EIN: 546001279
UEI: LDRWDCHH9N15
Audit also covers 3 related EINs: 432061820, 546001278, 546001281 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing
Audited by: Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P.
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 28, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 28, 2027 (175 days from today).
What is a management decision? →Uniform Guidance Procurement Manual, Assistance Listing #21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund and Assistance Listing #10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 – Child Nutrition Cluster, Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Condition The County does not have a Uniform Guidance Procurement Manual. Criteria The County should be using a procurement manual that aligns with Uniform Guidance requirements. Cause The County does not have a Uniform Guidance Procurement Manual. Effect Purchases made using federal funding may not be compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation We recommend developing a procurement manual that is compliant with Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action The County agrees with the recommendation and will develop one procurement manual that applies to all departments.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Uniform Guidance Procurement Manual, Assistance Listing #21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund and Assistance Listing #10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 – Child Nutrition Cluster, Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Condition The County does not have a Uniform Guidance Procurement Manual. Criteria The County should be using a procurement manual that aligns with Uniform Guidance requirements. Cause The County does not have a Uniform Guidance Procurement Manual. Effect Purchases made using federal funding may not be compliant with Uniform Guidance requirements. Recommendation We recommend developing a procurement manual that is compliant with Uniform Guidance. View of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action The County agrees with the recommendation and will develop one procurement manual that applies to all departments.
The County agrees with the recommendation and will develop one procurement manual that applies to all departments.
Supporting Documentation for Expenditures, Assistance Listing #21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, Activities Allowed/Unallowed – Material Non-Compliance Condition Key line items on the P&E report are not supported by documentation due to a miscommunication between the report preparer and expenditure reconciler. Criteria Key line items on the P&E report should be compared to documentation prior to submission. Cause Miscommunication between preparer of the P&E report and the reconciler of the actual expenditures. The reconciler of the expenditures tied the balances from the expenditures to the trial balance, but the preparer did not utilize the reconciled numbers. Effect No supporting documentation for key line items on P&E expenditure report. Questioned Cost Amount P&E report was understated by $186,000. Recommendation We recommend CSLFRF funds and spending spreadsheets be reviewed before preparation and submission of the report. Printed version should be reviewed and compared to spreadsheets before submission. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The County has reviewed, updated and verified spending spreadsheet for submission and will maintain until all expenditures are completed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Supporting Documentation for Expenditures, Assistance Listing #21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, Activities Allowed/Unallowed – Material Non-Compliance Condition Key line items on the P&E report are not supported by documentation due to a miscommunication between the report preparer and expenditure reconciler. Criteria Key line items on the P&E report should be compared to documentation prior to submission. Cause Miscommunication between preparer of the P&E report and the reconciler of the actual expenditures. The reconciler of the expenditures tied the balances from the expenditures to the trial balance, but the preparer did not utilize the reconciled numbers. Effect No supporting documentation for key line items on P&E expenditure report. Questioned Cost Amount P&E report was understated by $186,000. Recommendation We recommend CSLFRF funds and spending spreadsheets be reviewed before preparation and submission of the report. Printed version should be reviewed and compared to spreadsheets before submission. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The County has reviewed, updated and verified spending spreadsheet for submission and will maintain until all expenditures are completed.
The County has reviewed, updated, and verified spending spreadsheet for submission and will maintain until all expenditures are completed.
Understatement, Assistance Listing #21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, Reporting – Material Weakness Condition The SEFA was understated by $175,000 for the E&T LE Grant. Criteria All expenditures for the major programs should be identified and reported on the SEFA. Cause The only expenditures included on the SEFA were items reimbursed that appeared on the state Cardinal Report. Effect The SEFA was understated for the E&T LE Grant. Recommendation We recommend completing the SEFA using a listing of expenditures as well as reconciling to the Cardinal Report to ensure completeness. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The County agrees with this recommendation and will verify the expenditures as well the Cardinal Report for reporting.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Understatement, Assistance Listing #21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, Reporting – Material Weakness Condition The SEFA was understated by $175,000 for the E&T LE Grant. Criteria All expenditures for the major programs should be identified and reported on the SEFA. Cause The only expenditures included on the SEFA were items reimbursed that appeared on the state Cardinal Report. Effect The SEFA was understated for the E&T LE Grant. Recommendation We recommend completing the SEFA using a listing of expenditures as well as reconciling to the Cardinal Report to ensure completeness. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action The County agrees with this recommendation and will verify the expenditures as well the Cardinal Report for reporting.
The County agrees with this recommendation and will verify the expenditures as well as the Cardinal Report for reporting.
FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2025 — management decision was due January 31, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2024 — management decision was due August 15, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on April 23, 2023 — management decision was due October 23, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2022 — management decision was due July 23, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2020 — management decision was due June 15, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2018 — management decision was due June 20, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 25, 2017 — management decision was due June 25, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on December 23, 2016 — management decision was due June 23, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Virginia →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
