← Back to home

ARLINGTON THRIVENon-Profit

EIN: 510207684

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: KOSITZKA, WICKS, AND COMPANY

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

ARLINGTON THRIVE1 audit years3 findings
1
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2021)

FY 2021-06-30

$3,410,569 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 3, 2022. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 3, 2022 (1399 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2021-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The timesheets completed by employees of Arlington Thrive did not reflect actual activity charged to individual federal activities. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide reasonable assurance that grant requirements are reviewed on a timely basis and that Arlington Thrive is in compliance with these requirements. Personnel activity related to performing functions outlined in federal awards should be properly documented and supported by employee timesheets. Effect: Time sheets were completed and approved, but because submitted timesheets do not reflect actual time spent on specific federal activities, Arlington Thrive does not have adequate documentation to support personnel expenses charged to federal programs. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented that require all employees to complete timesheets that reflect the actual activity of all staff whose time is charged in whole or in part to any federal activity. Reports should be prepared at least monthly and signed by the employee and by a responsible supervisory official having firsthand knowledge of the activities performed during the period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The timesheets completed by employees of Arlington Thrive did not reflect actual activity charged to individual federal activities. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide reasonable assurance that grant requirements are reviewed on a timely basis and that Arlington Thrive is in compliance with these requirements. Personnel activity related to performing functions outlined in federal awards should be properly documented and supported by employee timesheets. Effect: Time sheets were completed and approved, but because submitted timesheets do not reflect actual time spent on specific federal activities, Arlington Thrive does not have adequate documentation to support personnel expenses charged to federal programs. Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented that require all employees to complete timesheets that reflect the actual activity of all staff whose time is charged in whole or in part to any federal activity. Reports should be prepared at least monthly and signed by the employee and by a responsible supervisory official having firsthand knowledge of the activities performed during the period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2021-002 - Significant deficiency: Support for grant expenses - payroll Recommendation: Procedures should be implemented that require all employees to complete timesheets that reflect the actual activity of all staff whose time is charged in whole or in part to any federal activity. Reports should have been prepared at least monthly and signed by the employee and by a responsible supervisory official having firsthand knowledge of the activities performed during the period. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Since the audit period, Arlington Thrive has improved its payroll procedures. Arlington Thrive has instituted the use of a technology platform (QBTime) for all employees to complete timesheets reflecting actual activity charged in whole or partially to any federal grant activity. Within QBTime, pay is classified with specific codes aligned to the specific funding source used for payroll. Employees with actual activity to any federal grant activity must use the specific codes to properly enter time against the funding source. At the end of each pay period, the immediate supervisor signs off employee timesheets submitted in QBTime. Arlington Thrive also uses other forms of performance tracking available through its newly upgraded database, Apricot Core. Interactions between staff and clients are date and time stamped. A log of these interactions is available as a report.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Client eligibility files required under the grant agreements were incomplete. Criteria: According to the grant requirements, client file documentation must be maintained to support the client?s eligibility to receive assistance. Effect: Client files were incomplete according to the grant requirements. 21.019 CARES: 94 percent of client files sampled had were missing the Updated Services Application, nexus to COVID- 19 pandemic, documentation noting the COVID-19 effect and general required documentation. 14.218 CBDG: 8 percent of client files sampled were missing eligibility support such as a lease or client identification. Recommendation: Controls should be in place to ensure proper documentation is maintained per grant agreements, and requests made to the County if shared client files are incomplete. The supervisors should periodically review client files to ensure completeness. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: Client eligibility files required under the grant agreements were incomplete. Criteria: According to the grant requirements, client file documentation must be maintained to support the client?s eligibility to receive assistance. Effect: Client files were incomplete according to the grant requirements. 21.019 CARES: 94 percent of client files sampled had were missing the Updated Services Application, nexus to COVID- 19 pandemic, documentation noting the COVID-19 effect and general required documentation. 14.218 CBDG: 8 percent of client files sampled were missing eligibility support such as a lease or client identification. Recommendation: Controls should be in place to ensure proper documentation is maintained per grant agreements, and requests made to the County if shared client files are incomplete. The supervisors should periodically review client files to ensure completeness. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2021-003: Support for grant expenses - client eligibility files Recommendation: Controls should be in place to ensure proper documentation is maintained per grant agreements, and requests made to the County if shared client files are incomplete. The supervisors should periodically review client files to ensure completeness. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: During the audit period, Arlington Thrive employees were dealing with a great number of changes due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the continuous changing of the Arlington County guidance and the transition of the Arlington Thrive workforce to a virtual, teleworking environment. Further, many of the Arlington Thrive clients had very limited access to internet and a computer, and had very little technology skills; therefore, proper documentation was very difficult to acquire and quite scarce. Even after Arlington Thrive's attempt to collect proper documentation and/or shared client files, the challenges continued. Since the audit period, Arlington has made two improvements: 1. In the 3rd quarter of FY21 , a Quality Assurance Specialist position was created to focus on conducting periodic reviews of client files to validate proper documentation per grant agreement is maintained and to validate client files are complete. Arlington Thrive conducted its first internal case management document audit at the end of FY21 to identify potential gaps with proper documentation and to assist case management team in remediating potential control weaknesses. 2. Arlington Thrive upgraded its internal database to Apricot Core, improving the capability of document collection and mitigating the number of incomplete files. Further, all requests entered in the database are required to include proper supporting documentation for final approval.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-004
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Documentation provided to support the grant expenses did not agree. Criteria: Supporting documentation for the specific grant expenses should be retained and agree to the amount paid on behalf of the client. Effect: Payments disbursed for rental assistance did not agree to supporting leases or documentation maintained in client folders. 21.019 CARES: ? 12 percent of transactions sampled had payments that did not agree with the supporting documentation. ? 7 percent of transactions sampled did not show supporting documentations that the rental assistance was related to COVID-19. 14.218 CBDG: 91 transactions selected: ? 6 percent of transactions sampled had payments amounts that did not agree to the supporting documentation. Recommendation: Before a payment is made, checks should be compared to the supporting documentation. Any discrepancies should be documented and followed up with the referral source or the client to ensure the documentation agrees and supports the payments made. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: Documentation provided to support the grant expenses did not agree. Criteria: Supporting documentation for the specific grant expenses should be retained and agree to the amount paid on behalf of the client. Effect: Payments disbursed for rental assistance did not agree to supporting leases or documentation maintained in client folders. 21.019 CARES: ? 12 percent of transactions sampled had payments that did not agree with the supporting documentation. ? 7 percent of transactions sampled did not show supporting documentations that the rental assistance was related to COVID-19. 14.218 CBDG: 91 transactions selected: ? 6 percent of transactions sampled had payments amounts that did not agree to the supporting documentation. Recommendation: Before a payment is made, checks should be compared to the supporting documentation. Any discrepancies should be documented and followed up with the referral source or the client to ensure the documentation agrees and supports the payments made. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2021 -004: Support for grant expenses - payments Recommendation: Before a payment is made, checks should be compared to the supporting documentation. Any discrepancies should be documented and followed up with the referral source or the client to ensure the documentation agrees and supports the payments made. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Many discrepancies between the checks and the supporting documentation were due to delays in acquiring funding during the time of the application; and the large number of applications submitted during the beginning stages of COVID-19 pandemic. Leasing offices were closed making it hard to acquire rental ledgers. Leases were not being renewed , and hardcopies of leases were not being distributed due to the nationwide shutdown. Arlington Thrive has made improvements since the audit period. In FY22, Arlington Thrive rolled out a case management dashboard from its newly upgraded internal database, Apricot Core. This dashboard allows Arlington Thrive case managers to store supporting documents along with client fund requests (payments made to vendors). This facilitates the identification of supporting documents and helps validate the final payment to be disbursed. Supporting documents and data are securely stored in Apricot Core. It also includes a mobile platform, Connect, where applicants can independently complete an application and submit all documents for assistance. This mobile platform capability provides the opportunity to expand as a countywide tool for future assistance.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Virginia

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.