EIN: 550561151
UEI: C1S2RAPGNCR5
Audited by: Tetrick & Bartlett, PLLC
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 14, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 19, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 19, 2025 (361 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2024 — management decision was due August 28, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2022 — management decision was due July 12, 2022.
Responsibility for approving, executing and recording transactions and custody of the resulting asset arising from the transaction should be assigned to different individuals. Cause: Responsibilities of approval, execution, recording and custody are not distributed among the office staff to the best degree possible. Effect: Because of the failure to segregate duties, internal control structure elements do not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by management in the normal course of performing assigned functions. Recommendation: Responsibilities of approval, execution, recording and custody be distributed among individuals to the degree possible. We recommend that management and the Board of Directors provide oversight and independent review functions and to continue exercising due diligence and professional skepticism in relation to the District's financial operations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: To the extent possible, the District has segregated its duties. Any further segregation of duties would not be economically feasible. Total Questioned Costs $ -0-
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴#2021-006 Segregation of Duties United States Department of Agriculture Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities AL# 10.760 Criteria: Internal control should be implemented to the degree possible to assign to different individuals the responsibility for approving, executing and recording transactions and custody of the resulting asset arising from the transaction. Condition: Responsibility for approving, executing and recording transactions and custody of the resulting asset arising from the transaction should be assigned to different individuals. Cause: Responsibilities of approval, execution, recording and custody are not distributed among the office staff to the best degree possible. Effect: Because of the failure to segregate duties, internal control structure elements do not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by management in the normal course of performing assigned functions. Recommendation: Responsibilities of approval, execution, recording and custody be distributed among individuals to the degree possible. We recommend that management and the Board of Directors provide oversight and independent review functions and to continue exercising due diligence and professional skepticism in relation to the District's financial operations. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: To the extent possible, the District has segregated its duties. Any further segregation of duties would not be economically feasible. Total Questioned Costs $ -0-
#2021-006 Segregation of Duties United States Department of Agriculture Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities AL #10.760 Recommendation: Responsibilities of approval, execution, recording and custody be distributed among individuals to the degree possible. We recommend that management and the Board of Directors should remain involved in the financial affairs of the District to provide oversight and independent review functions and to continue exercising due diligence and professional skepticism in relation to the District's financial operations. Action Taken: To the extent possible, the District has segregated its duties. Any further segregation of duties would not be economically feasible.
FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2020 — management decision was due July 28, 2020.
Responsibility for approving, executing and recording transactions and custody of the resulting asset arising from the transaction should be assigned to different individuals. Cause: Responsibilities of approval, execution, recording and custody are not distributed among the office staff to the best degree possible. Effect: Because of the failure to segregate duties, internal control structure elements do not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by management in the normal course of performing assigned functions. Costs
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Internal control should be implemented to the degree possible to assign to different individuals the responsibility for approving, executing and recording transactions and custody of the resulting asset arising from the transaction. Condition: Responsibility for approving, executing and recording transactions and custody of the resulting asset arising from the transaction should be assigned to different individuals. Cause: Responsibilities of approval, execution, recording and custody are not distributed among the office staff to the best degree possible. Effect: Because of the failure to segregate duties, internal control structure elements do not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by management in the normal course of performing assigned functions. Costs
#2019-004 Segregation of Duties United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grants/State's Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii United States Department of Agriculture Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural Communities CFDA #14.228 CFDA #10.760 Recommendation: Responsibilities of approval, execution, recording and custody be distributed among individuals to the degree possible. We recommend that management and the Board of Directors should remain involved in the financial affairs of the District to provide oversight and independent review functions and to continue exercising due diligence and professional skepticism in relation to the District's financial operations. Action Taken: To the extent possible, the District has segregated its duties. Any further segregation of duties would not be economically feasible. 55
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in West Virginia →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
