← Back to home

City of Charlottesville, VirginiaLocal Government

EIN: 546001202

UEI: C6VFXLAFKEY1

Audit also covers 2 related EINs: 546001201, 546001203 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates

Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

City of Charlottesville, Virginia11 audit years6 findings2 repeat
11
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$28.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$28,663,139 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2026 (24 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$37,050,845 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$37,244,476 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 22, 2024 — management decision was due August 22, 2024.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$44,416,391 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$32,773,411 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$32,549,586 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2022 — management decision was due July 10, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$22,478,618 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2021 — management decision was due September 4, 2021.

2020-001
Eligibility
REPEAT OF 2019-001QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

One student tested had a household income in excess of the approved limit for free lunch. Due to a miscalculation of the total household income, the student was approved for free lunch benefits in error. Criteria: Students must meet certain household income ranges to be eligible for free or reduced lunches. Cause: There was an error in the total household income calculation resulting in improper approval. Effect: An ineligible student received free lunch instead of reduced lunch. Questioned Cost Amount: The total cost difference for reduced lunch for 180 school days is $72. Perspective Information: The finding occurred in one of fifty-three students selected for testing. Recommendation: We recommend application approvals and calculations be reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Employees completing applications will exercise more care in calculations of income.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-001: Child Nutrition Cluster Eligibility Condition: One student tested had a household income in excess of the approved limit for free lunch. Due to a miscalculation of the total household income, the student was approved for free lunch benefits in error. Criteria: Students must meet certain household income ranges to be eligible for free or reduced lunches. Cause: There was an error in the total household income calculation resulting in improper approval. Effect: An ineligible student received free lunch instead of reduced lunch. Questioned Cost Amount: The total cost difference for reduced lunch for 180 school days is $72. Perspective Information: The finding occurred in one of fifty-three students selected for testing. Recommendation: We recommend application approvals and calculations be reviewed. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Employees completing applications will exercise more care in calculations of income.

Corrective Action Plan

Employees completing applications will exercise more care in calculations of income.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Eligibility →
2020-002
Subrecipient Monitoring
OTHER MATTERS

Subrecipient monitoring was performed by City staff, but no review of the completed monitoring was documented. Criteria: Controls over subrecipient monitoring must be appropriately executed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Review of subrecipient monitoring is not documented. Effect: The implementation of controls for review of the results of subrecipient monitoring visits is difficult to verify without documentation of review. Without sufficient review, findings may continue unaddressed by the City. Questioned Cost Amount: Not applicable. Perspective Information: This finding applies to the City?s only Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Cluster subrecipient. Recommendation: We recommend that the review of the monitoring performed by the City staff is documented for subrecipient monitoring visits. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Staff will document review process for subrecipient monitoring documentation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-002: Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Cluster Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Subrecipient monitoring was performed by City staff, but no review of the completed monitoring was documented. Criteria: Controls over subrecipient monitoring must be appropriately executed as required by the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Review of subrecipient monitoring is not documented. Effect: The implementation of controls for review of the results of subrecipient monitoring visits is difficult to verify without documentation of review. Without sufficient review, findings may continue unaddressed by the City. Questioned Cost Amount: Not applicable. Perspective Information: This finding applies to the City?s only Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Cluster subrecipient. Recommendation: We recommend that the review of the monitoring performed by the City staff is documented for subrecipient monitoring visits. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Staff will document review process for subrecipient monitoring documentation.

Corrective Action Plan

Staff will document review process for subrecipient monitoring documentation.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →
2020-003
Eligibility
REPEAT OF 2019-001QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Three students were approved for reduced meals via Medicaid Direct Certification, yet they were provided free meals by the City. Another student was approved for free meals via Medicaid Direct Certification but was provided reduced meals. Criteria: Direct certified students are automatically awarded the state approved eligibility from the direct certification listing. Cause: There was a software error affecting the import of the direct cert information, resulting in the improper award of eligibility. Effect: Ineligible students are receiving free lunch. Eligible students are not receiving free lunch. Questioned Cost Amount: The questioned cost based on the number of students found with the error is $7,045.50. Amount is calculated based on the total cost of $72 per student for reduced lunch for 180 school days. Perspective Information: The finding occurred in four of fifty-three students selected for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that staff ensure the software is accurately awarding eligibility for direct certification students based on the status approved by the state. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Staff importing direct certification listings will spot check student eligibility.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-003: Child Nutrition Cluster Eligibility Condition: Three students were approved for reduced meals via Medicaid Direct Certification, yet they were provided free meals by the City. Another student was approved for free meals via Medicaid Direct Certification but was provided reduced meals. Criteria: Direct certified students are automatically awarded the state approved eligibility from the direct certification listing. Cause: There was a software error affecting the import of the direct cert information, resulting in the improper award of eligibility. Effect: Ineligible students are receiving free lunch. Eligible students are not receiving free lunch. Questioned Cost Amount: The questioned cost based on the number of students found with the error is $7,045.50. Amount is calculated based on the total cost of $72 per student for reduced lunch for 180 school days. Perspective Information: The finding occurred in four of fifty-three students selected for testing. Recommendation: We recommend that staff ensure the software is accurately awarding eligibility for direct certification students based on the status approved by the state. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Staff importing direct certification listings will spot check student eligibility.

Corrective Action Plan

Staff importing direct certification listings will spot check student eligibility.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Eligibility →
2020-004
Subrecipient Monitoring
OTHER MATTERS

Not all aspects of the City?s subrecipient monitoring procedures were performed during the year. Criteria: Subrecipient activities should be monitored to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Cause: Staff turnover during fiscal year 2020 caused a vacancy in the staff position that traditionally completed these aspects of subrecipient monitoring. No other staff were assigned the responsibilities while the position was open. However, the City did perform other aspects of monitoring. Effect: Subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Perspective Information: This finding applies to the City?s only Federal Transportation Formula Grant subrecipient. Recommendation: We recommend that all subreceipients for the Federal Transportation Formula Grant are monitored annually with appropriate documentation retained on file. Additionally, a member of management or appropriate staff should review the results of the monitoring visits. If a vacancy in a staff position occurs, ensure that another staff member will fulfill the monitoring responsibilities. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: A new staff member was hired subsequent to year end who will be responsible to complete regular subrecipient monitoring. Visits will begin occurring promptly to review fiscal year 2020 and future visits will occur regularly in upcoming fiscal years

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-004: Federal Transportation Formula Grants Subrecipient Monitoring Condition: Not all aspects of the City?s subrecipient monitoring procedures were performed during the year. Criteria: Subrecipient activities should be monitored to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, complies with the terms and conditions of the subaward, and achieves performance goals. Cause: Staff turnover during fiscal year 2020 caused a vacancy in the staff position that traditionally completed these aspects of subrecipient monitoring. No other staff were assigned the responsibilities while the position was open. However, the City did perform other aspects of monitoring. Effect: Subrecipient monitoring was not performed. Perspective Information: This finding applies to the City?s only Federal Transportation Formula Grant subrecipient. Recommendation: We recommend that all subreceipients for the Federal Transportation Formula Grant are monitored annually with appropriate documentation retained on file. Additionally, a member of management or appropriate staff should review the results of the monitoring visits. If a vacancy in a staff position occurs, ensure that another staff member will fulfill the monitoring responsibilities. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: A new staff member was hired subsequent to year end who will be responsible to complete regular subrecipient monitoring. Visits will begin occurring promptly to review fiscal year 2020 and future visits will occur regularly in upcoming fiscal years

Corrective Action Plan

A new staff member was hired subsequent to year end who will be responsible to complete regular subrecipient monitoring. Visits will begin occurring promptly to review fiscal year 2020 and future visits will occur regularly in upcoming fiscal years.

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,302,321 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-001
Eligibility
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

One student tested had a household income outside of the approved range, but was approved for eligibility due to a miscalculation of the total household income. Criteria: Students must meet certain household income ranges to be eligible for free or reduced lunches. Cause: There was an error in the total household income calculation resulting in improper approval. Effect: An ineligible student received free lunch instead of reduced lunch. Questioned Cost Amount: The total cost of reduced lunch for 180 school days is $72. Perspective Information: The finding occurred in one of twenty five students selected for testing. Recommendation: We recommend application approvals and calculations be reviewed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: One student tested had a household income outside of the approved range, but was approved for eligibility due to a miscalculation of the total household income. Criteria: Students must meet certain household income ranges to be eligible for free or reduced lunches. Cause: There was an error in the total household income calculation resulting in improper approval. Effect: An ineligible student received free lunch instead of reduced lunch. Questioned Cost Amount: The total cost of reduced lunch for 180 school days is $72. Perspective Information: The finding occurred in one of twenty five students selected for testing. Recommendation: We recommend application approvals and calculations be reviewed.

Corrective Action Plan

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE "To be one community filled with opportunity" Office of Director of Finance P.O. Box 911 ? Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Telephone 434-970-3200 ? Fax 434-970-3232 Corrective Action Plan December 10, 2019 Federal Transit Authority The City of Charlottesville respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2019. Independent accounting firm: Brown Edwards 1909 Financial Drive Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Audit period: July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019 The findings from the June 30, 2019 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbers consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS ? MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM 2019-001: Child Nutrition Cluster Eligibility Condition: One student tested had a household income outside of the approved range, but was approved for eligibility due to a miscalculation of the total household income. An ineligible student received free lunch instead of reduced lunch. The total cost of reduced lunch for 180 days is $72. The finding occurred in one of twenty-five students selected for testing. Recommendations: Review application approvals and calculations. Corrective Action: Employees evaluating applications will exercise more care in calculating of income eligibility. Approved applications will be reviewed to verify calculations. If the cognizant agency had questions regarding this plan, please contact Glen Pack, Comptroller, at packge@charlottesville.org or by phone at 434-970-3901. __________________________________ Christopher Cullinan, Director of Finance

About Eligibility →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,260,226 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2018 — management decision was due June 11, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$24,606,534 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2018 — management decision was due July 29, 2018.

2017-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,624,403 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2017 — management decision was due July 3, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Virginia

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.