← Back to home

Logan County CommissionLocal Government

EIN: 556000343

UEI: TJQ6TT66B9J1

Audited by: BHM CPA Group, Inc

Oversight agency: 11 [Department of Commerce]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Logan County Commission7 audit years2 findings
7
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$5.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$5,876,429 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (24 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$4,712,857 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 30, 2025 — management decision was due October 30, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

QUALIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$5,086,999 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 8, 2024 — management decision was due October 8, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$2,758,826 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2024 — management decision was due August 27, 2024.

2022-004
Subrecipient Monitoring
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

We noted during our audit that the Logan County Commission failed to properly monitor subrecipients. Specifically, there was no assurance that the funds sent for reimbursement were expensed by the subrecipients. Criteria: Appendix XI of the 2 CFR Part 200 July 2021 Compliance Supplement states, in part: “Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f))…” Questioned Costs: $993,739 Context: $993,739 of disbursements were made to local governments without the subrecipients activities being monitored to ensure expenditures of the subaward were used for authorized purposes and in accordance with the grant guidelines. Cause: The Logan County Commission did not have procedures in place to ensure this subrecipient monitoring requirement was performed. Effect: Failure to properly monitor subrecipients increases the likelihood of errors or irregularities not being prevented or detected in a timely manner. Additionally, the risk of unallowable activities and unallowable costs is significantly increased. Management failed to comply with all applicable, material compliance requirements of the grant agreement. Recommendation: The Logan County Commission is directed to review this regulation and comply with the provisions set forth therein. Clients’ response See Corrective Action Plan

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Subrecipient Monitoring General Information: Grant Title: Airport Improvement Program ALN #: 20.106 Federal Agency: Department of Transportation Condition: We noted during our audit that the Logan County Commission failed to properly monitor subrecipients. Specifically, there was no assurance that the funds sent for reimbursement were expensed by the subrecipients. Criteria: Appendix XI of the 2 CFR Part 200 July 2021 Compliance Supplement states, in part: “Monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals (2 CFR sections 200.332(d) through (f))…” Questioned Costs: $993,739 Context: $993,739 of disbursements were made to local governments without the subrecipients activities being monitored to ensure expenditures of the subaward were used for authorized purposes and in accordance with the grant guidelines. Cause: The Logan County Commission did not have procedures in place to ensure this subrecipient monitoring requirement was performed. Effect: Failure to properly monitor subrecipients increases the likelihood of errors or irregularities not being prevented or detected in a timely manner. Additionally, the risk of unallowable activities and unallowable costs is significantly increased. Management failed to comply with all applicable, material compliance requirements of the grant agreement. Recommendation: The Logan County Commission is directed to review this regulation and comply with the provisions set forth therein. Clients’ response See Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan

The Logan County Commission will endeavor to put procedures in place to ensure subrecepient monitoring requirements are performed in compliance with all applicable, material compliance requirements of the Grant agreement.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2022-005
Reporting
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Timeliness of Single Audit We noted that the County did not submit the single audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the prescribed timeframe. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) section 200.512 State: “The audit must be completed and the data collection form …and reporting package … must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period….” The entity was unable to compile financial statements before the prescribed timeframe had been reached. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, or take actions that could include in part; temporarily withhold cash payments, disallow all or part of the cost of the activity, wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award, withhold further Federal awards for the project or program, or take other remedies that may be legally available. For future single audits, the County should endeavor to ensure that financial statements are complete and that the audit is scheduled prior to the single audit deadline Clients’ response See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Timeliness of Single Audit We noted that the County did not submit the single audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse within the prescribed timeframe. Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) section 200.512 State: “The audit must be completed and the data collection form …and reporting package … must be submitted within the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine months after the end of the audit period….” The entity was unable to compile financial statements before the prescribed timeframe had been reached. The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may impose additional conditions, or take actions that could include in part; temporarily withhold cash payments, disallow all or part of the cost of the activity, wholly or partly suspend or terminate the Federal award, withhold further Federal awards for the project or program, or take other remedies that may be legally available. For future single audits, the County should endeavor to ensure that financial statements are complete and that the audit is scheduled prior to the single audit deadline Clients’ response See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

The Logan County Commission will endeavor to ensure that financial statements are complete and that the audit is scheduled prior to the single audit deadline. We have employed an outside accounting firm to assist with the financial statements

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,303,813 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 22, 2022 — management decision was due March 22, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,608,072 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2021 — management decision was due September 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,492,029 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 10, 2020 — management decision was due September 10, 2020.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in West Virginia

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.