← Back to home

Mid-Atlantic Association of Community Health Centers, Inc.Non-Profit

EIN: 521344933

UEI: TST3H6NDBEY1

Audited by: Gross Mendelsohn & Associates, P.A.

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Mid-Atlantic Association of Community Health Centers, Inc.10 audit years4 findings
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,678,851 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 20, 2026 (11 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,788,522 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2025 — management decision was due July 17, 2025.

FY 2023-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,455,987 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 9, 2023 — management decision was due May 9, 2024.

FY 2022-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,349,556 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2023 — management decision was due July 9, 2023.

FY 2021-03-31

$800,963 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 15, 2022 — management decision was due August 15, 2022.

FY 2020-03-31

$1,064,649 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 29, 2020 — management decision was due June 29, 2021.

2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The Association has overages in approved budget categories and had activities/cost in the categories not approved by the grant budget for which no prior approval from the grant award agency has been obtained. The Association was in compliance with the total budget for the year. The Association was in compliance with the total budget for the year. Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance - Administrative and Financial Management requirements, the Association is required to track their actual use of HRSA funds and reconcile those with the approved grant budget. The Association is required to report any deviations from the budget and request prior approvals from the grant award agency. Context: Compliance with approved budgets and prior approval for adjustments or revision by the grant award agency. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with the compliance requirement of Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Cost/Cost Principle. Cause: The Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for supervising the grant and performing and reviewing the budget vs actual use of grant award and obtaining the preapproval from the grant award agency. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Association report the deviation and request approval from the grant award agency. We also recommend that the Association use the approved grant budget as a guide to spend the grant funds. Any deviations should be promptly reported and prior approval from the grant award agency should be obtained. Reconciling frequently, quarterly, or monthly, will help identify issues closer to when they occur, thereby resolving any overages in approved categories or costs requiring preapproval on a timely basis. We also recommend that the Association maintain written policies and procedures for their accounting and financial management system practices. Management should identify and implement actions needed to carry out specific responses to risks including but not limited to budget overages. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for supervising the grant award and performing and reviewing the budget vs actual, including obtaining the preapproval from the grant award agency for any deviations. These positions have now been filled and reviews are now being performed on a monthly basis to ensure compliance with the approved grant budgets. Management is also reviewing its policies and procedures for accounting and financial management system practices and strengthening controls around this compliance requirement. Management will report and request approval for the deviations from the budget.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding - 2020-001 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services CFDA #93.129 State and Regional Primary Care Associations - HRSA Non-Compliance - Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Cost/Cost Principle Condition: The Association has overages in approved budget categories and had activities/cost in the categories not approved by the grant budget for which no prior approval from the grant award agency has been obtained. The Association was in compliance with the total budget for the year. The Association was in compliance with the total budget for the year. Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance - Administrative and Financial Management requirements, the Association is required to track their actual use of HRSA funds and reconcile those with the approved grant budget. The Association is required to report any deviations from the budget and request prior approvals from the grant award agency. Context: Compliance with approved budgets and prior approval for adjustments or revision by the grant award agency. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with the compliance requirement of Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Cost/Cost Principle. Cause: The Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for supervising the grant and performing and reviewing the budget vs actual use of grant award and obtaining the preapproval from the grant award agency. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: We recommend that the Association report the deviation and request approval from the grant award agency. We also recommend that the Association use the approved grant budget as a guide to spend the grant funds. Any deviations should be promptly reported and prior approval from the grant award agency should be obtained. Reconciling frequently, quarterly, or monthly, will help identify issues closer to when they occur, thereby resolving any overages in approved categories or costs requiring preapproval on a timely basis. We also recommend that the Association maintain written policies and procedures for their accounting and financial management system practices. Management should identify and implement actions needed to carry out specific responses to risks including but not limited to budget overages. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for supervising the grant award and performing and reviewing the budget vs actual, including obtaining the preapproval from the grant award agency for any deviations. These positions have now been filled and reviews are now being performed on a monthly basis to ensure compliance with the approved grant budgets. Management is also reviewing its policies and procedures for accounting and financial management system practices and strengthening controls around this compliance requirement. Management will report and request approval for the deviations from the budget.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding NO 2020-001 Non-Compliance ? Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Cost/Cost Principle Recommendation: We recommend that the Association report the deviation and request approval from the grant award agency. We also recommend that the Association use the approved grant budget as a guide to spend the grant funds. Any deviation should be promptly reported and prior approval from the grant award agency should be obtained. Reconciling frequently, quarterly, or monthly will help identify issues closer to when they occur. We also recommend that the Association maintain written policies and procedures for their accounting and financial management system practices. Management should identify and implement actions needed to carry out specific responses to risks including but not limited to budget overages. Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the findings and will implement the auditors? recommendations. The finding is in process.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2020-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The Association has requested drawdowns for costs to cover future periods outside of the grant award period and for costs not fully supported by the accounting records and source documentation for which no prior approval from the grant award agency has been obtained. Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance - Allowability of Costs Requirements, the Association must only charge expenses to the grant award for expenses incurred during the grant award period and not to cover future expenses. The Association must also clearly document the flow of money from the approved grant budget, to the accounting records, to receipts and supporting documentation. Context: Compliance with requirements of Allowable Cost/Cost Principle/Cash Management. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with the compliance requirement Allowable Cost/Cost Principle/Cash Management. Cause: The Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for supervising and administering of the compliance requirements of Allowable Cost and Cash Management compliance per uniform guidance. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: $32,127 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association report the deviation and request approval from the grant award agency. We also recommend that the Association maintain written policies and procedures for their accounting and financial management system practices. Management should identify and implement actions needed to carry out specific responses to risks including but not limited to Allowable Cost/Cost Principle/Cash Management We also recommend that the Association strengthen their controls around the record retention and access to ensure the cost is supported by adequate documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: These are isolated incidents and occurred during the time frame when the Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for supervising and administering the compliance requirements of Allowable Cost and Cash Management compliance per uniform guidance. These positions have now been filled and reviews are now being performed on a monthly basis to ensure compliance. Management is also reviewing its policies and procedures for accounting and financial management system practices and strengthening controls around this compliance requirement. Management will report and request approval from the grant award agency.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding - 2020-002 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services CFDA #93.129 State and Regional Primary Care Associations - HRSA Non-Compliance Allowable Cost/Cost Principle/Cash Management Condition: The Association has requested drawdowns for costs to cover future periods outside of the grant award period and for costs not fully supported by the accounting records and source documentation for which no prior approval from the grant award agency has been obtained. Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance - Allowability of Costs Requirements, the Association must only charge expenses to the grant award for expenses incurred during the grant award period and not to cover future expenses. The Association must also clearly document the flow of money from the approved grant budget, to the accounting records, to receipts and supporting documentation. Context: Compliance with requirements of Allowable Cost/Cost Principle/Cash Management. Effect: The Association is not in compliance with the compliance requirement Allowable Cost/Cost Principle/Cash Management. Cause: The Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for supervising and administering of the compliance requirements of Allowable Cost and Cash Management compliance per uniform guidance. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: $32,127 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association report the deviation and request approval from the grant award agency. We also recommend that the Association maintain written policies and procedures for their accounting and financial management system practices. Management should identify and implement actions needed to carry out specific responses to risks including but not limited to Allowable Cost/Cost Principle/Cash Management We also recommend that the Association strengthen their controls around the record retention and access to ensure the cost is supported by adequate documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: These are isolated incidents and occurred during the time frame when the Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for supervising and administering the compliance requirements of Allowable Cost and Cash Management compliance per uniform guidance. These positions have now been filled and reviews are now being performed on a monthly basis to ensure compliance. Management is also reviewing its policies and procedures for accounting and financial management system practices and strengthening controls around this compliance requirement. Management will report and request approval from the grant award agency.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding NO 2020-002 Non-Compliance ? Allowable Cost/Cost Principle/Cash Management Recommendation: We recommend that the Association report the deviation and request approval from the grant award agency. We also recommend that the Association maintain written policies and procedures for their accounting and financial management system practices. Management should identify and implement actions needed to carry out specific responses to risks including but not limited to Allowable Cost/Cost Principle/Cash Management. We also recommend that the Association strengthen their controls around the record retention and access to ensure the cost is supported by adequate documentation. Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the findings and will implement the auditors? recommendations. The finding is in process.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2020-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The March 31, 2019 financial statements were not prepared in a timely manner, therefore, the Data Collection Form (Form) and reporting package were not submitted by the stipulated due date of December 31, 2019 to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance, the Association is required to submit the Form and the reporting package within the earlier of thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the signed audit report or nine (9) months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period is agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for audit. Context: Timely submission of the single audit report package and the Form was tested for compliance. Effect: The March 31, 2019 Form and single audit reporting package was not submitted timely to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Cause: The late filing was due to turnover in the management level position responsible for reporting compliance, which resulted in delayed production of the financial records required for the audit for the year ended March 31, 2019. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Association should ensure that financial statements are prepared in a timely manner for the annual single audit and for the timely submission of the Data Collection Form within the required filing period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The late filing was due to turnover in the management level position responsible for the reporting compliance requirement. The position is now filled, and the Association is working diligently with the external auditor to ensure completion of the current audit and complete and timely submission of the Data Collection Form.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding - 2020-003 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services CFDA #93.129 State and Regional Primary Care Associations - HRSA Non-Compliance Over Timely Submission of Data Collection Form Condition: The March 31, 2019 financial statements were not prepared in a timely manner, therefore, the Data Collection Form (Form) and reporting package were not submitted by the stipulated due date of December 31, 2019 to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse Criteria: Per the Uniform Guidance, the Association is required to submit the Form and the reporting package within the earlier of thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the signed audit report or nine (9) months after the end of the audit period, unless a longer period is agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for audit. Context: Timely submission of the single audit report package and the Form was tested for compliance. Effect: The March 31, 2019 Form and single audit reporting package was not submitted timely to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse. Cause: The late filing was due to turnover in the management level position responsible for reporting compliance, which resulted in delayed production of the financial records required for the audit for the year ended March 31, 2019. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Association should ensure that financial statements are prepared in a timely manner for the annual single audit and for the timely submission of the Data Collection Form within the required filing period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The late filing was due to turnover in the management level position responsible for the reporting compliance requirement. The position is now filled, and the Association is working diligently with the external auditor to ensure completion of the current audit and complete and timely submission of the Data Collection Form.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING NO 2020-003 Non-Compliance Over Timely Submission of Data Collection Form Recommendation: The Association should ensure that financial statements are prepared in a timely manner for the annual single audit and for the timely submission of the Data Collection Form within the required filing period. Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and have implemented the auditors? recommendations. The finding is now closed

About Reporting →
2020-004
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Deficiency in design and operation of internal control over compliance which did not allow the management or employees in normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of the major federal program on a timely basis, resulting in a questioned cost. Criteria: The Association must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Association is managing the federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the major federal program. Context: Recipient responsibilities on Internal Controls as outlined under Uniform Guidance and in 45 Code of Federal Regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with compliance requirements of the major federal program. Cause: The Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for designing and operation of internal controls over compliance requirements of the major federal program. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: $32,127 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association review their current written policies and procedures for their Financial Management and Internal Controls system and should establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with the compliance requirement applicable to the major federal program. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: These are isolated incidents and occurred during the time frame when the Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for the design and operation of internal controls over compliance requirements of the major federal program. These positions have now been filled. Management is reviewing the written policies and procedures for their Financial Management and Internal Controls system and will establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with the compliance requirement applicable to the major federal program.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding - 2020-004 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services CFDA # 93.129 State and Regional Primary Care Associations - HRSA Internal Control Over Compliance Requirements of Major Federal Program Condition: Deficiency in design and operation of internal control over compliance which did not allow the management or employees in normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of the major federal program on a timely basis, resulting in a questioned cost. Criteria: The Association must establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal awards that provides reasonable assurance that the Association is managing the federal awards in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations and the terms and conditions of the major federal program. Context: Recipient responsibilities on Internal Controls as outlined under Uniform Guidance and in 45 Code of Federal Regulations. Effect: Noncompliance with compliance requirements of the major federal program. Cause: The Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for designing and operation of internal controls over compliance requirements of the major federal program. Repeat Finding: No Questioned Costs: $32,127 Recommendation: We recommend that the Association review their current written policies and procedures for their Financial Management and Internal Controls system and should establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with the compliance requirement applicable to the major federal program. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: These are isolated incidents and occurred during the time frame when the Association experienced turnover in two of the management level positions responsible for the design and operation of internal controls over compliance requirements of the major federal program. These positions have now been filled. Management is reviewing the written policies and procedures for their Financial Management and Internal Controls system and will establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with the compliance requirement applicable to the major federal program.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING NO 2020-004 Internal Control Over Compliance Requirements of Major Federal Program Recommendation: We recommend that the Association review their current written policies and procedures for their Financial Management and Internal Controls system and should establish and maintain effective internal control over compliance with the compliance requirement applicable to the major federal program. Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding and will implement the auditors? recommendations. The finding is in process.

About Other →

FY 2019-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$946,270 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2020 — management decision was due July 30, 2020.

FY 2018-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,010,275 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2019 — management decision was due August 27, 2019.

FY 2017-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,048,353 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2018 — management decision was due July 31, 2018.

FY 2016-03-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,393,714 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 27, 2016 — management decision was due June 27, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Maryland

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.