← Back to home

City of Junction City, KansasLocal Government

EIN: 486019171

UEI: FVMQCKBN8S91

Audited by: AdamsBrown, LLC

Oversight agency: 66 [Environmental Protection Agency]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

City of Junction City, Kansas6 audit years1 findings
6
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$13.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$13,846,274 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 11, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 11, 2026 (31 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2024-007
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Federal program Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – 21.027 Compliance requirements – Reporting Criteria or specific requirement Internal controls should be in place to ensure that reports are completed accurately. Condition During review of the annual program reporting, it was noted that cumulative expenditures and current period expenditures were not properly reported. Context For the current period expenditures, they were calculated using an incorrect timeframe, which resulted in them being under-reported. In addition, the cumulative expenditures were calculated using the amount reported in the prior reporting period and adding the current period expenditures, which led to them being under-reported, as well. Cause Turnover led to a new staff member preparing the reporting, and they did not have any training from the prior staff member regarding its preparation. Effect Incorrect current period expenditures and cumulative expenditures were reported to the Treasury. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its grant reporting procedures and implement controls to ensure that grant reports are completed accurately. Additionally, we recommend that all staff involved receive proper training in order to understand the information that is being requested. Views of responsible officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal program Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – 21.027 Compliance requirements – Reporting Criteria or specific requirement Internal controls should be in place to ensure that reports are completed accurately. Condition During review of the annual program reporting, it was noted that cumulative expenditures and current period expenditures were not properly reported. Context For the current period expenditures, they were calculated using an incorrect timeframe, which resulted in them being under-reported. In addition, the cumulative expenditures were calculated using the amount reported in the prior reporting period and adding the current period expenditures, which led to them being under-reported, as well. Cause Turnover led to a new staff member preparing the reporting, and they did not have any training from the prior staff member regarding its preparation. Effect Incorrect current period expenditures and cumulative expenditures were reported to the Treasury. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its grant reporting procedures and implement controls to ensure that grant reports are completed accurately. Additionally, we recommend that all staff involved receive proper training in order to understand the information that is being requested. Views of responsible officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-007 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds – 21.027 – Reporting Condition During review of the annual program reporting, it was noted that cumulative expenditures and current period expenditures were not properly reported. Recommendation We recommend that the City review its grant reporting procedures and implement controls to ensure that grant reports are completed accurately. Additionally, we recommend that all staff involved receive proper training in order to understand the information that is being requested. Comments on the Finding The City is in agreement with the finding. Action Taken Moving forward, a second individual will review and approve the prepared reports and information prior to it being submitted. This was implemented in January 2025.

About Reporting →

FY 2023-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, ADVERSE OPINION$4,560,042 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2025 — management decision was due July 20, 2025.

FY 2020-12-31

$2,049,832 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 14, 2021 — management decision was due January 14, 2022.

FY 2018-12-31

QUALIFIED OPINION$965,988 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 22, 2019 — management decision was due March 22, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

QUALIFIED OPINION$5,434,068 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2018 — management decision was due February 13, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

QUALIFIED OPINION$5,065,865 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 5, 2017 — management decision was due May 5, 2018.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.