← Back to home

Goldenrod Regional Housing AgencyLocal Government

EIN: 470741757

UEI: K5JNA5STPS25

Audited by: Niewedde & Wiens, CPA's

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Goldenrod Regional Housing Agency4 audit years3 findings1 repeat
4
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$821.1K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$821,142 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 15, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 15, 2025 (328 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-004QUESTIONED COSTS

The Agency shares one checking account for which all bills are paid from and expenses are allocated between the Housing Choice Voucher program and the Management program. The Management program had a decrease in its unrestricted net position of $2,726.03 during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024 which left a deficit balance of $7,534.93. The Management program owed the Voucher program $7,101.65 and as a result of the deficit unrestricted net position, is unable to repay the funds. Further, the Agency ended providing management services after September 30, 2024 and the program will no longer have a revenue stream and will be unable to repay the funds due to the Voucher program from future revenues. Cause: The Agency was not adequately monitoring its financial condition. Effect or Potential Effect: The Housing Choice Voucher program funded the Management programs losses and related deficit. Recommendation: The Agency should review with HUD on how to handle this issue. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2024-004: Allowable Activities Housing Choice Voucher – 14.871 Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Questioned Costs: $7,101.65 Repeat Finding 2023-004 Criteria: In the Housing Choice Voucher program, accumulated administrative fees post fiscal year 2003 may only be used to support the Housing Choice Voucher program. Further, the transfers of HAP and associated administrative fees, even temporarily, to support another program or use are not allowed and could be considered a breach of the annual contributions contract. Condition: The Agency shares one checking account for which all bills are paid from and expenses are allocated between the Housing Choice Voucher program and the Management program. The Management program had a decrease in its unrestricted net position of $2,726.03 during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024 which left a deficit balance of $7,534.93. The Management program owed the Voucher program $7,101.65 and as a result of the deficit unrestricted net position, is unable to repay the funds. Further, the Agency ended providing management services after September 30, 2024 and the program will no longer have a revenue stream and will be unable to repay the funds due to the Voucher program from future revenues. Cause: The Agency was not adequately monitoring its financial condition. Effect or Potential Effect: The Housing Choice Voucher program funded the Management programs losses and related deficit. Recommendation: The Agency should review with HUD on how to handle this issue. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2024-004 Allowable Activities - AGREED The HA no longer Manages the USDA properties, it will not be accessing the funds in the Voucher bank account to pay for expenses. We do have 3 different accounts for Voucher, FSS Escrow and FSS Forfeitures appropriate to follow all regulations

Prior Finding References

2023-004

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2023-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$802,516 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 17, 2024 — management decision was due October 17, 2024.

2023-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

The Agency shares one checking account for which all bills are paid from and expenses are allocated between the Housing Choice Voucher program and the Management program. The Management program had a decrease in its unrestricted net position of $3,082.66 during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022 which left a balance of $580.05. During the year ending September 30, 2023, unrestricted net position decreased $5,388.95 and now has a deficit balance of $4,808.90. The deficit means the Management program used Housing Choice Voucher funds to cover its expenses. The revenue source for the Management program is limited and the management fee it earns is established by USDA Rural Development as it is providing management services to Rural Rental Housing programs so any significant increase in revenue is not likely. Significant expenses would need to be cut in the Management program to make the program profitable for the deficit unrestricted net position to be funded. Cause: The Agency is not adequately monitoring its financial condition. The Agency utilizes a single general ledger to account for all of the Agency’s activities but each programs activities are accounted for in a unique account number so the Housing Choice Voucher program and Management program are not comingled into one account. However, the monthly income statement generated has all the activity listed together and does show a separate bottom line for both programs and does not allow the Agency to monitor each program separately. Effect or Potential Effect: The Housing Choice Voucher program is funding the Management programs losses and related deficit. Recommendation: The Agency should review with its fee accountant to see if a new income statement report could be generated to show each program individually. If this is not possible, the Agency should consider having separate general ledgers maintained for each program. Doing this would allow the Agency to see each programs financial condition monthly. The Agency should review areas to cut costs as both programs are losing money. The Agency must maintain a system of fairly allocating expenses between each program. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2023-004: Allowable Activities Housing Choice Voucher – 14.871 Material Weakness/Noncompliance – Activities Allowed or Unallowed Questioned Costs: $4,808.90 Criteria: In the Housing Choice Voucher program, accumulated administrative fees post fiscal year 2003 may only be used to support the Housing Choice Voucher program. Further, the transfers of HAP and associated administrative fees, even temporarily, to support another program or use are not allowed and could be considered a breach of the annual contributions contract. Condition: The Agency shares one checking account for which all bills are paid from and expenses are allocated between the Housing Choice Voucher program and the Management program. The Management program had a decrease in its unrestricted net position of $3,082.66 during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2022 which left a balance of $580.05. During the year ending September 30, 2023, unrestricted net position decreased $5,388.95 and now has a deficit balance of $4,808.90. The deficit means the Management program used Housing Choice Voucher funds to cover its expenses. The revenue source for the Management program is limited and the management fee it earns is established by USDA Rural Development as it is providing management services to Rural Rental Housing programs so any significant increase in revenue is not likely. Significant expenses would need to be cut in the Management program to make the program profitable for the deficit unrestricted net position to be funded. Cause: The Agency is not adequately monitoring its financial condition. The Agency utilizes a single general ledger to account for all of the Agency’s activities but each programs activities are accounted for in a unique account number so the Housing Choice Voucher program and Management program are not comingled into one account. However, the monthly income statement generated has all the activity listed together and does show a separate bottom line for both programs and does not allow the Agency to monitor each program separately. Effect or Potential Effect: The Housing Choice Voucher program is funding the Management programs losses and related deficit. Recommendation: The Agency should review with its fee accountant to see if a new income statement report could be generated to show each program individually. If this is not possible, the Agency should consider having separate general ledgers maintained for each program. Doing this would allow the Agency to see each programs financial condition monthly. The Agency should review areas to cut costs as both programs are losing money. The Agency must maintain a system of fairly allocating expenses between each program. View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee’s management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

FINDING 2023 – 004: ALLOWABLE ACTIVITIES HOUSING CHOICE VOUCHER – 14.871 MATERIAL WEAKNESS / NON-COMPLIANCE – ACTIVITIES ALLOWED OR UNALLOWED QUESTIONED COSTS: $4,808.90 The Agency agrees with the above finding. FY 2022-2023 was a year of transition for Goldenrod Regional Housing Agency with the movement of staff into the Interim Director position from a position of case management. The director acknowledges inexperience in accounting procedures noting additional training is needed. Utilizing a single general ledger to account for all the Agency’s activities, while not comingled, does not allow the Agency to monitor each program separately. The Agency has contacted our fee accountant regarding the auditor’s recommendation to generate a new income statement or have separate general ledgers maintained for each program to note the financial condition of each program and make the needed adjustments. Further exploration is needed to determine how to repay the Voucher Program for the Management overage.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2022-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$868,661 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 17, 2023 — management decision was due November 17, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$795,549 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 26, 2022 — management decision was due December 26, 2022.

2021-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The Agency did in fact have a signed depository agreement but it was the 1991 version of the form and that bank name on the form was not the current bank?s current name. Cause: The Agency was not monitoring the requirement to ensure a current version of the form was used that bank?s current name matched what was included on the form. Effect or Potential Effect: The Agency was in noncompliance with HUD?s requirement to have proper depository agreements. Recommendation: The Agency should contact its financial institutions and have them sign the appropriate depository agreement and follow the terms which includes proper collateralization View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee?s management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2021-003: Depository Agreements Assistance Listing 14.871 Material Weakness\Noncompliance Criteria: The Agency is required to enter into depository agreements with its financial institutions in the form required by HUD. The agreements serve as safeguards for federal funds and provide third-party rights to HUD. They further required deposits that are not insurance to be collateralized by allowable criteria defined by HUD. Condition: The Agency did in fact have a signed depository agreement but it was the 1991 version of the form and that bank name on the form was not the current bank?s current name. Cause: The Agency was not monitoring the requirement to ensure a current version of the form was used that bank?s current name matched what was included on the form. Effect or Potential Effect: The Agency was in noncompliance with HUD?s requirement to have proper depository agreements. Recommendation: The Agency should contact its financial institutions and have them sign the appropriate depository agreement and follow the terms which includes proper collateralization View of the Responsible Officials of the Auditee: The auditee?s management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

This Agency agrees with the above finding in that we did not have the proper depository agreement signed. The Agency was not aware a new form was required. An updated depository agreement has been signed and is on file at the Agency and our financial institution.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Nebraska

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.