← Back to home

HARRISONBURG-ROCKINGHAM COMMUNITY SERVICENon-Profit

EIN: 540960906

UEI: YDS5BNAKQR69

Audited by: Robinson, Farmer, Cox Associates

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

HARRISONBURG-ROCKINGHAM COMMUNITY SERVICE6 audit years2 findings
6
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$829.3K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$829,275 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FY 2024-06-30

$1,184,523 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 23, 2026 — management decision was due August 23, 2026.

FY 2023-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,287,528 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2025 — management decision was due February 13, 2026.

FY 2022-06-30

$1,292,338 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2023 — management decision was due July 5, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$982,413 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2022 — management decision was due August 15, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,034,617 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2021 — management decision was due July 26, 2021.

2020-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
OTHER MATTERS

Submitted proposals were not retained to support the selection of the vendor chosen to provide services. The lack of documentation did not allow for review of procurement decisions to support proper procedures were followed. Criteria: Documentation is required to be maintained supporting the contract price and evaluation of all vendors responding to requests for proposals (RFP) or invitations to bid (ITB). Cause: Documentation was disposed of after vendor selection was completed. Effect: Insufficient documentation to determine if the contract amount agrees to the submitted proposal. Also, insufficient documentation to support that all procurement procedures were followed. Recommendation: Procurement documentation should contain the original RFP or ITB, scoring criteria, individual vendor scoring, and the completed contact for the selected vendor. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding. In response, Management is planning to provide additional training to all staff involved in the procurement policy and process, especially those whose position would require engagement in the RFP process. Additionally, the Board will implement a new digital documentation storage process wherein all documentation related to procurement will be maintained in a shared file which is backed up nightly. This digital file will be in addition to the paper files that are currently required to be maintained. Currently the position of Administrative Director is designated to train and consult with all personnel on matters regarding procurement requirements; which will now include review and maintenance of the shared procurement folder."

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

" 2020-001: Opioid STR Grant-CFDA #93.788, Procurement-Document Retention Condition: Submitted proposals were not retained to support the selection of the vendor chosen to provide services. The lack of documentation did not allow for review of procurement decisions to support proper procedures were followed. Criteria: Documentation is required to be maintained supporting the contract price and evaluation of all vendors responding to requests for proposals (RFP) or invitations to bid (ITB). Cause: Documentation was disposed of after vendor selection was completed. Effect: Insufficient documentation to determine if the contract amount agrees to the submitted proposal. Also, insufficient documentation to support that all procurement procedures were followed. Recommendation: Procurement documentation should contain the original RFP or ITB, scoring criteria, individual vendor scoring, and the completed contact for the selected vendor. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding. In response, Management is planning to provide additional training to all staff involved in the procurement policy and process, especially those whose position would require engagement in the RFP process. Additionally, the Board will implement a new digital documentation storage process wherein all documentation related to procurement will be maintained in a shared file which is backed up nightly. This digital file will be in addition to the paper files that are currently required to be maintained. Currently the position of Administrative Director is designated to train and consult with all personnel on matters regarding procurement requirements; which will now include review and maintenance of the shared procurement folder."

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN January 26, 2021 Harrisonburg-Rockingham Community Services Board respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2020. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P. 1909 Financial Drive, Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Audit period: June 30, 2020 The findings from the June 30, 2020 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (the "Schedule") are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the number assigned in the Schedule. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS- MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT 2020-001: Opioid STR Grant-CFDA #93.788, Procurement-Document Retention Condition: Submitted proposals were not retained to support the selection of the vendor chosen to provide services. The lack of documentation did not allow for review of procurement decisions to support proper procedures were followed. Criteria: Documentation is required to be maintained supporting the contract price and evaluation of all vendors responding to requests for proposals (RFP) or invitations to bid (1TB). Cause: Documentation was disposed of after vendor selection was completed. Effect: Insufficient documentation to determine if the contract amount agrees to the submitted proposal. Also, insufficient documentation to support that all procurement procedures were followed. Recommendation: Procurement documentation should contain the original RFP or 1TB, scoring criteria, individual vendor scoring, and the completed contact for the selected vendor. Corrective Action: Training is being provided to any staff whose position would require engagement in the RFP process and will be completed by the end of the 3rd quarter of fiscal year 2021. The Administrative Director will review and maintain a shared procurement folder which will include all supporting documentation from each RFP. If the Federal Audit Clearinghouse has questions regarding this plan, please call Stephanie Laos, Controller at (540)434-7079.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2020-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
OTHER MATTERS

Signed vendor contract selected for testing did not contain all of the required Uniform Guidance clauses. Criteria: All vendor contracts must contain the required clauses of specified in Appendix II to the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Employee who signed the contract did not have the necessary knowledge of the Uniform Guidance requirements. As a result, the contact was not reviewed for the required Uniform Guidance clauses. Effect: Contract did not contain all clauses required by the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: Contracts should be reviewed and signed by a member of management or program director, having appropriate knowledge of the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding. In response, Management will review all current contracts to insure Uniform Guidance language is included. Additionally, Management will be providing training to all staff involved contracting on behalf of the Board regarding the required contract language. Currently the position of Administrative Director is designated to maintain a running list of contracts originating by and for HRCSB; which will now include consultation with HRCSB on required language in federally funded contracts."

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

"2020-002: Opioid STR Grant-CFDA #93.788, Procurement-Required Contract Language under Uniform Guidance Condition: Signed vendor contract selected for testing did not contain all of the required Uniform Guidance clauses. Criteria: All vendor contracts must contain the required clauses of specified in Appendix II to the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Employee who signed the contract did not have the necessary knowledge of the Uniform Guidance requirements. As a result, the contact was not reviewed for the required Uniform Guidance clauses. Effect: Contract did not contain all clauses required by the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: Contracts should be reviewed and signed by a member of management or program director, having appropriate knowledge of the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with this finding. In response, Management will review all current contracts to insure Uniform Guidance language is included. Additionally, Management will be providing training to all staff involved contracting on behalf of the Board regarding the required contract language. Currently the position of Administrative Director is designated to maintain a running list of contracts originating by and for HRCSB; which will now include consultation with HRCSB on required language in federally funded contracts."

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN January 26, 2021 Harrisonburg-Rockingham Community Services Board respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2020. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P. 1909 Financial Drive, Harrisonburg, VA 22801 Audit period: June 30, 2020 The findings from the June 30, 2020 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs (the "Schedule") are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the number assigned in the Schedule. FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS- MAJOR FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAM AUDIT 2020-002: Opioid STR Grant-CFDA #93.788, Procurement-Required Contract Language under Uniform Guidance Condition: Signed vendor contract selected for testing did not contain all of the required Uniform Guidance clauses. Criteria: All vendor contracts must contain the required clauses of specified in Appendix II to the Uniform Guidance. Cause: Employee who signed the contract did not have the necessary knowledge of the Uniform Guidance requirements. As a result, the contact was not reviewed for the required Uniform Guidance clauses. Effect: Contract did not contain all clauses required by the Uniform Guidance. Recommendation: Contracts should be reviewed and signed by a member of management or program director, having appropriate knowledge of the Uniform Guidance requirements. Corrective Action: A review of all current contracts will be conducted by the end of the 3n1 quarter of fiscal year 2021. Any contracts found to be missing required language will be updated. Additionally, a knowledgeable Director will review the contract while in draft form to ensure compliance with required language, prior to any required signatures. If the Federal Audit Clearinghouse has questions regarding this plan, please call Stephanie Laos, Controller at (540)434-7079.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Virginia

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.