EIN: 521237297
UEI: JKD6JWENM3G6
Audited by: LSWG, P.A.
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 14, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 14, 2026 (48 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2025 — management decision was due July 9, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2024 — management decision was due August 7, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2023 — management decision was due July 13, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2022 — management decision was due July 5, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2021 — management decision was due July 10, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 1, 2020 — management decision was due July 1, 2020.
In fiscal year 2019, as management was performing year-end close procedures, a variance of $65,182 was identified. Through management?s investigation, the variance was identified as being excess drawdowns that occurred prior to fiscal year 2019. The variance affected federal awards which were closed during fiscal year 2014 and fiscal year 2019. Cause: Management did not perform reconciliations of the draws by individual federal award. There were several other issues involved which also allowed for this overdraw including: the implementation of the federal salary cap, a co-mingling of the awards by the governing agency in the Payment Management System, and Affordable Care Act awards. Effect: The lack of internal controls surrounding this reconciliation have allowed the Foundation to overdraw Federal Funds. A liability has been recorded for this variance and will be subsequently returned Questioned Costs: None Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a reconciliation of expenditures by federal award prior to drawing down future funds to ensure this not happen in the future. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Foundation agrees with the finding and has implemented the following control procedures: ? The ACFO will maintain a log of reimbursement requests, with dates, amounts and funds available for reimbursement, and ? The ACFO will generate a payment data inquiry from the Department of Health and Human Services Program Support Centers Payment Management System, and ? The ACFO will compare the log and inquiry to ensure that previous reimbursement data matches. ? The CFO/COO will review the records provided by the ACFO quarterly with the preparation and submission of the quarterly Federal Cash Transactions Report via the Payment Management System. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-001 Reconciliations Material Weakness Criteria: Generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP) requires entities to establish and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting to ensure accurate financial reports. Condition: In fiscal year 2019, as management was performing year-end close procedures, a variance of $65,182 was identified. Through management?s investigation, the variance was identified as being excess drawdowns that occurred prior to fiscal year 2019. The variance affected federal awards which were closed during fiscal year 2014 and fiscal year 2019. Cause: Management did not perform reconciliations of the draws by individual federal award. There were several other issues involved which also allowed for this overdraw including: the implementation of the federal salary cap, a co-mingling of the awards by the governing agency in the Payment Management System, and Affordable Care Act awards. Effect: The lack of internal controls surrounding this reconciliation have allowed the Foundation to overdraw Federal Funds. A liability has been recorded for this variance and will be subsequently returned Questioned Costs: None Auditor?s Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a reconciliation of expenditures by federal award prior to drawing down future funds to ensure this not happen in the future. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Foundation agrees with the finding and has implemented the following control procedures: ? The ACFO will maintain a log of reimbursement requests, with dates, amounts and funds available for reimbursement, and ? The ACFO will generate a payment data inquiry from the Department of Health and Human Services Program Support Centers Payment Management System, and ? The ACFO will compare the log and inquiry to ensure that previous reimbursement data matches. ? The CFO/COO will review the records provided by the ACFO quarterly with the preparation and submission of the quarterly Federal Cash Transactions Report via the Payment Management System. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.
2019-001 Reconciliations Material Weakness Recommendation: We recommend that management perform a reconciliation of expenditures by federal award prior to drawing down future funds to ensure that this does not happen in the future. Action Taken: The Foundation has implemented the following control procedures as of October 2018: ? The ACFO will maintain a log of reimbursement requests, with dates, amounts and funds available for reimbursement, and ? The ACFO will generate a payment data inquiry from the Department of Health and Human Services Program Support Centers Payment Management System, and ? The ACFO will compare the log and inquiry to ensure that previous reimbursement data matches. ? The CFO/COO will review the records provided by the ACFO quarterly with the preparation and submission of the quarterly Federal Cash Transactions Report via the Payment Management System. Approximately $42,000 of the overdrawn funds were returned in October 2019. The Foundation has been in contact with HHS to determine the course of action regarding repayment of the remaining overdrawn funds.
The Public Health Foundation did not adopt a formal written procurement policy following these standards by June 30, 2019. Cause: The Foundation did not update its written procurement policy to account for the new OMB regulations, nor did management document how procurement decisions were made, nor how or if those procurements should be categorized per the new procurement regulations. Effect: The Foundation did not comply with the requirement that the procurement policy be documented by the required date. However, the Foundation?s main expenditure is for salaries, benefits and related payroll taxes of its employees. These costs, totaling approximately $659,559 were 75.9% of the Foundation?s total expenditures for this federal award. Salaries and related fringe benefits would not be subject to the competitive bidding process required under the procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None Auditor?s Recommendation: The Foundation should adopt a formal written procurement policy in the format and with the elements required by 2 CFR sections 200.318 to 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Foundation agrees with the finding, and will update its written procurement policy and document procurement decisions. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-002 Policies and Procedures Material Weakness Program Information CFDA # 93.421 Strengthening Public Health Systems Criteria: Non-federal entities must follow the procurement standards of 2 CFR sections 200.318 to 200.326. The effective date of required procurement under these standards is for auditee fiscal years beginning on or after December 26, 2017. Condition: The Public Health Foundation did not adopt a formal written procurement policy following these standards by June 30, 2019. Cause: The Foundation did not update its written procurement policy to account for the new OMB regulations, nor did management document how procurement decisions were made, nor how or if those procurements should be categorized per the new procurement regulations. Effect: The Foundation did not comply with the requirement that the procurement policy be documented by the required date. However, the Foundation?s main expenditure is for salaries, benefits and related payroll taxes of its employees. These costs, totaling approximately $659,559 were 75.9% of the Foundation?s total expenditures for this federal award. Salaries and related fringe benefits would not be subject to the competitive bidding process required under the procurement policy. Questioned Costs: None Auditor?s Recommendation: The Foundation should adopt a formal written procurement policy in the format and with the elements required by 2 CFR sections 200.318 to 200.326. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Foundation agrees with the finding, and will update its written procurement policy and document procurement decisions. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding.
2019-002 Policies and Procedures Material Weaknesses Recommendation: The Foundation should adopt a formal written procurement policy in the format and with the elements required by 2 CFR sections 200.318 to 200.326. Action Taken: The Foundation will update its written procurement policy and document procurement decisions. ? The ACFO will update the Foundation?s Procurement policy to incorporate the requirement elements required by 2 CFR sections 200.318 to 200.326. ? The CFO will ensure that procurement decisions are documented.
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2019 — management decision was due September 27, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2018 — management decision was due August 9, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2017 — management decision was due August 6, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in District of Columbia →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.