EIN: 566001967
UEI: HL4FGNJNGE97
Audited by: Martin Starnes & Associates, CPAs, P.A.
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 30, 2026 (36 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2024 — management decision was due June 11, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2024 — management decision was due July 17, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on November 29, 2022 — management decision was due May 29, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2021 — management decision was due June 15, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2020 — management decision was due June 17, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2019 — management decision was due May 11, 2020.
The County Department of Social Services failed to provide evidence that an SOLQ report was ran to support birthdate, citizenship and social security number. Upon further review, applicant was eligible. Context: Of the 1,554,772 casefiles, we examined 60 and determined that one (2%) applicants received benefits during the fiscal year without an online verification in the file. Effect: Casefile was missing completed online verification documents, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: Caseworker failed to obtain or retain the completed eligibility documentation. Questioned Costs: None. The County was able to substantiate that the applicants were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should run online verification documents and retain documentation of such in the applicant?s casefile. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding: 2019-001 Significant Deficiency Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 45 CFR 435, documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. Condition: The County Department of Social Services failed to provide evidence that an SOLQ report was ran to support birthdate, citizenship and social security number. Upon further review, applicant was eligible. Context: Of the 1,554,772 casefiles, we examined 60 and determined that one (2%) applicants received benefits during the fiscal year without an online verification in the file. Effect: Casefile was missing completed online verification documents, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: Caseworker failed to obtain or retain the completed eligibility documentation. Questioned Costs: None. The County was able to substantiate that the applicants were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should run online verification documents and retain documentation of such in the applicant?s casefile. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan.
Finding: 2019-001 Name of Contact Person: Will Wakefield, DSS Director Corrective Action: Management concurs and has already implemented a process of reviewing previously approved files for correction to go along with the process of reviewing new files to ensure caseworkers are obtaining evidence of an online verification obtained and reviewed and kept in client casefile. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately.
The County Department of Social Services failed to provide evidence that an OLV report was run to verify income. Upon further review, applicant was eligible. Context: Of the 3,141 casefiles, we examined 40 and determined that one (2.5%) applicants received benefits during the fiscal year without an online verification in the file. Effect: Casefile was missing completed online verification documents, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: Caseworker failed to obtain or retain the completed eligibility documentation. Questioned Costs: None. The County was able to substantiate that the applicants were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should run online verification documents and retain documentation of such in the applicant?s casefile. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding: 2019-002 Significant Deficiency Eligibility Criteria: In accordance with 45 CFR 96.48, documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. Condition: The County Department of Social Services failed to provide evidence that an OLV report was run to verify income. Upon further review, applicant was eligible. Context: Of the 3,141 casefiles, we examined 40 and determined that one (2.5%) applicants received benefits during the fiscal year without an online verification in the file. Effect: Casefile was missing completed online verification documents, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: Caseworker failed to obtain or retain the completed eligibility documentation. Questioned Costs: None. The County was able to substantiate that the applicants were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should run online verification documents and retain documentation of such in the applicant?s casefile. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management concurs with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan.
Finding: 2019-002 Name of Contact Person: Will Wakefield, DSS Director Corrective Action: Management concurs and has already implemented a process of reviewing previously approved files for correction to go along with the process of reviewing new files to ensure caseworkers are obtaining evidence of an online verification obtained and reviewed and kept in client casefile. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately.
FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2018 — management decision was due June 18, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-003
FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2017 — management decision was due June 13, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-003
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on December 14, 2016 — management decision was due June 14, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-002
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Carolina →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
