← Back to home

CHARLOTTE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 562274174

UEI: MH89AMKM1S41

Audited by: CLA

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

CHARLOTTE COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC, INC.7 audit years5 findings2 repeat
7
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$4.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

$4,704,310 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 31, 2026 (212 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-002

Supervisors should review the sliding fee discount program assessment form to determine if patients are eligible to receive sliding fee rates. Criteria: Must use specific sliding fee discount rates which are calculated based on income and household data. Supervisors should review the assessment form to ensure proper application. Cause: Supervisors review the sliding fee discount program assessment form weekly, however, there is no support that this review occurs for the selections made from the time period of January 2024 through October 2024. This was prior to the single audit report for the year ended December 31, 2023 being issued and prior to the corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2023 being placed into action. Selections made after the issuance of the single audit report for the year ended December 31, 2023 had documentation supporting that an individual separate from the preparer reviewed that the sliding fee scale was appropriately applied. Effect: Errors could lead to improper amounts being charged to the patient. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: CLA recommends that the sliding fee discount program assessment form is reviewed to ensure the proper rate is used for each patient. Documentation of the review should be maintained. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management takes Exception with this Finding. Due to unforeseen circumstances CCHC’s FYE 2023 Annual Audit was not completed until November 2024. Of the sample examined for FYE 2023, Management was advised one sliding fee calculation was inaccurate. To address the FYE 2023 audit finding and to have a more robust reviewing process, Management conducted staff training and revised the oversight to include two signatures on all Sliding Fee Applications. The newly minted work process was introduced in December 2024. During the course of the FYE 2024 Annual Audit, the initial audit sample only included Sliding Fee Applications for the period January 2024-October 2024: resulting in 100% of the sample not having a secondary review. A review step that up until November 2024 had not been previously cited by the Auditors. Management would like to note, Sliding Fee calculation was 100% accurate as of December 2024.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Special Provisions – Sliding Fee Discount Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Health Center Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 and 93.527 Award Period: 01/01/2024 – 12/31/2024 Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Questioned Costs: None Condition: Supervisors should review the sliding fee discount program assessment form to determine if patients are eligible to receive sliding fee rates. Criteria: Must use specific sliding fee discount rates which are calculated based on income and household data. Supervisors should review the assessment form to ensure proper application. Cause: Supervisors review the sliding fee discount program assessment form weekly, however, there is no support that this review occurs for the selections made from the time period of January 2024 through October 2024. This was prior to the single audit report for the year ended December 31, 2023 being issued and prior to the corrective action plan for the year ended December 31, 2023 being placed into action. Selections made after the issuance of the single audit report for the year ended December 31, 2023 had documentation supporting that an individual separate from the preparer reviewed that the sliding fee scale was appropriately applied. Effect: Errors could lead to improper amounts being charged to the patient. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: CLA recommends that the sliding fee discount program assessment form is reviewed to ensure the proper rate is used for each patient. Documentation of the review should be maintained. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management takes Exception with this Finding. Due to unforeseen circumstances CCHC’s FYE 2023 Annual Audit was not completed until November 2024. Of the sample examined for FYE 2023, Management was advised one sliding fee calculation was inaccurate. To address the FYE 2023 audit finding and to have a more robust reviewing process, Management conducted staff training and revised the oversight to include two signatures on all Sliding Fee Applications. The newly minted work process was introduced in December 2024. During the course of the FYE 2024 Annual Audit, the initial audit sample only included Sliding Fee Applications for the period January 2024-October 2024: resulting in 100% of the sample not having a secondary review. A review step that up until November 2024 had not been previously cited by the Auditors. Management would like to note, Sliding Fee calculation was 100% accurate as of December 2024.

Corrective Action Plan

Special Provisions - Sliding Fee Discount Recommendation: CLA recommends that the sliding fee discount program assessment form is reviewed to ensure the proper rate is used for each patient. Documentation of the review should be maintained. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: Management takes Exception with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Management Response: Management takes Exception with this Finding. Due to unforeseen circumstances CCHC’s FYE 2023 Annual Audit was not completed until November 2024. Of the sample examined for FYE 2023, Management was advised one sliding fee calculation was inaccurate. To address the FYE 2023 audit finding and to have a more robust reviewing process, Management conducted staff training and revised the oversight to include two signatures on all Sliding Fee Applications. The newly minted work process was introduced in December 2024. During the course of the FYE 2024 Annual Audit, the initial audit sample only included Sliding Fee Applications for the period January 2024-October 2024: resulting in 100% of the sample not having a secondary review. A review step that up until November 2024 had not been previously cited by the Auditors. Management would like to note, Sliding Fee calculation was 100% accurate as of December 2024. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carolyn C. Allison, CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: Completed December 2024

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-003OTHER MATTERS

At the start of a new project, no written rate quotes were obtained as required by the procurement policy. One of the vendors selected had worked on a previous project and proper procurement procedures were followed at that time, however, no new quotes were obtained for the new project. Criteria: The procurement policy states that for expected small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000 rate quotes must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources in writing and documentation should be maintained on file, and vendors over $10,000 should have a signed contract. Cause: The Clinic has a procurement policy, however, at the start of the new project quoted rates were not obtained for the existing vendor. Effect: Possible overpayment for the project. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: CLA recommends the procurement policy is consistently followed. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management takes Partial Exception with this Finding. In an effort to be a good steward of Taxpayer/Federal Funding, Management consciousness chose to continue to work with a Construction Project Manager who had been previously vetted via the CCHC procurement process. CCHC had multiple projects in que and to ensure completion in the most expeditiously and fiscally responsible manner, Management chose to continue to work with a proven entity and monitor for spikes in cost and/or other outliers that may have caused a scintilla of concern. CCHC is currently in the process of revising the Procurement Policy to acknowledge potential future situations and may on occasion find the most cost effective/efficient option is a Sole Source award.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Procurement – Written Rate Quotes Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury and Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds and the Health Center Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 21.027, 93.224 and 93.527 Award Period: 01/01/2024 – 12/31/2024 Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Questioned Costs: None Condition: At the start of a new project, no written rate quotes were obtained as required by the procurement policy. One of the vendors selected had worked on a previous project and proper procurement procedures were followed at that time, however, no new quotes were obtained for the new project. Criteria: The procurement policy states that for expected small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000 rate quotes must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources in writing and documentation should be maintained on file, and vendors over $10,000 should have a signed contract. Cause: The Clinic has a procurement policy, however, at the start of the new project quoted rates were not obtained for the existing vendor. Effect: Possible overpayment for the project. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: CLA recommends the procurement policy is consistently followed. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management takes Partial Exception with this Finding. In an effort to be a good steward of Taxpayer/Federal Funding, Management consciousness chose to continue to work with a Construction Project Manager who had been previously vetted via the CCHC procurement process. CCHC had multiple projects in que and to ensure completion in the most expeditiously and fiscally responsible manner, Management chose to continue to work with a proven entity and monitor for spikes in cost and/or other outliers that may have caused a scintilla of concern. CCHC is currently in the process of revising the Procurement Policy to acknowledge potential future situations and may on occasion find the most cost effective/efficient option is a Sole Source award.

Corrective Action Plan

Procurement – Written Rate Quotes Recommendation: CLA recommends the procurement policy is consistently followed. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: Management takes Partial Exception with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: Management Response: Management takes Partial Exception with this Finding. In an effort to be a good steward of Taxpayer/Federal Funding, Management consciousness chose to continue to work with a Construction Project Manager who had been previously vetted via the CCHC procurement process. CCHC had multiple projects in que and to ensure completion in the most expeditiously and fiscally responsible manner, Management chose to continue to work with a proven entity and monitor for spikes in cost and/or other outliers that may have caused a scintilla of concern. CCHC is currently in the process of revising the Procurement Policy to acknowledge potential future situations and may on occasion find the most cost effective/efficient option is a Sole Source award. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carolyn C. Allison, CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: August 31, 2025

Prior Finding References

2023-003

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-12-31

$3,916,539 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2024 — management decision was due June 15, 2025.

2023-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Supervisors should review the sliding fee discount program assessment form to determine if patients are eligible to receive sliding fee rates. One of the 20 sliding fee discount program selections had an incorrect sliding fee discount rate applied to their services, resulting in the patient underpaying by approximately $195. Criteria: Must use specific sliding fee discount rates which are calculated based on income and household data. Supervisors should review the assessment form to ensure proper application. Cause: Supervisors review the sliding fee discount program assessment form weekly, however, this error was not caught during that weekly review. Effect: Errors could lead to improper amounts being charged to the patient. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends that the sliding fee discount program assessment form is reviewed to ensure the proper rate is used for each patient. Documentation of the review should be maintained. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Clinic agrees with the finding. The Front Desk lead will review the sliding fee discount document and verify accuracy of calculation and sign the application.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Special Provisions – Sliding Fee Discount Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Health Center Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 93.224 and 93.527 Award Period: 01/01/2023 – 12/31/2023 Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Questioned Costs: None Condition: Supervisors should review the sliding fee discount program assessment form to determine if patients are eligible to receive sliding fee rates. One of the 20 sliding fee discount program selections had an incorrect sliding fee discount rate applied to their services, resulting in the patient underpaying by approximately $195. Criteria: Must use specific sliding fee discount rates which are calculated based on income and household data. Supervisors should review the assessment form to ensure proper application. Cause: Supervisors review the sliding fee discount program assessment form weekly, however, this error was not caught during that weekly review. Effect: Errors could lead to improper amounts being charged to the patient. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends that the sliding fee discount program assessment form is reviewed to ensure the proper rate is used for each patient. Documentation of the review should be maintained. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Clinic agrees with the finding. The Front Desk lead will review the sliding fee discount document and verify accuracy of calculation and sign the application.

Corrective Action Plan

2023-002 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Recommendation: CLA recommends that the sliding fee discount program assessment form is reviewed to endure the proper rate is used for each patient. Documentation of the review should be maintained. Action planned in response to finding: The Front Desk lead will review the sliding fee discount document and verify accuracy of calculation and sign the application.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2023-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

At the start of a new project, no written rate quotes were obtained as required by the procurement policy. One of the vendors selected had worked on a previous project and proper procurement procedures were followed at that time, however, no new quotes were obtained for the new project. Criteria: The procurement policy states that for expected small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000 rate quotes must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources in writing and documentation should be maintained on file. Cause: The Clinic has a procurement policy, however, at the start of the new project quoted rates were not obtained for the existing vendor. Effect: Possible overpayment for the project. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends the procurement policy is consistently followed. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Clinic agrees with the finding. All small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000 will have rate quotes obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources in writing and documentation will be maintained in the vendor file. Anytime there is a new project that is utilizing federal-sourced funds, and the expected expenditure for that service/good is over $10,000 (but under $250,000), the Clinic will follow the simplified acquisition procedures as noted in 2 CFR Part 200 and the Clinic’s policy for small purchases.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Procurement – Written Rate Quotes Federal Agency: Department of the Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Period: 01/01/2023 – 12/31/2023 Type: Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Questioned Costs: None Condition: At the start of a new project, no written rate quotes were obtained as required by the procurement policy. One of the vendors selected had worked on a previous project and proper procurement procedures were followed at that time, however, no new quotes were obtained for the new project. Criteria: The procurement policy states that for expected small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000 rate quotes must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources in writing and documentation should be maintained on file. Cause: The Clinic has a procurement policy, however, at the start of the new project quoted rates were not obtained for the existing vendor. Effect: Possible overpayment for the project. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: CLA recommends the procurement policy is consistently followed. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Clinic agrees with the finding. All small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000 will have rate quotes obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources in writing and documentation will be maintained in the vendor file. Anytime there is a new project that is utilizing federal-sourced funds, and the expected expenditure for that service/good is over $10,000 (but under $250,000), the Clinic will follow the simplified acquisition procedures as noted in 2 CFR Part 200 and the Clinic’s policy for small purchases.

Corrective Action Plan

2023-003 Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance Recommendation: CLA recommends that the procurement policy is consistently followed. Action planned in response to finding: All small purchases between $10,000 and $250,000 will have rate quotes obtained from and adequate number of qualified sources in writing and documentation will be maintained in the vendor file. Anytime there is a new project that is utilizing federal-sourced funds, and the expected expenditure for that service/good is over $10,000 (but under $250,000), we will follow the simplified acquisition procedures as noted in 2 CFR Part 200 and our policy for small purchases. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2024.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-12-31

$3,870,275 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 10, 2023 — management decision was due January 10, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

$2,830,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2022 — management decision was due December 29, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

$1,915,436 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 15, 2021 — management decision was due January 15, 2022.

2020-002
Cash Management / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Finding 2020-002: Lack of Documentation Ensuring Vendor is Not Suspended or Debarred Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers CFDA Number: 93.224 Award Period: 1/1/2020 ? 12/31/2020 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Criteria: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred, including contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Cause: In our sample of five (5) vendors, we noted no noncompliance, however, the Clinic was unable to provide documentation that the Clinic had verified the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect: The Clinic could make payments to a suspended or debarred vendor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic continue to verify a vendor is not suspended or debarred, however, retain documentation verifying that process occurred. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Clinic agrees with the finding. The Clinic will print documentation to include date and source of search when verifying debarment or suspension. A procedure will be created documenting the process. In addition, the Clinic is looking to hire a procurement specialist to add oversight of the purchasing processes to include debarment or suspension, quotes and bidding, and approvals. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for the Corrective Action: Carolyn Allison, CEO Planned Completion Date for the Corrective Action Plan: August 31, 2021

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-002: Lack of Documentation Ensuring Vendor is Not Suspended or Debarred Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program: Consolidated Health Centers CFDA Number: 93.224 Award Period: 1/1/2020 ? 12/31/2020 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Condition and Criteria: Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred, including contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000. Cause: In our sample of five (5) vendors, we noted no noncompliance, however, the Clinic was unable to provide documentation that the Clinic had verified the vendors were not suspended or debarred. Effect: The Clinic could make payments to a suspended or debarred vendor. Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic continue to verify a vendor is not suspended or debarred, however, retain documentation verifying that process occurred. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Clinic agrees with the finding. The Clinic will print documentation to include date and source of search when verifying debarment or suspension. A procedure will be created documenting the process. In addition, the Clinic is looking to hire a procurement specialist to add oversight of the purchasing processes to include debarment or suspension, quotes and bidding, and approvals. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for the Corrective Action: Carolyn Allison, CEO Planned Completion Date for the Corrective Action Plan: August 31, 2021

Corrective Action Plan

FINDINGS?FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDITS 2020-002 Consolidated Health Centers ? CFDA No. 93.224 Recommendation: We recommend that the Clinic continue to verify a vendor is not suspended or debarred, however, retain documentation verifying that process occurred. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Clinic agrees with the finding. The Clinic will print documentation to include date and source of search when verifying debarment or suspension. A procedure will be created documenting the process. In addition, the Clinic is looking to hire a procurement specialist to add oversight of the purchasing processes to include debarment or suspension, quotes and bidding, and approvals. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Carolyn Allison, CEO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: August 31, 2021

About Cash Management, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2019-12-31

$1,515,795 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2020 — management decision was due June 1, 2021.

FY 2016-12-31

$858,189 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2017 — management decision was due November 14, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Carolina

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.