← Back to home

Guide Nashville Homes, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 562638041

UEI: FYJAGCUDNEM3

Audited by: PKF O'Connor Davies, LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Guide Nashville Homes, Inc.10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$991K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$991,014 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 19, 2026 (9 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$992,245 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2025 — management decision was due September 28, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$994,582 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 8, 2024 — management decision was due September 8, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$988,567 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$984,260 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 14, 2022 — management decision was due October 14, 2022.

2021-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

For the year under audit, there was one new certification (move-in). Per our review of available documentation, form HUD-50059 was not signed by resident or management and there was no signed lease agreement. Cause: The Company?s sponsor was in the midst of a significant reorganization. Also, the Company had just emerged from finalizing significant repairs to one of the group homes due to a fire. It appears the person responsible for ensuring obtaining these signatures was in the process of being reassigned and management did not provide for oversight of her previous functions during this time period. Effect: The Company was not in compliance with stipulated regulations. Context: Out of two group homes having total occupancy capacity of 12 residents, there was one new move-in for the year under audit. Recommendation: Management should assign someone to monitor compliance with signature requirements, possibly by periodically reviewing tenant files on an unannounced basis and documenting the result. Managements? View: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001 Federal Program: 14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) Criteria: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development per July 2021 OMB Compliance Supplement stipulates that resident (tenant) eligibility is determined at move-in or at initial certification. Part of the eligibility requirements (24 CFR Part 5) requires the owner to determine resident?s eligibility and to effect electronic submission of form HUD-50059 information. When the owner uses a service bureau to submit this information, it is required to obtain both management and resident signature on this form with a copy provided to resident, a copy attached to lease agreement and a copy maintained in resident file. Also, the resident is required to sign the lease agreement. Condition: For the year under audit, there was one new certification (move-in). Per our review of available documentation, form HUD-50059 was not signed by resident or management and there was no signed lease agreement. Cause: The Company?s sponsor was in the midst of a significant reorganization. Also, the Company had just emerged from finalizing significant repairs to one of the group homes due to a fire. It appears the person responsible for ensuring obtaining these signatures was in the process of being reassigned and management did not provide for oversight of her previous functions during this time period. Effect: The Company was not in compliance with stipulated regulations. Context: Out of two group homes having total occupancy capacity of 12 residents, there was one new move-in for the year under audit. Recommendation: Management should assign someone to monitor compliance with signature requirements, possibly by periodically reviewing tenant files on an unannounced basis and documenting the result. Managements? View: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

3.11.22 CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR FINDINGS REPORTED UNDER UNIFORM GUIDANCE GUIDE NASHVILLE HOMES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF JUNE 30, 2021 This schedule presents the corrective action planned by FSI for findings reported in this report in accordance with Title 2 US. Code of Federal Regulations (CPR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Finding ref number: SECTION Ill -- FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS 2021-001 Federal Program: 14.181 Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) Finding Caption: The Company was not in compliance with stipulated regulations For the year under audit, there was one new certification (move-in). Form HUD-50059 was not signed by resident or management and there was no signed lease agreement. Name, address, and telephone of District contact person: Sarah Norman, Chief of Community Development 8003 Corporate Drive, Nottingham, MD 21236 Office: 410-453-9553 ext. 1018 Mobile: 410-599-3417 E-Mail: Sarah.Norman@SheppardPratt.org Corrective action the auditee plans to take in response to the finding: While certain signatures were not obtained, a resident signature was obtained on a service bureau?s form for income information in support of respective vouchers. Effective immediately, an internal HUD Compliance Specialist will institute periodic, unannounced quarterly inspections of FSI client files to ensure compliance. Anticipated date to complete the corrective action: 3.14.22 sheppardpratt.org

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$974,305 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2021 — management decision was due September 25, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$980,563 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2020 — management decision was due September 17, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$984,774 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 1, 2019 — management decision was due July 1, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$998,779 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2017 — management decision was due June 10, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$989,232 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2017 — management decision was due September 19, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Maryland

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.