EIN: 476005723
UEI: K619ZDM88GM9
Audited by: FORWARD CPA LLC
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 12, 2026 (18 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2024 — management decision was due May 19, 2025.
The total number of children reported on the Impact Aid application was correct for children residing on Indian lands, both with and without disabilities, and it was also correct for total membership enrolled with disabilities. However, the supporting data provided for children with disabilities did not agree with the information used to prepare and report on the Impact Aid application as follows: Criteria: The District is responsible for reporting a correct count of federally connected children in various categories on their Impact Aid application, including children with disabilities. Cause: When preparing the Impact Aid application, the District used an incorrect report that was not updated for children with disabilities as of the survey date. The procedures in place to monitor accuracy of the final application before submission were not sufficient to avoid undetected errors. Effect: The District may receive incorrect Impact Aid under the grant application than is appropriate for federally connected children and those receiving special services based if an incorrect number of children is reported. Recommendation: District personnel should enhance control procedures to monitor the application process to ensure correct information is being reported.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The total number of children reported on the Impact Aid application was correct for children residing on Indian lands, both with and without disabilities, and it was also correct for total membership enrolled with disabilities. However, the supporting data provided for children with disabilities did not agree with the information used to prepare and report on the Impact Aid application as follows: Criteria: The District is responsible for reporting a correct count of federally connected children in various categories on their Impact Aid application, including children with disabilities. Cause: When preparing the Impact Aid application, the District used an incorrect report that was not updated for children with disabilities as of the survey date. The procedures in place to monitor accuracy of the final application before submission were not sufficient to avoid undetected errors. Effect: The District may receive incorrect Impact Aid under the grant application than is appropriate for federally connected children and those receiving special services based if an incorrect number of children is reported. Recommendation: District personnel should enhance control procedures to monitor the application process to ensure correct information is being reported.
We had run an incorrect report for the children with disabilities, but have added procedures to ensure the correct report is ran of the survey date. We will add procedures to review the list of children to ensure it is accurate for current IEP's prior to submitting the application.
2023-003
The District did not amend budgets with the grantor agency prior to spending and did not take into account prior fiscal year spending before spending in the current fiscal year and filing reimbursement claims. The District did not consider prior year spending by budget category incurred and reported on the schedule of federal awards (SEFA) in fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023. As such they posted additional similarly eligible, but different categorical, expenses in fiscal 2024 to their general ledger in an effort to claim the remaining reimbursement in line with budget categories. However, from a cumulative approach, audit adjustments of ($167,945) for ESSERS II and ($90,128) for ESSERS III were required in fiscal 2024 to properly state the remaining expenditures of the multi-year grants on the fiscal 2024 SEFA. After the required adjustments, cumulatively, ESSERS II overspent supplies by $84,902 and ESSERS III overspent salaries by $28,633. Similar findings for overspending on budgets were noted in fiscal 2022 and 2023. The District also did not take into consideration the prior year spending when submitting reimbursement claims in fiscal 2024 so the claims submitted did not match the actual spending as incurred and reported by the District, in succession, over the multi-year period. However, the claims for reimbursements did substantially agree both for grant total and by grant budget line and therefore, the grantor agency fully paid for the reimbursements submitted. Criteria: The District is responsible for having a system of controls to ensure compliance with budget requirements of the grantor agency and for monitoring of expenditures against approved budgets and total grant amounts. The District is also responsible for monitoring that expenditures claimed for reimbursement for multi-year grants agree to the expenditures that were reported in the general ledgers as they were incurred over multiple fiscal years. Cause: The District did not have a control process to summarize grants expended over multiple fiscal years against original budgets. The District’s business manager also passed away suddenly in the middle of the multi-year grant period which contributed to the difficulty of monitoring the multiyear grant. Grant budgets were not amended to represent prior spending reported, so they did not correctly represent the remainder of spending by budget line. As such, the District believed their spending was within allowed budgets. The District was also working with the grantor agency on both current year reporting and remaining reimbursement claims, but the focus was on total eligible expenses, not on fiscal year reporting. Both the ESSERS II and ESSERS III reimbursement claims for grant totals have been fully paid by the granting agency. Effect: Federal expenditures for disallowed activities could occur if budgets are not approved in advance and spent accordingly. Federal expenditures may also be disallowed if they do not agree with the amounts reported in the fiscal year. Recommendation: The District should implement controls to prevent obligation or spending that would cause the categorical budget to be exceeded without first securing an approved budget amendment. The District should implement controls to monitor that only costs to be claimed on federal grants are being coded to those functions. Further, the District should implement controls to monitor that the costs claimed for reimbursement agree to the fiscal year that were reported on the financial statements.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The District did not amend budgets with the grantor agency prior to spending and did not take into account prior fiscal year spending before spending in the current fiscal year and filing reimbursement claims. The District did not consider prior year spending by budget category incurred and reported on the schedule of federal awards (SEFA) in fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023. As such they posted additional similarly eligible, but different categorical, expenses in fiscal 2024 to their general ledger in an effort to claim the remaining reimbursement in line with budget categories. However, from a cumulative approach, audit adjustments of ($167,945) for ESSERS II and ($90,128) for ESSERS III were required in fiscal 2024 to properly state the remaining expenditures of the multi-year grants on the fiscal 2024 SEFA. After the required adjustments, cumulatively, ESSERS II overspent supplies by $84,902 and ESSERS III overspent salaries by $28,633. Similar findings for overspending on budgets were noted in fiscal 2022 and 2023. The District also did not take into consideration the prior year spending when submitting reimbursement claims in fiscal 2024 so the claims submitted did not match the actual spending as incurred and reported by the District, in succession, over the multi-year period. However, the claims for reimbursements did substantially agree both for grant total and by grant budget line and therefore, the grantor agency fully paid for the reimbursements submitted. Criteria: The District is responsible for having a system of controls to ensure compliance with budget requirements of the grantor agency and for monitoring of expenditures against approved budgets and total grant amounts. The District is also responsible for monitoring that expenditures claimed for reimbursement for multi-year grants agree to the expenditures that were reported in the general ledgers as they were incurred over multiple fiscal years. Cause: The District did not have a control process to summarize grants expended over multiple fiscal years against original budgets. The District’s business manager also passed away suddenly in the middle of the multi-year grant period which contributed to the difficulty of monitoring the multiyear grant. Grant budgets were not amended to represent prior spending reported, so they did not correctly represent the remainder of spending by budget line. As such, the District believed their spending was within allowed budgets. The District was also working with the grantor agency on both current year reporting and remaining reimbursement claims, but the focus was on total eligible expenses, not on fiscal year reporting. Both the ESSERS II and ESSERS III reimbursement claims for grant totals have been fully paid by the granting agency. Effect: Federal expenditures for disallowed activities could occur if budgets are not approved in advance and spent accordingly. Federal expenditures may also be disallowed if they do not agree with the amounts reported in the fiscal year. Recommendation: The District should implement controls to prevent obligation or spending that would cause the categorical budget to be exceeded without first securing an approved budget amendment. The District should implement controls to monitor that only costs to be claimed on federal grants are being coded to those functions. Further, the District should implement controls to monitor that the costs claimed for reimbursement agree to the fiscal year that were reported on the financial statements.
The district will add procedures to monitor that additional spending is not being done after the grant is fully spent. In addition, the District will implement controls to ensure approved budget amendments are secured prior to spending. The District will also implement controls to ensure prior year spending is considered for reimbursement requests. The District will work with the grantor agency on any necessary correction of reports and submission of supporting documentation since both grants' reimbursement requests have been fully paid for the total grant amounts.
The District did not monitor completeness of weekly certified payroll submission for federally funded construction contracts. Criteria: Construction projects paid with Education Stabilization Funds are subject to wage rate requirements. The District is responsible for monitoring that all weekly certified payrolls are received. Cause: The contractor did not provide a subcontractor list to the District and did not provide weekly reports to the District indicating which subcontractors were onsite. Further, weekly certified payrolls were not sent to the District until we requested them during our audit procedures. Effect: It is possible that not all contractors required to certify weekly payroll submitted their wage rate certifications. Recommendation: The District should enhance control procedures to monitor completeness of the documents provided by the general contractor.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The District did not monitor completeness of weekly certified payroll submission for federally funded construction contracts. Criteria: Construction projects paid with Education Stabilization Funds are subject to wage rate requirements. The District is responsible for monitoring that all weekly certified payrolls are received. Cause: The contractor did not provide a subcontractor list to the District and did not provide weekly reports to the District indicating which subcontractors were onsite. Further, weekly certified payrolls were not sent to the District until we requested them during our audit procedures. Effect: It is possible that not all contractors required to certify weekly payroll submitted their wage rate certifications. Recommendation: The District should enhance control procedures to monitor completeness of the documents provided by the general contractor.
The district has received the subcontractor list and is gathering the certified payroll certifications for the subcontractors onsite. We will work with the general contractor to ensure the documents we have are complete. We will monitor that these controls are taking place as planned.
FAC accepted this audit on December 1, 2023 — management decision was due June 1, 2024.
Enrollment and supporting data provided by the District as of the survey date did not agree with the Impact Aid Application as follows: see chart. Criteria: The District is responsible for reporting a correct count of federally connected children in various categories on their Impact Aid application. Cause: Provedures in place to monitor accuracy of the final application before submission were not sufficient to avoid undetected errors. Effect: The District may receive incorrect Impact Aid under the grant application than is appropriate for federally connected children in general, and those receiving special services based on incorrect number of children reported. Recommendation: District personnel should enhance control procedures to monitor the application process to ensure correct infmation is being reported.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: Enrollment and supporting data provided by the District as of the survey date did not agree with the Impact Aid Application as follows: see chart. Criteria: The District is responsible for reporting a correct count of federally connected children in various categories on their Impact Aid application. Cause: Provedures in place to monitor accuracy of the final application before submission were not sufficient to avoid undetected errors. Effect: The District may receive incorrect Impact Aid under the grant application than is appropriate for federally connected children in general, and those receiving special services based on incorrect number of children reported. Recommendation: District personnel should enhance control procedures to monitor the application process to ensure correct infmation is being reported.
We had used the Impact Aid Coronavirus Relief Act when submitting FY2022 and FY2023 application so had not completed a survey for several years. We will add procedures and formulas in the source census files to ensure children count of each category agrees to the application.
FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2022 — management decision was due June 11, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on November 11, 2021 — management decision was due May 11, 2022.
During fiscal 2021, the District did not follow the requirements for compliance with allowable costs as indicated by: the salary budget and supply expense budgets were exceeded by more than the allowed threshold and time-and-effort certifications were not obtained for wages and salaries charged to this federal program. Criteria: The District should follow the requirements in the Compliance Supplement, the requirements given for specific grant awards, and any additional requirements by pass-through entities, including following the requirements in 2 CFR 200.430 to obtain certifications for wages and salaries charged to a federal program. Cause: The District did not have sufficient procedures in place to monitor that the requirements for federal programs were being followed. Effect: The District may not receive the federal funding awarded under the grant if requirements are not followed. Recommendation: The District should assign personnel to monitor and manage the federal award programs to ensure necessary requirements are being followed, such as not exceeding the budget and obtaining time-and-effort certifications.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: During fiscal 2021, the District did not follow the requirements for compliance with allowable costs as indicated by: the salary budget and supply expense budgets were exceeded by more than the allowed threshold and time-and-effort certifications were not obtained for wages and salaries charged to this federal program. Criteria: The District should follow the requirements in the Compliance Supplement, the requirements given for specific grant awards, and any additional requirements by pass-through entities, including following the requirements in 2 CFR 200.430 to obtain certifications for wages and salaries charged to a federal program. Cause: The District did not have sufficient procedures in place to monitor that the requirements for federal programs were being followed. Effect: The District may not receive the federal funding awarded under the grant if requirements are not followed. Recommendation: The District should assign personnel to monitor and manage the federal award programs to ensure necessary requirements are being followed, such as not exceeding the budget and obtaining time-and-effort certifications.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: We will assign personnel to monitor and manage the federal award programs. We will amend the program budget as needed prior to spending. We have obtained the time-and-effort certifications.
FAC accepted this audit on November 4, 2020 — management decision was due May 4, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 19, 2020 — management decision was due July 19, 2020.
The District did not have controls in place to sufficiently monitor federal award programs as evidenced by reports not being filed by due dates and lacking support; spending not agreeing to budgeted amounts; payroll time and effort reports not being monitored; and insufficient documentation for security. Criteria: The District should follow the requirements in the Compliance Supplement, the requirements given for specific grant awards, and any additional requirements by pass-through entities. Cause: Procedures in place to monitor the requirements for federal programs were not sufficient. Effect: The District may not receive the federal funding awarded under the grant if requirements are not followed. Context: The lack of monitoring of controls appears to be pervasive across all federal funds. Recommendation: The District should assign personnel to monitor and manage the federal award programs to ensure necessary requirements are being followed.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: The District did not have controls in place to sufficiently monitor federal award programs as evidenced by reports not being filed by due dates and lacking support; spending not agreeing to budgeted amounts; payroll time and effort reports not being monitored; and insufficient documentation for security. Criteria: The District should follow the requirements in the Compliance Supplement, the requirements given for specific grant awards, and any additional requirements by pass-through entities. Cause: Procedures in place to monitor the requirements for federal programs were not sufficient. Effect: The District may not receive the federal funding awarded under the grant if requirements are not followed. Context: The lack of monitoring of controls appears to be pervasive across all federal funds. Recommendation: The District should assign personnel to monitor and manage the federal award programs to ensure necessary requirements are being followed.
We will assign personnel to monitor and manage the federal award programs.
FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2019 — management decision was due July 22, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-003
FAC accepted this audit on November 28, 2017 — management decision was due May 28, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on November 20, 2016 — management decision was due May 20, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Nebraska →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.