← Back to home

Unified School District No. 489 Hays, KansasLocal Government

EIN: 480726243

UEI: MXM6DG3XTRZ1

Audited by: AdamsBrown, LLC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 14, 2026

Unified School District No. 489 Hays, Kansas10 audit years4 findings
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$7.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$7,292,364 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 18, 2026 (89 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$7,362,631 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 29, 2025 — management decision was due July 29, 2025.

2024-003
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2024-003 Federal Award Special Education (IDEA) Cluster – 84.027 and 84.173 Compliance Requirement Maintenance of Effort Criteria or specific requirement Internal controls should be in place to ensure that accurate amounts are reported to the State Department of Education for the Maintenance of Effort calculation. Condition Certain expenditure amounts reported to the State Department of Education for the Maintenance of Effort calculation were not accurate or could not be corroborated. Context We determined, through testing of the Maintenance of Effort submission, that five amounts reported had an immaterial variance when compared to the supporting documentation. Cause Supporting documentation was not saved at the time of preparation of the report, and some relevant accounts were missed when summing the expenditures that needed to be reported. Effect The State Department of Education was provided inaccurate amounts for use in its Maintenance of Effort calculation. Recommendation Procedures should be established and implemented to ensure that all supporting documentation used in the preparation of the Maintenance of Effort submission be saved and that all expenditures reported are accurate. Views of responsible officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY 2024-003 Federal Award Special Education (IDEA) Cluster – 84.027 and 84.173 Compliance Requirement Maintenance of Effort Criteria or specific requirement Internal controls should be in place to ensure that accurate amounts are reported to the State Department of Education for the Maintenance of Effort calculation. Condition Certain expenditure amounts reported to the State Department of Education for the Maintenance of Effort calculation were not accurate or could not be corroborated. Context We determined, through testing of the Maintenance of Effort submission, that five amounts reported had an immaterial variance when compared to the supporting documentation. Cause Supporting documentation was not saved at the time of preparation of the report, and some relevant accounts were missed when summing the expenditures that needed to be reported. Effect The State Department of Education was provided inaccurate amounts for use in its Maintenance of Effort calculation. Recommendation Procedures should be established and implemented to ensure that all supporting documentation used in the preparation of the Maintenance of Effort submission be saved and that all expenditures reported are accurate. Views of responsible officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-003 Federal Award Special Education (IDEA) Cluster – 84.027 and 84.173 Compliance Requirement Maintenance of Effort Condition Certain expenditure amounts reported to the State Department of Education for the Maintenance of Effort calculation were not accurate or could not be corroborated. Recommendation Procedures should be established and implemented to ensure that all supporting documentation used in the preparation of the Maintenance of Effort submission be saved and that all expenditures reported are accurate. Comments on the Finding Recommendation The district agrees with the finding and noted the difference between records used and the final records for the school year in question. The district is aware of the oversight and will continue to improve the maintenance of effort submission process. Action Taken For the maintenance of effort submission to be completed in January 2025, all amounts will be tied to data within the District’s accounting records updated after end of year adjustments. Any data or information used in the preparation will be marked and saved in a file for documentation purposes.

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2023-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$8,572,948 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2024 — management decision was due August 16, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$11,599,725 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2023 — management decision was due July 26, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

ADVERSE OPINION, NON-GAAP BASIS$7,858,967 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 30, 2022 — management decision was due July 30, 2022.

2021-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

2021-001 ? Child Nutrition Cluster ? Allowable Activities and Costs/Cost Principles Criteria or specific requirement Reimbursement for meals served is determined by applying the applicable meals times rates formula. Condition The District submitted inaccurate meal counts for reimbursement. Context During testing of the Child Nutrition Cluster, it was discovered that one meal was over-reimbursed during a month tested and one meal was under-reimbursed during a month tested. Cause Handwritten meal counts were incorrectly summed and submitted for reimbursement. Effect Inaccurate meal counts were submitted to the State and reimbursed. Recommendation We recommend that the District review its controls related to monthly reimbursement requests for the Child Nutrition Cluster in order to ensure that accurate meal counts are submitted. Views of responsible officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001 ? Child Nutrition Cluster ? Allowable Activities and Costs/Cost Principles Criteria or specific requirement Reimbursement for meals served is determined by applying the applicable meals times rates formula. Condition The District submitted inaccurate meal counts for reimbursement. Context During testing of the Child Nutrition Cluster, it was discovered that one meal was over-reimbursed during a month tested and one meal was under-reimbursed during a month tested. Cause Handwritten meal counts were incorrectly summed and submitted for reimbursement. Effect Inaccurate meal counts were submitted to the State and reimbursed. Recommendation We recommend that the District review its controls related to monthly reimbursement requests for the Child Nutrition Cluster in order to ensure that accurate meal counts are submitted. Views of responsible officials See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-001 - Child Nutrition Cluster - Allowable Activities and Costs/Cost Principles Context During testing of the Child Nutrition Cluster, it was discovered that one meal was over-reimbursed during a month tested and one meal was under-reimbursed during a month tested. Recommendation We recommend that the District review its controls related to monthly reimbursement requests for the Child Nutrition Cluster in order to ensure that accurate meal counts are submitted. Action Taken The District is aware of the oversight and will continue to strive to improve its review process. A review of meal counts has been implemented, and staff will continue to work to ensure that an accurate meal count is submitted each month. All actions have been taken as of the date of this notice.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2020-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$6,514,352 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 14, 2021 — management decision was due August 14, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$5,797,855 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 4, 2020 — management decision was due September 4, 2020.

2019-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Criteria or specific requirement Internal controls should be in place to ensure that any raises given, or other changes made to an employee?s pay during the year, are properly documented. Proper documentation is needed to allow for review and monitoring of the payroll process. Part of this process includes ensuring that updated contracts are properly signed by the appropriate individuals and filed for record-keeping. Condition Updated contracts are not consistently being signed and stored for record-keeping and review. In addition, due to the lack of review process, errors on works agreements are not being caught or corrected. Context We determined, through testing of a sample of the Head Start Program, that employees are receiving raises or other changes are being made to their salary, and some of these updated contracts are not being signed by the appropriate officials and the individual employee. In addition, work agreements were found that did not match the amount paid to the employee. Of the 32 employees tested, 2 did not have proper supporting documentation showing the wages or salary that they were paid. Effect Two employees were not paid the amount that their documentation shows. Total questioned costs are $2,938. Cause Changes are being made within the payroll system without ensuring that a signed contract or work agreement exists to support the changes. Recommendation We recommend that the District put in place a policy that is effective at ensuring that all contracted employees sign and return a copy of their contract. In addition, these contracts should be reviewed before entering changes into the payroll system. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or specific requirement Internal controls should be in place to ensure that any raises given, or other changes made to an employee?s pay during the year, are properly documented. Proper documentation is needed to allow for review and monitoring of the payroll process. Part of this process includes ensuring that updated contracts are properly signed by the appropriate individuals and filed for record-keeping. Condition Updated contracts are not consistently being signed and stored for record-keeping and review. In addition, due to the lack of review process, errors on works agreements are not being caught or corrected. Context We determined, through testing of a sample of the Head Start Program, that employees are receiving raises or other changes are being made to their salary, and some of these updated contracts are not being signed by the appropriate officials and the individual employee. In addition, work agreements were found that did not match the amount paid to the employee. Of the 32 employees tested, 2 did not have proper supporting documentation showing the wages or salary that they were paid. Effect Two employees were not paid the amount that their documentation shows. Total questioned costs are $2,938. Cause Changes are being made within the payroll system without ensuring that a signed contract or work agreement exists to support the changes. Recommendation We recommend that the District put in place a policy that is effective at ensuring that all contracted employees sign and return a copy of their contract. In addition, these contracts should be reviewed before entering changes into the payroll system. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

SIGINIFCANT DEFICIENCY 2019-004 Recommendation: We recommend that the District put in place a policy that is effective at ensuring that all contracted employees sign and return a copy of their contract. In addition, all contracts and work agreements should be reviewed before entering changes into the payroll system. Action Taken: Employee contracts will be distributed to staff with a due date for return. Once the due date has passed, Human Resources will do an audit for unreturned/unsigned contracts. If an unsigned contract is found, the employee?s direct supervisor will be notified so as to secure a signature on the contract. A new due date will be assigned, and the supervisor will be responsible for contacting the employee and ensuring that the signed contract is returned. If the second due date passes with no resolution, the Director of Finance will be notified, as well as the Superintendent. See 2019-003 for action taken regarding review of contracts and work agreements. Corrective actions are anticipated to be put in place by 02/24/2020.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$4,943,831 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2019 — management decision was due July 2, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$4,927,627 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2018 — management decision was due July 16, 2018.

2017-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$4,390,364 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 28, 2016 — management decision was due June 28, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.