← Back to home

The Foundation for University HospitalNon-Profit

EIN: 471686351

UEI: JFQWJFHF2F44

Audited by: Prager Metis CPAs, LLC

Oversight agency: 16 [Department of Justice]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 14, 2026

The Foundation for University Hospital4 audit years3 findings
4
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,396,658 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (16 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,847,155 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,391,230 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$1,240,037 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

2022-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

The Foundation requested and received reimbursement for payments made to an ineligible restaurant. Effect: Costs to ineligible restaurant are unallowable. Questioned Cost: Cost of $12,850 were paid to the ineligible restaurant. Context: A sample of 40 payments to restaurants totaling $464,776 was selected for audit from a population totaling $1,064,742. The finding relates to one ineligible restaurant noted in our population. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement procedures to verify that all restaurants requesting reimbursement be verified as "Eligible Restaurants". View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Foundation acknowledges and agrees with the findings and in the process of addressing this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-003 Federal Program: U.S. Department of Treasury Passed through the New Jersey Economic Development Authority COVID-19 Sustain and Serve NJ CFDA #21.019 Criteria: The Sustain and Serve Agreement requires funds to be spent at ?Eligible Restaurants?. Eligible Restaurants are approved by the awarding agency. Condition: The Foundation requested and received reimbursement for payments made to an ineligible restaurant. Effect: Costs to ineligible restaurant are unallowable. Questioned Cost: Cost of $12,850 were paid to the ineligible restaurant. Context: A sample of 40 payments to restaurants totaling $464,776 was selected for audit from a population totaling $1,064,742. The finding relates to one ineligible restaurant noted in our population. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Foundation should implement procedures to verify that all restaurants requesting reimbursement be verified as "Eligible Restaurants". View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Foundation acknowledges and agrees with the findings and in the process of addressing this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-003 Finding: The Foundation requested and received reimbursement for payments made to an ineligible restaurant. Cause: This was primarily due to inadequate staffing for the Foundation as there was only one employee, Executive Director, who was responsible for daily operations and financial record keeping. Questioned Costs: $12,850 Corrective Action: The Foundation has addressed this inadequacy by hiring a part time seasoned bookkeeper to be responsible for financial record keeping. Responsible Official: Jessica Backofen Completion Date: October 21, 2022

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-004
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

The Foundation requested and received reimbursement using duplicate invoices on three occasions. Cause: The duplicate invoices were not detected during the reimbursement request process. Effect: The Foundation was paid for costs that were not incurred. Questioned costs: Unallowable costs of $12,590 were reimbursed to the Foundation. Context: A sample of 40 payments to restaurants totaling $464,776 was selected for audit from a population of $1,064,742. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Foundation should establish processes and controls to ensure duplicate invoices are not processed for reimbursement. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Foundation acknowledges and agrees with the findings and in the process of addressing this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: U.S. Department of Treasury Passed through the New Jersey Economic Development Authority COVID-19 Sustain and Serve NJ CFDA #21.019 Criteria: Grantees are required to establish internal controls over compliance that ensure reimbursement is requested for individual invoices and prevent duplicate invoices from entering the system. Condition: The Foundation requested and received reimbursement using duplicate invoices on three occasions. Cause: The duplicate invoices were not detected during the reimbursement request process. Effect: The Foundation was paid for costs that were not incurred. Questioned costs: Unallowable costs of $12,590 were reimbursed to the Foundation. Context: A sample of 40 payments to restaurants totaling $464,776 was selected for audit from a population of $1,064,742. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Foundation should establish processes and controls to ensure duplicate invoices are not processed for reimbursement. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Foundation acknowledges and agrees with the findings and in the process of addressing this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-004 Finding: The Foundation requested and received reimbursement using duplicate invoices on three occasions. Cause: This was primarily due to inadequate staffing for the Foundation as there was only one employee, Executive Director, who was responsible for daily operations and financial record keeping. Questioned Costs: $12,590 Corrective Action: The Foundation has addressed this inadequacy by hiring a part time seasoned bookkeeper to be responsible for financial record keeping. Responsible Official: Jessica Backofen Completion Date: October 21, 2022

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-005
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

The Foundation requested and received reimbursement for meals in excess of $10 per meal. Cause: The Foundation failed to recalculate the cost per meal before requesting reimbursement. Effect: Reimbursement in excess of $10 is an unallowed cost. Questioned costs: Unallowable costs of $16,540 were reimbursed to the Foundation. Context: A sample of 40 payments to restaurants totaling $464,776 was selected for audit from a population of $1,064,742. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Foundation should establish processes and controls to ensure cost per meals do not exceed the allowable rate of $10 per meal. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Foundation acknowledges and agrees with the findings and in the process of addressing this finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: U.S. Department of Treasury Passed through the New Jersey Economic Development Authority COVID-19 Sustain and Serve NJ CFDA #21.019 Criteria: The Sustain and Serve Agreement allows a maximum of $10 per meal. Condition: The Foundation requested and received reimbursement for meals in excess of $10 per meal. Cause: The Foundation failed to recalculate the cost per meal before requesting reimbursement. Effect: Reimbursement in excess of $10 is an unallowed cost. Questioned costs: Unallowable costs of $16,540 were reimbursed to the Foundation. Context: A sample of 40 payments to restaurants totaling $464,776 was selected for audit from a population of $1,064,742. Our sample was a statistically valid sample. Recommendation: The Foundation should establish processes and controls to ensure cost per meals do not exceed the allowable rate of $10 per meal. View of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The Foundation acknowledges and agrees with the findings and in the process of addressing this finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-005 Finding: The Foundation requested and received reimbursement for meals in excess of $10 per meal. Cause: This was primarily due to inadequate staffing for the Foundation as there was only one employee, Executive Director, who was responsible for daily operations and financial record keeping. Questioned Costs: $16,540 Corrective Action: The Foundation has addressed this inadequacy by hiring a part time seasoned bookkeeper to be responsible for financial record keeping. Responsible Official: Jessica Backofen Completion Date: October 21, 2022

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in New Jersey

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.