← Back to home

Howard County, MarylandLocal Government

EIN: 526000965

UEI: LJPAM296M118

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Howard County, Maryland10 audit years5 findings
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$42.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$42,281,619 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2026 (20 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$26,282,388 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$32,886,628 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2024 — management decision was due September 27, 2024.

2023-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The County did not perform onsite inspections of housing occupied by tenants receiving home-assisted tenant -based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Context: The County did not conduct the annual inspections for all units as required Cause: The County’s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure that the required onsite inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards. Effect: Compliance with housing quality standards was not ensured in the absence of inspections. There is an increased risk that the tenants living in substandard housing conditions that do not meet the minimum requirements for health and safety. Repeat Finding : No Recommendation: We recommend the County develop internal controls and procedures to ensure Housing Quality Standard requirements are met. We further recommend the County develop a tracking system to ensure all tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance are inspected timely. Views of Responsible Officials: The County agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number: 2023-001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Home Investment Partnership Assistance Listing Number: 14.239 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: M21-UC240203 - 2021 & M22-UC240203 – 2022 Award Period: 7/12021 – 6/30/2029 and 8/3/2022 – 9/1/2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: During the period of affordability (i.e., the period for which the nonfederal entity must maintain subsidized housing) for HOME assisted rental housing, the participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections to determine compliance with property standards and verify the information submitted by the owners no less than (a) every three years for projects containing one to four units, (b) every two years for projects containing five to 25 units, and (c) every year for projects containing 26 or more units. The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME/HOME-ARP-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). Regarding HOME-ARP funds: the rental units must comply with the same requirements as HOME per 24 CFR 92.251 for (a) new construction, (b)rehabilitation projects, (c)(1) and (2) acquisition of standard housing, (e) manufactured housing, and (f) on-going property condition standards. Regarding HOME-ARP funds: the rental units must comply with the same requirements as HOME per 24 CFR 92.251 for (a) new construction, (b)rehabilitation projects, (c)(1) and (2) acquisition of standard housing, (e) manufactured housing, and (f) on-going property condition standards. Condition: The County did not perform onsite inspections of housing occupied by tenants receiving home-assisted tenant -based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards. Questioned Costs: None Context: The County did not conduct the annual inspections for all units as required Cause: The County’s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure that the required onsite inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards. Effect: Compliance with housing quality standards was not ensured in the absence of inspections. There is an increased risk that the tenants living in substandard housing conditions that do not meet the minimum requirements for health and safety. Repeat Finding : No Recommendation: We recommend the County develop internal controls and procedures to ensure Housing Quality Standard requirements are met. We further recommend the County develop a tracking system to ensure all tenants receiving HOME-assisted tenant-based rental assistance are inspected timely. Views of Responsible Officials: The County agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County agrees with the finding and recommendation. The County was awarded $32M in new funding to address the housing needs of low- and moderate-income residents facing eviction and/or homelessness during the COVID pandemic. Staff was focused on effectively managing the COVID funding during that time to help keep residents safely housed; therefore, the monitoring tasks for HOME-assisted TBRA were not completed as required. The Department is creating additional Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to ensure all steps are being taken to meet monitoring requirements, even if current personnel changes so the process can continue effectively and on time. Action taken in response to finding: The participating jurisdiction must perform on-site inspections of rental housing occupied by tenants receiving HOME/HOME-ARP-assisted tenant-based rental assistance to determine compliance with housing quality standards (24 CFR sections 92.209(i), 92.251(f), and 92.504(d)). 1. Completion of a HOME/HOME-ARP Training Plan 2. Completion of a HOME/HOME-ARP Monitoring Completion Plan 3. Ongoing prioritizing of progress as part of the regular agenda in twice monthly Finance & Grants meetings 4. Completion of an SOP for current and future continuity of function Regarding HOME-ARP funds: the rental units must comply with the same requirements as HOME per 24 CFR 92.251 for (a) new construction, (b)rehabilitation projects, (c)(1) and (2) acquisition of standard housing, (e) manufactured housing, and (f) on-going property condition standards. 1. These requirements are being added to the HOME/HOME-ARP Reports, as part of the Monitoring Completion Plan 2. Ongoing prioritizing of progress as part of the regular agenda in twice monthly Finance & Grants meetings 3. Completion of an SOP for current and future continuity of function Name of contact person (s) responsible for the corrective action plan: Kim Zanti, Division Chief, Community Planning and Grants

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$57,878,114 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2023 — management decision was due September 29, 2023.

2022-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The County did not timely report required subaward information to FSRS for first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more. Questioned Costs: None Context: Five of five subawards selected for testing were reported to FSRS. "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Cause: The County?s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure that required subaward information was timely reported to FSRS. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: Subawards were not properly reported in FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Recommendation: We further recommend the County to develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required subawards are reported accurately and timely to FSRS. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County agrees with the finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan related to this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number: 2022-001 Prior Year Finding: No Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program: CDBG Entitlement Grant Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 14.218 Award Number: B-18-UC-24-0012, B-19-UC-24-0012, B20-UW-24-0012, B20-UC-24-0012, B-21-UC-24-0012 Compliance Requirement: Reporting ? Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), prime (direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Subawardee Name and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $30,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ?? 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The County did not timely report required subaward information to FSRS for first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more. Questioned Costs: None Context: Five of five subawards selected for testing were reported to FSRS. "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Cause: The County?s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure that required subaward information was timely reported to FSRS. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: Subawards were not properly reported in FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Recommendation: We further recommend the County to develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required subawards are reported accurately and timely to FSRS. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The County agrees with the finding. See separate Corrective Action Plan related to this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Howard County respectively submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2022. 2022-001 Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: CDBG Entitlement Grant Cluster ALN: 14.218 Award Number: B-18-UC-24-0012, B-19-UC-24-0012, B20-UW-24-0012, B20-UC-24-0012, B- 21-UC- 24-0012 Compliance Requirement: Reporting ? Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Prior Year Finding: No Criteria: Compliance: Per the Federal Funding Accountability Transparency Act (FFATA), prime(direct) recipients of grants or cooperative agreements are required to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more to the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). Reports must be filed in FSRS by the end of the month following the month in which the prime recipient awards any sub-grant greater than or equal to $30,000. If the initial award is below $30,000 but subsequent grant modifications result in a total award equal to or over $30,000, the award will be subject to the reporting requirements as of the date the award exceeds $30,000. If the initial award equals or exceeds $30,000 but funding is subsequently de-obligated such that the total award amount falls below $30,000, the award continues to be subject to FFATA reporting requirements. The following key data elements must be reported: Sub awardee Name and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number; Amount of Subaward (inclusive of modifications); Subaward Obligation/Action Date; Date of Report Submission; Subaward Number; Project Description; and Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers. (Names and Compensation of Highly Compensated Officers must only be reported when the entity in the preceding fiscal year received 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenues in Federal awards; and $30,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from Federal awards; and the public does not have access to this information about the compensation of the senior executives of the entity through periodic reports filed under section 2 Howard County Government, Calvin Ball County Executive www.howardcountymd.gov 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ?? 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.) Control: Per 2 CFR section 200.303(a), a non-Federal entity must: Establish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non- Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. These internal controls should comply with guidance in ?Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government? issued by the Comptroller General of the United States or the ?Internal Control Integrated Framework?, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Condition: The County did not accurately report required subaward information to FSRS for firsttier subawards of $30,000 or more. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The County?s policies and procedures were not sufficient to ensure that the required subaward information was reported to FSRS. Internal controls did not prevent or detect the errors. Effect: Subawards were not reported in FSRS in accordance with FFATA requirements. Recommendation: We further recommend the County to develop controls and procedures to ensure that all required subawards are reported accurately and timely to FSRS. Views of Responsible Officials: The County agrees with the finding and recommendation. The staff of the Howard County Department of Housing & Community Development (DHCD) will implement a process to ensure that FSRS reporting is completed no later than the end of the month following the month a sub award agreement has been executed. Action taken in response to the finding: DHCD obligates subawards on the date a grant agreement has been fully executed with a subrecipient. To ensure that the required subaward information is reported to FSRS accurately and in a timely manner, an internal process has been established where the FSRS reporting will be completed on or about the same time as the fully executed grant agreement is received. The DHCD Home Program Specialist will be responsible for submitting the FFATA report in FSRS. Name of contact person (s) responsible for the corrective action plan: Maggie Carnegie/ Elizabeth Meadows ? Howard County Department of Housing & Community Development Planned completion date for the corrective action plan: June 30, 2023

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$55,500,190 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 24, 2022 — management decision was due November 24, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$26,654,928 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 23, 2021 — management decision was due November 23, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,045,884 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2020 — management decision was due August 20, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,333,017 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2019 — management decision was due August 28, 2019.

2018-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2017-06-30

$20,074,318 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2018 — management decision was due September 21, 2018.

2017-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2017-004
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2016-06-30

$9,361,091 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 22, 2016 — management decision was due June 22, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Virginia

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.