← Back to home

Unified School District #333Local Government

EIN: 486020582

UEI: HRCLQLEKJAE4

Audited by: Mapes & Miller LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Unified School District #33310 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION$2,039,570 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 3, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 3, 2026 (3 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION$2,337,165 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2025 — management decision was due September 17, 2025.

2024-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During the review of program expenditures for the Title VIB Targeted Improvement Plan (TIP) grant, we noted that most of the expenditures were recorded with journal entries to the TIP Grant expenditure accounts rather than coding them directly to the program accounts. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to ensure that costs are correctly charged to the expenditure accounts when incurred and that costs are adequately documented and supported. Cause: The Special Education Coop had high turnover of office staff and procedures where not in place to properly code the expenditures to the TIP grant accounts. Effect: Expenditures were incorrectly posted to the incorrect expenditure accounts and journal entries were made to reclassify. Context: Spreadsheets were provided documenting expenditures that should have been coded to the TIP grant. However, tracing the journal entries to specific expenditures was difficult for some transactions. Questioned costs are less than $25,000. Recommendations: We recommend that the District determine what they are expending the TIP grant for and more accurately code the expenditures to the correct accounts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Special Education Coop office staff will establish procedures to more accurately code TIP grant expenditures when they are paid rather than reclassifying them with journal entries at the end of the year.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: During the review of program expenditures for the Title VIB Targeted Improvement Plan (TIP) grant, we noted that most of the expenditures were recorded with journal entries to the TIP Grant expenditure accounts rather than coding them directly to the program accounts. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place to ensure that costs are correctly charged to the expenditure accounts when incurred and that costs are adequately documented and supported. Cause: The Special Education Coop had high turnover of office staff and procedures where not in place to properly code the expenditures to the TIP grant accounts. Effect: Expenditures were incorrectly posted to the incorrect expenditure accounts and journal entries were made to reclassify. Context: Spreadsheets were provided documenting expenditures that should have been coded to the TIP grant. However, tracing the journal entries to specific expenditures was difficult for some transactions. Questioned costs are less than $25,000. Recommendations: We recommend that the District determine what they are expending the TIP grant for and more accurately code the expenditures to the correct accounts. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Special Education Coop office staff will establish procedures to more accurately code TIP grant expenditures when they are paid rather than reclassifying them with journal entries at the end of the year.

Corrective Action Plan

The Special Education Coop office staff will establish procedures to more accurately code TIP grant expenditures when they are paid rather than reclassifying them with journal entries at the end of the year.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$2,753,220 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$3,053,848 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2023 — management decision was due September 29, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$2,575,488 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2022 — management decision was due August 28, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,652,195 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2021 — management decision was due August 27, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,452,983 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2020 — management decision was due September 4, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,307,343 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 27, 2019 — management decision was due August 27, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,422,050 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2018 — management decision was due September 26, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,327,934 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2017 — management decision was due July 24, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.