EIN: 521263256
UEI: DLRNHQQ9KQG1
Audited by: DeLeon & Stang, CPAs and Advisors
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 26, 2026 (116 days from today).
What is a management decision? →During fiscal year 2025, MSP contracted with several vendors for products and services who were paid more than $25,000. There was no evidence documenting that these vendors were checked for suspension and debarment prior to payment. Cause: There were several vendors who were paid cumulatively more than $25,000 during fiscal year 2025. Most of these payments related to payments to client landlords. Documentation was not retained and we were unable to verify that the vendors had been checked for suspension and debarment. Effect: We were unable to determine that the required checks for suspension and debarment had been performed as the documentation was not retained. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend MSP perform follow its internal processes and retain documentation of the suspension and debarment check in the vendor file as support for vendors who are paid or expected to be paid over $25,000 prior to funds being disbursed. Response: MSP will still perform the verifications by using the System for Award Management (SAM) and Office of Inspector General (OIG) websites. We will start saving documentation that will support the required vendor verifications.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-001 – Procurement, suspension and debarment Assistance Listing #: 14.267 Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, recipients who receive federal funding shall fully comply with Subpart C of 2 CFR Part 180, which requires nonfederal entities to verify that the person/entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, if the expected payments are equal to or exceed $25,000. A non-federal entity has three options for performing this verification: 1) checking SAM exclusions; 2) collecting a certification from that person; or 3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During fiscal year 2025, MSP contracted with several vendors for products and services who were paid more than $25,000. There was no evidence documenting that these vendors were checked for suspension and debarment prior to payment. Cause: There were several vendors who were paid cumulatively more than $25,000 during fiscal year 2025. Most of these payments related to payments to client landlords. Documentation was not retained and we were unable to verify that the vendors had been checked for suspension and debarment. Effect: We were unable to determine that the required checks for suspension and debarment had been performed as the documentation was not retained. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: We recommend MSP perform follow its internal processes and retain documentation of the suspension and debarment check in the vendor file as support for vendors who are paid or expected to be paid over $25,000 prior to funds being disbursed. Response: MSP will still perform the verifications by using the System for Award Management (SAM) and Office of Inspector General (OIG) websites. We will start saving documentation that will support the required vendor verifications.
Finding 2025-001: Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Assistance Listing #: 14.267 Recommendation: Delong & Stang recommend MSP perform its internal processes and retain documentation of the suspension and debarment check in the vendor file as support for vendors who are paid or expected to be paid over $25,000 prior to funds being disbursed. Management Response: MSP agrees with the recommendation and will strengthen its vendor verification process by ensuring that all vendors expected to receive payments of $25,000 or more are screened through SAM and OIG prior to contract execution or payment. Documentation supporting these verifications will be retained in the vendor file and reviewed periodically for compliance. Action Plan: 1. Update the procurement checklist to include mandatory SAM and OIG verification before payment approval. 2. Create a standardized electronic filing system for verification documentation. 3. Train finance and program staff on suspension and debarment requirements. 4. Conduct quarterly reviews of vendors exceeding the $25,000 threshold to ensure compliance and documentation retention. 5. Assign responsibility to the Finance Manager for monitoring and maintaining compliance records.
2024-001
As noted in the prior year, MSP charges payroll costs to the federal award programs using a set percentage based on budget and not based on employee’s actual time or effort amongst various programs. Cause: Individual payroll amounts were allocated to grant awards based on internally developed budgets of employees' time. Management continues to work on a solution that will capture costs across the various programs for those employees who work in multiple programs. Effect: The salary costs charged to the federal programs may have been under or over reported based on the actual level of effort. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: As noted previously, we recommend MSP make changes overall its timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect the work performed and if budget estimates are utilized, that they are reconciled and trued up on a consistent basis. Response: Management continues to work with ADP to modify the existing time card structure. They will assist MSP with creating time cards that will allow employees to sign in to any designated work department therefore the hours will be appropriately broken out by department/grant. The enhancement is still a work in progress and should be in effect no later than May 31, 2026.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-002 – Allowable costs – payroll Assistance Listing #: 93.671, 14.267 Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance’s compensation requirements (2 CFR 200.430), payroll systems must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and supported by a system of internal controls that provides reasonable assurances that charges are accurate; allowable and reasonable; and properly allocated. The Uniform Guidance allows for use of budget estimates on an interim basis. When using budget estimates on an interim basis, grantees must reconcile estimates against actual time or effort on a regular basis to ensure that estimates conform to actual staff activity. Grantees must make adjustments in the payroll distribution to align with actual time. Condition: As noted in the prior year, MSP charges payroll costs to the federal award programs using a set percentage based on budget and not based on employee’s actual time or effort amongst various programs. Cause: Individual payroll amounts were allocated to grant awards based on internally developed budgets of employees' time. Management continues to work on a solution that will capture costs across the various programs for those employees who work in multiple programs. Effect: The salary costs charged to the federal programs may have been under or over reported based on the actual level of effort. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: Yes Recommendation: As noted previously, we recommend MSP make changes overall its timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect the work performed and if budget estimates are utilized, that they are reconciled and trued up on a consistent basis. Response: Management continues to work with ADP to modify the existing time card structure. They will assist MSP with creating time cards that will allow employees to sign in to any designated work department therefore the hours will be appropriately broken out by department/grant. The enhancement is still a work in progress and should be in effect no later than May 31, 2026.
Finding 2025-002: Allowable Costs – Payroll Assistance Listing #: 93.671 Recommendation: Deleon & Stang recommends MSP make changes overall its timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect work performed and if budget estimates are utilized, that they are reconciled and trued up on a consistent basis. Management Response: MSP agrees with the recommendation and remains committed to improving its timekeeping and payroll allocation processes. Management is working with ADP to implement a system that captures actual employee time by program and grant, ensuring payroll costs are accurately charged and supported by documented effort. Until full implementation is complete, periodic reconciliations between budgeted and actual time will be performed. Action Plan: 1. Complete ADP system enhancements that allow employees to record time by department,program, and grant. 2. Establish written procedures requiring staff to allocate hours based on actual workperformed. 3. Implement monthly reviews and reconciliations of payroll allocations against actual timerecords. 4. Train supervisors and employees on the revised timekeeping process. 5. Perform quarterly management reviews of payroll distributions and make necessaryadjustments to ensure compliance with Uniform Guidance requirements. 6. Target full implementation and testing of the enhanced timekeeping system prior to thenext audit cycle.
2024-002
FAC accepted this audit on June 4, 2026 — management decision was due December 4, 2026.
During fiscal year 2024, MSP contracted with several vendors for products and services who were paid more than $25,000. There was no evidence documenting that these vendors were checked for suspension and debarment prior to payment. Cause: Although there were no individual services greater than $25,000, there were several vendors who were paid cumulatively more than $25,000. Most of these payments related to payments to client landlords. Per inquiry, the suspension and debarment status of these vendors was not checked during the fiscal year 2024. Effect: Without verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred prior to payment, MSP faces a heightened risk that they are expending federal dollars to excluded parties. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend MSP perform and document each verification on vendors over $25,000 prior to funds being disbursed. An alternative would be for the standard contract to address suspension and debarment and obtain the certification from the vendors at the time the contract is executed. Additionally, we recommend that MSP’s policies and procedures be updated to reflect the need to check vendors for suspension and debarment on an annual basis. Response: MSP now performs and documents verification on all vendors and subcontractors. This practice has been implemented prior to the completion of the FY 2024 audit. Additionally, policies and procedures have been updated to reflect appropriate suspension and debarment considerations.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-001 – Procurement, suspension and debarment Assistance listing#: 14.267 Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance, recipients who receive federal funding shall fully comply with Subpart C of 2 CFR Part 180, which requires nonfederal entities to verify that the person/entity with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified, if the expected payments are equal to or exceed $25,000. A non-federal entity has three options for performing this verification: 1) checking SAM exclusions; 2) collecting a certification from that person; or 3) adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person. Condition: During fiscal year 2024, MSP contracted with several vendors for products and services who were paid more than $25,000. There was no evidence documenting that these vendors were checked for suspension and debarment prior to payment. Cause: Although there were no individual services greater than $25,000, there were several vendors who were paid cumulatively more than $25,000. Most of these payments related to payments to client landlords. Per inquiry, the suspension and debarment status of these vendors was not checked during the fiscal year 2024. Effect: Without verifying whether vendors are suspended or debarred prior to payment, MSP faces a heightened risk that they are expending federal dollars to excluded parties. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend MSP perform and document each verification on vendors over $25,000 prior to funds being disbursed. An alternative would be for the standard contract to address suspension and debarment and obtain the certification from the vendors at the time the contract is executed. Additionally, we recommend that MSP’s policies and procedures be updated to reflect the need to check vendors for suspension and debarment on an annual basis. Response: MSP now performs and documents verification on all vendors and subcontractors. This practice has been implemented prior to the completion of the FY 2024 audit. Additionally, policies and procedures have been updated to reflect appropriate suspension and debarment considerations.
Response: MSP now performs and documents verification on all vendors and subcontractors. This practice has been implemented prior to the completion of the FY 2024 audit. Additionally, policies and procedures have been updated to reflect appropriate suspension and debarment considerations.
During fiscal year 2024, MSP charged payroll costs to the federal award programs using a set percentage based on budget and not based on employee’s actual time or effort amongst various programs. Cause: Individual payroll amounts were allocated to grant awards based on internally developed budgets of employees' time. Management was unaware that while this is an accepted method, eventually a "true-up" or reconciliation to actual time incurred on specific grants is required. Effect: The salary costs charged to the federal programs may have been under or over reported based on the actual level of effort. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend MSP make changes overall its timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect the work performed and if budget estimates are utilized, that they are reconciled and trued up on a consistent basis. Response: MSP plans to implement changes overall to timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect the work performed and to reconcile and true up any budget estimates on a consistent basis.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2024-002 – Allowable costs – payroll Assistance Listing #: 93.671 Criteria: In accordance with the Uniform Guidance’s compensation requirements (2 CFR 200.430), payroll systems must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed and supported by a system of internal controls that provides reasonable assurances that charges are accurate; allowable and reasonable; and properly allocated. The Uniform Guidance allows for use of budget estimates on an interim basis. When using budget estimates on an interim basis, grantees must reconcile estimates against actual time or effort on a regular basis to ensure that estimates conform to actual staff activity. Grantees must make adjustments in the payroll distribution to align with actual time. Condition: During fiscal year 2024, MSP charged payroll costs to the federal award programs using a set percentage based on budget and not based on employee’s actual time or effort amongst various programs. Cause: Individual payroll amounts were allocated to grant awards based on internally developed budgets of employees' time. Management was unaware that while this is an accepted method, eventually a "true-up" or reconciliation to actual time incurred on specific grants is required. Effect: The salary costs charged to the federal programs may have been under or over reported based on the actual level of effort. Questioned Costs: N/A Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend MSP make changes overall its timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect the work performed and if budget estimates are utilized, that they are reconciled and trued up on a consistent basis. Response: MSP plans to implement changes overall to timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect the work performed and to reconcile and true up any budget estimates on a consistent basis.
Response: MSP plans to implement changes overall to timekeeping processes to ensure that payroll costs accurately reflect the work performed and to reconcile and true up any budget estimates on a consistent basis.
FAC accepted this audit on April 29, 2024 — management decision was due October 29, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on May 9, 2023 — management decision was due November 9, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2022 — management decision was due December 20, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on June 21, 2021 — management decision was due December 21, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on July 12, 2020 — management decision was due January 12, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on May 2, 2019 — management decision was due November 2, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2018 — management decision was due December 1, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2017 — management decision was due March 18, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in District of Columbia →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.