EIN: 530206027
UEI: KQ1KJG78NNS9
Audited by: KPMG LLP
Cognizant agency: 43 [National Aeronautics and Space Administration]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 16, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 16, 2026 (44 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on April 29, 2025 — management decision was due October 29, 2025.
Criteria or Requirement 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include establishing procedures to ensure timely and accurate reporting of financial information required by the agreement with the United States Postal Service or obtaining written approval of any extension of reporting deadlines. Condition Found, including Perspective The Organization has not established adequate internal control procedures to ensure the timely submission of the Financial Report, Contribution Reports, and Quality Report (collectively the Annual Reports) to the United States Postal Service (USPS) for the National Postal Museum (NPM) project. Prior to the June 30, 2024 reporting deadline, the Organization notified USPS the Annual Reports would be submitted late as a result of employee turnover, and USPS acknowledged the delay. A formal extension of the deadline was not granted. The Organization eventually submitted its Annual Reports to the USPS on February 12, 2025 (227 days late), for the June 30, 2024 reporting deadline. Possible Cause and Effect The Organization experienced turnover within the NPM project. Specifically, the individual responsible for preparing the Annual Reports left the Organization in fiscal year 2023 and it took time for the successor to learn the reporting process resulting in delayed reporting. Questioned Costs None identified. Statistical Validity The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding in the Prior Year No Recommendation We recommend the Organization appropriately identify resources needed to fulfill the reporting requirements under the NPM agreement to help ensure the Annual Reports are submitted to the USPS within the required deadlines. Additionally, the Organization should establish a comprehensive list of NPM requirements and should establish procedures to cross train staff to perform required responsibilities applicable to the NPM Project. Views of Responsible Officials The Smithsonian agrees with the finding. The Smithsonian would like to add that the reports were delivered to the sponsor and that the sponsor was satisfied with them. Furthermore, the sponsor has provided written acknowledgment that they were “verbally kept up to date” by the National Postal Museum (NPM) regarding this potential delay. Moving forward, NPM will strengthen senior management oversight of report delivery, review due dates more rigorously, and enhance internal controls to ensure timely submission. Any potential delays will be confirmed in writing to the sponsor ahead of the due date, and compliance updates will be provided by NPM senior management to the sponsor on a regular basis. Additionally, NPM will establish procedures to cross train staff to perform required responsibilities applicable to the NPM Project.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or Requirement 2 CFR 200.303 requires non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include establishing procedures to ensure timely and accurate reporting of financial information required by the agreement with the United States Postal Service or obtaining written approval of any extension of reporting deadlines. Condition Found, including Perspective The Organization has not established adequate internal control procedures to ensure the timely submission of the Financial Report, Contribution Reports, and Quality Report (collectively the Annual Reports) to the United States Postal Service (USPS) for the National Postal Museum (NPM) project. Prior to the June 30, 2024 reporting deadline, the Organization notified USPS the Annual Reports would be submitted late as a result of employee turnover, and USPS acknowledged the delay. A formal extension of the deadline was not granted. The Organization eventually submitted its Annual Reports to the USPS on February 12, 2025 (227 days late), for the June 30, 2024 reporting deadline. Possible Cause and Effect The Organization experienced turnover within the NPM project. Specifically, the individual responsible for preparing the Annual Reports left the Organization in fiscal year 2023 and it took time for the successor to learn the reporting process resulting in delayed reporting. Questioned Costs None identified. Statistical Validity The sample was not intended to be, and was not, a statistically valid sample. Repeat Finding in the Prior Year No Recommendation We recommend the Organization appropriately identify resources needed to fulfill the reporting requirements under the NPM agreement to help ensure the Annual Reports are submitted to the USPS within the required deadlines. Additionally, the Organization should establish a comprehensive list of NPM requirements and should establish procedures to cross train staff to perform required responsibilities applicable to the NPM Project. Views of Responsible Officials The Smithsonian agrees with the finding. The Smithsonian would like to add that the reports were delivered to the sponsor and that the sponsor was satisfied with them. Furthermore, the sponsor has provided written acknowledgment that they were “verbally kept up to date” by the National Postal Museum (NPM) regarding this potential delay. Moving forward, NPM will strengthen senior management oversight of report delivery, review due dates more rigorously, and enhance internal controls to ensure timely submission. Any potential delays will be confirmed in writing to the sponsor ahead of the due date, and compliance updates will be provided by NPM senior management to the sponsor on a regular basis. Additionally, NPM will establish procedures to cross train staff to perform required responsibilities applicable to the NPM Project.
The Smithsonian agrees with the finding. The Smithsonian would like to add that the reports were delivered to the sponsor and that the sponsor was satisfied with them. Furthermore, the sponsor has provided written acknowledgment that they were “verbally kept up to date” by the National Postal Museum (NPM) regarding this potential delay. Moving forward, NPM will strengthen senior management oversight of report delivery, review due dates more rigorously, and enhance internal controls to ensure timely submission. Any potential delays will be confirmed in writing to the sponsor ahead of the due date, and compliance updates will be provided by NPM senior management to the sponsor on a regular basis. Additionally, NPM will establish procedures to cross train staff to perform required responsibilities applicable to the NPM Project.
FAC accepted this audit on March 1, 2024 — management decision was due September 1, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on April 6, 2023 — management decision was due October 6, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2022 — management decision was due September 26, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2021 — management decision was due September 22, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2020 — management decision was due September 2, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2018 — management decision was due September 13, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on May 11, 2017 — management decision was due November 11, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in District of Columbia →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.