← Back to home

PIPELINE SAFETY TRUSTNon-Profit

EIN: 562369975

UEI: VVFCENTG7Y75

Audited by: LARSON GROSS ASSURANCE, PLLC

Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

PIPELINE SAFETY TRUST3 audit years1 findings
3
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,036,877 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 29, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 29, 2026 (64 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Criteria – Federal regulations require that grantees have controls in place to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into contracts for goods or services exceeding $25,000. Condition and Context – The Technical Assistance Grants program had one vendor contract totaling $79,079 that was subject to suspension and debarment requirements. There was no evidence that a suspension and debarment check was performed prior to entering into the contract with the vendor. Cause – Lack of sufficient oversight may have led to procurement policies not being followed and suspension and debarment checks not being performed in a consistent manner. Effect – Pipeline Safety Trust (the Trust) could be subject to questioned costs or other sanctions from the funding agency if vendors retained and paid from federal funds are later found to be suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs – Based on our testing, we noted the vendor was not suspended or debarred, so there are no questioned costs to report. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Established procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures should be enforced requiring suspension and debarment documentation be retained. Views of Responsible Officials – Management agrees with the finding and has prepared corrective action as detailed in its Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria – Federal regulations require that grantees have controls in place to verify that vendors are not suspended or debarred prior to entering into contracts for goods or services exceeding $25,000. Condition and Context – The Technical Assistance Grants program had one vendor contract totaling $79,079 that was subject to suspension and debarment requirements. There was no evidence that a suspension and debarment check was performed prior to entering into the contract with the vendor. Cause – Lack of sufficient oversight may have led to procurement policies not being followed and suspension and debarment checks not being performed in a consistent manner. Effect – Pipeline Safety Trust (the Trust) could be subject to questioned costs or other sanctions from the funding agency if vendors retained and paid from federal funds are later found to be suspended or debarred. Questioned Costs – Based on our testing, we noted the vendor was not suspended or debarred, so there are no questioned costs to report. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Established procurement, suspension and debarment policies and procedures should be enforced requiring suspension and debarment documentation be retained. Views of Responsible Officials – Management agrees with the finding and has prepared corrective action as detailed in its Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

While Pipeline Safety Trust followed an internal checklist to verify vendors were not suspended or debarred, it did not consistently document completion of this process. Planned Corrective Action: Pipeline Safety Trust will formalize its existing checklist process by implementing the following measures: 1. Documented Checklist for Each Vendor: Require completion of the existing checklist for every vendor subject to suspension and debarment verification, including attaching a screenshot of the System for Award Management (SAM) confirmation. 2. Update Financial Procedures: Revise the financial procedures to explicitly require retention of the documented checklist and SAM verification screenshot as part of the procurement process for federally funded awards exceeding $25,000. 3. Staff Training: Provide training to staff involved in procurement to ensure understanding and compliance with the updated procedures. Name of Responsible Parties: Heather Radke, Business Manager Bill Caram, Executive Director Anticipated Completion Date: January 31, 2026

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2024-03-31

$975,067 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2024 — management decision was due June 30, 2025.

FY 2023-03-31

$791,037 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2023 — management decision was due June 27, 2024.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Washington

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.