EIN: 566000329
UEI: DKDZCDLWEMP3
Audited by: MARTIN STARNES & ASSOCIATES, CPAS, P.A.
Oversight agency: 66 [Environmental Protection Agency]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 13, 2025 (421 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The County Department of Social Services maintained inconsistent documentation for income and household membership. Context: Of the 484,970 benefit payments valued at $183,928,254, we examined 60 ($24,334 value) and determined that one casefile (2%) had inconsistent documentation supporting the eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, the recipient was deemed eligible. Effect: Casefile maintained inconsistent documentation, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: The caseworker did not verify updated documentation to the NCFAST system. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. The County was able to substantiate that the recipients were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review their eligibility determinations and ensure that the correct information is included for proper documentation for eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medicaid Cluster AL # 93.778 Grant Number: 071-420 Finding: 2024-003 Significant Deficiency, Eligibility Nonmaterial Non-compliance Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that casefiles include all required documentation. In accordance with 45 CFR 435, documentation must be maintained to support eligibility determinations. Condition: The County Department of Social Services maintained inconsistent documentation for income and household membership. Context: Of the 484,970 benefit payments valued at $183,928,254, we examined 60 ($24,334 value) and determined that one casefile (2%) had inconsistent documentation supporting the eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, the recipient was deemed eligible. Effect: Casefile maintained inconsistent documentation, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: The caseworker did not verify updated documentation to the NCFAST system. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. The County was able to substantiate that the recipients were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review their eligibility determinations and ensure that the correct information is included for proper documentation for eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report
Name of Contact Person: Carolyn Moser, Health & Human Services Director Corrective Action/Management’s Response: The Department of Social Services always maintains Medicaid training as a high priority due to the complexity and prevalence of the program. Best practices are addressed at all staff meetings and second party review processes are considered strong, particularly for less experienced staff. This particular situation has been resolved and emphasis placed on maintaining proper documentation has been relayed to Medicaid staff. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately and ongoing.
FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2024 — management decision was due August 13, 2024.
The County Department of Social Services maintained inconsistent documentation for income and resources. Context: Of the 1035 participants during the current year valued at $335,908, we examined 60 (valued at $18,282) and determined that 10 (17%) had inconsistent documentation supporting the eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, these 10 participants were still eligible. We also determined that 1 participant (2% valued at $300) was not supported with case documentation to confirm eligibility. Effect: Casefile maintained inconsistent documentation, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: The caseworker did not verify updated documentation to the NCFAST system. Questioned Costs: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Even though the sample results only identified $300 in questioned costs, if tests were extended to the entire population, questioned costs could exceed $25,000. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review their eligibility determinations and ensure that the correct information is included for proper documentation for eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management must have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to properly review and assess the eligibility of individuals. In accordance with the Energy Programs Manual (EP-300 Energy Programs section 300.09), documentation must be maintained in order to ensure the accuracy of the benefits being provided within program requirements, the case file is complete and accurate, and evidence of review should be documented. Condition: The County Department of Social Services maintained inconsistent documentation for income and resources. Context: Of the 1035 participants during the current year valued at $335,908, we examined 60 (valued at $18,282) and determined that 10 (17%) had inconsistent documentation supporting the eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, these 10 participants were still eligible. We also determined that 1 participant (2% valued at $300) was not supported with case documentation to confirm eligibility. Effect: Casefile maintained inconsistent documentation, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: The caseworker did not verify updated documentation to the NCFAST system. Questioned Costs: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, auditors are required to report known questioned costs when likely questioned costs are greater than $25,000. Even though the sample results only identified $300 in questioned costs, if tests were extended to the entire population, questioned costs could exceed $25,000. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review their eligibility determinations and ensure that the correct information is included for proper documentation for eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Name of Contact Person: Carolyn Moser, Health & Human Services Director Corrective Action/Management’s Response: Audit Finding Review Training is held with Family and Children's Medicaid to review Audit results and errors found. Verification sheet for F&C Medicaid are reviewed. This form is to be used for every application and recertification. Additional trainings/unit meetings are also held throughout the year. Areas covered are review of: Child Support referrals, income, verification of Social Security Number, tax household, household relationship, reacting to changes, addresses, and OVS. Ongoing trainings continue. Individual conferences are held with each worker with an error. During the conference, the case record is reviewed along with policy, error explanations and steps to take to prevent error from reoccurring. Each quarter Pender County is required to submit to the State a Quarterly Report of cases 2nd party reviewed along with verification of trainings held, agendas and attendance sheets. Pender is required to review over 120 cases per quarter. There are several Medicaid Supervisors. Each month supervisors pull cases from each worker to 2nd party review. Supervisors meet with each worker that they have an error or internal control issue. Errors and internal control issues are discussed monthly at Unit meetings. Policy, manual changes, Admin letters, job aids and other information are also discussed and reviewed monthly during Unit meetings. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately and ongoing.
FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2023 — management decision was due August 1, 2023.
The County Department of Social Services maintained inconsistent documentation for household membership and countable resources. Context: Of the 430,010 benefit payments valued at $139,895,964, we examined 60 and determined that three (5%) had inconsistent documentation supporting the eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, the recipients were deemed eligible. Effect: Casefile maintained inconsistent documentation, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: The caseworker did not verify updated documentation to the NCFAST system. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. The County was able to substantiate that the recipients were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review their eligibility determinations and ensure the correct information is included for proper documentation for eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program AL # 93.778 Grant Number: 071-420, 071-375, 071-128, 071-480, 071-434 Finding: 2022-004 Material Weakness Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that casefiles include all required documentation. Condition: The County Department of Social Services maintained inconsistent documentation for household membership and countable resources. Context: Of the 430,010 benefit payments valued at $139,895,964, we examined 60 and determined that three (5%) had inconsistent documentation supporting the eligibility determination in the case file. Upon further review, the recipients were deemed eligible. Effect: Casefile maintained inconsistent documentation, which could allow benefits to be provided to individuals who are not eligible. Cause: The caseworker did not verify updated documentation to the NCFAST system. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. The County was able to substantiate that the recipients were eligible to receive benefits. Recommendation: Caseworkers should review their eligibility determinations and ensure the correct information is included for proper documentation for eligibility. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Finding: 2022-004 Name of Contact Person: Carolyn Moser, Health & Human Services Director Corrective Action/Management?s Response: Audit Finding Review Training is held with Family and Children's Medicaid to review Audit results and errors found. Verification sheet for F&C Medicaid are reviewed. This form is to be used for every application and recertification. Additional trainings/unit meetings are also held throughout the year. Areas covered are review of: Child Support referrals, income, verification of Social Security Number, tax household, household relationship, reacting to changes, addresses, and OVS. Ongoing trainings continue. Individual conferences are held with each worker with an error. During the conference, the case record is reviewed along with policy, error explanations and steps to take to prevent error from reoccurring. Each quarter Pender County is required to submit to the State a Quarterly Report of cases 2nd party reviewed along with verification of trainings held, agendas and attendance sheets. Pender is required to review over 120 cases per quarter. There are 4 Medicaid Supervisors. Each month supervisors pull cases from each worker to 2nd party review. Supervisors meet with each worker that they have an error or internal control issue. Errors and internal control issues are discussed monthly at Unit meetings. Policy, manual changes, Admin letters, job aids and other information are also discussed and reviewed monthly during Unit meetings. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately and ongoing. Finding: 2022-005 Name of Contact Person: Carolyn Moser, Health & Human Services Director Corrective Action/Management?s Response: The County has corrected and resubmitted the impacted report and continues to pay close attention to detail when compiling all of the data for payroll calculations. Once resubmitted, there were no monies owed, just minor adjustments in allocations between programming. Additionally, the Business Officer has worked with the Internal Audit Compliance Officer in the Finance Department to strengthen the excel formulas and lessen the inherent opportunity for errors. Finance also implemented additional checks during the 1571 monthly review process to ensure elimination of any such errors prior to submission. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately and ongoing. Finding: 2022-006 Name of Contact Person: Carolyn Moser, Health & Human Services Director Corrective Action/Management?s Response: The County, much like other local governments around the State and Country, has experienced turnover from employee resignation and longterm employee retirements. The County met requirements for 2nd party reviews when program supervisor positions were filled, and in the future will ensure that there is a back up or at least a look back period for 2nd party reviews for periods of SNAP program supervisor vacancies. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately and ongoing. Finding: 2022-007 Name of Contact Person: Carolyn Moser, Health & Human Services Director Corrective Action/Management?s Response: The County, much like other local governments around the State and Country, has experienced turnover from employee resignation and long-term employee retirements. The County met requirements for 2nd party reviews when program supervisor positions were filled, and in the future will ensure that there is a back up or at least a look back period for 2nd party reviews for periods of LIHEAP program supervisor vacancies. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately and ongoing.
Due to formula errors in the spreadsheet used to upload the information into the NC CORELS template salary and fringe benefits were incorrectly reported on the Part I Statement of Administrative Costs for the 1571. Context: Of the total 377 Medicaid salaries and benefits amounts uploaded into NC CORELS, we examined 25 and determined that 3 or (12%) had salary and fringe benefits that were incorrectly reported on the Part I Statement of Administrative Costs. Effect: Salary and fringe benefits not being correctly reported could cause the State to reimburse the incorrect amount to the County. Cause: The spreadsheet used to calculate salaries and fringe had a formula issue causing the salary information to be pulled for the wrong employee names. The report was subsequently corrected, and the proper adjustment was made. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Recommendation: Management should implement internal controls to ensure accuracy of the 1571 crosscutting monthly submission. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Medical Assistance Program AL # 93.778 Grant Number: 071-420, 071-375, 071-128, 071-480, 071-434 Finding: 2022-005 Material Weakness Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that salaries and fringe reported on Part I Statement of Administrative Costs for the 1571 crosscutting monthly report is correct. Condition: Due to formula errors in the spreadsheet used to upload the information into the NC CORELS template salary and fringe benefits were incorrectly reported on the Part I Statement of Administrative Costs for the 1571. Context: Of the total 377 Medicaid salaries and benefits amounts uploaded into NC CORELS, we examined 25 and determined that 3 or (12%) had salary and fringe benefits that were incorrectly reported on the Part I Statement of Administrative Costs. Effect: Salary and fringe benefits not being correctly reported could cause the State to reimburse the incorrect amount to the County. Cause: The spreadsheet used to calculate salaries and fringe had a formula issue causing the salary information to be pulled for the wrong employee names. The report was subsequently corrected, and the proper adjustment was made. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Recommendation: Management should implement internal controls to ensure accuracy of the 1571 crosscutting monthly submission. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Name of Contact Person: Carolyn Moser, Health & Human Services Director Corrective Action/Management?s Response: The County has corrected and resubmitted the impacted report and continues to pay close attention to detail when compiling all of the data for payroll calculations. Once resubmitted, there were no monies owed, just minor adjustments in allocations between programming. Additionally, the Business Officer has worked with the Internal Audit Compliance Officer in the Finance Department to strengthen the excel formulas and lessen the inherent opportunity for errors. Finance also implemented additional checks during the 1571 monthly review process to ensure elimination of any such errors prior to submission. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately and ongoing.
The County Department of Social Services did not have a system in place the entire year to perform second party reviews for the SNAP program. Context: While performing tests of internal control over compliance on the program above, we noted the above condition. Effect: The County?s second-party review process is not effective at ensuring that case files are complete and accurate. Errors could exist that go uncorrected. Cause: Due to staff turnover, second-party reviews were not completed for the entire year. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Recommendation: The County should ensure that the second-party review process is being followed and reviews are being completed for all months of the year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Cluster AL # 10.561 Grant Number: 071-417 Finding: 2022-006 Material Weakness Criteria: The NC Food and Nutrition Services Manual section FNS 135 requires counties to conduct second-party reviews as part of the system of quality control. Management should have adequate second-party review procedures in place to properly review and assess the eligibility of individuals in order to ensure that the benefits being provided are within program requirements, and documentation in the case file is complete and accurate, and evidence of review should be documented. Condition: The County Department of Social Services did not have a system in place the entire year to perform second party reviews for the SNAP program. Context: While performing tests of internal control over compliance on the program above, we noted the above condition. Effect: The County?s second-party review process is not effective at ensuring that case files are complete and accurate. Errors could exist that go uncorrected. Cause: Due to staff turnover, second-party reviews were not completed for the entire year. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Recommendation: The County should ensure that the second-party review process is being followed and reviews are being completed for all months of the year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Name of Contact Person: Carolyn Moser, Health & Human Services Director Corrective Action/Management?s Response: The County, much like other local governments around the State and Country, has experienced turnover from employee resignation and long-term employee retirements. The County met requirements for 2nd party reviews when program supervisor positions were filled, and in the future will ensure that there is a back up or at least a look back period for 2nd party reviews for periods of SNAP program supervisor vacancies. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately and ongoing.
The County Department of Social Services did not have a system in place the entire year to perform second party reviews for the energy programs. Context: While performing tests of internal control over compliance on the program above, we noted the above condition. Effect: The County?s second-party review process is not effective at ensuring that case files are complete and accurate. Errors could exist that go uncorrected. Cause: Due to staff turnover, second-party reviews were not completed for the entire year. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Recommendation: The County should ensure that the second-party review process is being followed and reviews are being completed for all months of the year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed-through the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services Program Name: Low-Income Home Energy Assistance AL # 93.568 Grant Number: 071-406, 071-372 Finding: 2022-007 Material Weakness Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR 200, management must have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to properly review and assess the eligibility of individuals to ensure the accuracy of the benefits being provided in within program requirements and documentation in the case file is complete and accurate, and evidence of review should be documented. Condition: The County Department of Social Services did not have a system in place the entire year to perform second party reviews for the energy programs. Context: While performing tests of internal control over compliance on the program above, we noted the above condition. Effect: The County?s second-party review process is not effective at ensuring that case files are complete and accurate. Errors could exist that go uncorrected. Cause: Due to staff turnover, second-party reviews were not completed for the entire year. Questioned Costs: None. The finding represents an internal control issue; therefore, no questioned costs are applicable. Recommendation: The County should ensure that the second-party review process is being followed and reviews are being completed for all months of the year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report
Name of Contact Person: Carolyn Moser, Health & Human Services Director Corrective Action/Management?s Response: The County, much like other local governments around the State and Country, has experienced turnover from employee resignation and long-term employee retirements. The County met requirements for 2nd party reviews when program supervisor positions were filled, and in the future will ensure that there is a back up or at least a look back period for 2nd party reviews for periods of LIHEAP program supervisor vacancies. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately and ongoing.
FAC accepted this audit on July 13, 2022 — management decision was due January 13, 2023.
During our testing, we noted that the monthly performance reports and the final closeout reporting were not submitted in a timely manner as required by the program. In addition, reports were not maintained on file to provide proper documentation. Context: During testing of the program, we noted the above condition. Effect: Reports were not maintained on file and submitted to NCPRO in a timely manner. Cause: Lack of controls and review over the reporting requirements process. Reports were submitted to the NCPRO; however, they were not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Implement stronger controls over the reporting requirements. Submit reports timely and maintain proper documentation of required reports. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Treasury Passed-through the Office of State Budget and Management N.C. Pandemic Recovery Office (NCPRO) Program Name: COVID-19 ? Coronavirus Relief Fund CFDA # 21.019 Grant Number: 02-69 Finding: 2021-004 Significant Deficiency Non-material, Non-compliance ? Reporting Criteria: In accordance with the federal Single Audit Act and guidelines for the Coronavirus Relief Fund, management should have an adequate system of internal control procedures in place to ensure that any required reporting under the program is completed timely and accurately. Condition: During our testing, we noted that the monthly performance reports and the final closeout reporting were not submitted in a timely manner as required by the program. In addition, reports were not maintained on file to provide proper documentation. Context: During testing of the program, we noted the above condition. Effect: Reports were not maintained on file and submitted to NCPRO in a timely manner. Cause: Lack of controls and review over the reporting requirements process. Reports were submitted to the NCPRO; however, they were not submitted timely. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: Implement stronger controls over the reporting requirements. Submit reports timely and maintain proper documentation of required reports. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The County agrees with this finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan section of this report.
Finding: 2021-004 The North Carolina Pandemic Recovery Office has indicated that Pender County has submitted all Coronavirus Relief Funds documentation to satisfy their requirements. There were monthly and final reporting requirements, and those submissions were made accordingly but not timely due to frequency and coordination with Town?s as subrecipients.
FAC accepted this audit on August 18, 2021 — management decision was due February 18, 2022.
US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services (NC DHHS) Program Name: Medicaid Cluster - Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) CFDA # 93.778 Award Year: 2020 Criteria: Per the NC Department of Health and Human Services-Division of Health Benefits, the County Department of Social Services Agency is responsible to determine client eligibility in accordance with eligibility requirements defined in the approved State Plan (42 CFR Section 431.10). Condition and Context: Of the 60 claims tested, we noted 2 errors which resulted in ineligible benefits and 3 additional errors, identified in connection with the testing performed on those 60 claims, that also resulted in ineligible benefits. Therefore, a total of 5 eligibility errors were identified in an ultimate sample of 63 individual recipients tested. 1 case (included in original sample) in which claim recipient's mother timely notified the agency's Food & Nutrition Services (FNS) caseworker that the entire household had moved out of the state. FNS caseworker closed the FNS case and completed and submitted DSS Form 8194 (Income Maintenance Transmittal Form) to the agency's applicable Family & Children's' (F&C) Medicaid caseworker and supervisor for appropriate disposition. F&C caseworker failed to react timely to a reported change in client's situation until error was identified at auditor's testing 11/04/2020, therefore the entire case households' full Medicaid benefits continued in Pender County. The claim recipient, mother and 2 siblings were therefore not eligible for any Medicaid benefits for the periods: 10/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 resulting in a total of 4 individual eligibility errors. 1 case (included in original sample) in which claim recipient was receiving full Medicaid (MAF-C) benefits as a parent caretaker, of his daughter who was not receiving benefits in his case and had actually been removed from the home and placed with a relative in another county. This information was documented by a FNS caseworker in case notes, however there is no evidence that the FNS caseworker notified the F&C's Medicaid caseworker or supervisor of the change. FNS caseworker failed to report a change in client's situation and notify all applicable programs until error was identified at auditor's testing 11/10/2020, therefore, claim recipient received full Medicaid benefits in error. The claim recipient was not eligible for full MAF-C benefits for the periods: 04/01/2019 - 01/31/2020 and continues due to the COVID-19 emergency provisions. Although recipient was not eligible for MAF-C he may have been eligible for MAF-D benefits for the same periods. Of the 60 claims tested, we noted 6 instances which included incorrect countable and/or non-countable income resulting in incorrect budget calculations; 7 instances which included incorrect MAGI tax household or member relationship status which is required under the Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) for proper eligibility determinations for Family and Children's' Medicaid; 2 instances where agency caseworkers failed to react timely to a change in client's situation; 1 instance which included incorrect countable resources and incorrect budget calculations; 10 instances in which the local agency failed to prepare a child support referral when there was not absent parent documentation and the parent/caretaker was receiving benefits in the case; 5 instances where agency caseworkers failed to run online verification matches (OVS) and / or (AVS) in NC FAST for all applicable members of the household; and 4 instances where agency caseworker failed to obtain, update and verify a beneficiary's social security number and therefore failed to verify citizenship. Effect: Ineligible persons received benefits. Additionally, there is significant potential for additional ineligible persons to receive benefits. Cause: Insufficient training and review of client eligibility files. Questioned Costs: None at local level. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of finding 2019-004 from the immediate previous audit. Recommendation: We recommend the County continue to implement training to ensure that all County staff are properly informed of applicable program requirements. Management's Response: See corrective action plan.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the NC Department of Health and Human Services (NC DHHS) Program Name: Medicaid Cluster - Medical Assistance Program (Medicaid; Title XIX) CFDA # 93.778 Award Year: 2020 Criteria: Per the NC Department of Health and Human Services-Division of Health Benefits, the County Department of Social Services Agency is responsible to determine client eligibility in accordance with eligibility requirements defined in the approved State Plan (42 CFR Section 431.10). Condition and Context: Of the 60 claims tested, we noted 2 errors which resulted in ineligible benefits and 3 additional errors, identified in connection with the testing performed on those 60 claims, that also resulted in ineligible benefits. Therefore, a total of 5 eligibility errors were identified in an ultimate sample of 63 individual recipients tested. 1 case (included in original sample) in which claim recipient's mother timely notified the agency's Food & Nutrition Services (FNS) caseworker that the entire household had moved out of the state. FNS caseworker closed the FNS case and completed and submitted DSS Form 8194 (Income Maintenance Transmittal Form) to the agency's applicable Family & Children's' (F&C) Medicaid caseworker and supervisor for appropriate disposition. F&C caseworker failed to react timely to a reported change in client's situation until error was identified at auditor's testing 11/04/2020, therefore the entire case households' full Medicaid benefits continued in Pender County. The claim recipient, mother and 2 siblings were therefore not eligible for any Medicaid benefits for the periods: 10/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 resulting in a total of 4 individual eligibility errors. 1 case (included in original sample) in which claim recipient was receiving full Medicaid (MAF-C) benefits as a parent caretaker, of his daughter who was not receiving benefits in his case and had actually been removed from the home and placed with a relative in another county. This information was documented by a FNS caseworker in case notes, however there is no evidence that the FNS caseworker notified the F&C's Medicaid caseworker or supervisor of the change. FNS caseworker failed to report a change in client's situation and notify all applicable programs until error was identified at auditor's testing 11/10/2020, therefore, claim recipient received full Medicaid benefits in error. The claim recipient was not eligible for full MAF-C benefits for the periods: 04/01/2019 - 01/31/2020 and continues due to the COVID-19 emergency provisions. Although recipient was not eligible for MAF-C he may have been eligible for MAF-D benefits for the same periods. Of the 60 claims tested, we noted 6 instances which included incorrect countable and/or non-countable income resulting in incorrect budget calculations; 7 instances which included incorrect MAGI tax household or member relationship status which is required under the Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) for proper eligibility determinations for Family and Children's' Medicaid; 2 instances where agency caseworkers failed to react timely to a change in client's situation; 1 instance which included incorrect countable resources and incorrect budget calculations; 10 instances in which the local agency failed to prepare a child support referral when there was not absent parent documentation and the parent/caretaker was receiving benefits in the case; 5 instances where agency caseworkers failed to run online verification matches (OVS) and / or (AVS) in NC FAST for all applicable members of the household; and 4 instances where agency caseworker failed to obtain, update and verify a beneficiary's social security number and therefore failed to verify citizenship. Effect: Ineligible persons received benefits. Additionally, there is significant potential for additional ineligible persons to receive benefits. Cause: Insufficient training and review of client eligibility files. Questioned Costs: None at local level. Identification of a Repeat Finding: This is a repeat of finding 2019-004 from the immediate previous audit. Recommendation: We recommend the County continue to implement training to ensure that all County staff are properly informed of applicable program requirements. Management's Response: See corrective action plan.
Audit Finding Review Training was held on 11/18/2020 with Family and Children's Medicaid to review Audit results and errors found. Verification sheet for F&C Medicaid was reviewed. This form is to be used for every application and recertification. Additional trainings/unit meetings were also held on 12/21/20, 1/7/21, 2/1/21, 3/5/21, 3/23/21 and 4/28/21. Areas covered were review of: Child Support referrals, income, verification of Social Security Number, tax household, household relationship, reacting to changes, addresses, and OVS. Ongoing trainings continue. Individual conferences were held on 11/18/21 with each worker with an error. During the conference, the case record was reviewed along with policy, error explained and steps to take to prevent error from reoccurring. Each quarter Pender County is required to submit to the State a Quarterly Report of cases 2nd party reviewed along with verification of trainings held, agendas and attendance sheets. Pender is required to review 124 cases per quarter. Pender reviewed 181 cases for the quarter of July - September 2020, 166 cases for the quarter of October - December 2020, 186 cases for the quarter of January - March 2021, and 191 cases for the quarter of April - June 2021. There are 4 Medicaid Supervisors. Each month supervisors pull cases from each worker to 2nd party review. Supervisors meet with each worker that they have an error or internal control issue. Errors and internal control issues are discussed monthly at Unit meetings. Policy, manual changes, Admin letters, job aids and other information are also discussed and reviewed monthly during Unit meetings.
2019-004
FAC accepted this audit on June 17, 2020 — management decision was due December 17, 2020.
US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NC DHHS) Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (MA) CFDA # 93.778 Criteria: Per NCDHHS-Division of Health Benefits, the County Department of Social Services Agency is responsible to determine client eligibility in accordance with eligibility requirements defined in the approved State Plan (42 CFR Section 431.10). Condition and Context: Of the original 77 claims tested, we noted 3 errors which resulted in ineligible benefits and 1 additional error, identified in connection with the testing performed on those 77 claims, that also resulted in ineligible benefits. Therefore, a total of 4 eligibility errors identified in a sample of 78 individual recipients tested. 1 case (included in the original sample) in which the claim recipient had SSA disability income which was unaddressed by the local agency and exceeded the limit for MAF-C, full Medicaid benefits based on the recipient's tax household status. Re-determination at testing determined that had the recipient not been receiving full Medicaid benefits, they would have been able to meet a deductible for various periods of time during the ineligible period and therefore would have be eligible for benefits under a different program MAF-M. The recipient was therefore not eligible for any Medicaid benefits for the periods: 10/01/2017 - 03/31/2018; 04/01/2018 - 04/04/2018; 10/01/2018 - 10/07/2018 & 04/01/2019 - 04/11/2019. 1 case (included in the original sample) in which the local DSS agency failed to react to a "critical age of 19" change in recipient's status and perform a required exparte recertification to determine availability of ongoing benefits. Recipient continued to receive MAF-N, with full Medicaid benefits instead of applicable MAF-D, family planning benefits only for the period 09/01/2018 - 07/31/2019. 1 case (included in the original sample) in which the local agency failed to react to a change in recipient's status when the agency was notified that the recipient had moved out of state and was applying for benefits there. The agency closed the case in NCFAST, however failed to properly end-date the certification period timely resulting in benefits continuing through the end of the original certification period in error. The recipient was therefore not eligible for any Medicaid benefits for the period: 01/01/2019 - 07/31/2019. 1 case (not included in original sample) in which a sibling of the claim recipient, who had turned 19 "critical age change" and therefore should have become a tax household of 1 prior to the certification period, had countable income that exceeded the limit for MAF-C for a household of 1 and therefore was not eligible for full Medicaid benefits for the period 09/01/2018 - 12/31/2019. Based on the countable income, the recipient would have only been eligible for MAF-D family planning benefits only for the same period. Additionally, of the 78 total claims tested, we noted 13 cases which included incorrect countable and/or non-countable income resulting in incorrect budget calculations; 14 cases which included incorrect MAGI tax household or member relationship status which are required under the Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) for proper eligibility determinations for Family and Children?s' Medicaid; 1 case in which the local agency failed to react timely to a change in a claim recipient or recipient's parent/caretaker's situation; 2 cases which included incorrect countable resources; 10 cases in which the local agency failed to prepare a child support referral when there was no absent parent documentation and the parent/caretaker was receiving benefits in the case; 4 cases in which the agency failed to run required online verification search (OVS) in the NC FAST system for all applicable case participants; 20 cases in which the agency failed to obtain, update and verify a recipient's social security number in order to complete eligibility verifications and verify citizenship. Effect: Ineligible persons received benefits. Additionally there is significant potential for additional ineligible persons to receive benefits. Cause: Administrative oversight. Questioned Costs: None noted at local level.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴US Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NC DHHS) Program Name: Medical Assistance Program (MA) CFDA # 93.778 Criteria: Per NCDHHS-Division of Health Benefits, the County Department of Social Services Agency is responsible to determine client eligibility in accordance with eligibility requirements defined in the approved State Plan (42 CFR Section 431.10). Condition and Context: Of the original 77 claims tested, we noted 3 errors which resulted in ineligible benefits and 1 additional error, identified in connection with the testing performed on those 77 claims, that also resulted in ineligible benefits. Therefore, a total of 4 eligibility errors identified in a sample of 78 individual recipients tested. 1 case (included in the original sample) in which the claim recipient had SSA disability income which was unaddressed by the local agency and exceeded the limit for MAF-C, full Medicaid benefits based on the recipient's tax household status. Re-determination at testing determined that had the recipient not been receiving full Medicaid benefits, they would have been able to meet a deductible for various periods of time during the ineligible period and therefore would have be eligible for benefits under a different program MAF-M. The recipient was therefore not eligible for any Medicaid benefits for the periods: 10/01/2017 - 03/31/2018; 04/01/2018 - 04/04/2018; 10/01/2018 - 10/07/2018 & 04/01/2019 - 04/11/2019. 1 case (included in the original sample) in which the local DSS agency failed to react to a "critical age of 19" change in recipient's status and perform a required exparte recertification to determine availability of ongoing benefits. Recipient continued to receive MAF-N, with full Medicaid benefits instead of applicable MAF-D, family planning benefits only for the period 09/01/2018 - 07/31/2019. 1 case (included in the original sample) in which the local agency failed to react to a change in recipient's status when the agency was notified that the recipient had moved out of state and was applying for benefits there. The agency closed the case in NCFAST, however failed to properly end-date the certification period timely resulting in benefits continuing through the end of the original certification period in error. The recipient was therefore not eligible for any Medicaid benefits for the period: 01/01/2019 - 07/31/2019. 1 case (not included in original sample) in which a sibling of the claim recipient, who had turned 19 "critical age change" and therefore should have become a tax household of 1 prior to the certification period, had countable income that exceeded the limit for MAF-C for a household of 1 and therefore was not eligible for full Medicaid benefits for the period 09/01/2018 - 12/31/2019. Based on the countable income, the recipient would have only been eligible for MAF-D family planning benefits only for the same period. Additionally, of the 78 total claims tested, we noted 13 cases which included incorrect countable and/or non-countable income resulting in incorrect budget calculations; 14 cases which included incorrect MAGI tax household or member relationship status which are required under the Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) for proper eligibility determinations for Family and Children?s' Medicaid; 1 case in which the local agency failed to react timely to a change in a claim recipient or recipient's parent/caretaker's situation; 2 cases which included incorrect countable resources; 10 cases in which the local agency failed to prepare a child support referral when there was no absent parent documentation and the parent/caretaker was receiving benefits in the case; 4 cases in which the agency failed to run required online verification search (OVS) in the NC FAST system for all applicable case participants; 20 cases in which the agency failed to obtain, update and verify a recipient's social security number in order to complete eligibility verifications and verify citizenship. Effect: Ineligible persons received benefits. Additionally there is significant potential for additional ineligible persons to receive benefits. Cause: Administrative oversight. Questioned Costs: None noted at local level.
Note that this year was the first year, since MAGI budgeting started (2014), that MAGI cases have been pulled as part of the County Single Audit process. DHHS Management has instituted a verification sheet for applications and reviews in order for the workers to double check the information and be sure it is entered correctly and verified. Supervisors are continuing to do second party reviews on cases to try and identify errors and make corrections if need be. Pender County has completed refresher training with staff to reinforce Medicaid Policy. The Quality Improvement/Training Supervisor is also doing second party reviews of cases as well. With the goal, in coordination with the supervisors, to identify themes or consistent errors by staff. The Quality Improvement Training Supervisor has worked individually with staff as well as with particular units to also increase worker knowledge, reduce errors and increase understanding of policy focusing on the particular areas identified in the audit. Pender county's current Medicaid case count is approximately 10,417 cases representing 15,114 individuals.
FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2019 — management decision was due August 24, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2018 — management decision was due August 6, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-007
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-005
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2017 — management decision was due July 23, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Carolina →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.