← Back to home

Samaritan House, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 541291021

UEI: FR8DK7CTZYE3

Audit also covers EIN: 810799867 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: Eide Bailly LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Samaritan House, Inc.10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,812,661 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 6, 2026 (8 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$2,121,693 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2025 — management decision was due August 3, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$2,089,044 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2024 — management decision was due September 4, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,580,908 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2023 — management decision was due July 30, 2023.

2022-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

For the year ended June 30, 2022, we noted that the Organization obtained services requiring the use of procurement standards related to the construction of property but did not have any standards of conduct, written procedures, or obtain multiple bids before receiving the services. Cause: Management did not follow its written policies and procedures as the construction contract price was deemed suitable to not require additional solicitations or proposals. Effect or Potential Effect: As a result, the Organization did not meet the required standards related to procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that management follow their written guidance for all expenditures that require procurement standards to be followed to ensure there are no issues in compliance with the standard. Views of Responsible Official: Management concurs with the audit finding however, management notes that the contract price was determined reasonable to not require further solicitations. Management notes that the contract price includes the price of materials only and labor hours related to construction will not be charged to the Organization. Management further notes that the contractor is also receiving donated materials from other organizations for use in construction and will not charge the Organization for all donated materials. Management will ensure that procurement procedures are followed for all future expenditures as required.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding ? Procurement Standards Information on the Federal Program: Federal Program: AL: 21.027 ? Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Program Pass-Through Entity: City of Virginia Beach & Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services Award Number: N/A Compliance Requirement. Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Type of Finding: Material Noncompliance Criteria: Program requirements state that recipients and subrecipients must perform the following: 1) Non-federal entities must maintain written standards of conduct governing actions of employee engagement in procurement activities 2) non-federal entities must maintain written procedures for procurement transactions 3) when value of procurement for property or services is over the simplified acquisitions threshold ($10,000) formal procurement methods are required under sealed bid or proposal procurement methods. Condition: For the year ended June 30, 2022, we noted that the Organization obtained services requiring the use of procurement standards related to the construction of property but did not have any standards of conduct, written procedures, or obtain multiple bids before receiving the services. Cause: Management did not follow its written policies and procedures as the construction contract price was deemed suitable to not require additional solicitations or proposals. Effect or Potential Effect: As a result, the Organization did not meet the required standards related to procurement. Recommendation: We recommend that management follow their written guidance for all expenditures that require procurement standards to be followed to ensure there are no issues in compliance with the standard. Views of Responsible Official: Management concurs with the audit finding however, management notes that the contract price was determined reasonable to not require further solicitations. Management notes that the contract price includes the price of materials only and labor hours related to construction will not be charged to the Organization. Management further notes that the contractor is also receiving donated materials from other organizations for use in construction and will not charge the Organization for all donated materials. Management will ensure that procurement procedures are followed for all future expenditures as required.

Corrective Action Plan

Planned Corrective Action: To correct this deficiency, the Organization has put this planned corrective action into place. Management will ensure that the Organization?s written procurement procedures are followed for all future expenditures as required. Name of Contact Person: Robin Gauthier, Executive Director

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,373,870 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2022 — management decision was due July 9, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,967,741 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2020 — management decision was due June 13, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,829,857 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2020 — management decision was due July 5, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,605,951 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2019 — management decision was due August 11, 2019.

2018-002
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$895,187 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2018 — management decision was due July 24, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$767,373 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 10, 2016 — management decision was due May 10, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.