← Back to home

FREDERICK COMMUNITY COLLEGEHigher Education

EIN: 520743590

UEI: VRQEHK1XWRL3

Audited by: SB & COMPANY, LLC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

FREDERICK COMMUNITY COLLEGE9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$9.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,809,341 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by May 1, 2025 (490 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,783,051 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 8, 2024 — management decision was due August 8, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,274,169 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 28, 2022 — management decision was due May 28, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,505,754 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 1, 2022 — management decision was due December 1, 2022.

2021-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our testing of Return of Title IV calculations, we reviewed whether the Return of Title IV funds were returned within the 45-day window. We noted that for 7 out of the 40 students selected, funds were not returned timely. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the Federal award. The characteristics of internal controls are presented in the context of the components of internal controls discussed in Internal Control ? Integrated Framework (COSO Report), published by the United States Government Accountability Office?s Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government. The COSO Report provides a framework for organizations to design, implement, and evaluate controls that will facilitate compliance with the requirements of Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements.Per Uniform Guidance: When a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV aid earned by the student as of the student?s withdrawal date. If the total amount of Title IV assistance earned by the student is less than the amount that was disbursed to the student or on his or her behalf as of the date of the institution?s determination that the student withdrew, the difference must be returned to the Title IV programs as outlined in this section and no additional disbursements may be made to the student for the payment period or period of enrollment. If the amount the student earned is greater than the amount disbursed, the difference between the amounts must be treated as a post-withdrawal disbursement (34 CFR 668.22(a)(1) through (a)(5)). Returns of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the SFA account or electronic fund transfers initiated to ED as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew. Returns by check are late if the check is issued more than 45 days after the institution determined the student withdrew or the date on the canceled check shows the check was endorsed more than 60 days after the date the institution determined that the student withdrew (34 CFR 668.173(b)). Cause: For the 7 selections, the College did not return the Return of Title IV funds within the 45-day window. Management stated that there was a temporary employee responsible for this task during fiscal year 2021 and the employee did not submit the information timely. Effect or Potential Effect: The College was not in compliance with the 45-day requirement to return the Return of Title IV funds. Recommendation: We recommend the College to establish and implement a process to ensure Return of Title IV funds are returned timely. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the Corrective Action Plan section in this report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: During our testing of Return of Title IV calculations, we reviewed whether the Return of Title IV funds were returned within the 45-day window. We noted that for 7 out of the 40 students selected, funds were not returned timely. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions of the Federal award. The characteristics of internal controls are presented in the context of the components of internal controls discussed in Internal Control ? Integrated Framework (COSO Report), published by the United States Government Accountability Office?s Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government. The COSO Report provides a framework for organizations to design, implement, and evaluate controls that will facilitate compliance with the requirements of Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements.Per Uniform Guidance: When a recipient of Title IV grant or loan assistance withdraws from an institution during a payment period or period of enrollment in which the recipient began attendance, the institution must determine the amount of Title IV aid earned by the student as of the student?s withdrawal date. If the total amount of Title IV assistance earned by the student is less than the amount that was disbursed to the student or on his or her behalf as of the date of the institution?s determination that the student withdrew, the difference must be returned to the Title IV programs as outlined in this section and no additional disbursements may be made to the student for the payment period or period of enrollment. If the amount the student earned is greater than the amount disbursed, the difference between the amounts must be treated as a post-withdrawal disbursement (34 CFR 668.22(a)(1) through (a)(5)). Returns of Title IV funds are required to be deposited or transferred into the SFA account or electronic fund transfers initiated to ED as soon as possible, but no later than 45 days after the date the institution determines that the student withdrew. Returns by check are late if the check is issued more than 45 days after the institution determined the student withdrew or the date on the canceled check shows the check was endorsed more than 60 days after the date the institution determined that the student withdrew (34 CFR 668.173(b)). Cause: For the 7 selections, the College did not return the Return of Title IV funds within the 45-day window. Management stated that there was a temporary employee responsible for this task during fiscal year 2021 and the employee did not submit the information timely. Effect or Potential Effect: The College was not in compliance with the 45-day requirement to return the Return of Title IV funds. Recommendation: We recommend the College to establish and implement a process to ensure Return of Title IV funds are returned timely. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Refer to the Corrective Action Plan section in this report.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan-The process for Return of Title IV funds had four different steps each handled by a different staff member in the office. If one person was delayed, in this case the contact person, the entire process would be impacted. Thee has been an adjustment to the process to prevent this from occurring in the future. R2T4 has been re-assigned to the Loan Coordinator. This person is responsible for the process in its entirety. The Associate Director is currently reviewing all returns for the 21/22 academic year and reporting to the Interim Director/Consultant. In addition, the Peoplesoft system is being modified to create a method for the Coordinator to be prompted at intervals prior to the 45-day limit if modifications to the account haven't been made. The Director will also receive this report to ensure the process is fully completed. Responsible Contact Person-Dr. Nora Clark, Vice President for Student Affairs. Anticipated Completion Date-June 30, 2022

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,424,417 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 7, 2020 — management decision was due April 7, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,782,275 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 1, 2020 — management decision was due July 1, 2020.

2019-001
Cash Management
OTHER MATTERS

Criteria 2 CFR part 200.305 (b) requires that grantees funded on a reimbursement basis must pay for program cost before reimbursement is requested from the Federal government. Condition During our testing, we noted that an amount requested on a draw down request in September 2018 was for more than the amount disbursed. The College reduced the draw down for October 2018 by the amount of the excess draw down in September 2018. Cause The College?s procedures to ensure it calculates draw downs correctly was not able to catch the error before the request was submitted. Effect The College had excess Federal funds until its next draw down. Recommendation We recommend the College perform a closer review of its calculation for a request of draw down. Questioned costs Unknown. Corrective Action Plan The College agrees with this finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria 2 CFR part 200.305 (b) requires that grantees funded on a reimbursement basis must pay for program cost before reimbursement is requested from the Federal government. Condition During our testing, we noted that an amount requested on a draw down request in September 2018 was for more than the amount disbursed. The College reduced the draw down for October 2018 by the amount of the excess draw down in September 2018. Cause The College?s procedures to ensure it calculates draw downs correctly was not able to catch the error before the request was submitted. Effect The College had excess Federal funds until its next draw down. Recommendation We recommend the College perform a closer review of its calculation for a request of draw down. Questioned costs Unknown. Corrective Action Plan The College agrees with this finding. See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

We concur with this finding. Our review of the draw down calculation missed this error before the request was made but was subsequently discovered and corrected in the draw down for the next month. We will exercise greater oversight in our calculation and review process. This finding has been corrected.

About Cash Management →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,808,354 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2018 — management decision was due June 11, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,185,670 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2017 — management decision was due June 11, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,808,272 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 15, 2016 — management decision was due June 15, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Maryland

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.