← Back to home

Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 521661050

UEI: VM43TLTK7E23

Audited by: EIDE BAILLY LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified School District10 audit years3 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$9.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$9,670,162 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 3, 2026 (6 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

$10,537,359 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$10,556,346 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 22, 2024 — management decision was due November 22, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$10,035,941 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 24, 2023 — management decision was due November 24, 2023.

2022-002
Equipment & Real Property
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

2022-002 50000 (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID-19: Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief II (ESSER II) Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirements Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439 requires the District to obtain written approval from the California Department of Education (CDE) prior to purchasing equipment for which the per unit costs exceeds $5,000. Condition The District expended $71,283 of ESSER II funds on capital expenditures that were not preapproved by the pass-through agency, as required. The District has submitted the request for a retroactive approval in March 2023; however, the District has not received a response. Questioned Costs As a result of the condition identified above, a total of $71,283 in questioned costs were identified. Context The condition was identified as a result of inquiry with the District's Business Services personnel and review of ESSER II expenditures and related invoices. Effect The District currently assumes all the risk of non-compliance with requirements stated under Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439 due to the lack of preapproval from the pass-through agency, as required.Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District's lack of awareness of requirements under Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should review the requirements stated in Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439 and implement a procedure to address the deficiency currently identified. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District?s Budget and Purchasing Technician will ensure that each department manager submits the requirements with the needs to the State prior to purchasing.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-002 50000 (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) Federal Program Affected Program Name: COVID-19: Elementary and Secondary Emergency Relief II (ESSER II) Fund Assistance Listing Number: 84.425D Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: California Department of Education Compliance Requirement: Equipment and Real Property Management Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirements Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439 requires the District to obtain written approval from the California Department of Education (CDE) prior to purchasing equipment for which the per unit costs exceeds $5,000. Condition The District expended $71,283 of ESSER II funds on capital expenditures that were not preapproved by the pass-through agency, as required. The District has submitted the request for a retroactive approval in March 2023; however, the District has not received a response. Questioned Costs As a result of the condition identified above, a total of $71,283 in questioned costs were identified. Context The condition was identified as a result of inquiry with the District's Business Services personnel and review of ESSER II expenditures and related invoices. Effect The District currently assumes all the risk of non-compliance with requirements stated under Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439 due to the lack of preapproval from the pass-through agency, as required.Cause The condition identified appears to have materialized due to the District's lack of awareness of requirements under Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should review the requirements stated in Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 200, Subpart E, Section 200.439 and implement a procedure to address the deficiency currently identified. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District?s Budget and Purchasing Technician will ensure that each department manager submits the requirements with the needs to the State prior to purchasing.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District?s Budget and Purchasing Technician will ensure that each department manager submits the requirements with the needs to the State prior to purchasing.

About Equipment and Real Property Management →
2022-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2022-003 50000 (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) Federal Program Affected Program Name: Impact Aid Assistance Listing Number: 84.041 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: N/A ? Direct-funded Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirements As required by Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Appendix II to Part 200, Section (D), all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-federal entities must require contractors to pay rates that are not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor (Davis-Bacon Act). To comply with this requirement, contractors or subcontractors are required to submit weekly copies of the payroll records and statements of compliance to the nonfederal entity. Condition The District does not have a procedure in place to ensure compliance with the prevailing wage requirement (Davis-Bacon Act). As a result, the District was unable to provide supporting documents. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified related to the condition identified above. Context The condition was identified during the course of our review of supporting documents and our inquiry with District?s personnel. Effect Since the District does not have a procedure in place to ensure compliance with the prevailing wage requirement (Davis-Bacon Act), the District has a higher risk of non-compliance with this requirement. Additionally the District was unable to demonstrate its compliance with the prevailing wage requirement. Cause The condition appears to be attributed to the District?s lack of procedures that are in place to ensure compliance. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should adopt and implement procedures that are aligned with requirements outlined in Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Appendix II to Part 200, Section (D). Failure to adopt and implement these procedures will increase the likelihood of the District?s noncompliance with this requirement. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District?s Maintenance and Transportation Director will establish a procedure guide for future projects to meet the requirements of prevailing wages as well as all other State compliances for facility projects.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-003 50000 (Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance) Federal Program Affected Program Name: Impact Aid Assistance Listing Number: 84.041 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Pass-Through Entity: N/A ? Direct-funded Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency and Noncompliance Criteria or Specific Requirements As required by Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Appendix II to Part 200, Section (D), all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-federal entities must require contractors to pay rates that are not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor (Davis-Bacon Act). To comply with this requirement, contractors or subcontractors are required to submit weekly copies of the payroll records and statements of compliance to the nonfederal entity. Condition The District does not have a procedure in place to ensure compliance with the prevailing wage requirement (Davis-Bacon Act). As a result, the District was unable to provide supporting documents. Questioned Costs There were no questioned costs identified related to the condition identified above. Context The condition was identified during the course of our review of supporting documents and our inquiry with District?s personnel. Effect Since the District does not have a procedure in place to ensure compliance with the prevailing wage requirement (Davis-Bacon Act), the District has a higher risk of non-compliance with this requirement. Additionally the District was unable to demonstrate its compliance with the prevailing wage requirement. Cause The condition appears to be attributed to the District?s lack of procedures that are in place to ensure compliance. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The District should adopt and implement procedures that are aligned with requirements outlined in Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200, Appendix II to Part 200, Section (D). Failure to adopt and implement these procedures will increase the likelihood of the District?s noncompliance with this requirement. Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District?s Maintenance and Transportation Director will establish a procedure guide for future projects to meet the requirements of prevailing wages as well as all other State compliances for facility projects.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan and Views of Responsible Officials The District?s Maintenance and Transportation Director will establish a procedure guide for future projects to meet the requirements of prevailing wages as well as all other State compliances for facility projects.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

$10,302,172 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 1, 2022 — management decision was due September 1, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$8,258,955 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2021 — management decision was due September 25, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$8,707,006 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2020 — management decision was due September 2, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$6,896,527 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2018 — management decision was due June 18, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$6,290,442 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2018 — management decision was due August 11, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$6,455,244 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2017 — management decision was due July 31, 2017.

2016-004
Eligibility / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2015-005

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-005

About Eligibility, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.