← Back to home

International Food Policy Research InstituteNon-Profit

EIN: 521041632

UEI: D55RRNBWGXW5

Audited by: RSM US LLP

Oversight agency: 98 [U.S. Agency for International Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

International Food Policy Research Institute9 audit years1 findings
9
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$21.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,328,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 9, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 9, 2026 (181 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,009,000 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2024 — management decision was due December 1, 2024.

2023-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Finding 2023-001: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: United States Agency of International Development Pass-through entity: The University of Arizona Program: Policy, Evidence, Analytics, Evidence, Research and Learning (PEARL) Assistance listing number: 98.001 Federal award identification number: 720RFS22IO00003 Criteria: IFPRI’s procurement and assistance policy and procedures manual states that potential research partners, vendors and other parties shall be screened for exclusion from donor and government-required debarment, suspension, and other sanctions by using the Lexis Nexis Bridger Insight XG tool. Condition and context: IFPRI did not follow its suspension and debarment policy for one vendor with a procurement action of $88,000. Cause: IFPRI did not follow its suspension and debarment policy for one vendor by not properly documenting that this vendor went through suspension and debarment within the Lexis Nexis Bridger Insight XG tool at the time of the awarding of the contract. Effect: Given though the vendor in this matter is not suspended or debarred, IFPRI did not have that documented knowledge at the time of the awarding of the contract. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management enhance its internal controls around suspension and debarment satisfying the compliance requirement detailed above. Views of responsible individuals: Management agrees with the finding and recommendation. See corrective action plan for further information.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-001: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: United States Agency of International Development Pass-through entity: The University of Arizona Program: Policy, Evidence, Analytics, Evidence, Research and Learning (PEARL) Assistance listing number: 98.001 Federal award identification number: 720RFS22IO00003 Criteria: IFPRI’s procurement and assistance policy and procedures manual states that potential research partners, vendors and other parties shall be screened for exclusion from donor and government-required debarment, suspension, and other sanctions by using the Lexis Nexis Bridger Insight XG tool. Condition and context: IFPRI did not follow its suspension and debarment policy for one vendor with a procurement action of $88,000. Cause: IFPRI did not follow its suspension and debarment policy for one vendor by not properly documenting that this vendor went through suspension and debarment within the Lexis Nexis Bridger Insight XG tool at the time of the awarding of the contract. Effect: Given though the vendor in this matter is not suspended or debarred, IFPRI did not have that documented knowledge at the time of the awarding of the contract. Questioned costs: None Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend management enhance its internal controls around suspension and debarment satisfying the compliance requirement detailed above. Views of responsible individuals: Management agrees with the finding and recommendation. See corrective action plan for further information.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023-001: Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Name of Responsible Official: James Fields Anticipated Completion Date: Already Completed Condition: IFPRI did not follow its suspension and debarment policy for one vendor with a procurement action of $88,000. Cause: IFPRI did not follow its suspension and debarment policy for one vendor by not properly documenting that this vendor went through suspension and debarment within the Lexis Nexis Bridger Insight XG tool at the time of the awarding of the contract. Effect: Given though the vendor in this matter is not suspended or debarred, IFPRI did not have that documented knowledge at the time of the awarding of the contract. Corrective Action Plan: IFPRI has a Sanction Compliance Program in place. As Standard practice, app partners/vendors, perspective new hires, and other parties including the owner(s) of partner organizations must be screened using the LexisNexis Bridget Insight XG5 application (XG5). This is a fully integrated compliance tool that allows users to screen names of individuals and businesses/organizations against various screening lists (watchlists) preloaded and updated in the system. Currently, IFPRI subscribes to the following watchlists through XG5: EPLS, EU Consolidated List, HM Treasury Sanctions, OFAC Non-SDN Entities, OFAC Sanctions, OFAC SDN, OSFI Consolidated List, UK Hm Treasury List, UN Consolidated List, and World Bank ineligible Firms.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,041,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 19, 2023 — management decision was due December 19, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,018,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 1, 2022 — management decision was due November 1, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,968,186 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 15, 2021 — management decision was due October 15, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,805,066 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 19, 2020 — management decision was due October 19, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$20,593,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 14, 2019 — management decision was due October 14, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,066,000 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 5, 2018 — management decision was due October 5, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,935,470 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 22, 2017 — management decision was due December 22, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in District of Columbia

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.