← Back to home

University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice AssociationNon-Profit

EIN: 480805658

UEI: U49EMXEVWPB5

Audited by: Regier, Carr, & Monroe, L.L.P.

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association10 audit years8 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$2.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$2,642,139 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 10, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 10, 2026 (22 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2024-001

U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development No. 14.241 – Housing Opportunities for Person with AIDS Grant Period Year Ended June 30, 2025 Criteria: While the housing opportunity program implemented further segregation of duties over the program participants' eligibility, rent and utility assistance calculation and program reporting during the year, the internal controls were lacking in verifying the participant’s utility assistance calculations. Condition and Context: We noted an incorrect utility assistance calculation, which internal control processes did not identify. Effect: While testing a sample of forty program transactions, one client utility assistance expense was calculated incorrectly. The payment was reviewed and approved which resulted in an overpayment of $340. Cause: The established internal controls failed to detect an incorrect utility payment. Recommendation: Internal control processes should include recalculating the amount being paid for each utility assistance and how many weeks the payment covers. During the year, additional staff were hired to improve controls and mitigate the risk. We noted improvement as the year progressed. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. Procedures are being implemented to ensure appropriate internal controls are established and followed, see attached corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development No. 14.241 – Housing Opportunities for Person with AIDS Grant Period Year Ended June 30, 2025 Criteria: While the housing opportunity program implemented further segregation of duties over the program participants' eligibility, rent and utility assistance calculation and program reporting during the year, the internal controls were lacking in verifying the participant’s utility assistance calculations. Condition and Context: We noted an incorrect utility assistance calculation, which internal control processes did not identify. Effect: While testing a sample of forty program transactions, one client utility assistance expense was calculated incorrectly. The payment was reviewed and approved which resulted in an overpayment of $340. Cause: The established internal controls failed to detect an incorrect utility payment. Recommendation: Internal control processes should include recalculating the amount being paid for each utility assistance and how many weeks the payment covers. During the year, additional staff were hired to improve controls and mitigate the risk. We noted improvement as the year progressed. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. Procedures are being implemented to ensure appropriate internal controls are established and followed, see attached corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

In response to Finding 2025-001 Internal Control over Allowable Costs identified in the fiscal year 2025 audit, the University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association has modified the HOPW A, housing opportunities for persons with AIDS, procedures for documenting a participant's eligibility period, support allowance, and assistance provided for transitional, short-term, long-term, and placement assistance. As of January 2026, the program has modified the KCTH checklist for housing assistance/support services to include the date each assistance starts and will end. The total amount eligible for either 5 months or 21 weeks, dependent on the assistance type, will also be documented in the file. Request to process payments will include the number of weeks/months for the current request and previously utilized. In April of 2025 an additional FTE was hired to assist in verifying the calculations and support amounts for accuracy. Jamie Thorstenberg, Housing Program Coordinator, will serve as the contact person for this corrective action plan. We hope these changes will sufficiently address Finding 2025-001 Segregation of Duties / Review Procedures.

Prior Finding References

2024-001

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-06-30

$2,898,455 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2025 — management decision was due August 4, 2025.

2024-001
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Criteria: The housing opportunity program lacks segregation of duties over the program participants' eligibility, rent and utility assistance calculation and program reporting. Condition and Context: Internal controls were lacking with verifying the participant’s eligibility, rent and utility assistance calculations and complying with the reporting guidelines. Effect: While testing a sample of forty program transactions, no issues of noncompliance were noted. However, the lack of segregation of duties and related internal controls over the program could lead to misappropriation of assets and/or noncompliance with the program requirements. The annual performance and evaluation report was filed timely by the preparer without a reviewer’s approval. Cause: Segregation of duties and control procedures were not implemented and regularly maintained. Recommendation: Internal control processes could be implemented with another level of review over the program activities, including rent/utility calculations, participants' eligibility, and reporting. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. Procedures are being implemented to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and related controls are established and followed, see attached corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The housing opportunity program lacks segregation of duties over the program participants' eligibility, rent and utility assistance calculation and program reporting. Condition and Context: Internal controls were lacking with verifying the participant’s eligibility, rent and utility assistance calculations and complying with the reporting guidelines. Effect: While testing a sample of forty program transactions, no issues of noncompliance were noted. However, the lack of segregation of duties and related internal controls over the program could lead to misappropriation of assets and/or noncompliance with the program requirements. The annual performance and evaluation report was filed timely by the preparer without a reviewer’s approval. Cause: Segregation of duties and control procedures were not implemented and regularly maintained. Recommendation: Internal control processes could be implemented with another level of review over the program activities, including rent/utility calculations, participants' eligibility, and reporting. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. Procedures are being implemented to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and related controls are established and followed, see attached corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

In response to Finding 2024-001 Segregation of Duties/ Review Procedures identified in the fiscal year 2024 audit, the University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association has modified the HOPW A, housing opportunities for persons with AIDS, procedures for verifying the participant's eligibility, rent and utility assistance calculations for accuracy assurance. Immediately, the program has modified the KCTH checklist for housing assistance/support services to include a verification line for both the "intake" and the "verified" for each participant file. To manage the increasing workload of the growing program, a new housing coordinator position is in the recruitment stage. This position will ensure there is an available FTE to complete the verification process timely and assist the Ryan White case managers with client housing needs. Sheila Norris, Director of Finance, will serve as the contact person for this corrective action plan. We hope these changes will sufficiently address Finding 2024-001 Segregation of Duties/ Review Procedures.

About Eligibility →

FY 2023-06-30

$2,589,085 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2024 — management decision was due September 27, 2024.

2023-001
Program Income
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-001

Criteria: Program income for the Ryan White programs lacked controls. Program income was not being allocated or tracked separately amongst the Ryan White C and D programs. Condition and Context: All charges generated from the Ryan White programs were going to one fund instead of being separated for each Ryan White program. The 340B revenue was not allocated to Ryan White C. Effect: If the program income is not allocated to the respective Ryan White programs, the related earnings may not be used for respective program expenses. Cause: Program income controls and process were not implemented and routinely performed. Recommendation: Appropriate internal controls over the Ryan White program income should be established and documented. A new fund for each Ryan White program should be maintained to properly track program income within the fund. The 340B revenue should go to the Ryan White C fund. Current Year Status: While management has made multiple improvements to the program income processes, patient payments included in program income for the Ryan White programs lacked control over the allocation of the payments and a finding was issued in the current year. A new fund was established for Ryan White programs, and expenses were tracked through the new funds. All of the 340B revenue was properly allocated to Ryan White C fund.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Program income for the Ryan White programs lacked controls. Program income was not being allocated or tracked separately amongst the Ryan White C and D programs. Condition and Context: All charges generated from the Ryan White programs were going to one fund instead of being separated for each Ryan White program. The 340B revenue was not allocated to Ryan White C. Effect: If the program income is not allocated to the respective Ryan White programs, the related earnings may not be used for respective program expenses. Cause: Program income controls and process were not implemented and routinely performed. Recommendation: Appropriate internal controls over the Ryan White program income should be established and documented. A new fund for each Ryan White program should be maintained to properly track program income within the fund. The 340B revenue should go to the Ryan White C fund. Current Year Status: While management has made multiple improvements to the program income processes, patient payments included in program income for the Ryan White programs lacked control over the allocation of the payments and a finding was issued in the current year. A new fund was established for Ryan White programs, and expenses were tracked through the new funds. All of the 340B revenue was properly allocated to Ryan White C fund.

Corrective Action Plan

In response to Finding 2023-001 Prgram Income: Internal Control Identified is the fisal year2023 audit, the University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association has modified program income procedures to include a review and posting by the Senior Accountant in the financial close process. Patient payments received less refunds are allocated. The patient payments less refunds amount is an export of the speciality services facility group from the electronic medical record system, eClinicalworks as generated from a Ryan White procvider's clean claim submission. The patients included in the monthly allocation are vetted by Ryan White grant staff during the claim process. Sheila Norris, Director of Finance, will serve as the contact person for this corrective action plan. We hope these charges will sufficiently address Finding 2023-001 Program Income: Internal Control

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Program Income →

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,104,174 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2023 — management decision was due September 20, 2023.

2022-001
Program Income
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

Finding 2022-001 Program Income: Control, Tracking, and Allocation Method U.S Department of Health and Human Services No. 93.153 ? Coordinated services and Access to Research for Women, Infants, Children and Youth No. 93.918 ? Provide Outpatient Early Intervention Services with Respect to HIV Disease Grant Period Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria: Program income for the Ryan White programs lacked controls. Program income was not being allocated or tracked separately amongst the Ryan White C and D programs. Condition and Context: All charges generated from the Ryan White programs were going to one fund instead of being separated for each Ryan White program. The 340B revenue was not allocated to Ryan White C. Effect: If the program income is not allocated to the respective Ryan White programs, the related earnings may not be used for respective program expenses. Cause: Program income controls and process were not implemented and routinely performed. Recommendation: Appropriate internal controls over the Ryan White program income should be established and documented. A new fund for each Ryan White program should be maintained to properly track program income within the fund. The 340B revenue should go to the Ryan White C fund. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding noted in the report as well as in the HRSA site visit report. Procedures were in the process of being implemented throughout the year and went into effect in June 2022 to properly allocate program income retrospectively throughout the year. Subsequent to year end, they implemented a new system that will track program income in more detail and to the respective Ryan White programs, see attached corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-001 Program Income: Control, Tracking, and Allocation Method U.S Department of Health and Human Services No. 93.153 ? Coordinated services and Access to Research for Women, Infants, Children and Youth No. 93.918 ? Provide Outpatient Early Intervention Services with Respect to HIV Disease Grant Period Year Ended June 30, 2022 Criteria: Program income for the Ryan White programs lacked controls. Program income was not being allocated or tracked separately amongst the Ryan White C and D programs. Condition and Context: All charges generated from the Ryan White programs were going to one fund instead of being separated for each Ryan White program. The 340B revenue was not allocated to Ryan White C. Effect: If the program income is not allocated to the respective Ryan White programs, the related earnings may not be used for respective program expenses. Cause: Program income controls and process were not implemented and routinely performed. Recommendation: Appropriate internal controls over the Ryan White program income should be established and documented. A new fund for each Ryan White program should be maintained to properly track program income within the fund. The 340B revenue should go to the Ryan White C fund. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding noted in the report as well as in the HRSA site visit report. Procedures were in the process of being implemented throughout the year and went into effect in June 2022 to properly allocate program income retrospectively throughout the year. Subsequent to year end, they implemented a new system that will track program income in more detail and to the respective Ryan White programs, see attached corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Ms. Lehmer, In response to Finding 2022-001 Program Income: Control, Tracking, and Allocation Method as identified with the fiscal year 2022 audit, the University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association has implemented the following as of July 1, 2022, to remedy the finding. 1. Established a program income department/fund to track program income and expense for each Ryan White Grant C and D: Program Income Ryan White Part C-620204, Program Income Ryan White Part D-620205. 2. 340B Program Income recorded 100% as Program Income Ryan White Part C, per requirement for HHS Awards, 45 CFR part 75.307. Sheila Norris, Director of Finance, will serve as the contact person in regard to this corrective action plan. We hope these changes will sufficiently address Finding 2022-001 Program Income: Control, Tracking, and Allocation Method. Please let me know if additional action is required. Sincerely, L. Aaron Ryan, RN, MBA, FACMPE Executive Director University of Kansas School of Medicine - Wichita Medical Practice Association

About Program Income →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,883,865 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2022 — management decision was due August 21, 2022.

2021-001
Eligibility / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Finding 2021-001 Segregation of Duties / Review Procedures U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development No. 14.241 ? Housing Opportunities for Person with AIDS Grant Period Year Ended June 30, 2021 Criteria: The housing opportunity program lacks segregation of duties over the invoice approval, program participants' eligibility, and program reporting. Condition and Context: Internal controls were not established to verify the participant?s eligibility in the housing opportunity program. The program manager was the only person approving invoices, determining eligibility, and complying with the reporting guidelines. Effect: While testing a sample of program transactions, no issues of noncompliance were noted. However, the lack of segregation of duties and related internal controls over the program could lead to misappropriation of assets and/or noncompliance with the program requirements. Cause: Segregation of duties and control procedures were not implemented and regularly maintained. Recommendation: Internal control processes could be implemented with another level of review over the program activities, including invoice approval, rent/utility calculations, participants' eligibility, and reporting. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. Procedures are being implemented to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and related controls are established and followed, see attached corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2021-001 Segregation of Duties / Review Procedures U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development No. 14.241 ? Housing Opportunities for Person with AIDS Grant Period Year Ended June 30, 2021 Criteria: The housing opportunity program lacks segregation of duties over the invoice approval, program participants' eligibility, and program reporting. Condition and Context: Internal controls were not established to verify the participant?s eligibility in the housing opportunity program. The program manager was the only person approving invoices, determining eligibility, and complying with the reporting guidelines. Effect: While testing a sample of program transactions, no issues of noncompliance were noted. However, the lack of segregation of duties and related internal controls over the program could lead to misappropriation of assets and/or noncompliance with the program requirements. Cause: Segregation of duties and control procedures were not implemented and regularly maintained. Recommendation: Internal control processes could be implemented with another level of review over the program activities, including invoice approval, rent/utility calculations, participants' eligibility, and reporting. Management Response: Management agrees with the finding. Procedures are being implemented to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and related controls are established and followed, see attached corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Re: Corrective Action Plan Ms. Lehmer, In response to Finding 2021-001 Segregation of Duties/Review Procedures as identified with the fiscal year 2021 audit, the University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Medical Practice Association has implemented the following interventions as of January 1, 2022, to remedy the finding. 1. Utilize separate personnel to review request before they are submitted from the KCTH program to the parent organization for payment. By implementing additional personnel for review, we are mitigating the chances of inappropriate purchases from the program 2. Development of General Procurement Standards. See attached document. 3. Development of Fiscal Process and Documentation Policy. See attached document. Jamie Thorstenberg, or the acting housing program coordinator, will serve as the contact person carrying out the corrective action plan. We hope these changes will sufficiently address Finding 2021-001 Segregation of Duties/Review Procedures. Please let me know if additional action is needed. Sincerely, L. Aaron Ryan, RN, MBA, F ACMPE Executive Director, University of Kansas School of Medicine- Wichita Medical Practice Association

About Eligibility, Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

$2,303,991 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 4, 2021 — management decision was due August 4, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$2,255,524 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2020 — management decision was due July 27, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,161,729 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 18, 2019 — management decision was due August 18, 2019.

2018-001
Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,068,408 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2018 — management decision was due September 21, 2018.

2017-001
Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2017-002
Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,956,962 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2017 — management decision was due August 7, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.