← Back to home

Voorhees UniversityHigher Education

EIN: 570329786

UEI: LSMRHTLQXBQ9

Audited by: Scott and Company, LLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Voorhees University9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$27.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$27,579,219 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2025 (337 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Cash Management
OTHER MATTERS

Condition and Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs. Minimum elapsed time for funds transfer is dependent upon the payment system/method used by the non-federal entity. The US Department of Education (ED) uses the G6 grants management platform, which is a module of the Education Central Automated Processing System (EDCAPS). Generally, funds requested from G6 process overnight and the funds are available in the non-federal entity’s account the next business day. The University has procedures in place to ensure that funds are drawn down from G6 only after they have been expended. However, we noted in one (1) instance where an amount appears to have been drawn down in advance. Context: The University made twenty nine (29) drawdowns of federal program funds during the fiscal year. In comparing the dates of the drawdowns with the accumulated program expenditures to each drawdown date, one (1) drawdown on 12/20/2023 exceeded accumulated program expenditures as of that date by $44,538. By 1/12/2024, the University had expended the amount advanced. Effect: The University was not in compliance with federal cash management regulations for a portion of the current fiscal year. Cause: Administrative oversight. Auditor's Recommendation: The University should development a spreadsheet or other tool similar to the one the auditor used to test cash management compliance that compares cumulative program expenditures to drawdowns. This tool should be updated prior to drawing down funds in order to ensure that drawdowns are limited to amounts expended at any point in time.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition and Criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b), non-federal entities must minimize the time elapsed between transfer of funds from the US Treasury or pass-through entity and disbursement by the non-federal entity for direct program project costs and the proportionate share of allowable indirect costs. Minimum elapsed time for funds transfer is dependent upon the payment system/method used by the non-federal entity. The US Department of Education (ED) uses the G6 grants management platform, which is a module of the Education Central Automated Processing System (EDCAPS). Generally, funds requested from G6 process overnight and the funds are available in the non-federal entity’s account the next business day. The University has procedures in place to ensure that funds are drawn down from G6 only after they have been expended. However, we noted in one (1) instance where an amount appears to have been drawn down in advance. Context: The University made twenty nine (29) drawdowns of federal program funds during the fiscal year. In comparing the dates of the drawdowns with the accumulated program expenditures to each drawdown date, one (1) drawdown on 12/20/2023 exceeded accumulated program expenditures as of that date by $44,538. By 1/12/2024, the University had expended the amount advanced. Effect: The University was not in compliance with federal cash management regulations for a portion of the current fiscal year. Cause: Administrative oversight. Auditor's Recommendation: The University should development a spreadsheet or other tool similar to the one the auditor used to test cash management compliance that compares cumulative program expenditures to drawdowns. This tool should be updated prior to drawing down funds in order to ensure that drawdowns are limited to amounts expended at any point in time.

Corrective Action Plan

We concur with the recommendation. The one (1) instance of drawdown that exceeded the three day rule for drawdowns was an oversight on the part fo the institution. In addition, we will revise the spreadsheet used to track cumulative program expenditures against drawdowns.

About Cash Management →
2024-003
Cash Management
OTHER MATTERS

Condition and criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(1), advance payments to a recipient or subrecipient must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed with actual, immediate cash requirements of the recipient or subrecipient in carrying out the purpose of the approved program or project. The timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the recipient or subrecipient for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(11) further states that the recipient or subrecipient must generally maintain advance payments of federal funds in interest-bearing accounts. It was noted during the audit that the University received an advance payment of $1,483,500 to be used for student scholarships in a future fiscal year and such advance payment was deposited into a noninterest-bearing account. Context: The funds were advanced to the University in April 2024 and had not been expended as of June 30, 2024. Such funds were still deposited in the noninterest-bearing account as of June 30, 2024. Effect: The University was not in compliance with federal cash management regulations for a portion of the current fiscal year. Cause: University personnel indicate that they were advised by ED that it was permissible to draw down the funds in advance and hold them in a noninterest-bearing account until needed. Auditor’s Recommendation: At a minimum, the University should transfer the advanced funds to an interest-bearing account. Interest earned on federal advance payments in excess of $500 should be remitted annually to the US Department of Health and Human Services using the instructions contained in the enclosures to the original grant award notification. The University should also contact appropriate ED officials to ensure that it is in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(1).

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition and criteria: According to 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(1), advance payments to a recipient or subrecipient must be limited to the minimum amounts needed and be timed with actual, immediate cash requirements of the recipient or subrecipient in carrying out the purpose of the approved program or project. The timing and amount of advance payments must be as close as is administratively feasible to the actual disbursements by the recipient or subrecipient for direct program or project costs and the proportionate share of any allowable indirect costs. 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(11) further states that the recipient or subrecipient must generally maintain advance payments of federal funds in interest-bearing accounts. It was noted during the audit that the University received an advance payment of $1,483,500 to be used for student scholarships in a future fiscal year and such advance payment was deposited into a noninterest-bearing account. Context: The funds were advanced to the University in April 2024 and had not been expended as of June 30, 2024. Such funds were still deposited in the noninterest-bearing account as of June 30, 2024. Effect: The University was not in compliance with federal cash management regulations for a portion of the current fiscal year. Cause: University personnel indicate that they were advised by ED that it was permissible to draw down the funds in advance and hold them in a noninterest-bearing account until needed. Auditor’s Recommendation: At a minimum, the University should transfer the advanced funds to an interest-bearing account. Interest earned on federal advance payments in excess of $500 should be remitted annually to the US Department of Health and Human Services using the instructions contained in the enclosures to the original grant award notification. The University should also contact appropriate ED officials to ensure that it is in compliance with 2 CFR section 200.305(b)(1).

Corrective Action Plan

The University will move to have the funds placed into an interest bearing account. In addition, we will seek additional clarity from the program officer as it relates to the original guidance received and the steps to submitting interest to the appropriate agency.

About Cash Management →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$25,194,255 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2024 — management decision was due September 25, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,482,172 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,169,412 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2022 — management decision was due August 3, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,627,252 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2021 — management decision was due August 7, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,384,579 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2020 — management decision was due July 30, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,730,033 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2019 — management decision was due August 2, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,956,526 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2018 — management decision was due September 19, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,689,415 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2017 — management decision was due August 10, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in South Carolina

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.