EIN: 561085968
UEI: YLJ8NLWM6H34
Audited by: Butler & Burke, LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 30, 2026 (34 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2025 — management decision was due August 10, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2023 — management decision was due June 5, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on December 8, 2022 — management decision was due June 8, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2021 — management decision was due June 1, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2021 — management decision was due July 13, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2020 — management decision was due July 12, 2020.
Bank reconciliations were not prepared in a timely manner and did not show evidence that they were reviewed by appropriate personnel. Effect: Internal control is weakened when time passes and significant transactions that affect the bank account of the organization are not reconciled on a timely basis. Cause: Small staff size and change in personnel made experience with the organization's banking transactions difficult to identify and reconcile. Recommendation: Bank statements should be reconciled on a timely basis and a review of appropriate personnel should be evident by documentation. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees that bank reconciliations to ledger need to be performed accurately and timely. Bank reconciliations were performed and reviewed (not initialed, but reviewed) for the fiscal year 2019, however, management will make sure they are initialed as reviewed in the future. Also, all bank transactions are now reconciled to the general ledger as they are recorded before closing a month to ensure the accuracy and timely recording of transactions.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Section II - Financial Statement Findings SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Finding: 2019-001 Criteria: Bank reconciliations should be performed in a timely manner and reviewed by appropriate personnel. Condition: Bank reconciliations were not prepared in a timely manner and did not show evidence that they were reviewed by appropriate personnel. Effect: Internal control is weakened when time passes and significant transactions that affect the bank account of the organization are not reconciled on a timely basis. Cause: Small staff size and change in personnel made experience with the organization's banking transactions difficult to identify and reconcile. Recommendation: Bank statements should be reconciled on a timely basis and a review of appropriate personnel should be evident by documentation. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management agrees that bank reconciliations to ledger need to be performed accurately and timely. Bank reconciliations were performed and reviewed (not initialed, but reviewed) for the fiscal year 2019, however, management will make sure they are initialed as reviewed in the future. Also, all bank transactions are now reconciled to the general ledger as they are recorded before closing a month to ensure the accuracy and timely recording of transactions.
Section II ? Financial Statement Findings Finding: 2019-001 Name of contract person: Marge Becker, Chief Financial Officer Corrective Action: Management and especially the CFO are well aware, committed to and agree that Bank Reconciliations need to be performed accurately and timely. During FY1819, we: 1. Evaluated the skill sets of the employee handling the cash journal entry transactions 2. Reduced the number of transactions recorded to the bank account directly without support/documentation and requiring journal entry. 3. Brought in a temporary accountant with the appropriate credentials just to work on the bank reconciliations. This was her sole responsibility. 4. Established proactive procedures to ensure the download, support, approval, recording and reconciliation of all bank transactions timely. Correcting entries are not and should not be recorded to ?closed and reported? financial statement months; therefore, journal entries were appropriately carried over to an open month (and recorded together). The CFO worked closely with the temporary accountant (the CFO?s handwriting/comments are on supporting documentation) in review of findings. The summary bank reconciliation top sheet is on the network and reviewed by the CFO. We will make sure that this review is ?documented? through paper initials or typed on the form in the future. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately.
Documentation for route sheets for the months of January and February 2019 were mistakenly shredded by the organization for the Meals-on-Wheels program. Effect: No documentation for the months of January and February 2019 was available for testing in the Aging Cluster program. Cause: A large shredding job was completed at the organization in July 2019 and program route sheets from January and February 2019 were inadvertently shredded as part of the project. An internal investigation revealed that the boxes in question were mistakenly placed in the shredding area rather than on shelving designated for their storage. Recommendation: Review of the internal control procedures safeguarding the filing of documentation for such records be reviewed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management has already taken steps to strengthen the internal control by (1) files to be shredded will be placed in the upper part of the storage room in a clearly marked "shredding" area. (2) Boxes holding Meals-on-Wheels program route sheets will be housed separately from any material needing to be shredded. These boxes will be relocated from the storage room to a more secure, isolated closet within the agency.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Section III - Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY Finding: 2019-002 Criteria: Activities Allowed or Unallowed Funds may be used for services associated with access to supportive services for in-home services. Condition: Documentation for route sheets for the months of January and February 2019 were mistakenly shredded by the organization for the Meals-on-Wheels program. Effect: No documentation for the months of January and February 2019 was available for testing in the Aging Cluster program. Cause: A large shredding job was completed at the organization in July 2019 and program route sheets from January and February 2019 were inadvertently shredded as part of the project. An internal investigation revealed that the boxes in question were mistakenly placed in the shredding area rather than on shelving designated for their storage. Recommendation: Review of the internal control procedures safeguarding the filing of documentation for such records be reviewed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Management has already taken steps to strengthen the internal control by (1) files to be shredded will be placed in the upper part of the storage room in a clearly marked "shredding" area. (2) Boxes holding Meals-on-Wheels program route sheets will be housed separately from any material needing to be shredded. These boxes will be relocated from the storage room to a more secure, isolated closet within the agency.
Section III ? Federal Award Finding and Questioned Costs Finding: 2019-002 Name of contact person: Kristen Perry, Chief Operating Officer Correction Action: Occasionally, departments at Senior Services will purge files and contract with an outside entity to complete large shredding jobs. On these occasions, files needing to be shredded are placed in a centralized storage room at the agency. Also kept in this centralized storage room are boxes of Meals-on-Wheels program route sheets that need to be saved. Typically, these boxes are placed on a shelving system separate from the documents for shredding. In July 2019, a large shredding job was completed at Senior Services and program route sheets from January and February of 2019 were inadvertently shredded as part of the project. An internal investigation revealed that the boxes in question (January and February 2019 route sheets) were mistakenly placed in the shredding area rather than on the shelving unit that is designated for their storage. To ensure this does not happen again, and as a quality control measure, we are making the following changes to this procedure: 1. Files to be shredded will be placed in the upper part of the storage room in a clearly marked ?shredding? area. 2. The boxes holding the historical Meals-on-Wheels program route sheets needing to be saved will be housed separate from any material needing to be shredded. These boxes will be relocated from the storage room to a more secure, isolated closet within the agency. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately.
FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2019 — management decision was due July 10, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2017 — management decision was due May 21, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on November 15, 2016 — management decision was due May 15, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Carolina →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.