University of Saint MaryHigher Education

EIN: 480547846

UEI: FTYLWMXBJ9H1

Audited by: Forvis Mazars, LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

University of Saint Mary10 audit years5 findings4 repeat
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
4
Repeat Findings
$18.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,222,166 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 12, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 12, 2026 (78 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,985,010 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 17, 2024 — management decision was due May 17, 2025.

2024-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Reference Number: Finding #2024-001 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds #21.027 U.S. Department of Treasury Passed Through Kansas Department of Commerce Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting: The University’s grant agreement with Kansas Department of Commerce (KDOC) requires quarterly financial and narrative project reports detailing the use of the grant funds in such a way that are consistent with the Project as presented in the Grantee’s Grant Administration Plan and Budget. The quarterly reports are due on the last day of the month following the end of the period completed. These dates are July 31, 2023, October 31, 2023, January 31, 2024, and April 30, 2024. The reports should identify all grant funds remaining to be spent, the project progress and outcome of the project. Condition - The University did not submit reports to the KDOC at the required deadlines during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Questioned Costs - None noted. Context - Out of a population of four reports, we selected two reports and noted the two instances of noncompliance with the timely reporting requirement of the CSLFRF. Effect - The University was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of the grant agreement program. Cause - Management received conflicting information about the reporting requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding Recommendation - We recommend that management review this area and establish procedures to ensure required reports are completed timely and accurately. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management worked closely with the KDOC on the requirements of the quarterly submissions and was in frequent communication with them. However, management received conflicting guidance from the KDOC about the required submissions for the program. Due to the conflicting guidance, management stopped submitting reports and was waiting for further feedback. Management wanted to avoid submitting future reports that may have been potentially inaccurate or missing appropriate documentation. Management finally received final guidance at the beginning of September 2024 and will begin submitting reports on a timely basis.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number: Finding #2024-001 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds #21.027 U.S. Department of Treasury Passed Through Kansas Department of Commerce Criteria or Specific Requirement – Reporting: The University’s grant agreement with Kansas Department of Commerce (KDOC) requires quarterly financial and narrative project reports detailing the use of the grant funds in such a way that are consistent with the Project as presented in the Grantee’s Grant Administration Plan and Budget. The quarterly reports are due on the last day of the month following the end of the period completed. These dates are July 31, 2023, October 31, 2023, January 31, 2024, and April 30, 2024. The reports should identify all grant funds remaining to be spent, the project progress and outcome of the project. Condition - The University did not submit reports to the KDOC at the required deadlines during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. Questioned Costs - None noted. Context - Out of a population of four reports, we selected two reports and noted the two instances of noncompliance with the timely reporting requirement of the CSLFRF. Effect - The University was not in compliance with the reporting requirements of the grant agreement program. Cause - Management received conflicting information about the reporting requirements. Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding Recommendation - We recommend that management review this area and establish procedures to ensure required reports are completed timely and accurately. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions – Management worked closely with the KDOC on the requirements of the quarterly submissions and was in frequent communication with them. However, management received conflicting guidance from the KDOC about the required submissions for the program. Due to the conflicting guidance, management stopped submitting reports and was waiting for further feedback. Management wanted to avoid submitting future reports that may have been potentially inaccurate or missing appropriate documentation. Management finally received final guidance at the beginning of September 2024 and will begin submitting reports on a timely basis.

Corrective Action Plan

Contact Person: Nancy Bramlett, VP of Finance and Administrative Services Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management worked closely with the KDOC on the requirements of the quarterly submissions and was in frequent communication with them. However, management received conflicting guidance from the KDOC about the required submissions for the program. Due to the conflicting guidance, management stopped submitting reports and was waiting for further feedback. Management wanted to avoid submitting future reports that may have been potentially inaccurate or missing appropriate documentation. Management finally received final guidance at the beginning of September 2024 and will begin submitting reports on a timely basis. Anticipated Completion Date: 10/31/2024

About Reporting →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,094,989 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2023 — management decision was due June 19, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,629,312 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2022 — management decision was due May 1, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,233,113 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 3, 2021 — management decision was due May 3, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,217,425 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2021 — management decision was due September 17, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,958,611 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-001OTHER MATTERS

Reference Number Finding 2019-001 Student Financial Assistance Cluster U.S. Department of Education Federal Direct Loans CFDA 84.268 Federal Pell Grant Program CFDA 84.063 Award Year 2019 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions - Enrollment Reporting 34 CFR 685.309 and 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2) Condition ? The University did not accurately or timely notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) of student status changes. Questioned Costs ? None. Context ? Out of a population of 359 student enrollment status changes requiring notification, a sample of 40 student status changes was selected for testing. Out of the 40 selected for testing, five students that had status changes were not communicated to NSLDS on a timely basis. Additionally, 21 students had a variance between the University?s last date of attendance records and what was reported to the NSLDS. The sampling methodology was not intended to be a statistically valid sample. Effect ? NSLDS was not notified of student enrollment status changes on a timely and accurate basis. Cause ? In the case of the five students whose status changes were not communicated to NSLDS on a timely basis, exit dates were recorded in the system either late or in error causing the system to not report correctly to NSLDS. In the case of the 21 students that had a variance between the University?s last date of attendance records and what was reported to NSLDS, 18 were students whose actual exit date was correctly reported to NSLDS as May 3rd, 2019, but the date had been entered into the University?s database as May 4th, 2019, or the date of the graduation ceremony. For the remaining three students, NSLDS was unable to accept the dates because of the timing of when the exit dates were recorded in the University database and subsequently reported to NSLDS. The students were reported as being in a full-time status on April 29th, 2019 and subsequent to that report date, an exit date was recorded in the University?s database at a date prior to April 29th, 2019. This issue also caused the finding discussed above for these three students. Identification as a Repeat Finding ? The University had a similar finding in the prior year. See 2018-001. Recommendation ? The University should implement additional policies and procedures to ensure the NSLDS system is updated timely and accurately throughout the year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? The University will conduct a thorough review of its processes regarding the reporting of exit and withdraw dates, document those processes and ensure staff are trained. Exception reports will be generated to identify unusual situations that may require manual intervention.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Reference Number Finding 2019-001 Student Financial Assistance Cluster U.S. Department of Education Federal Direct Loans CFDA 84.268 Federal Pell Grant Program CFDA 84.063 Award Year 2019 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Special Tests and Provisions - Enrollment Reporting 34 CFR 685.309 and 34 CFR 690.83(b)(2) Condition ? The University did not accurately or timely notify the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) of student status changes. Questioned Costs ? None. Context ? Out of a population of 359 student enrollment status changes requiring notification, a sample of 40 student status changes was selected for testing. Out of the 40 selected for testing, five students that had status changes were not communicated to NSLDS on a timely basis. Additionally, 21 students had a variance between the University?s last date of attendance records and what was reported to the NSLDS. The sampling methodology was not intended to be a statistically valid sample. Effect ? NSLDS was not notified of student enrollment status changes on a timely and accurate basis. Cause ? In the case of the five students whose status changes were not communicated to NSLDS on a timely basis, exit dates were recorded in the system either late or in error causing the system to not report correctly to NSLDS. In the case of the 21 students that had a variance between the University?s last date of attendance records and what was reported to NSLDS, 18 were students whose actual exit date was correctly reported to NSLDS as May 3rd, 2019, but the date had been entered into the University?s database as May 4th, 2019, or the date of the graduation ceremony. For the remaining three students, NSLDS was unable to accept the dates because of the timing of when the exit dates were recorded in the University database and subsequently reported to NSLDS. The students were reported as being in a full-time status on April 29th, 2019 and subsequent to that report date, an exit date was recorded in the University?s database at a date prior to April 29th, 2019. This issue also caused the finding discussed above for these three students. Identification as a Repeat Finding ? The University had a similar finding in the prior year. See 2018-001. Recommendation ? The University should implement additional policies and procedures to ensure the NSLDS system is updated timely and accurately throughout the year. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions ? The University will conduct a thorough review of its processes regarding the reporting of exit and withdraw dates, document those processes and ensure staff are trained. Exception reports will be generated to identify unusual situations that may require manual intervention.

Corrective Action Plan

2019 Corrective Action Plan Finding Reference Number 2019-001 Contact Person ? Kimberly Warren Cause ?In the case of the five students whose status changes were not communicated to NSLDS on a timely basis, exit dates were recorded in the system either late or in error causing the system to not report correctly to NSLDS. In the case of the 21 students that had a variance between the University?s last date of attendance records and what was reported to NSLDS, 18 were students whose actual exit date was correctly reported to NSLDS as May 3rd, 2019, but the date had been entered into the University?s database as May 4th, 2019, or the date of the graduation ceremony. For the remaining three students, NSLDS was unable to accept the dates because of the timing of when the exit dates were recorded in the University database and subsequently reported to NSLDS. The students were reported as being in a full-time status on April 29th, 2019 and subsequent to that report date, an exit date was recorded in the University?s database at a date prior to April 29th, 2019. This issue also caused the finding discussed above for these three students. Current Status ? In Progress Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action ?The University will conduct a thorough review of its processes regarding the reporting of exit and withdraw dates, document those processes and ensure staff are trained. Exception reports will be generated to identify unusual situations that may require manual intervention. Anticipated Completion Date ? November 30, 2019

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

$14,395,039 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 28, 2018 — management decision was due April 28, 2019.

2018-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-001, 2016-002OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-001, 2016-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2017-06-30

$15,626,795 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 27, 2017 — management decision was due May 27, 2018.

2017-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2016-002OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

$16,018,014 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 29, 2016 — management decision was due May 29, 2017.

2016-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2015-002

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.