,923. This is the total of the ten invoices found to have been paid from unbudgeted line items. Context: Of the 13 transactions, we examined 13, and found ten instances of noncompliance. Excess of the budgeted line item. Recommendation: The program director should adhere to the detailed line-item budget. Requests for approval of expenditures not approved on the line-item budget should be submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture prior to expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Agriculture Direct Program Program Name: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) CFDA#?s: 10.025 Award No. and Year: 19-1001-0774-CA (2018 - 2019) Compliance Requirements: Allowable Cost /Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: In accordance with 2CFR200, expenditures reimbursed with grant funds must be approved in the line-item budget of the grant. Condition: Of the 13 transactions examined for a line item, ten expenditures were not budgeted. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget. The additional expenditure exceeded the line-item budget. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $1,923. This is the total of the ten invoices found to have been paid from unbudgeted line items. Context: Of the 13 transactions, we examined 13, and found ten instances of noncompliance. Excess of the budgeted line item. Recommendation: The program director should adhere to the detailed line-item budget. Requests for approval of expenditures not approved on the line-item budget should be submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture prior to expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services ? CFDA No. 10.025 Material Weakness: See Finding 2020-001 Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to obtain prior written approval from the U.S> Department of Agriculture for budget modification prior to incurring expenditures. Action Taken: We concur with the recommendation and implemented the recommendation immediately upon becoming aware of the 2020 audit engagement issues. We engaged with a certified public accounting firm to assist staff with our future grants and contracts accounting and reporting needs. The firm is experienced and knowledgeable of not-for-profit financial accounting, Uniform Guidance, grants and contracts, reimbursement reports, drawdowns and other related accounting matters and applicable standards.
Of the 49 transactions examined for a line item, twenty-one expenditures were not budgeted. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget. The additional expenditure exceeded the line-item budget. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $19,541. This is the total of the twenty-one invoices found to have been paid from unbudgeted line items. Context: Of the 49 transactions, we examined 49, and found twenty-one instances of noncompliance. Excess of the budgeted line item. Recommendation: The program director should adhere to the detailed line-item budget. Requests for approval of expenditures not approved on the line-item budget should be submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture prior to expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Agriculture Direct Program Program Name: Rural Business Cooperative Service (RCDG) CFDA#?s: 10.771 Award No. and Year: 01-060-581026695 (2018 - 2020) Compliance Requirements: Allowable Cost /Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: In accordance with 2CFR200, expenditures reimbursed with grant funds must be approved in the line-item budget of the grant. Condition: Of the 49 transactions examined for a line item, twenty-one expenditures were not budgeted. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget. The additional expenditure exceeded the line-item budget. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $19,541. This is the total of the twenty-one invoices found to have been paid from unbudgeted line items. Context: Of the 49 transactions, we examined 49, and found twenty-one instances of noncompliance. Excess of the budgeted line item. Recommendation: The program director should adhere to the detailed line-item budget. Requests for approval of expenditures not approved on the line-item budget should be submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture prior to expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
Rural Business Cooperative Service ? CFDA No. 10.771 Material Weakness: See Finding 2020-001 Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to obtain prior written approval from the U.S> Department of Agriculture for budget modification prior to incurring expenditures. Action Taken: We concur with the recommendation and implemented the recommendation immediately upon becoming aware of the 2020 audit engagement issues. We engaged with a certified public accounting firm to assist staff with our future grants and contracts accounting and reporting needs. The firm is experienced and knowledgeable of not-for-profit financial accounting, Uniform Guidance, grants and contracts, reimbursement reports, drawdowns and other related accounting matters and applicable standards.
Of the 110 transactions examined for a line item, forty-eight expenditures were not budgeted. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget. The additional expenditures exceeded the line-item budget. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $53,059. This is the total of the forty-eight invoices found to have been paid from unbudgeted line items. Context: Of the 110 transactions, we examined 110, and found forty-eight instances of noncompliance. Excess of the budgeted line item. Recommendation: The program director should adhere to the detailed line-item budget. Requests for approval of expenditures not approved on the line-item budget should be submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture prior expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Agriculture Direct Program Program Name: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) CFDA#?s: 10.902 Award No. and Year: Various Compliance Requirements: Allowable Cost / Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: In accordance with 2CFR200, expenditures reimbursed with grant funds must be approved in the line-item budget of the grant. Condition: Of the 110 transactions examined for a line item, forty-eight expenditures were not budgeted. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget. The additional expenditures exceeded the line-item budget. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $53,059. This is the total of the forty-eight invoices found to have been paid from unbudgeted line items. Context: Of the 110 transactions, we examined 110, and found forty-eight instances of noncompliance. Excess of the budgeted line item. Recommendation: The program director should adhere to the detailed line-item budget. Requests for approval of expenditures not approved on the line-item budget should be submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture prior expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
Rural Business Cooperative Service ? CFDA No. 10.901 Material Weakness: See Finding 2020-001 Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to obtain prior written approval from the U.S> Department of Agriculture for budget modification prior to incurring expenditures. Action Taken: We concur with the recommendation and implemented the recommendation immediately upon becoming aware of the 2020 audit engagement issues. We engaged with a certified public accounting firm to assist staff with our future grants and contracts accounting and reporting needs. The firm is experienced and knowledgeable of not-for-profit financial accounting, Uniform Guidance, grants and contracts, reimbursement reports, drawdowns and other related accounting matters and applicable standards.
Of the 59 transactions examined for a line item, thirty-eight expenditures were not budgeted. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget. The additional expenditures exceeded the line-item budget. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $53,550. This is the total of the thirty-eight invoices found to have been paid from unbudgeted line items. Context: Of the 59 transactions, we examined 59, and found thirty-eight instances of noncompliance. Excess of the budgeted line item. Recommendation: The program director should adhere to the detailed line-item budget. Requests for approval of expenditures not approved on the line-item budget should be submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture prior to expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Agriculture Direct Program Program Name: National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) CFDA#?s: 10.311 Award No. and Year: 2018-70017-28607 (2018 ? 2021) Compliance Requirements: Allowable Cost / Cost Principles Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: In accordance with 2CFR200, expenditures reimbursed with grant funds must be approved in the line-item budget of the grant. Condition: Of the 59 transactions examined for a line item, thirty-eight expenditures were not budgeted. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds in accordance with the approved detailed lineitem budget. The additional expenditures exceeded the line-item budget. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $53,550. This is the total of the thirty-eight invoices found to have been paid from unbudgeted line items. Context: Of the 59 transactions, we examined 59, and found thirty-eight instances of noncompliance. Excess of the budgeted line item. Recommendation: The program director should adhere to the detailed line-item budget. Requests for approval of expenditures not approved on the line-item budget should be submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture prior to expenditure. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
National Institute of Food and Agriculture ? CFDA No. 10.311 Material Weakness: See Finding 2020-001 Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to obtain prior written approval from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for budget modification prior to incurring expenditures. Action Taken: We concur with the recommendation and implemented the recommendation immediately upon becoming aware of the 2020 audit engagement issues. We engaged with a certified public accounting firm to assist staff with our future grants and contracts accounting and reporting needs. The firm is experienced and knowledgeable of not-for-profit financial accounting, Uniform Guidance, grants and contracts, reimbursement reports, drawdowns and other related accounting matters and applicable standards.
Of the 37 transactions examined for a line item, thirty-seven expenditures were not budgeted within the date range within the period of performance. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds within the period of performance. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $21,157. This is the total of the thirty-seven invoices found to have been paid outside the period of performance. Context: Of the 37 transactions, we examined 37, and found thirty-seven instances of noncompliance. Recommendation: No-cost extensions should be requested timely. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Agriculture Direct Program Program Name: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) CFDA#?s: 10.025 Award No. and Year: 19-1001-0774-CA (2018 - 2019) Compliance Requirements: Period of Performance Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria: Expenditures reimbursed with grant funds must be within the award?s period of performance. Condition: Of the 37 transactions examined for a line item, thirty-seven expenditures were not budgeted within the date range within the period of performance. Effect: The Organization did not expend funds within the period of performance. Cause: The program director did not compare and reconcile actual to budget in a timely manner. Questioned Costs: $21,157. This is the total of the thirty-seven invoices found to have been paid outside the period of performance. Context: Of the 37 transactions, we examined 37, and found thirty-seven instances of noncompliance. Recommendation: No-cost extensions should be requested timely. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: See separate corrective action plan.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service ? CFDA No. 10.025 Material Weakness: See Finding 2020-001 Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented to obtain no-cost extensions from the U.S. Department of Agriculture prior to incurring expenditures. Action Taken: We concur with the recommendation and implemented the recommendation immediately upon becoming aware of the 2020 audit engagement issues. We engaged with a certified public accounting firm to assist staff with our future grants and contracts accounting and reporting needs. The firm is experienced and knowledgeable of not-for-profit financial accounting, Uniform Guidance, grants and contracts, reimbursement reports, drawdowns and other related accounting matters and applicable standards.
FAC accepted this audit on May 10, 2021 — management decision was due November 10, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2020 — management decision was due December 24, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on July 23, 2019 — management decision was due January 23, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2018 — management decision was due May 1, 2019.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Georgia →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
