← Back to home

County of SpotsylvaniaLocal Government

EIN: 546001622

UEI: GM7WK5Z7A5M1

Audit also covers EIN: 546001624 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

County of Spotsylvania11 audit years9 findings4 repeat
11
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
4
Repeat Findings
$59.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$59,534,240 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 26, 2026 (25 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Criteria or Specific Requirement: Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: School system management is required to submit monthly reimbursement requests to the Virginia State Department of Education, which relies on these reports as the basis for reimbursing the school system for reported expenditures. For three of the monthly reimbursement requests selected for testing, the school system was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that an individual independent of the preparer reviewed and approved the reimbursement reports prior to submission. As a result, there was no evidence of adequate segregation of duties between the preparation of the reimbursement requests and their review and approval. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the reimbursement request was properly supported by underlying documentation of the associated expenditures. Cause: The school system did not have sufficient policies and procedures over internal controls to maintain evidence of review and approval of the reimbursement reports. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Effect: The lack of a formal review and approval process could result in inaccurate amounts reported and reimbursed for the Federal programs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the school system implement procedures to ensure that documentation evidencing the separate preparation and approval of monthly reimbursement requests is retained for audit purposes. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or Specific Requirement: Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should comply with the guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control-Integrated Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition/Context: School system management is required to submit monthly reimbursement requests to the Virginia State Department of Education, which relies on these reports as the basis for reimbursing the school system for reported expenditures. For three of the monthly reimbursement requests selected for testing, the school system was unable to provide documentation demonstrating that an individual independent of the preparer reviewed and approved the reimbursement reports prior to submission. As a result, there was no evidence of adequate segregation of duties between the preparation of the reimbursement requests and their review and approval. Questioned Costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the reimbursement request was properly supported by underlying documentation of the associated expenditures. Cause: The school system did not have sufficient policies and procedures over internal controls to maintain evidence of review and approval of the reimbursement reports. Section III – Findings and Questioned Costs – Major Federal Programs (Continued) Effect: The lack of a formal review and approval process could result in inaccurate amounts reported and reimbursed for the Federal programs. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the school system implement procedures to ensure that documentation evidencing the separate preparation and approval of monthly reimbursement requests is retained for audit purposes. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend that the management of the school system implement policies and procedures to ensure that documentation evidencing the separate preparation and approval of the monthly reimbursement requests are retained for audit purposes. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Example- The School Board will establish an additional level of segregation of duties within the monthly reimbursement process, prior to submission, to ensure appropriate oversight and review. Procedures now require that the preparation of reimbursement reports be performed by one staff member, while the review and approval of the reports are completed by a separate individual, independent of the preparer, prior to submission. Evidence of review and approval is documented and retained in accordance with Federal record-retention requirements.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$43,720,216 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$48,369,298 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Spotsylvania Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the vendors were not federally suspended or debarred. Cause: Spotsylvania Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Spotsylvania School should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP1026 -2021 Pass-Through Agency: Virginia Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 179001-600540/452770 Award Period: 3/3/21 – 12/31/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person (7) Distribution of work to individuals and firms or economic considerations. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Spotsylvania Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the vendors were not federally suspended or debarred. Cause: Spotsylvania Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Spotsylvania School should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Number: SLFRP1026 Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Prior Year Finding: No Criteria: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person (7) Distribution of work to individuals and firms or economic considerations. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non‐Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Spotsylvania County Public Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Questioned Costs: None Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program Cause: Spotsylvania County Public Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Recommendation: Spotsylvania County Public Schools should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Our procurement office will complete a check list to ensure compliance. Current procedures already require for suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts/agreements with vendors. In this case, the procedure was followed appropriately, but documentation was not retained. Failure to retain a screenshot of the debarment search is easily corrected and staff will ensure such screenshots are saved when the search is completed. Action taken in response to finding: Spotsylvania County Public Schools will ensure the procurement checklist is followed and all supporting documentation is retained on file. Name of contact person (s) responsible for the corrective action plan: Phil Trayer and Jamie Pitts

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Spotsylvania Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the vendors were not federally suspended or debarred. Cause: Spotsylvania Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Spotsylvania School should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP1026 -2021 Pass-Through Agency: Virginia Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 179001-600540/452770 Award Period: 3/3/21 – 12/31/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person (7) Distribution of work to individuals and firms or economic considerations. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Spotsylvania Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the vendors were not federally suspended or debarred. Cause: Spotsylvania Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Spotsylvania School should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Number: SLFRP1026 Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Prior Year Finding: No Criteria: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person (7) Distribution of work to individuals and firms or economic considerations. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non‐Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Spotsylvania County Public Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Questioned Costs: None Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program Cause: Spotsylvania County Public Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Recommendation: Spotsylvania County Public Schools should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Our procurement office will complete a check list to ensure compliance. Current procedures already require for suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts/agreements with vendors. In this case, the procedure was followed appropriately, but documentation was not retained. Failure to retain a screenshot of the debarment search is easily corrected and staff will ensure such screenshots are saved when the search is completed. Action taken in response to finding: Spotsylvania County Public Schools will ensure the procurement checklist is followed and all supporting documentation is retained on file. Name of contact person (s) responsible for the corrective action plan: Phil Trayer and Jamie Pitts

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$48,369,298 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 7, 2024 — management decision was due May 7, 2025.

2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Spotsylvania Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the vendors were not federally suspended or debarred. Cause: Spotsylvania Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Spotsylvania School should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP1026 -2021 Pass-Through Agency: Virginia Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 179001-600540/452770 Award Period: 3/3/21 – 12/31/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person (7) Distribution of work to individuals and firms or economic considerations. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Spotsylvania Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the vendors were not federally suspended or debarred. Cause: Spotsylvania Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Spotsylvania School should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Number: SLFRP1026 Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Prior Year Finding: No Criteria: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person (7) Distribution of work to individuals and firms or economic considerations. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non‐Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Spotsylvania County Public Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Questioned Costs: None Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program Cause: Spotsylvania County Public Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Recommendation: Spotsylvania County Public Schools should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Our procurement office will complete a check list to ensure compliance. Current procedures already require for suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts/agreements with vendors. In this case, the procedure was followed appropriately, but documentation was not retained. Failure to retain a screenshot of the debarment search is easily corrected and staff will ensure such screenshots are saved when the search is completed. Action taken in response to finding: Spotsylvania County Public Schools will ensure the procurement checklist is followed and all supporting documentation is retained on file. Name of contact person (s) responsible for the corrective action plan: Phil Trayer and Jamie Pitts

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Spotsylvania Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the vendors were not federally suspended or debarred. Cause: Spotsylvania Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Spotsylvania School should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP1026 -2021 Pass-Through Agency: Virginia Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 179001-600540/452770 Award Period: 3/3/21 – 12/31/24 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities. 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person (7) Distribution of work to individuals and firms or economic considerations. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Spotsylvania Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program. Questioned costs: There are no questioned costs related to this finding as the vendors were not federally suspended or debarred. Cause: Spotsylvania Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: Spotsylvania School should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Award Number: SLFRP1026 Compliance Requirement: Suspension and Debarment Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Prior Year Finding: No Criteria: Compliance: 2 CFR 200.213 Suspension and Debarment restricts awards, subawards, and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities 2 CFR 180.300 states that an entity may determine suspension and debarment status by: (a) Checking SAM (System for Award Management) Exclusions; or (b) Collecting a certification from that person; or (c) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person (7) Distribution of work to individuals and firms or economic considerations. Control: Per 2 CFR Section 200.303(a), a non‐Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non‐Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in “Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government” issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the “Internal Control Integrated Framework”, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: Spotsylvania County Public Schools could not provide supporting documentation that suspension and debarment status was determined prior to award. Questioned Costs: None Context: The suspension and debarment status for one out of two vendors was not retained related to the Coronavirus and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program Cause: Spotsylvania County Public Schools did not adhere to established internal controls over suspension and debarment transactions. Effect: In the absence of required documentation, it is not possible to verify that particular vendors were not suspended or debarred at the time that the applicable agreement or contract was finalized. Recommendation: Spotsylvania County Public Schools should ensure that employees are following the requirements they have outlined in their procurement policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Our procurement office will complete a check list to ensure compliance. Current procedures already require for suspension and debarment verification prior to entering into contracts/agreements with vendors. In this case, the procedure was followed appropriately, but documentation was not retained. Failure to retain a screenshot of the debarment search is easily corrected and staff will ensure such screenshots are saved when the search is completed. Action taken in response to finding: Spotsylvania County Public Schools will ensure the procurement checklist is followed and all supporting documentation is retained on file. Name of contact person (s) responsible for the corrective action plan: Phil Trayer and Jamie Pitts

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-06-30

$54,076,218 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$55,352,285 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

$35,823,810 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 30, 2021 — management decision was due March 2, 2022.

FY 2019-06-30

$23,664,826 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2020 — management decision was due September 2, 2020.

2019-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-002OTHER MATTERS

During our testing of sixty (60) eligibility determinations, we noted the following exceptions: ? One (1) beneficiary case file did not contain evidence for proof of citizenship. ? One (1) eligible beneficiary?s redetermination was completed, but not within twelve (12) months of the prior determination of eligibility. Cause: An increase in the number of applicants during the year as a result of continued implementation of Affordable Care Act measures, as well as a lack of personnel to assist in processing and reviewing these applications, prevented the County from complying with the program?s requirements for determination of participant?s eligibility. Effect: The County?s noncompliance could result in costs disallowed by the grantor or a reduction in future funding for this program. Questioned Cost: Undeterminable. Recommendation: The County should implement a plan to enhance internal controls related to participant eligibility to ensure files contain adequate supporting documentation in accordance with the program requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Responsible Person: Luana Cheatham, Erin Turner, Leanne Richardson and Jamillah Jefferson. Benefits Division Director: Currently vacant. Estimated Completion: Latest deployment date: 1/13/20, all activity will be on-going. Corrected Action: The prior year?s corrective action plan was not shared with Ms. Cheatham, the individual identified as the ?responsible person?. As a result, the Benefits leadership team was unaware of the planned corrective actions and subsequently did not successfully implement the corrective action plan submitted. Once a worker completes all mandatory trainings and is performing required duties and completing associated tasks accurately and timely, a worker is moved from 100% monitoring to general supervision. The optimal process for evaluation of on-going performance includes random case monitoring for accuracy in determination and quality of documentation. Worker knowledge and ability to perform accurate, timely determination and maintain quality case documentation is supported by regular communication and training in policy updates and system changes. Due the high number of Eligibility Workers with less than one year experience and therefore requiring elevated levels of supervision and case review, the ability of Supervisors to engage in random case monitoring of existing workers and deliver regular unit refresher training on policy or systems issues was very limited. Existing workers, due to high caseloads but still accountable to process cases timely, and experiencing ongoing challenges presented by state system access issues, were at risk for errors in eligibility determination actions and decisions. Errors in performance by existing workers were not noted timely due to priority given to training and supporting new workers. Specific Corrective Action: All Eligibility Supervisor positions are now filled, which will allow capacity for random case monitoring to be conducted monthly inclusive of all workers in the sample pool. Supervisors and Senior Worker level staff will conduct one random case readings per month, per eligibility worker. The findings from these case readings will be logged, tracked, and discussed monthly at Benefit Division Leadership meetings and used to develop targeted training. The findings will also be reviewed and discussed at employee staffing meetings. Start date: February 2020 A Medicaid focus workgroup will meet regularly to review caseload management, processing deadlines, policy updates, peer trainings, ?Q&A? sessions, and other needs as determined. Start date: November 2019 Each month, Supervisors will provide policy and/or procedure refresher at the monthly Division meetings. Training topics will be decided based on evaluation of Division case reading findings, internal and external audit finding and employee requests. Start date: October 2019

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001: Significant Deficiency and Non-material Noncompliance ? Eligibility (Repeat Finding ? 2018-002) Program: Medical Assistance Program (CFDA Number 93.778 ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ? Virginia Department of Social Services; Federal Award Number: not available; Federal Award Year: 2019) Criteria: Per Title 2 Subpart Section 200.303, ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings.? Per Subchapter M1520.001 of the Virginia Medical Assistance Eligibility Manual, ?An annual review of all of the enrollee's eligibility requirements is called a renewal. A renewal of the enrollee's eligibility must be completed at least once every 12 months. The renewal should be initiated in the 11th month to ensure timely completion of the renewal?. Condition: During our testing of sixty (60) eligibility determinations, we noted the following exceptions: ? One (1) beneficiary case file did not contain evidence for proof of citizenship. ? One (1) eligible beneficiary?s redetermination was completed, but not within twelve (12) months of the prior determination of eligibility. Cause: An increase in the number of applicants during the year as a result of continued implementation of Affordable Care Act measures, as well as a lack of personnel to assist in processing and reviewing these applications, prevented the County from complying with the program?s requirements for determination of participant?s eligibility. Effect: The County?s noncompliance could result in costs disallowed by the grantor or a reduction in future funding for this program. Questioned Cost: Undeterminable. Recommendation: The County should implement a plan to enhance internal controls related to participant eligibility to ensure files contain adequate supporting documentation in accordance with the program requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Responsible Person: Luana Cheatham, Erin Turner, Leanne Richardson and Jamillah Jefferson. Benefits Division Director: Currently vacant. Estimated Completion: Latest deployment date: 1/13/20, all activity will be on-going. Corrected Action: The prior year?s corrective action plan was not shared with Ms. Cheatham, the individual identified as the ?responsible person?. As a result, the Benefits leadership team was unaware of the planned corrective actions and subsequently did not successfully implement the corrective action plan submitted. Once a worker completes all mandatory trainings and is performing required duties and completing associated tasks accurately and timely, a worker is moved from 100% monitoring to general supervision. The optimal process for evaluation of on-going performance includes random case monitoring for accuracy in determination and quality of documentation. Worker knowledge and ability to perform accurate, timely determination and maintain quality case documentation is supported by regular communication and training in policy updates and system changes. Due the high number of Eligibility Workers with less than one year experience and therefore requiring elevated levels of supervision and case review, the ability of Supervisors to engage in random case monitoring of existing workers and deliver regular unit refresher training on policy or systems issues was very limited. Existing workers, due to high caseloads but still accountable to process cases timely, and experiencing ongoing challenges presented by state system access issues, were at risk for errors in eligibility determination actions and decisions. Errors in performance by existing workers were not noted timely due to priority given to training and supporting new workers. Specific Corrective Action: All Eligibility Supervisor positions are now filled, which will allow capacity for random case monitoring to be conducted monthly inclusive of all workers in the sample pool. Supervisors and Senior Worker level staff will conduct one random case readings per month, per eligibility worker. The findings from these case readings will be logged, tracked, and discussed monthly at Benefit Division Leadership meetings and used to develop targeted training. The findings will also be reviewed and discussed at employee staffing meetings. Start date: February 2020 A Medicaid focus workgroup will meet regularly to review caseload management, processing deadlines, policy updates, peer trainings, ?Q&A? sessions, and other needs as determined. Start date: November 2019 Each month, Supervisors will provide policy and/or procedure refresher at the monthly Division meetings. Training topics will be decided based on evaluation of Division case reading findings, internal and external audit finding and employee requests. Start date: October 2019

Corrective Action Plan

2019-001: Significant Deficiency and Non-material Noncompliance ? Eligibility (Repeat Finding ? 2018-002) Program: Medical Assistance Program (CFDA Number 93.778 ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ? Virginia Department of Social Services; Federal Award Number: not available; Federal Award Year: 2019) Criteria: Per Title 2 Subpart Section 200.303, ?The non-Federal entity must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity's compliance with statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of Federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings.? Per Subchapter M1520.001 of the Virginia Medical Assistance Eligibility Manual, ?An annual review of all of the enrollee's eligibility requirements is called a renewal. A renewal of the enrollee's eligibility must be completed at least once every 12 months. The renewal should be initiated in the 11th month to ensure timely completion of the renewal?. Condition: During our testing of sixty (60) eligibility determinations, we noted the following exceptions: ? One (1) beneficiary case file did not contain evidence for proof of citizenship. ? One (1) eligible beneficiary?s redetermination was completed, but not within twelve (12) months of the prior determination of eligibility. Cause: An increase in the number of applicants during the year as a result of continued implementation of Affordable Care Act measures, as well as a lack of personnel to assist in processing and reviewing these applications, prevented the County from complying with the program?s requirements for determination of participant?s eligibility. Effect: The County?s noncompliance could result in costs disallowed by the grantor or a reduction in future funding for this program. Questioned Cost: Undeterminable. Recommendation: The County should implement a plan to enhance internal controls related to participant eligibility to ensure files contain adequate supporting documentation in accordance with the program requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Responsible Person: Luana Cheatham, Erin Turner, Leanne Richardson and Jamillah Jefferson. Benefits Division Director: Currently vacant. Estimated Completion: Latest deployment date: 1/13/20, all activity will be on-going. Corrected Action: The prior year?s corrective action plan was not shared with Ms. Cheatham, the individual identified as the ?responsible person?. As a result, the Benefits leadership team was unaware of the planned corrective actions and subsequently did not successfully implement the corrective action plan submitted. Once a worker completes all mandatory trainings and is performing required duties and completing associated tasks accurately and timely, a worker is moved from 100% monitoring to general supervision. The optimal process for evaluation of on-going performance includes random case monitoring for accuracy in determination and quality of documentation. Worker knowledge and ability to perform accurate, timely determination and maintain quality case documentation is supported by regular communication and training in policy updates and system changes. Due the high number of Eligibility Workers with less than one year experience and therefore requiring elevated levels of supervision and case review, the ability of Supervisors to engage in random case monitoring of existing workers and deliver regular unit refresher training on policy or systems issues was very limited. Existing workers, due to high caseloads but still accountable to process cases timely, and experiencing ongoing challenges presented by state system access issues, were at risk for errors in eligibility determination actions and decisions. Errors in performance by existing workers were not noted timely due to priority given to training and supporting new workers. Specific Corrective Action: All Eligibility Supervisor positions are now filled, which will allow capacity for random case monitoring to be conducted monthly inclusive of all workers in the sample pool. Supervisors and Senior Worker level staff will conduct one random case readings per month, per eligibility worker. The findings from these case readings will be logged, tracked, and discussed monthly at Benefit Division Leadership meetings and used to develop targeted training. The findings will also be reviewed and discussed at employee staffing meetings. Start date: February 2020 A Medicaid focus workgroup will meet regularly to review caseload management, processing deadlines, policy updates, peer trainings, ?Q&A? sessions, and other needs as determined. Start date: November 2019 Each month, Supervisors will provide policy and/or procedure refresher at the monthly Division meetings. Training topics will be decided based on evaluation of Division case reading findings, internal and external audit finding and employee requests. Start date: October 2019

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Eligibility →
2019-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our testing of forty (40) eligibility determinations, we noted two (2) instances in which the adoptive parents submitted the annual affidavit to the County, but not within thirty (30) days of the anniversary date of the approved adoption agreement. Cause: Parents did not submit the annual affidavit with the required time period. Effect: The County?s noncompliance could result in costs disallowed by the grantor or a reduction in future funding for this program. Questioned Cost: None noted. Recommendation: The County should implement a plan to enhance internal controls to ensure the timely submission of program required documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Responsible Person: Services Supervisor: LaCora Harris Estimated Completion: Effective 1/13/20 Corrected Action: To ensure files contain adequate supporting documentation the Case Aide position, under supervision of the Services Supervisor, will be responsible for monthly monitoring of all Adoption Subsidy cases agreement dates. At a minimum the Case Aide will mail out a request for the annual Affidavit one month prior to the anniversary of an Adoption Subsidy agreement. The Case Aide will then update the case accordingly, prior to the anniversary date, to document if the Affidavit is received or if it is not returned.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Program: Adoption Assistance (CFDA Number 93.659 ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ? Virginia Department of Social Services; Federal Award Number: not available; Federal Award Year: 2019) Criteria: Per the Code of Virginia, Section 63.2-1302, adoptive parents shall submit annually to the local board within thirty (30) days of the anniversary date of the approved agreement an affidavit which certifies that (i) the child on whose behalf they are receiving adoption assistance payments remains in their care, (ii) the child's condition requiring adoption assistance continues to exist, and (iii) whether or not changes to the adoption assistance agreement are requested. Condition: During our testing of forty (40) eligibility determinations, we noted two (2) instances in which the adoptive parents submitted the annual affidavit to the County, but not within thirty (30) days of the anniversary date of the approved adoption agreement. Cause: Parents did not submit the annual affidavit with the required time period. Effect: The County?s noncompliance could result in costs disallowed by the grantor or a reduction in future funding for this program. Questioned Cost: None noted. Recommendation: The County should implement a plan to enhance internal controls to ensure the timely submission of program required documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Responsible Person: Services Supervisor: LaCora Harris Estimated Completion: Effective 1/13/20 Corrected Action: To ensure files contain adequate supporting documentation the Case Aide position, under supervision of the Services Supervisor, will be responsible for monthly monitoring of all Adoption Subsidy cases agreement dates. At a minimum the Case Aide will mail out a request for the annual Affidavit one month prior to the anniversary of an Adoption Subsidy agreement. The Case Aide will then update the case accordingly, prior to the anniversary date, to document if the Affidavit is received or if it is not returned.

Corrective Action Plan

2019-002: Significant Deficiency and Non-material Noncompliance ? Eligibility Program: Adoption Assistance (CFDA Number 93.659 ? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ? Virginia Department of Social Services; Federal Award Number: not available; Federal Award Year: 2019) Criteria: Per the Code of Virginia, Section 63.2-1302, adoptive parents shall submit annually to the local board within thirty (30) days of the anniversary date of the approved agreement an affidavit which certifies that (i) the child on whose behalf they are receiving adoption assistance payments remains in their care, (ii) the child's condition requiring adoption assistance continues to exist, and (iii) whether or not changes to the adoption assistance agreement are requested. Condition: During our testing of forty (40) eligibility determinations, we noted two (2) instances in which the adoptive parents submitted the annual affidavit to the County, but not within thirty (30) days of the anniversary date of the approved adoption agreement. Cause: Parents did not submit the annual affidavit with the required time period. Effect: The County?s noncompliance could result in costs disallowed by the grantor or a reduction in future funding for this program. Questioned Cost: None noted. Recommendation: The County should implement a plan to enhance internal controls to ensure the timely submission of program required documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Responsible Person: Services Supervisor: LaCora Harris Estimated Completion: Effective 1/13/20 Corrected Action: To ensure files contain adequate supporting documentation the Case Aide position, under supervision of the Services Supervisor, will be responsible for monthly monitoring of all Adoption Subsidy cases agreement dates. At a minimum the Case Aide will mail out a request for the annual Affidavit one month prior to the anniversary of an Adoption Subsidy agreement. The Case Aide will then update the case accordingly, prior to the anniversary date, to document if the Affidavit is received or if it is not returned.

About Eligibility →

FY 2018-06-30

$23,193,454 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019 — management decision was due September 27, 2019.

2018-002
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

FY 2017-06-30

$21,036,998 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2018 — management decision was due August 13, 2018.

2017-002
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2016-003

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-003

About Eligibility →

FY 2016-06-30

$20,448,542 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2017 — management decision was due July 11, 2017.

2016-003
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2015-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Eligibility →
2016-004
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-002OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-002

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Virginia

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.