← Back to home

Unified School District No. 395 LaCrosse, KansasLocal Government

EIN: 480698546

UEI: DMCCKLGNM1Z6

Audited by: AdamsBrown, LLC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Unified School District No. 395 LaCrosse, Kansas1 audit years1 findings
1
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,149,309 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on October 24, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by April 24, 2025 (495 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Significant Deficiency 2024-004 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) – 93.323 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles Criteria or specific requirement In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430, payroll charges should be supported by proper documentation that reflects the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on a Federal award and non-Federal award. In addition, in order to ensure that employees are paid the correct amount and that no conflict of interest may occur, internal controls should be put in place to ensure that all wage rates paid have been approved by the Board. Condition Three employees were paid an additional amount using program funding in order to reflect the administrative burden associated with running the program for three years. For two of the employees, no personnel activity reports or other time records could be provided to support those costs. For the third employee, a monthly log of hours worked on grant activities was provided. However, it only showed the total hours for that month and did not break them out by date of occurrence. Additionally, no supervisor review or other control over that log occurred. Lastly, the employees’ contracts were not amended and approved by the Board to reflect these additional amounts. Context We determined, through testing of program expenditures, that $16,162 was paid in gross wages and taxes for the three employees. Cause District employees do not have a significant amount of experience with large federal programs, and they were not aware of the compliance requirements. Effect Proper records were not maintained to support program expenditures. Recommendation Employees with grant administration responsibilities should undergo training to better their understanding of the compliance requirements that accompany Federal programs. Additionally, controls should be implemented to ensure that all required records are prepared, as well as to ensure that the Board approves all wage rates. Views of responsible officials See corrective action plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Significant Deficiency 2024-004 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) – 93.323 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles Criteria or specific requirement In accordance with 2 CFR 200.430, payroll charges should be supported by proper documentation that reflects the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee works on a Federal award and non-Federal award. In addition, in order to ensure that employees are paid the correct amount and that no conflict of interest may occur, internal controls should be put in place to ensure that all wage rates paid have been approved by the Board. Condition Three employees were paid an additional amount using program funding in order to reflect the administrative burden associated with running the program for three years. For two of the employees, no personnel activity reports or other time records could be provided to support those costs. For the third employee, a monthly log of hours worked on grant activities was provided. However, it only showed the total hours for that month and did not break them out by date of occurrence. Additionally, no supervisor review or other control over that log occurred. Lastly, the employees’ contracts were not amended and approved by the Board to reflect these additional amounts. Context We determined, through testing of program expenditures, that $16,162 was paid in gross wages and taxes for the three employees. Cause District employees do not have a significant amount of experience with large federal programs, and they were not aware of the compliance requirements. Effect Proper records were not maintained to support program expenditures. Recommendation Employees with grant administration responsibilities should undergo training to better their understanding of the compliance requirements that accompany Federal programs. Additionally, controls should be implemented to ensure that all required records are prepared, as well as to ensure that the Board approves all wage rates. Views of responsible officials See corrective action plan.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-004 Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (ELC) – 93.323 Activities Allowed or Unallowed and Allowable Costs and Cost Principles Condition Three employees were paid an additional amount using program funding in order to reflect the administrative burden associated with running the program for three years. For two of the employees, no personnel activity reports or other time records could be provided to support those costs. For the third employee, a monthly log of hours worked on grant activities was provided. However, it only showed the total hours for that month and did not break them out by date of occurrence. Additionally, no supervisor review or other control over that log occurred. Lastly, the employees’ contracts were not amended and approved by the Board to reflect these additional amounts. Recommendation Employees with grant administration responsibilities should undergo training to better their understanding of the compliance requirements that accompany Federal programs. Additionally, controls should be implemented to ensure that all required records are prepared, as well as to ensure that the Board approves all wage rates. Comments on the Finding Staff are aware of the oversight and will strive to improve the process. Action Taken Staff involved in grant administration will review training available from the Kansas State Department of Education regarding federal programs. Additionally, a year-end review of gross wages will be implemented to ensure that paid amounts match the approved contracts.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.