EIN: 576000244
UEI: G37EMUQ344X5
Audited by: Mauldin and Jenkins
Oversight agency: 66 [Environmental Protection Agency]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 6, 2026 (4 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 23, 2025 — management decision was due March 23, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2024 — management decision was due June 27, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2024 — management decision was due March 24, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2024 — management decision was due July 9, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2023 — management decision was due March 28, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on February 23, 2023 — management decision was due August 23, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2022 — management decision was due March 28, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on May 8, 2022 — management decision was due November 8, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2021 — management decision was due September 17, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 9, 2020 — management decision was due May 9, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2020 — management decision was due July 21, 2020.
The City?s procurement files for electric buses and demand responses service did not include an independent cost price analysis. Context: We addressed the matter with the City to determine that a policy be put in place that requires the use of a procurement file checklist which includes cost price analysis. Effect: Failure to properly use the procurement file checklist can lead to noncompliance and the misappropriation of federal funds that are not detected during the normal course of business. Cause: The lack of compliance is due to there being no written policies and procedures detailing appropriate internal controls relative to the procurement requirements of federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement a procurement policy outlining the applicable procurement file checklist and cost price analysis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We concur with the finding. The City is in the process of implementing controls and procedures to ensure that all procurement files contain a cost price analysis.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FA 2019-001. U.S. Department of Transportation - Cost Price Analysis CFDA#: 20.507/20.526 Federal Transit Cluster Award Year: 2019 Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that procurement files include a cost price analysis as required by Uniform Guidance. Condition: The City?s procurement files for electric buses and demand responses service did not include an independent cost price analysis. Context: We addressed the matter with the City to determine that a policy be put in place that requires the use of a procurement file checklist which includes cost price analysis. Effect: Failure to properly use the procurement file checklist can lead to noncompliance and the misappropriation of federal funds that are not detected during the normal course of business. Cause: The lack of compliance is due to there being no written policies and procedures detailing appropriate internal controls relative to the procurement requirements of federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement a procurement policy outlining the applicable procurement file checklist and cost price analysis. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We concur with the finding. The City is in the process of implementing controls and procedures to ensure that all procurement files contain a cost price analysis.
FA 2019-001 U.S. Department of Transportation ? Cost Price Analysis Management Response - We concur with the finding which was previously identified in a Federal Transit Administration (?FTA?) Triennial Review. The City has implemented controls and procedures to ensure that all procurement files contain a cost price analysis. Corrective Action Plan ? The City revised its procurement policy in October, 2019 and has established a purchasing process with multiple redundancies built in to ensure that expenditures are processed in a manner that complies with federal rules. Compliance with rules on cost price analysis is an integral part of this process. Our revised policies and processes have been acknowledged by FTA.
The City?s procurement files for electric buses and demand responses service did not include any documentation that a review for suspended or debarred vendors had taken place. Context: We addressed the matter with the City to determine that a policy be put in place that requires documentation of all vendor reviews for suspension or debarment. Effect: Failure to properly review suspended or debarred vendors can lead to noncompliance and the misappropriation of federal funds that are not detected during the normal course of business. Cause: The lack of compliance is due to there being no written policies and procedures detailing appropriate internal controls relative to the procurement requirements of federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement a procurement policy requiring the documentation of vendor review for suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We concur with the finding. The City is in the process of implementing controls and procedures to ensure that all procurement files contain adequate documentation for the review of suspended and debarred vendors.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FA 2019-002. U.S. Department of Transportation - Suspended and Debarment Review CFDA#: 20.507/20.526 Federal Transit Cluster Award Year: 2019 Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to provide reasonable assurance that procurement procedures include a review for suspended or debarred vendors.Condition: The City?s procurement files for electric buses and demand responses service did not include any documentation that a review for suspended or debarred vendors had taken place. Context: We addressed the matter with the City to determine that a policy be put in place that requires documentation of all vendor reviews for suspension or debarment. Effect: Failure to properly review suspended or debarred vendors can lead to noncompliance and the misappropriation of federal funds that are not detected during the normal course of business. Cause: The lack of compliance is due to there being no written policies and procedures detailing appropriate internal controls relative to the procurement requirements of federal awards. Recommendation: We recommend the City implement a procurement policy requiring the documentation of vendor review for suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We concur with the finding. The City is in the process of implementing controls and procedures to ensure that all procurement files contain adequate documentation for the review of suspended and debarred vendors.
FA 2019-002 U.S. Department of Transportation ? Suspended and Debarment Review Management Response - We concur with the finding which was previously identified in an FTA Triennial Review. The City has implemented controls and procedures to ensure that all procurement files contain adequate documentation for the review of suspended and debarred vendors. Corrective Action Plan ? The City revised its procurement policy in October, 2019 and has established a purchasing process with multiple redundancies built in to ensure that expenditures are processed in a manner that complies with federal rules. We will take all necessary steps to make certain that any individual or company we are considering for a contract award for any expenditure of federal grant funding will be checked to determine that they have not been suspended or debarred from participating in a federal grant program. Our revised policies and processes have been acknowledged by FTA.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2019 — management decision was due March 29, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2019 — management decision was due August 21, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2018 — management decision was due March 30, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2018 — management decision was due July 22, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2017 — management decision was due March 28, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2017 — management decision was due August 27, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in South Carolina →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
