EIN: 521774227
UEI: M8PYUJCKELC6
Audited by: Gelman, Rosenberg & Freedman
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on November 3, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 3, 2026 (121 days ago).
What is a management decision? →The single audit reporting package for the College's year ended December 31, 2023, was due to the Federal audit clearinghouse by September 30, 2024. However, the College's data collection form for 2023 was not submitted by September 30, 2024. Cause: During the 2023 audit process, the College did not provide supporting documentation for audit requests in a timely manner, which caused significant delays in completing the audit process. Effect or Potential Effect: Not timely filing the single audit reporting package is indicative of timeliness issues with the audit process. Questioned Costs: None. Context: As a result of delays in the completion of the 2023 audit, the single audit reporting package for the year ended December 31, 2023, was not submitted timely. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not a repeat finding.Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to ensure that future audits are completed timely so that the single audit reporting package is submitted by the appropriate deadline of either 30 days after the date of the auditor's report(s) or 9 months after the end of the fiscal year, whichever comes first.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-004: Late Submission of Audit Report to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse (Significant Deficiency - Reporting Compliance Area) Federal Program: All Federal Programs Criteria: The Uniform Guidance, specifically 2 CFR 200.512(a), establishes the filing requirements for the submission of single audits to the Federal audit clearing house and indicates that the single audit reporting package must be submitted 30 days after the date of the auditor's report(s) or 9 months after the end of the fiscal year, whichever comes first. Condition: The single audit reporting package for the College's year ended December 31, 2023, was due to the Federal audit clearinghouse by September 30, 2024. However, the College's data collection form for 2023 was not submitted by September 30, 2024. Cause: During the 2023 audit process, the College did not provide supporting documentation for audit requests in a timely manner, which caused significant delays in completing the audit process. Effect or Potential Effect: Not timely filing the single audit reporting package is indicative of timeliness issues with the audit process. Questioned Costs: None. Context: As a result of delays in the completion of the 2023 audit, the single audit reporting package for the year ended December 31, 2023, was not submitted timely. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not a repeat finding.Recommendation: We recommend that management implement procedures and control processes to ensure that future audits are completed timely so that the single audit reporting package is submitted by the appropriate deadline of either 30 days after the date of the auditor's report(s) or 9 months after the end of the fiscal year, whichever comes first.
Views of Responsible Officials: Thank you for bringing these findings to our attention, as they clarify some issues we have faced in our internal controls. The following 3-step approach has been implemented to rectify these concerns. 1. Personnel Changes: In Q2 of 2024, the CEO began significant staffing changes within the accounting and finance department. First, the former internal CFO position was replaced by an external fractional CFO team following a thorough vetting process. The selected CFO team is led by a CPA and former auditor who understands internal control matters, processes, and procedures. As a part of a large national firm, the team has ample resources and has developed procedures for the monthly financial statement close to address the issues raised in this audit. Secondly, following the transition of the former Accounting Manager, we began recruiting for a Director of Finance position. This role will serve as the organization’s controller. We anticipate completing this recruitment effort and welcoming the new employee by Q3 2025. 2. Executive Oversight: Since Q2 2024, the COO and CEO have been more actively involved in the financial management of the organization. This has included effectively engaging department directors in the development and oversight of their respective budgets, reviewing financial reports monthly, and keeping the Board of Directors informed of fiscal matters on a regular basis. 3. Process Improvements: During the staffing changes mentioned above, it became clear that the organization lacked or had outdated protocols for many accounting functions. We are working to update/develop policies and procedures for the respective business processes. The updated financial manual will be available for staff to reference to ensure standard processes are followed in the future.
FAC accepted this audit on September 20, 2023 — management decision was due March 20, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 15, 2022 — management decision was due March 15, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2021 — management decision was due March 29, 2022.
ACMG?s hourly employees were being paid at a lower rate than approved. Cause: ACMG?s payroll provider was using a 40 hour work week for the hourly rate calculation rather than a 37.5 hour work week. The payroll provider used 2,080 hours for their calculation instead of 1,950 hours. Effect or Potential Effect: Employees were being paid less their authorized rate. Questioned Costs: None noted Context: ACMG hired a third party to administer their payroll. The payroll company was not aware that ACMG had a 37.5 hour work week. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: Management should do a review of the payroll journal provided each cycle to ensure that the proper rates are being paid.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2020-001 - Hourly Rate Employees Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, paragraph 430 ?Compensation ? personal services? requires that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed, and that these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Additionally, these records must comply with established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity. Condition: ACMG?s hourly employees were being paid at a lower rate than approved. Cause: ACMG?s payroll provider was using a 40 hour work week for the hourly rate calculation rather than a 37.5 hour work week. The payroll provider used 2,080 hours for their calculation instead of 1,950 hours. Effect or Potential Effect: Employees were being paid less their authorized rate. Questioned Costs: None noted Context: ACMG hired a third party to administer their payroll. The payroll company was not aware that ACMG had a 37.5 hour work week. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: Management should do a review of the payroll journal provided each cycle to ensure that the proper rates are being paid.
Views of Responsible Officials: The College?s management recognizes finding 2020-001 for the 2020 audit and will implement the following corrective action: 1. When changes are made to salaries or hourly rates for staff, the Accounting Manager will verify in the payroll system that the proper rate has been updated, using 1,950 hours. 2. When the Accounting Manger runs payroll, they will verify again that the appropriate rate is being used to pay staff. 3. The Chief Financial Officer will also verify that the appropriate rate is being used for staff, when they perform their review and approval of each payroll cycle.
ACMG provided timesheets for May, 2020 showing time spent on ACMG?s behalf. A portion of May's time was not entered into ACMG's general ledger. All employees are employees of the ACMG Foundation, a related party. Salary expense is allocated to ACMG based on actual time spent per employee timesheets. After discussion with management, it was determined that part of May and all of June was not allocated to ACMG which is not in agreement with the employee timesheets. Cause: ACMG Foundation received funds via the Payroll Protection Program. In order to qualify for forgiveness, the qualifying salary expenses were not allocated to ACMG. All salary expense remained on ACMG Foundation?s books as they are all employees of ACMG Foundation. Effect or Potential Effect: Documented actual time spent with respect to ACMG was not properly allocated to ACMG. Payroll expense was understated on ACMG?s financial statements. ACMG Foundation's salaries were overstated which could potentially adversely the tax status of the Foundation. Questioned Costs: None noted Context: ACMG did not directly receive the Payroll Protection Funding. These funds went to the ACMG Foundation as they are the employer on record. ACMG was using the time spent on 501c(3) type activities to satisfy the terms of the loan. ACMG did track the time by program appropriately. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: As a result of the audit, an adjusting journal entry was posted to properly record the time for May and June in ACMG's accounting system. We recommend going forward, the allocation of salaries should be charged to the appropriate entity based on the documented supporting timesheets which aligns with the entity that is receiving the effort from employees.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding: 2020-002 - Salary Allocation Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, paragraph 430 ?Compensation ? personal services? requires that charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed, and that these records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Additionally, these records must comply with established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity. Condition: ACMG provided timesheets for May, 2020 showing time spent on ACMG?s behalf. A portion of May's time was not entered into ACMG's general ledger. All employees are employees of the ACMG Foundation, a related party. Salary expense is allocated to ACMG based on actual time spent per employee timesheets. After discussion with management, it was determined that part of May and all of June was not allocated to ACMG which is not in agreement with the employee timesheets. Cause: ACMG Foundation received funds via the Payroll Protection Program. In order to qualify for forgiveness, the qualifying salary expenses were not allocated to ACMG. All salary expense remained on ACMG Foundation?s books as they are all employees of ACMG Foundation. Effect or Potential Effect: Documented actual time spent with respect to ACMG was not properly allocated to ACMG. Payroll expense was understated on ACMG?s financial statements. ACMG Foundation's salaries were overstated which could potentially adversely the tax status of the Foundation. Questioned Costs: None noted Context: ACMG did not directly receive the Payroll Protection Funding. These funds went to the ACMG Foundation as they are the employer on record. ACMG was using the time spent on 501c(3) type activities to satisfy the terms of the loan. ACMG did track the time by program appropriately. Identification as a Repeat Finding, if Applicable: Not applicable Recommendation: As a result of the audit, an adjusting journal entry was posted to properly record the time for May and June in ACMG's accounting system. We recommend going forward, the allocation of salaries should be charged to the appropriate entity based on the documented supporting timesheets which aligns with the entity that is receiving the effort from employees.
Views of Responsible Officials: The College?s management disagrees with finding 2020-002 for the 2020 audit as the treatment of the salary expenses to qualify for the Payroll Protection Program, were activities conducted by employees that could be legitimately allocated to a section 501(c)(3) (aka Foundation) entity. ACMG?s activities are directed at the improvement of patient and public health, and advancing research and education in genetics, rather than promotion of the financial interests of genetics professionals. If there was any incidental private benefit to ACMG and its members, it was insubstantial. ACMG and the Foundation reached this conclusion after receiving informal guidance from legal counsel based on actions taken by similarly situated clients. To resolve this issue the following corrective action will be implemented: 1. An agreement was reached between the audit team, ACMG management, and outside counsel in which the payroll expenses in question for May and June 2020, would be moved from the Foundation?s books to ACMG. 2. In 2021, those expense will be reimbursed by the Foundation to ACMG via a grant based on funds received from the Payroll Protection Program.
FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2020 — management decision was due February 13, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on September 8, 2019 — management decision was due March 8, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on September 11, 2018 — management decision was due March 11, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2016-001
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2017 — management decision was due March 29, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-002
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2014-001
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Maryland →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.