← Back to home

Catawba Valley Medical Center and AffiliateNon-Profit

EIN: 560789196

UEI: S1GGJY9N3675

Audit also covers EIN: 452702114 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Catawba Valley Medical Center and Affiliate10 audit years4 findings
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,024,355 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 22, 2026 (72 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,206,719 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2024 — management decision was due June 30, 2025.

2024-002
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our cash management testing, we noted that all five drawdown selections were missing physical sign of review or approval. Criteria: It is an ideal practice to have all the cash drawdowns reviewed and approved by a second individual. This review should be documented. Questioned costs: None Cause: All the draw down requests as well as the data compiled to make such requests were reviewed in person with the preparer, and no documentation of this review was maintained. Effect: Lack of proper review and approvals could lead to incorrect draw requests. Recommendation: We recommend management maintain documentation of review and approval of the draw downs. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management will update the current review and approval process going forward.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Grants to Provide Outpatient Early Intervention Services with Respect to HIV Disease Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.918 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Condition: During our cash management testing, we noted that all five drawdown selections were missing physical sign of review or approval. Criteria: It is an ideal practice to have all the cash drawdowns reviewed and approved by a second individual. This review should be documented. Questioned costs: None Cause: All the draw down requests as well as the data compiled to make such requests were reviewed in person with the preparer, and no documentation of this review was maintained. Effect: Lack of proper review and approvals could lead to incorrect draw requests. Recommendation: We recommend management maintain documentation of review and approval of the draw downs. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management will update the current review and approval process going forward.

Corrective Action Plan

Approval of draw requests Recommendation: We recommend that the client keep physical sign of review or approval of the draw downs. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management will update the current review and approval process going forward. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Pam Gallagher, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2024

About Cash Management →
2024-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

During our cash disbursements testing, we noted one expense out of 40 selections was not allowable. An expenditure related to a retirement party was erroneously charged to the grant. Criteria: All expenses incurred under the grant must be to provide outpatient, high-quality, early intervention services and primary care related to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Questioned costs: $24.61 Cause: There was an oversight in the review and approval process. Effect: Unallowable costs were charged to the grant. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure that all expenses are properly reviewed and approved before payment to ensure only allowable expenditures are approved. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management will ensure all expenses are properly reviewed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal program title: Grants to Provide Outpatient Early Intervention Services with Respect to HIV Disease Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.918 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matter Condition: During our cash disbursements testing, we noted one expense out of 40 selections was not allowable. An expenditure related to a retirement party was erroneously charged to the grant. Criteria: All expenses incurred under the grant must be to provide outpatient, high-quality, early intervention services and primary care related to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Questioned costs: $24.61 Cause: There was an oversight in the review and approval process. Effect: Unallowable costs were charged to the grant. Recommendation: We recommend management ensure that all expenses are properly reviewed and approved before payment to ensure only allowable expenditures are approved. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management will ensure all expenses are properly reviewed.

Corrective Action Plan

Allowable Costs Recommendation: We recommend management ensure that all expenses are properly reviewed and approved before payment to ensure only allowable expenditures are approved. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Management will ensure all expenses are properly reviewed. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Pam Gallagher, CFO Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2024.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,454,603 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2024 — management decision was due September 12, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,167,394 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,508,118 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.

2021-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Inaccurate hours and pay rates were documented in the payroll expenditure details submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Cause: Thorough management review of the submissions was not performed. Effect: Expenditures submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not represent actual costs incurred. Questioned costs: $1,385 Recommendation: We recommend the Medical Center reach out to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to determine what process they would like the Medical Center to follow to correct the submissions. Identification of repeat findings: Not a repeat finding. Views of responsible officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Expenditures reported to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services must represent actual costs incurred. Condition: Inaccurate hours and pay rates were documented in the payroll expenditure details submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Cause: Thorough management review of the submissions was not performed. Effect: Expenditures submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services did not represent actual costs incurred. Questioned costs: $1,385 Recommendation: We recommend the Medical Center reach out to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to determine what process they would like the Medical Center to follow to correct the submissions. Identification of repeat findings: Not a repeat finding. Views of responsible officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Employee hours and pay rates included in the payroll expenditures reported the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services should be reviewed prior to submission. Unfortunately, the review was not completed as required prior to the submission. The Medical Center will review all items previously submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for accuracy to determine the dollar amount of unallowable expenditures. The Medical Center will submit additional payroll expenditures to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to account for any unallowable items previously submitted. Anticipated Completion Date: January 31, 2023

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Inaccurate hours and pay rates were documented in the payroll expenditure details submitted to NC Pandemic Recovery Office. Additionally, four instances were identified in which sales tax was inappropriately included in expenditure amounts reported to NC Pandemic Recovery Office. Cause: Thorough management review of the submissions was not performed. Effect: Unallowable costs were submitted to NC Pandemic Recovery Office for reimbursement. Questioned costs: $5,834 Recommendation: We recommend the Medical Center reach out to NC Pandemic Recovery Office to determine what process they would like the Medical Center to follow to correct the submissions. Identification of repeat findings: Not a repeat finding. Views of responsible officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Expenditures reported to NC Pandemic Recovery Office must represent actual allowable costs incurred. Condition: Inaccurate hours and pay rates were documented in the payroll expenditure details submitted to NC Pandemic Recovery Office. Additionally, four instances were identified in which sales tax was inappropriately included in expenditure amounts reported to NC Pandemic Recovery Office. Cause: Thorough management review of the submissions was not performed. Effect: Unallowable costs were submitted to NC Pandemic Recovery Office for reimbursement. Questioned costs: $5,834 Recommendation: We recommend the Medical Center reach out to NC Pandemic Recovery Office to determine what process they would like the Medical Center to follow to correct the submissions. Identification of repeat findings: Not a repeat finding. Views of responsible officials: See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Expenditures reported to the NC Pandemic Recovery Office should be reviewed prior to submission. Unfortunately, the review was not completed as required prior to the submission. The Medical Center will review all items previously submitted to the NC Pandemic Recovery Office for accuracy to determine the dollar amount of unallowable expenditures related to payroll and sales taxes. The Medical Center will submit additional expenditures to the NC Pandemic Recovery Office to account for any unallowable items previously submitted. Anticipated Completion Date: January 31, 2023

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,143,425 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2021 — management decision was due December 27, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$960,260 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 17, 2019 — management decision was due May 17, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,040,826 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2018 — management decision was due May 11, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$906,556 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 9, 2017 — management decision was due May 9, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$943,615 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2017 — management decision was due August 28, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Carolina

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.